Search

Introduction Endoscopic drainage should preferably be tried unless the abscess caused by the anastomotic leak is generalized and disseminated into the abdominal cavity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of patients treated with EndoVac. Patient and methods The medical records of patients who underwent low anterior resection and were treated using the EndoVac therapy system due to the detection of an anastomotic leak were retrospectively evaluated. Results Thirty-three of the patients with detection of anastomotic leaks were treated using EndoVac therapy system. The mean number of application of the EndoVac therapy system was 5.8 (1 to 12) for each patient. Mean duration of hospitalization of the patients was 24.5 (9 to 92) days. Five patients underwent a second operation during the follow-up period after application of the EndoVac therapy system. In our study, the number of patients recovering without the need for additional treatment is 30 (30/33). Our success rate was 90.1%. Conclusions The EndoVac therapy system is an alternative and helpful system in the treatment of colorectal anastomotic leaks without reoperation needed. It can also prevent permanent stoma.

Objectives The present study aims to report the incidence of colorectal cancer patients under 50 years of age and to compare its aggressiveness with colorectal cancer patients over 50 years of age. Background Recently, the incidence of colorectal cancer at younger ages has increased, and colorectal cancers in young people have a more aggressive course due to late screening programs. Method The files of patients who were operated for colorectal cancer were reviewed retrospectively. Information on the patients such as gender, age, BMI, type and duration of symptoms, location of the tumor, TNM staging, pathology results, operative procedure, morbidity and mortality rates were recorded. Admission complaints, symptom onset time, tumor locations, pathological findings and tumor stages were compared between patients under and over the age of 50. Results The incidence of colorectal cancer under 50 was 21 % (56/267). The age group of 40‒49 was found to be the most common age range under the age of 50, with a colorectal cancer rate of 68%. In patients under the age of 50, higher invasion of the tumor to the serosa, low differentiation of the tumor in terms of histological findings in a higher number of patients and higher mucin component of the tumors and higher N2 lymph node involvement ratio and the tumor was located more in the lower rectum were statistically significant when compared to patients over the age of 50 (p=0.026, p=0.018, p=0.002, p=0.042, p=0.006; respectively). Conclusion The incidence of colorectal cancer has increased at younger ages and has a more aggressive course. Screening programs should be modified (Tab. 4, Fig. 2, Ref. 45).

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on general surgical emergencies. On the other hand, we analyzed the effectiveness of the measures we have taken and the incidence of COVID-19 of patients and healthcare professionals.Method: In the pandemic period between March 14 and May 15, 2020, and in the same period of the previous year, the files of patients who underwent emergency surgery and followed up nonoperatively were reviewed retrospectively. The incidence of COVID-19 was questioned in patients operated on in the pandemic period and in health professionals working in the general surgery department.Results: Demographic data were similar between the two groups. The number of patients operated on in the pandemic group (n = 103) was lower than during the control group (n = 252) (p = 0.001). In the pandemic group, there was a significant decrease in the number of surgeries of uncomplicated appendicitis, acute cholecystitis and incarcerated hernia (p=0.001, p=0.005, p=0.001, respectively). Others surgeries were similar in both groups. In the pandemic group, nonoperatively follow-up rates were significantly lower in acute mechanical intestinal obstruction and acute cholecystitis (p=0.001, p=0.011, respectively). The findings of COVID-19 were positive in 6(6/103, %5.82) patients undergoing emergency surgery. None of our doctors had COVID-19 infection (0/20). The findings were positive only in 2 nurses from the general surgery department(2/24, %8,33).Conclusion: In these and similar pandemics, we think that a new algorithm is needed to approach emergencies and the results of this study can help for that.

The optimal method for preventing abscesses in perforated appendicitis is unclear. We compared the efficacy of lavage versus aspiration for periappendicular collections/abscesses in perforated appendicitis. Our study included 286 patients. After the removal of the appendectomy material, those who underwent aspiration without prior lavage were assigned to Group I, whereas those who underwent aspiration after lavage with 500 mL physiological saline were assigned to Group II. The primary outcome measure was postoperative complications. Secondary outcome measures were intraoperative complications, morbidity, and mortality. Group I comprised 174 patients (60 female and 114 male; mean age 34.47±17.40 y), whereas Group II comprised 112 patients (39 female and 73 male; mean age 36.22±18.60 y). The 2 groups were not significantly different in age, hospitalization duration, sex, abscess formation, morbidity, or mortality. Our results demonstrate that aspiration of the surgery area without prior lavage is sufficient and can be safely applied in perforated appendicitis.

Morbidity and mortality are higher in urgently operated abdominal hernia cases compared to elective surgeries. The present study aims to investigate the factors that cause increased morbidity and mortality in emergency surgical operations. The files of a total of 426 patients who were operated for non-reducible abdominal hernia between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients’ ages, genders, comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), ASA score, BMI, hernia types, duration of symptom, laboratory values, intestinal strangulations or necroses, whether intestinal resection was performed, whether mesh was preferred for hernia repair, and rates of morbidity and mortality were recorded. Factors affecting morbidity and mortality rates were analyzed. Factors such as gender, BMI (> 30), duration of symptom (> 24 h), presence of bowel necrosis and resection, type of hernia and prolonged operation time were found to cause an increase in morbidity. In the multivariate analysis, however, gender, duration of symptom and BMI (> 30) were statistically significant factors causing increased morbidity (p = 0.009, p

INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair is a well-known approach to inguinal hernia repair. The present study aims to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the TEP technique under general anesthesia (GA) and epidural anesthesia (EA). MATERIALS AND METHODS The patients were divided into 2 groups as those undergoing TEP under EA (Group 1) and those undergoing TEP under GA (Group 2). The 2 patient groups were compared in terms of sex, age, body mass index data, duration of surgery, total operation time, patient satisfaction, VAS scores (1, 4, 12, and 24 h), length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. RESULTS The number of patients operated under EA (Group 1) was 30, and the number of patients operated under GA (Group 2) was 32. Only in the postoperative first hour VAS scores was statistically significantly less and the need for analgesia evaluated in both groups was found to be statistically significantly lower in Group 1 (P

Background In the treatment of a subset of patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, no surgical method has been clearly established as superior. Methods The present study was a prospective randomized clinical trial. Patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis were recruited for the study. Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of complicated appendicitis were excluded. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: a laparoscopic appendectomy group and an open appendectomy group. The primary outcome measure was the rate of postoperative septic complications. Secondary outcome measures were the length of hospital stay, postoperative pain score, and quality of life score. Results Ninety-six patients were included in the study, 50 in the laparoscopic appendectomy group and 46 in the open appendectomy group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the rates of postoperative septic complications, hospital stay lengths, postoperative pain scores, or quality of life scores. Conclusion The laparoscopic approach to appendectomy in patients with uncomplicated appendicitis does not offer a significant advantage over the open approach in terms of length of hospital stay, postoperative pain score, or quality of life, which are considered the major advantages of minimally invasive surgery.

The goal of the study was to compare the efficacy of two methods--intracorporeal knotting and metal endoclip application--for closure of the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy in a specific group of patients with uncomplicated appendicitis.The patients were randomized into two groups who had their appendiceal stump secured by intracorporeal knotting (Group 1) and metal endoclipping (Group 2). Primary outcome measure was postoperative complications, whereas secondary outcome measures were intraoperative complications, operative time, length of hospital stay, and re-admissions (including rehospitalizations and reoperations).One hundred seven patients were prospectively recruited in a randomized study between December 2010 and May 2011. Group 1 and Group 2 included 46 and 61 patients, respectively. The rate of postoperative complications in Group 1 and Group 2 was 8.7% (4/46) and 4.9% (3/61) (P.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in secondary outcome measures except the mean operative time (61.9 minutes versus 46.3 minutes, P=.0008).The closure of the appendiceal stump by either intracorporeal knotting or metal endoclipping during laparoscopic appendectomy in uncomplicated appendicitis is safe with comparable morbidity and mortality rates.