Search

The earliest atrial (A)/ventricular (V) activation potentials, or fused A/V potentials, are commonly used as ablation targets for atrioventricular (AV) accessory pathways (APs). However, these targets can be achieved in a relatively wide area of the heart around AV rings at both atrial and ventricular sides. The aim of this study is to analyze the height of intracardiac A and V waves and their correlation to find the most appropriate side for successful delivery of radiofrequency energy, atrial or ventricular edge.Ninety patients diagnosed with orthodromic AV re-entrant tachycardia (AVRT) or Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome were enrolled. Local atrial/ventricular (A/V) amplitude potentials with the earliest activation or fused AV potentials were measured. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups with a 2:1 ratio. In group 1, ablation was done at the site where A was greater than V. In group 2, V was greater than A. Primary endpoint was success at first attempt, achieving antegrade AP conduction block, AV block during right ventricle pacing, or AVRT termination with no AP conduction.Fifty-one patients (56.7%) were male. Thirty patients had an ablation at an atrial site (A V) and 60 at a ventricular site (V A). Ablation was more successful at the ventricular site (87% vs 100%, P = 0.011). All 30 patients in the atrial arm and 71% of the ventricular group underwent ablation via the antegrade method.Success of catheter ablation of APs is higher where V A (ventricular site of AP), indicating the priority of the ventricular edge of the mitral ring for a better outcome.

Background Recent in vitro and clinical studies have shown that ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis (USACDT) can accelerate thrombolysis. Therefore, in this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of USACDT with conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with deep vein thrombosis. Methods A systematic search of the following electronic databases was performed from their dates of inception to 20 June 2020: MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. All randomized controlled trials that directly compared the complications and efficacy of USACDT and conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with deep vein thrombosis were identified. The statistical analysis was performed using comprehensive meta-analysis software. Results Finally, 18 studies with a total of 597 participants were included in our meta-analysis according to the eligibility criteria. Pooled proportion of USACDT success in patients with deep vein thrombosis was 87.8% (18 studies; 95% CI: 83.1–91.3). Success rate was significantly higher in USACDT treatment than in conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis treatment (seven studies; OR: 2.96; 95% CI: 1.69–5.16; P Conclusion This meta-analysis revealed that USACDT significantly increased the success rate of thrombolysis compared to conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis. Furthermore, USACDT was associated with lower rate of complication and infusion time. Taken together, these findings confirm the superiority of this novel intervention over conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis in treatment of patients with deep vein thrombosis.

Background: Metastasis is an important factor in the survival estimate of patients with breast cancer. The present study aimed to examine the frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR) expression in relation to the metastatic site, pattern, and tumor size in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: In this retrospective study, the medical records of patients diagnosed with MBC at Motahari Clinic (Shiraz, Iran) during 2017-2019 were examined. Metastasis was confirmed using computed tomography, and a total of 276 patients were included in the study. Based on the expression of receptors, the patients were categorized into luminal A, luminal B, HER2, and TNBC groups. The frequency and percentage of receptors in relation to the metastatic site, size, and pattern were compared using the Chi square test. P