1. How the COVID-19 Wave Changed Emergency Urology: Results From an Academic Tertiary Referral Hospital in the Epicentre of the Italian Red Zone
- Author
-
Giancarlo Albo, Giorgio Costantino, Elena Lievore, Emanuele Montanari, Luca Boeri, Andrea Gallioli, Matteo Giulio Spinelli, Fabrizio Longo, and Elisa De Lorenzis
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Urologic Diseases ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Urology ,030232 urology & nephrology ,Tertiary referral hospital ,Article ,Tertiary Care Centers ,03 medical and health sciences ,Patient Admission ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Reference population ,Emergency Treatment ,Pandemics ,Referral and Consultation ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Aged, 80 and over ,Academic Medical Centers ,Pandemic ,SARS-CoV-2 ,business.industry ,COVID-19 ,Retrospective cohort study ,Emergency department ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Patient Discharge ,Red zone ,Confidence interval ,Coronavirus ,Italy ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Communicable Disease Control ,Emergency medicine ,Urologic Surgical Procedures ,Female ,Urologic disease ,Emergency Service, Hospital ,business ,Emergency service - Abstract
OBJECTIVE To quantify and characterize the burden of urological patients admitted to emergency department (ED) in Lombardy during Italian COVID-19 outbreak, comparing it to a reference population from 2019. METHODS We retrospectively analysed all consecutive admissions to ED from 1 January to 9 April in both 2019 and 2020. According to the ED discharge ICD-9-CM code, patients were grouped in urological and respiratory patients. We evaluated the type of access (self-presented/ambulance), discharge priority code, ED discharge (hospitalization, home), need for urological consultation or urgent surgery. RESULTS The number of urological diagnoses in ED was inversely associated to COVID-19 diagnoses (95% confidence interval -0.41/-0.19; Beta = -0.8; P < .0001). The average access per day was significantly lower after 10 March 2020 (1.5 +/- 1.1 vs 6.5 +/- 2.6; P < .0001), compared to reference period. From 11 March 2020, the inappropriate admissions to ED were reduced (10/45 vs 96/195; P = .001). Consequently, the patients admitted were generally more demanding, requiring a higher rate of urgent surgeries (4/45 vs 4/195; P = .02). This reflected in an increase of the hospitalization rate from 12.7% to 17.8% (Beta = 0.88; P < .0001) during 2020. CONCLUSION Urological admissions to ED during lockdown differed from the same period of 2019 both qualitatively and quantitatively. The spectrum of patients seems to be relatively more critical, often requiring an urgent management. These patients may represent a challenge due to the difficult circumstances caused by the pandemic. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF