1. A Systematic Review of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Opioid Use Disorder
- Author
-
Joji Suzuki, Matthew J. Mosquera, Heather Burrell Ward, and Timothy Y. Mariano
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Craving ,PsycINFO ,Cochrane Library ,Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,medicine ,Humans ,Transcranial direct-current stimulation ,business.industry ,Opioid use disorder ,General Medicine ,Opioid-Related Disorders ,medicine.disease ,Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ,Neuromodulation (medicine) ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Neurology ,Brain stimulation ,Adjunctive treatment ,Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,medicine.symptom ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Background There is a great public health need to identify novel treatment strategies for opioid use disorder (OUD) in order to reduce relapse and overdose. Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has demonstrated preliminary effectiveness for substance use, but little is known about its use in OUD. Neuromodulation may represent a potential adjunctive treatment modality for OUD, so we conducted a systematic review to understand the state of the current research in this field. Methods We conducted a systematic review of studies using noninvasive brain stimulation to affect clinical outcomes related to substance use for adults with opioid use disorder. We searched the following online databases: PubMed, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost, 1872-present), and Science Citation Index Expanded (ISI Web of Science, 1945-present). All studies that measured clinical outcomes related to substance use, including cue-induced craving, were included. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Handbook. Results The initial search yielded 5590 studies after duplicates were removed. After screening titles and abstracts, 14 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility. Five studies were determined to meet inclusion criteria with a combined total subjects of N = 150. Given the paucity of studies and small number of total subjects, no quantitative analysis was performed. These studies used TMS (n = 3), tDCS (n = 1), and the BRIDGE device (n = 1), a noninvasive percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulator, to reduce cue-induced craving (n = 3), reduce clinical withdrawal symptoms (n = 1), or measure substance-use-related cortical plasticity (n = 1). Conclusions There is a dearth of research in the area of noninvasive brain stimulation for OUD. NIBS represents a novel treatment modality that should be further investigated for OUD.
- Published
- 2020