Search

To describe a novel technique to use the NGage® Nitinol Stone Extractor for large IOFB extraction.We conducted a retrospective case series study by reviewing the data of 4 eyes with retained large IOFB extracted with the use of the NGage® Nitinol Stone Extractor. The study was conducted in a single tertiary referral center on four eyes of four patients with large retained IOFB. Studied eyes were treated by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and IOFB extraction by using the NGage® Nitinol Stone Extractor through a limbal incision.Four eyes of four male patients with large Retained IOFB were included in the study. The nature of the IOFB was metallic in 2 eyes, glass in 1 eye or ceramic 1 eye. All the IOFB were removed from a limbal wound. Silicone oil tamponade was required in 3 eyes. Two eyes required reoperation. At 6 months postoperative, the final visual acuity using Snellen chart ranged between PL and 0.1.The NGage® Nitinol Stone Extractor can be a useful tool for the extraction of the large retained IOFB.

To describe and evaluate a novel technique of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) under chandelier illumination which is aided with the vital dyes and perfluorocarbon liquids for the management of the complex diabetic vitrectomy cases.We conducted a prospective interventional comparative study on 40 eyes of 36 patients with advanced diabetic eye disease requiring PPV. The study was conducted in a single tertiary referral center. Eyes were divided on 1:1 basis by stratified randomization into two groups. Group 1 had trimanual vitrectomy done assisted with chandelier illumination, perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) and vital dyes. Group 2 had the conventional bimanual vitrectomy done assisted with chandelier illumination only. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months after the surgery.Forty eyes of 36 patients with the mean age of 51.42 years (range 28-69) were evaluated. The anatomical success at 6 months could be achieved in all the eyes in both groups. The complete removal of the pre-retinal proliferations could be accomplished in all the eyes in the trimanual PPV group, and only in 85% of the eyes in the bimanual PPV group. Operative time was significantly shorter in the trimanual PPV group (p 0.001). More eyes in the trimanual PPV group (55.0%) could achieve better vision ( 6/60) 6 months after the operation compared to the bimanual PPV group (50.0%), but this difference was not statistically significant.Trimanual PPV is a novel, safe and effective technique that can improve the results of the complex diabetic PPV.