1. Does humeral torsion play a role in shoulder and elbow injury profiles of overhead athletes: a systematic review
- Author
-
Natalie L. Myers, Kevin W. McCurdy, Stephen J. Thomas, and Michael J. Donaldson
- Subjects
ELBOW INJURY ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Humeral torsion ,Population ,Asymptomatic ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,medicine ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Overhead athletes ,Range of Motion, Articular ,education ,Arm Injuries ,030222 orthopedics ,education.field_of_study ,business.industry ,030229 sport sciences ,General Medicine ,Humerus ,Adaptation, Physiological ,Confidence interval ,Critical appraisal ,Athletic Injuries ,Surgery ,Shoulder Injuries ,medicine.symptom ,Elbow Injuries ,Range of motion ,business - Abstract
Background Humeral retrotorsion (HRT) is one bony adaptation that occurs in overhead athletes. This bony adaptation often leads to bilateral changes in range of motion at the glenohumeral joint. Because HRT can create different stress environments on the surrounding tissue, it may play a role in upper-limb injury and pain profiles. Therefore, the aim of this review was to examine whether HRT plays a role in shoulder and elbow injury profiles. Methods Two separate critical appraisal tools were administered: the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (case control) and the Appraisal Tool for Cross-sectional Studies. The primary author extracted all data and obtained means and standard deviations for each outcome. Cohen d effect sizes (ESs) were calculated (ES [95% confidence interval]) for all HRT measurements including nondominant, dominant, and side-to-side differences. Finally, the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy was used to evaluate the overall strength of the recommendation. Results Nine articles were included in this review. Large ESs were present in 2 studies on examination of symptomatic and asymptomatic dominant HRT and ranged between 0.83 (0.08-1.55) and –2.57 (–3.66 to 1.99). The majority of all ESs for all HRT measurements were moderate or low, rendering comparisons between asymptomatic and symptomatic cohorts that were not clinically meaningful. Conclusion The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy rating was C based on inconsistent findings. Differences in sports populations and definitions of injuries across studies may be one reason for the varying ESs. HRT does occur in the overhead population, but the degree to which this HRT starts to affect upper-limb injury is unknown and is more than likely player specific and multifactorial.
- Published
- 2020