Search

Studies have shown that site-specific bone density measurements had more predictive value for complications than standard whole-region measurements. Recently, MRI-based assessments of vertebral bone quality (VBQ) were introduced. However, there have been few studies that investigate the association between site-specific MRI bone assessment and osteoporosis-related complications in patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion. In this work, we created a novel site-specific MRI-based assessment of the endplate bone quality (EBQ) and assessed its predictive value for severe cage subsidence following standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SA-LLIF).To investigate the predictive value of a novel MRI-based bone assessment for severe cage subsidence after SA-LLIF.Retrospective cohort study.Patients who underwent SA-LLIF from 2008 to 2019 at a single, academic institution with available preoperative lumbar CT and T1-weighted MRIs.Association between EBQ and severe subsidence after SA-LLIF.We retrospectively reviewed the records of SA-LLIF patients treated between 2008 and 2019. EBQ was measured using preoperative non-contrast T1-weighted MRIs of the lumbar spine. EBQ was defined as the average value of signal intensity of both endplates divided by that of the cerebrospinal fluid space at the level of L3. Bivariate and multivariable analyses with generalized linear mixed models were performed and set binary severe subsidence as the outcome.Two hundred five levels in 89 patients were included. Fifty levels (24.4%) demonstrated severe subsidence. Bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography was significantly lower in the subsidence group. Both VBQ and EBQ were significantly higher in the subsidence group. The EBQ plus Modic change (MC) model demonstrated that the effect of EBQ was independent of MC. In multivariate analyses adjusted with QCT-vBMD, EBQ showed a significant association with cage subsidence whereas VBQ only showed a marginal trend. The EBQ-based prediction model for severe subsidence showed better goodness of fit compared to the VBQ-based model.High EBQ was an independent factor for severe cage subsidence after SA-LLIF and the EBQ-based model showed better goodness of fit compared to VBQ- or MC-based models. EBQ assessment before SA-LLIF may provide insight into a patient's risk for severe subsidence.

Osteoporosis is a risk factor for instrumentation failure in spine surgery. Bone strength is commonly assessed by bone mineral density (BMD) as a surrogate marker. However, BMD represents only a portion of bone strength and does not capture the qualitative dimensions of bone. Recently, the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score was introduced as a novel marker of bone quality. However, it is still unclear if the VBQ score correlates with in-vivo bone microstructure.The aims of the study were (1) to demonstrate differences in MRI-based (VBQ) and in-vivo (microcomputed tomography; μCT) bone quality between osteopenic/osteoporotic and normal bone, (2) to show the correlation between VBQ, bone microstructure and volumetric BMD (vBMD), and (3) to determine the predictive value of the VBQ score for the prevalence of osteopenia/osteoporosis.Retrospective cross-sectional study.267 patients who underwent posterior lumbar fusion surgery from 2014 to 2021 at a single academic institution. Bone biopsies were harvested intraoperatively in 118 patients.VBMD, VBQ score, and bone microstructure parameters derived from μCT.Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements were performed at the lumbar spine and the L1/L2 average was used to categorize patients with a vBMD ≤120mg/cm267 patients (55.8% female, age 63.3 years, BMI 29.7 kg/mThis study demonstrated for the first time that the VBQ score is associated with trabecular microstructure determined by μCT. The bone microstructure and VBQ score were significantly different in patients with impaired vBMD. However, the ability to predict osteopenia/osteoporosis with the VBQ score was moderate. The VBQ score appears to reflect additional bone quality characteristics and might have a complementary role to vBMD. This enhances our understanding of the biological background of the radiographic VBQ score and might be a take-off point to evaluate the clinical utility of it as non-invasive screening tool for bone quality.

To investigate whether (1) there is a difference between patients with normal or sagittal spinal and spinopelvic malalignment in terms of their paraspinal muscle composition and (2) if sagittal malalignment can be predicted using muscle parameters.A retrospective review of patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion surgery was conducted. A MRI-based muscle measurement technique was used to assess the cross-sectional area, the functional cross-sectional area, the intramuscular fat and fat infiltration (FI) for the psoas and the posterior paraspinal muscles (PPM). Intervertebral disc degeneration was graded for levels L1 to S1. Sagittal vertical axis (SVA; ≥ 50 mm defined as spinal malalignment), pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL) were measured, and PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL; ≥ 10° defined as spinopelvic malalignment) was calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine the specificity and sensitivity of the FIOne hundred and fifty patients were analysed. The PI-LL and SVA malalignment groups were found to have a significantly higher FISignificant differences in the muscle composition between normal and malalignment groups with respect to FI

STUDY DESIGN Retrospective descriptive study. OBJECTIVE To create topographical maps of occipital bone thickness and venous sinus (VS) presence to assess the risks of screw insertion in four commercially available occipital plates. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Craniocervical junction instability and deformity are serious pathological conditions that require posterior fixation of the occipital bone to the cervical vertebrae. Insertion of occipital bone screws requires evaluation of both occipital bone thickness for effective internal fixation and intracranial venous sinus presence for vascular injury prevention. Despite the surgical risks, there is a paucity of research on safe screw placement. METHODS We created a matrix of 231 standardized measurement points to analyze the occipital bone thickness and venous sinus presence in cervical spine CT angiograms. These measurements were used to create topographical maps of occipital bone thickness and likelihood of venous sinus presence, which we then compared to the screw hole configurations of four occipital plates. RESULTS 100 patients were assessed. Maximum occipital bone thickness of 13.9 ± 3.3 mm was midline in the occipital bone, 45 mm from the foramen magnum, around the external occipital protuberance (EOP). Regions with thicknesses >8 mm were 2 cm lateral to the EOP at the level of the superior nuchal line and 2.5 cm inferior to the EOP. The area with the highest VS presence rate was around the EOP and the superior nuchal line. The right transverse VS was more prominent in both sexes. CONCLUSION There is a limited area of the occipital bone with thicknesses for enough screw purchase. Previous studies have shown 8 mm as the minimum screw length to reduce the risk of implant failure. In our analysis, only "T"-shaped plates had configurations with thicknesses >8 mm for each screw hole. For every screw hole in the analyzed occipital plates, there was a possibility of venous sinus presence ranging from 8-33%.Level of Evidence: 5.

Study design Retrospective observational study. Objectives To investigate the spinal cord safety margins for C2 instrumentation. Summary of background data Intraoperative spinal cord injury during C2 spine surgery is a rare, but potentially life-threatening complication. Pre-operative planning for C2 instrumentation mainly focuses on C2 pedicle bony dimensions on CT and the vertebral artery location and few studies have evaluated C2 spinal cord safety margins. Methods We measured two distances in C2 bilaterally: 1) C2 pedicle to dura distance (P-D), defined as a transverse line that measured the shortest distance between the medial wall of the C2 pedicle and the dural sac, 2) C2 pedicle to spinal cord (P-SC), defined as a transverse line that measured the shortest distance between the medial wall of the C2 pedicle and spinal cord. We defined the distances above 4 mm as safe for instrumentation. Result A total of 146 patients (mean age 71.2, 50.7% female) were included. The average distances were 5.5 mm for C2 left P-D, 5.9 mm for C2 right P-D, 10.1 mm for C2 left P-SC and 10.6 mm for C2 right P-SC. Twenty eight (21.4%) patients had C2 P-D distances under 4 mm and out of those 2 (7%) patients had distances under 2 mm. There were more female patients with C2 P-D distances under 4 mm compared to males. No patient had C2 P-SC distances under 4 mm. Conclusion We demonstrated that around 20% of patients had C2 P-D distance below 4 mm, but no patient had C2 P-SC distance less than 4 mm. Since a lateral misplacement can lead to a potentially fatal vertebral artery injury, medial screw trajectory is recommended for C2 pedicle instrumentation with consideration of these safety margins.Level of Evidence: 3.

The objective of this study is to determine the bone mineral density (BMD) changes in adjacent vertebra following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Consecutive patients undergoing ACDF with available preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging were included. Quantitative CT measurements of screw-free cervical and first thoracic vertebra were performed. Comparisons between pre- and postoperative BMD in the vertebrae one or two levels above the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV + 1, UIV + 2) and one level below the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV + 1) were assessed. Seventy-two patients (men, 66.7%) met the inclusion criteria. The patient population was 91.7% Caucasian with a mean age of 55.0 years. The mean interval (±SD) between surgery and secondary CT was 157 ± 23 days. Preoperative BMD (±SD) in UIV + 1 was 300.6 ± 66.2 mg/cm3 . There was a significant BMD loss of 1.5% at UIV + 1 after surgery, resulting in a postoperative BMD of 296.2 ± 64.8 mg/cm3 (p = .029). At UIV + 2 and LIV + 1, no significant differences between pre- and postoperative BMD (304.7 ± 75.7 mg/cm3 vs. 299.8 ± 74.3 mg/cm3 , 197.3 ± 50.4 mg/cm3 vs. 200.8 ± 48.7 mg/cm3 , p = .113 and p = .078, respectively) were observed. Clinical significance Our results demonstrate a small BMD decrease of 1.5% at UIV + 1. This suggests that the effect of ACDF surgery on the adjacent levels might be smaller compared to the previously described lumbar BMD loss of 10%-20% following posterior lumbar fusion procedures.

Background The preoperative assessment of C2 morphology is important for safe instrumentation. Sclerotic changes are often seen in C2 pedicles. Evaluating the diameter measurements solely might not accurately assess the safety of screw insertion. We have proposed a novel grading system of the C2 pedicle that includes sclerosis and evaluated the predictive value of this grading system with the surgeon's safety evaluation. Methods We reviewed and measured the dimensional values in 220 cervical computed tomography angiograms. Additionally, we used a grading system that divides the findings into 5 grades according to the width measurement and degree of sclerosis in the C2 pedicle. Two spine surgeons independently classified the pedicles as follows: safe (minimal risk of pedicle violation), caution needed (caution to minimize pedicle violation), or dangerous (a high risk of pedicle violation). Finally, we compared the measurements and the surgeons' safety assessments. Results A total of 411 pedicles of 203 patients (mean age, 69.5 years; 49.5% women) were included. Of the 411 C2 pedicles, 170 were classified as high risk by ≥1 surgeon. Between the dimensional measurements and grading system, the sclerotic grade showed the best predictive value. Conclusions We have introduced a novel tool to evaluate the safety of C2 pedicle screw placement. Our results suggest that our pedicle width–sclerosis grading system is reproducible and predicts the surgeon's assessment of safe screw placement better than C2 pedicle diametrical measurements alone.

The concept of sagittal spinal malalignment is well established in spinal surgery. However, the effect of musculature on its development has not been fully considered and the position of the pelvis is mostly seen as compensatory and not necessarily a possible cause of sagittal imbalance.This study aimed to investigate the influence of the posterior paraspinal muscles (PPM, erector spinae, and multifidus) and the psoas muscle on spinopelvic and spinal alignment.Retrospective cross-sectional study.Patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion between 2014 and 2021 for degenerative conditions at a tertiary care center, with preoperative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 12 months prior the surgery and a preoperative whole spine radiograph were included.PPM and psoas muscle measurements including the cross-sectional area (CSA), the functional cross-sectional area (fCSA), the amount of intramuscular fat (FAT), and the percentage of fat infiltration (FI). Spinopelvic measurements including lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA).A T2-weighted MRI-based quantitative assessment of the CSA, the fCSA and the amount FAT was conducted, and FI was further calculated. The regions of interest included the psoas muscle and the PPM on both sides at the L4 level that were summarized and normalized by the patient's height (cmA total of 150 patients (53.3% female) were included in the final analysis with a median age of 65.6 years and a median BMI of 28.2 kg/mThis study demonstrated the potential role of posterior paraspinal muscles and psoas muscle on pelvic retroversion and elucidated the relation to sagittal spinal malalignment. Although we cannot establish causality, we propose that increasing FI

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of age on the psoas and posterior paraspinal muscles (PPM; multifidus muscle and erector spinae) and to evaluate potential sex-related differences.MRI-based quantitative assessments of the cross-sectional area (CSA), the functional cross-sectional area (fCSA), the fat area (FAT) and the proportion of intramuscular fat (FI) were conducted on patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery between 2014 and 2021. The regions of interest were the psoas muscle and the PPM at the superior endplate of L4. The left and right sides of the muscle groups were summarized and normalized by the patient's height (cmA total of 195 patients (57.9%female) with a median age of 64.2 years and a body mass index of 28.3 kg/mThis study demonstrated sex-specific differences in spinal muscle morphology in relation to patient age. With increasing age there was a decrease in FI

A retrospective cross-sectional study.To assess the association between spinal muscle morphology and spinopelvic parameters in lumbar fusion patients, with a special emphasis on lumbar lordosis (LL).Maintenance of sagittal alignment relies on muscle forces, but the basic association between spinal muscles and spinopelvic parameters is poorly understood.Patients operated between 2014 and 2017 who had both lumbar magnetic resonance imaging scan and standing whole-spine radiographs within six months before surgery were included. Muscle measurements were conducted on axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images at the superior endplate L3-L5 for the psoas and L3-S1 for combined multifidus and erector spinae (paraspinal) muscles. A pixel intensity threshold method was used to calculate the total cross-sectional area (TCSA) and the functional cross-sectional area (FCSA). Spinopelvic parameters were measured on lateral standing whole-spine radiographs and included LL, pelvic incidence (PI), PI-LL mismatch, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, thoracic kyphosis, and sagittal vertical axis. Analyses were stratified by biological sex. Multivariable linear regression analyses with adjustments for age and body mass index (BMI) were performed.A total of 104 patients (62.5% female) were included in the analysis. The patient population was 90.4% White with a median age at surgery of 69 years and a median BMI of 27.8 kg/m 2 . All muscle measurements were significantly smaller in women. PI, pelvic tilt, and thoracic kyphosis were significantly greater in women. PI-LL mismatch was 6.1° (10.6°) in men and 10.2° (13.5°) in women ( P =0.106), and sagittal vertical axis was 45.3 (40.8) mm in men and 35.7 (40.8) mm in women ( P =0.251). After adjusting for age and BMI, paraspinal TCSA at L3-L5, and paraspinal FCSA at L4 showed significant positive associations with LL in women. In men, psoas TCSA at L5 and psoas FCSA at L5 showed significant negative associations with LL, but none of the paraspinal muscle measurements.Our findings indicate that psoas and lumbar spine extensor muscles interact differently on LL among men and women, creating a unique mechanical environment.Level 4.

Background context Clinically, the association between bone mineral density (BMD) and surgical instrumentation efficacy is well recognized. Although several studies have quantified the BMD of the human lumbar spine, comprehensive BMD data for the cervical spine is limited. The few available studies included young and healthy patient samples, which may not represent the typical cervical fusion patient. Currently no large scale study provides detailed BMD information of the cervical and first thoracic vertebrae in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery. Purpose The objective of this study was to determine possible trabecular BMD variations throughout the cervical spine and first thoracic vertebra in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and to assess the correlation between BMDs of the spinal levels C1-T1. Study Design/Setting This is a retrospective case series. Patient Sample Patients undergoing ACDF from 2015 to 2018 at a single, academic institution with available preoperative CT imaging were included in this study. Outcome Measures The outcome measure was bone mineral density measured by QCT. Methods Patients that underwent ACDF from 2015 to 2018 at a single, academic institution were included in this study. Subjects with previous cervical instrumentation or missing/incomplete preoperative cervical spine CT imaging were excluded. Asynchronous quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements of the lateral masses of C1 and the C2-T1 vertebral bodies were performed. For this purpose, an elliptical region of interest (ROI) that consisted exclusively of trabecular bone was selected. Any apparent sclerotic levels that might affect trabecular QCT measurements were excluded from the final analysis. Interobserver reliability of measurements was assessed by calculating the interclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Pairwise comparison of BMD was performed and correlations between the various cervical levels were evaluated. The statistical significance level was set at p Results In all, 194 patients (men, 62.9%) met inclusion criteria. The patient population was 91.2% Caucasian with a mean age of 55.9 years and mean BMI of 28.2 kg/m2. The ICC of cervical QCT measurements was excellent (ICC 0.92). The trabecular BMD was highest in the mid-cervical spine (C4) and decreased in the caudal direction (C1 average = 253.3 mg/cm3, C2 = 276.6 mg/cm3, C3 = 272.2 mg/cm3, C4 = 283.5 mg/cm3, C5 = 265.1 mg/cm3, C6 = 235.3 mg/cm3, C7 = 216.8 mg/cm3, T1 = 184.4 mg/cm3). The BMD of C7 and T1 was significantly lower than those of all other levels. Nonetheless, significant correlations in BMD among all measured levels were observed, with a Pearson's correlation coefficient ranging from 0.507 to 0.885. Conclusions To the authors’ knowledge this is the largest study assessing trabecular BMD of the entire cervical spine and first thoracic vertebra by QCT. The patient sample consisted of patients undergoing ACDF, which adds to the clinical relevance of the findings. Knowledge of BMD variation in the cervical spine might be useful to surgeons utilizing anterior cervical spine plate and screw systems. Due to the significant variation in cervical BMD, procedures involving instrumentation at lower density caudal levels might potentially benefit from a modification in instrumentation or surgical technique to achieve results similar to more cephalad levels.

We investigated the effect of posterior lumbar fusion surgery on the regional volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) measured by quantitative computed tomography. Surgery negatively affected the regional vBMD in adjacent levels. Interbody fusion was independently associated with vBMD decline and preoperative epidural steroid injections (ESIs) were associated with less postoperative vBMD decline. Few studies investigate postoperative BMD changes after lumbar fusion surgery utilizing quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Additionally, it remains unclear what preoperative and operative factors contribute to postoperative BMD changes. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of lumbar fusion surgery on regional volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) in adjacent vertebrae and to identify potential modifiers for postoperative BMD change. The data of patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion with available pre- and postoperative CTs were reviewed. The postoperative changes in vBMD in the vertebrae one or two levels above the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV+1, UIV+2) and one level below the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV+1) were analyzed. As potential contributing factors, history of ESI, and the presence of interbody fusion, as well as various demographic/surgical factors, were included. A total of 90 patients were included in the study analysis. Mean age (±SD) was 62.1 ± 11.7. Volumetric BMD (±SD) in UIV+1 was 115.4 ± 36.9 mg/cm3 preoperatively. The percent vBMD change in UIV+1 was − 10.5 ± 12.9% (p

Objective There have been some reports on the association between spinal balance parameters and regional bone mineral density (BMD), but the results are controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between spinopelvic parameters and regional volumetric BMDs (vBMDs) measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in the lumbosacral region of patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. Methods The data of consecutive patients undergoing posterior lumbar spinal fusion with preoperative computed tomography was reviewed. QCT measurements were conducted in L1–S1 vertebral trabecular bone. The associations between spinopelvic sagittal parameters and vBMDs were evaluated. Multivariate analyses adjusted with age, gender, race, and body mass index were conducted with vBMD as the response variable. Results A total of 144 patients were included in the final analyses. Mean age (± standard deviation) was 65.4 ± 11.8 years. Mean vBMD in L1 (± standard deviation) was 118.3 ± 37.4 mg/cm3. After adjusting by cofactors, lumbar lordosis was negatively associated with vBMDs in all levels from L1 to L5 (% regression coefficients and adjusted R2 values: L1, –0.438, 0.268; L2, –0.556, 0.296; L3, –0.608, 0.362; L4, –0.554, 0.228; L5, –0.424, 0.194), but not in S1. Sacral slope was negatively associated with vBMD only at L4 (% coefficient, –0.588; R2, 0.208). Other parameters were not significantly associated with vBMDs at any levels. Conclusions Higher lumbar lordosis was associated with lower vBMDs in all lumbar spine levels. Our results suggest that BMD is affected not only by metabolic factors but also by the mechanical environment. Further longitudinal studies are needed to elucidate this effect of vBMD on clinical outcomes.

Background Lateral lumbar interbody fusion can be performed without supplemental posterior instrumentation. Previous reports have shown favorable results with stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SA-LLIF); however, a reoperation rate of up to 26% has been reported. It remains unclear what perioperative factors are associated with early failure after SA-LLIF. The objective of this study is to determine perioperative factors that increase the risk of early revisions after SA-LLIF. Methods Data of consecutive patients with SA-LLIF were reviewed. All revisions or recommendations for revision surgery within 12 months after the LLIF procedure were documented. As potential contributors, operative levels, preoperative clinical diagnosis, number of fusion levels, and the average L1/L2 quantitative computed tomography–volumetric bone mineral density value were obtained along with other demographic factors. Cage subsidence (grade 0–III as per Marchi et al.), was also evaluated in patients who had radiographs/computed tomography between 6 and 12 months postoperatively (n = 122). Logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results Of 133 eligible patients, 21 (15.8%) underwent revision surgery and 4 (3.0%) were recommended for revision surgery within 1 year primarily because of neurologic symptoms or pain (68%). Baseline demographics showed no significant difference between the revision and the nonrevision group. The average number of levels fused was 2.12 (revision group) and 2.14 (nonrevision group) (P = 0.55). Significantly more patients in the revision group had the diagnosis of foraminal stenosis (64.0% vs. 39.8%; P = 0.04). Conclusions Patients with foraminal stenosis were more likely to have early revision surgery after SA-LLIF primarily because of neurologic symptoms/pain. This information can assist in preoperative discussions and management of patient expectations.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT It has been reported that degenerative disc disease (DDD) is associated with higher spinal bone mineral density (BMD) based on previous studies that used dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, DDD is often associated with proliferative bone changes and can lead to an overestimation of BMD measured with DXA. Trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD) in the vertebral body measured with quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is less affected by those changes and can be a favorable alternative to DXA for patients with degenerative spinal changes. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of DDD on regional trabecular vBMDs in the vertebral body measured by QCT. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Cross-sectional observational study at a single academic institution. PATIENTS SAMPLE Consecutive patients undergoing posterior lumbar spinal fusion between 2014 and 2017 who had a routine preoperative CT scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within a 90-day interval. OUTCOME MEASURES Regional trabecular vBMDs in the vertebral body by QCT. METHODS QCT measurements were conducted in L1–S1 vertebral trabecular bone. Any apparent sclerotic lesions that might affect vBMD values were excluded from the region of interest. The vBMDs of each level were defined as the average vBMD of the upper and lower vertebrae. To evaluate DDD, Pfirrmann grade, Modic grade, total end plate score, and vacuum phenomenon were documented. Univariate regression analysis and multivariate analyses with a linear mixed model adjusted with individual variability of segmental vBMDs were conducted with vBMD as the response variable. RESULTS Of 143 patients and 715 disc levels, 125 patients and 596 discs met our inclusion criteria. Mean vBMD (±standard deviation [SD]) of all levels was 119.0±39.6 mg/cm3. After adjusting for all covariates, Pfirrmann grade was not an independent contributor to vBMD, but the presence of any Modic change (type 1, β=6.8, p≤.001; type 2, β=6.7, p CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that the presence of certain end plate lesions (Modic changes and high TEPS) on MRI was significantly associated with increased regional QCT-vBMDs in the vertebral body, but no significant association was observed with disc nucleus pathology, unless it was associated with a vacuum phenomenon. When end plate lesions with Modic changes and high TEPS are present at the measuring level, care must be taken to interpret vBMD values, which might be overestimations even if the trabecular area appears normal.

The aims of this study were to determine the time trend of demographics, complications, and outcomes for patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF) or anterior lumbar interbody fusion/lateral lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF/LLIF) and to compare the differences in the time trends between both procedures.The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients undergoing PLIF/TLIF and ALIF/LLIF procedures. Outcomes were analyzed for differences between 2 time periods in the PLIF/TLIF and ALIF/LLIF cohorts separately (2009-2013 and 2015-2019). Longitudinal time trends of the 2 procedures were determined by difference-in-differences (DID) analysis. Statistical significance was defined as P 0.05.For both approaches, there was an increase in age and American Society of Anesthesiologists class over time, accompanied by a significant decrease in blood transfusions and morbidity. The DID analysis showed a greater change in age (DID:-1.8%; P0.001), and more patients were rated American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 (DID: -2.4%; P = 0.033) in the ALIF/LLIF cohort than in the PLIF/TLIF cohort. Length of stay declined significantly over time in both cohorts, with a greater reduction observed for patients who underwent ALIF/LLIF than for patients who underwent PLIF/TLIF (DID: 0.2%; P = 0.014). There were no changes in readmission rates over time in either cohort (PLIF/TLIF DID: 0.6%; P = 0.080; ALIF/LLIF DID: -0.2%; P = 0.696).Time trends for PLIF/TLIF and ALIF/LIIF showed a significant increase in the number of older patients with complex medical status undergoing surgery. Despite these trends, there were decreases in overall postoperative morbidity, incidence of blood transfusion, and length of stay, without increasing readmission. These results suggest general improvement in surgical and perioperative management of lumbar fusion over time with greater gains found in ALIF/LLIF-specific care than in PLIF/TLIF.

The effect of psoas and paraspinal muscle parameters on cage subsidence after minimally invasive techniques, such as standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SA-LLIF), is unknown.This study aimed to determine whether the functional cross-sectional area (FCSA) of psoas and lumbar spine extensor muscles (multifidus and erector spinae), and psoas FCSA normalized to the vertebral body area (FCSA/VBA) differ among levels with severe cage subsidence after SA-LLIF when compared to levels without severe cage subsidence.Retrospective single center cohort study.Patients who underwent SA-LLIF between 2008 and 2020 for degenerative conditions using exclusively polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages, had a lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan within 12 months, a lumbar computed tomography (CT) scan within 6 months prior to surgery, and a postoperative clinical and radiographic follow-up at a minimum of 6 months were included.Severe cage subsidence.MRI measurements included psoas and combined multifidus and erector spinae (paraspinal) FCSA and FCSA/VBA at the L3-L5 pedicles. Following manual segmentation of muscles on axial T2-weighted images using ITK-SNAP (version 3.8.0), the FCSA was calculated using a custom written program on Matlab (version R2019a, The MathWorks, Inc.) that used an automated pixel intensity threshold method to differentiate between fat and muscle. Mean volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) at L1/2 was measured by quantitative CT. The primary endpoint was severe cage subsidence per level according to the classification by Marchi et al. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed using generalized linear mixed models. All analyses were stratified by biological sex.95 patients (45.3% female) with a total of 188 operated levels were included in the analysis. The patient population was 92.6% Caucasian with a median age at surgery of 65 years. Overall subsidence (Grades 0-III) was 49.5% (53/107 levels) in men versus 58.0% (47/81 levels) in women (p=.302), and severe subsidence (Grades II-III) was 22.4% (24/107 levels) in men versus 25.9% (21/81 levels) in women (p=.608). In men, median psoas FCSA and psoas FCSA/VBA at L3 and L4 were significantly greater in the severe subsidence group when compared to the non-severe subsidence group. No such difference was observed in women. Paraspinal muscle parameters did not differ significantly between non-severe and severe subsidence groups for both sexes. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis with adjustments for vBMD and cage length, psoas FCSA at L3 (OR 1.002; p=.020) and psoas FCSA/VBA at L3 (OR 8.655; p=.029) and L4 (OR 4.273; p=.043) were found to be independent risk factors for severe cage subsidence in men.Our study demonstrated that greater psoas FCSA at L3 and psoas FCSA/VBA at L3 and L4 were independent risk factors for severe cage subsidence in men after SA-LLIF with PEEK cages. The higher compressive forces the psoas exerts on lumbar segments as a potential stabilizer might explain these findings. Additional pedicle screw fixation might be warranted in these patients to avoid severe cage subsidence.

This study aimed at quantifying trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) at the external occipital protuberance (EOP) and the upper cervical spine. A retrospective review of patients who underwent non-contrast enhanced computed tomography of the cervical spine that included the occipital bone up to the EOP between 2007 and 2020 was conducted. Measurements of trabecular vBMD were performed in the occipital midline area, with the region of interest extending 4.5 mm above and below the center of the EOP, as well as the C1 lateral masses and the C2 vertebral body using asynchronous quantitative computed tomography. Eighty-six patients (female, 37.2%) were included for analysis. The patient population was 81.4% Caucasian with a mean ± SD age of 62.3 ± 13.1 years. Total bone thickness at the EOP was 16.7 ± 3.4 mm, with a ratio of trabecular to total bone thickness of 0.44. Trabecular vBMD (mean ± SD) was significantly higher at the EOP than at C1 and C2 (EOP = 612.3 ± 145.8 mg/cm3 , C1 average = 290.3 ± 66.5 mg/cm3 , C2 = 305.8 ± 78.8 mg/cm3 ; p 65 years of age, cervical vBMD was significantly lower, but remained high at the EOP. Clinical significance: Trabecular vBMD at the EOP is significantly higher than at the upper cervical vertebrae and remains high in older populations. Together with morphological information about the occipital bone, these results might be helpful for occipitocervical fixation when deciding about uni- or bicortical screw placement at the EOP.

To develop a decision-making pathway for primary SA-LLIF. Furthermore, we analyzed the agreement of this pathway and compared outcomes of patients undergoing either SA-LLIF or 360-LLIF.A decision-making pathway for SA-LLIF was created based on the results of interviews/surveys of senior spine surgeons with over 10 years of experience. Internal validity was retrospectively evaluated using consecutive patients undergoing either SA-LLIF or 360-LLIF between 01/2018 and 07/2020 with 3D-printed Titanium cages. An outcome assessment looking primarily at revision surgery and secondary at cage subsidence, changes in disk and foraminal height, global and segmental lumbar lordosis, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, and length of stay was carried out.78 patients with 124 treated levels (37 SA-LLIF, 41 360-LLIF) were retrospectively analyzed. The pathway showed a direct agreement (SA-LLIF) of 100.0% and an indirect agreement (360-LLIF) of 95.1%. Clinical follow-up averaged 13.5 ± 6.5 months including 4 revision surgeries in the 360-LLIF group and none in the SA-LLIF group (p = 0.117). Radiographic follow-up averaged 9.5 ± 4.3 months, with no statistically significant difference in cage subsidence rate between the groups (p = 0.440). Compared to preoperative images, patients in both groups showed statistically significant changes in disk height (p 0.001), foraminal height (p 0.001), as well as restoration of segmental lordosis (p 0.001 and p = 0.018). The SA-LLIF group showed shorter duration of surgery, less estimated blood loss and shorter LOS (p 0.001).The proposed decision-making pathway provides a guide to adequately select patients for SA-LLIF. Further studies are needed to assess the external applicability and validity.Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

To compare outcomes of three-dimensional-printed porous titanium (Ti) versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage implantation for stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SA-LLIF) in treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration.Between October 2016 and July 2020, 44 patients (59 levels) underwent stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion with Ti or PEEK cages. The primary outcome was cage subsidence. Secondary outcomes included revision and/or recommendations for revision surgery, back and/or leg pain severity, changes in disc and/or foraminal height, and global and/or segmental lumbar lordosis.The study included 44 patients (21 females) with a mean age at surgery of 61.8 ± 11.5 years, mean radiological follow-up of 12.5 ± 8.2 months, and mean clinical follow-up of 11.0 ± 7.1 months. Overall subsidence rate was significantly less in the Ti versus PEEK group (20% vs. 58.8%, P = 0.004). Revision was recommended to none of the patients in the Ti group and 3 patients in the PEEK group (P = 0.239). Patients in the Ti group showed significantly better improvement in back pain numeric rating scale score (P = 0.001). Disc height (P0.001) and foraminal height restoration (P = 0.011) were statistically significant in the Ti group, whereas only disc height restoration was significant in the PEEK group (P = 0.003).In patients undergoing stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion to treat adjacent segment degeneration, Ti cages had a significantly lower overall subsidence rate compared with PEEK cages. Furthermore, Ti cages resulted in fewer recommendations for revision surgery. Whether greater pain reduction in the Ti group is associated with earlier or higher fusion rates needs to be further elucidated.

The importance of bone status assessment in spine surgery is well recognized. The current gold standard for assessing bone mineral density is dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). However, DEXA has been shown to overestimate BMD in patients with spinal degenerative disease and obesity. Consequently, alternative radiographic measurements using data routinely gathered during preoperative evaluation have been explored for the evaluation of bone quality and fracture risk. Opportunistic quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and more recently, the MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score, have both been shown to correlate with DEXA T-scores and predict osteoporotic fractures. However, to date the direct association between VBQ and QCT has not been studied.The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between VBQ and spine QCT BMD measurements and assess whether the recently described novel VBQ score can predict the presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis diagnosed with QCT.Cross-sectional study using retrospectively collected data.Patients undergoing lumbar fusion from 2014-2019 at a single, academic institution with available preoperative lumbar CT and T1-weighted MRIs were included.Correlation of the VBQ score with BMD measured by QCT, and association between VBQ score and presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis.Asynchronous QCT measurements were performed. The average L1-L2 BMD was calculated and patients were categorized as either normal BMD (120 mg/cmA total of 198 patients (53% female) were included. The mean age was 62 years and the mean BMI was 28.2 kg/mWe found that the VBQ score showed moderate diagnostic ability to differentiate patients with normal BMD versus osteopenic/osteoporotic BMD based on QCT. VBQ may be an interesting adjunct to clinically performed bone density measurements in the future.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the lumbar spine is used as an alternative to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in assessing bone mineral density (BMD). The average BMD of L1-L2 is the standard reportable metric used for diagnostic purposes according to current recommendations. The density of L1 and L2 has also been proposed as a reference value for the remaining lumbosacral vertebrae and is commonly used as a surrogate marker for overall bone health. Since regional BMD differences within the spine have been proposed, it is unclear if the L1-L2 average correlates with the remainder of the lumbosacral spine. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to determine possible BMD variations throughout the lumbosacral spine in patients undergoing lumbar fusion and to assess the correlation between the clinically used L1-L2 average and the remaining lumbosacral vertebral levels. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This is a retrospective case series. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients undergoing posterior lumbar spinal fusion from 2014 to 2017 at a single, academic institution with available preoperative CT imaging were included in this study. OUTCOME MEASURES The outcome measure was BMD measured by QCT. METHODS Standard QCT measurements at the L1 and L2 vertebra and additional experimental measurements of L3, L4, L5, and S1 were performed. Subjects with missing preoperative lumbar spine CT imaging were excluded. The correlations between the L1-L2 average and the other vertebral bodies of the lumbosacral spine (L3, L4, L5, S1) were evaluated. RESULTS In total, 296 consecutive patients (55.4% female, mean age of 63.1 years) with available preoperative CT were included. The vertebral BMD values showed a gradual decrease from L1 to L3 and increase from L4 to S1 (L1=118.8 mg/cm3, L2=116.6 mg/cm3, L3=112.5 mg/cm3, L4=122.4 mg/cm3, L5=135.3 mg/cm3, S1=157.4 mg/cm3). There was strong correlation between the L1-L2 average and the average of the other lumbosacral vertebrae (L3-S1) with a Pearson's correlation coefficient (r=0.85). We also analyzed the correlation between the L1-L2 average and each individual lumbosacral vertebra. Similar relationships were observed (r value, 0.67–0.87), with the strongest correlation between the L1-L2 average and L3 (r=0.87). CONCLUSIONS Our data demonstrate regional BMD differences throughout the lumbosacral spine. Nevertheless, there is high correlation between the clinically used L1-L2 average and the BMD values in the other lumbosacral vertebrae. We, therefore, conclude the standard clinically used L1-L2 BMD average is a useful bone quantity measure of the entire lumbosacral spine in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.

Background Context Sacral fractures are a rare but potentially devastating complication. Long-fusion constructs, including the sacrum, that do not extend to the pelvis may result in sacral fractures. Besides established risk factors including gender, age, and number of levels fused, body mass index (BMI), pelvic parameters, and bone mineral density (BMD) have also been proposed as potential risk factors for postoperative sacral fractures. The literature supporting this, however, is limited. Purpose The aim of the present study was to assess whether preoperative pelvic parameters, BMI, or BMD of patients with sacral fracture are different compared with age, gender, and fusion level-matched non-fracture controls. Study Design/Setting This is a case-control study. Patient Sample Patients undergoing posterior instrumented fusion at a single academic institution between 2002 and 2016 were included in the study. Outcome Measures The outcome measure was occurrence of a postoperative sacral fracture. Methods Patients with sacral fractures after posterior instrumented spinal fusion, including the sacrum, were retrospectively identified and matched 2:1 with non-fracture controls based on gender, age, and number of levels fused. Patients with concurrent spinopelvic fixation or missing preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging were excluded. Preoperative sagittal balance was assessed using lateral radiographs. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) assessment included standard measurements at L1/L2 and additional experimental measurements of the S1 body and sacral ala. Results Twenty-one patients with sacral fracture were matched to non-fracture controls. The majority of the patients with sacral fracture was female (76.2%) and of advanced age (mean 66.4 years). Fracture and control groups were well matched with respect to gender, age, and number of levels fused. Standard measurements at L1/L2 showed no significant difference in BMD between the fracture and the control groups (109.9 mg/cm3 vs. 116.4 mg/cm3, p=.414). Similarly, there was no significant BMD differences between the groups using the experimental measurements of the S1 body (183.6 mg/cm3 vs. 176.2 mg/cm3, p=.567) and the sacral ala (8.9 mg/cm3 vs. 4.8 mg/cm3, p=.616). Mean preoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch and pelvic tilt were not significantly different between the groups. Univariate conditional logistic regression analysis revealed that the odds of experiencing a sacral fracture was approximately six times higher for obese patients compared with normal or underweight patients. After controlling for BMI in multivariate conditional logistic regression models, BMD was still not significantly associated with the odds of experiencing sacral fractures. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the association of preoperative BMD measured by QCT, pelvic parameters, and BMI with postoperative sacral fractures in a large patient cohort. Interestingly, our data do not show any difference in preoperative pelvic parameters and BMD between the groups. This is in line with previous reports that indicate only a few patients with sacral fracture after fusion surgery have clear evidence of osteoporosis. Bone mineral density as a measure of bone quantity, rather than bone quality, may not be as important in these fractures as previously thought. Obesity, however, was associated with higher odds of experiencing postoperative sacral fractures. The present study thereby challenges the widespread concept that obesity is a protective factor against fractures in the elderly. In summary, our results suggest that BMI and gender, more than pelvic parameters and BMD, are risk factors for postoperative sacral fractures.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a safe and effective procedure but has approach-related complications like postoperative dysphagia and dysphonia (PDD). Patient-reported outcome measures including the Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory (HSS-DDI) have been used for the assessment of PDD. Various factors have been described that affect ACDF outcomes, and our aim was to investigate the effect of workers' compensation (WC) status.We included patients who underwent ACDF from 2015 to 2018 stratified according to insurance status: WC/non-WC. PDDs were assessed using the HSS-DDI score. We conducted logistic regression analyses. Statistical significance was set at P0.05.We included 287 patients, 44 (15.33%) WC and 243 (84.67%) non-WC. A statistical comparison revealed a clinically relevant difference in the HSS-DDI total score and both subdomains (P = 0.015; dysphagia P = 0.021; dysphonia P = 0.002). Additional logistic regression analysis adjusting for preoperative Neck Disability Index scores resulted in no clinically relevant differences in the HSS-DDI total score and both subdomains (total score P = 0.420; dysphagia P = 0.531; dysphonia 0.315).WC status was associated with a worse HSS-DDI score but could not be shown to be an independent risk factor for PDD. The preoperative NDI score was a strong predictor for PDD with a clinically relevant difference in the HSS DDI score (P0.0001). Surgeon awareness of risk factors for PDD such as WC status, even if it could not be shown as independent, is important as it may influence surgical decision making and managing patient expectations.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT The thoracic spine is a common location for vertebral fractures as well as instrumentation failure after long spinal fusion procedures. The association between those complications and bone mineral density (BMD) are well recognized. Due to the overlying sternum and ribs in the thoracic spine, projectional BMD assessment tools such as dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) are limited to the lumbar spine. Quantitative computed tomography circumvents several shortcomings of DXA and allows for level-specific BMD measurements. Studies comprehensively quantifying BMD of the entire thoracic spine in patients undergoing spine surgery are limited. PURPOSE The objective of this study was: (1) to assess the reliability of thoracic QCT measurements, (2) to determine possible level-specific BMD variation throughout the thoracic spine and (3) to assess the correlation between BMDs of the T1-T12 spinal levels. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Cross-sectional observation study. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients undergoing spine surgery from 2016–2020 at a single, academic institution with available preoperative CT imaging of the thoracic spine were included in this study. OUTCOME MEASURES The outcome measure was BMD measured by QCT. METHODS Patients undergoing spine surgery from 2016–2020 at a single, academic institution with available preoperative CT imaging of the thoracic spine were included in this study. Subjects with previous instrumentation at any thoracic level, concurrent vertebral fractures, a Cobb angle of more than 20 degrees, or incomplete thoracic spine CT imaging were excluded. Asynchronous quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements of T1-T12 were performed. To assess inter- and intra-observer reliability, a validation study was performed on 120 vertebrae in 10 randomly selected patients. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. A pairwise comparison of BMD was conducted and correlations between each thoracic level were evaluated. The statistical significance level was set at p RESULTS 60 patients (men, 51.7%) met inclusion criteria. The study population was 90% Caucasian with a mean age of 62.2 years and a mean BMI of 30.2 kg/m2. The inter- and intra-observer reliability of the thoracic QCT measurements was excellent (ICC of 0.97 and 0.97, respectively). The trabecular BMD was highest in the upper thoracic spine and decreased in the caudal direction (T1 = 182.3 mg/cm3, T2 = 168.1 mg/cm3, T3 = 163.5 mg/cm3, T4 = 164.7 mg/cm3, T5 = 161.4 mg/cm3, T6 = 152.5 mg/cm3, T7 = 143.5 mg/cm3, T8 = 141.3 mg/cm3, T9 = 143.5 mg/cm3, T10 = 145.1 mg/cm3, T11 = 145.3 mg/cm3, T12 = 133.6 mg/cm3). The BMD of all thoracic levels cranial to T6 was statistically higher than the BMD of all levels caudal to T6 (p CONCLUSIONS There is significant regional BMD variation in the thoracic spine depending on spinal level. This BMD variation might contribute to several clinically relevant phenomena. First, vertebral fractures occur most commonly at the thoracolumbar junction including T12. In addition to mechanical reasons, these fractures might be partially attributed to thoracic BMD that is lowest at T12. Second, the optimal upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) for stopping long fusions to the sacrum and pelvis is controversial. The BMD of surgically relevant upper thoracic stopping points (T2-T4) was significantly higher than the BMD of lower thoracic stopping points (T10-T12). Besides stress concentration at the relatively mobile lower thoracic segments, the low BMD at these levels might contribute to previously suggested higher rates of junctional failures with short fusions.

Anterior (ALIF) and lateral (LLIF) lumbar interbody fusion is associated with significant postoperative pain, opioid consumption and length of stay. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks improve these outcomes in other surgical subtypes but have not been applied to spine surgery. A retrospective study of 250 patients was performed to describe associations between TAP block and outcomes after ALIF/LLIF.The electronic medical records of 129 patients who underwent ALIF or LLIF with TAP block were compared to 121 patients who did not. All patients were cared for under a standardized perioperative care pathway with comprehensive multimodal analgesia. Differences in patent demographics, surgical factors, length of stay (LOS), opioid consumption, opioid-related side effects and pain scores were compared in bivariable and multivariable regression analyses.In bivariable analyses, TAP block was associated with a significantly shorter LOS, less postoperative nausea/vomiting and lower opioid consumption in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). In multivariable analyses, TAP block was associated with significantly shorter LOS (β - 12 h, 95% CI (- 22, - 2 h); p = 0.021). Preoperative opioid use was a strong predictive factor for higher opioid consumption in the PACU, opioid use in the first 24 h after surgery and longer LOS. We did not find significant differences in pain scores at any times between the groups.TAP block may represent an effective addition to pain management and opioid-reducing strategies and improve outcomes after ALIF/LLIF. Prospective trials are warranted to further explore these associations.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Postoperative dysphagia and dysphonia (PDD) are prevalent complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Identification of risk factors for these complications is necessary for effective prevention. Recently, patient reported outcome measures (PROM) have been used to determine PDD after ACDF. The Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory (HSS-DDI) is a validated PROM that specifically assesses dysphagia and dysphonia after anterior cervical spine surgery. PURPOSE To identify the perioperative risk factors for PDD utilizing the HSS-DDI. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Observational study of prospectively collected data at a single academic institution. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion from 2015 to 2019 who enrolled in the prospective data collection. OUTCOME MEASURE The HSS-DDI administered 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 4-6 months after surgery. METHODS As potential risk factors, the data on demographic factors, analgesic medications, history of psychiatric illness, preoperative sagittal alignment, surgical factors, preoperative diagnoses, and preoperative Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores were collected. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses utilizing the Tobit model were conducted. RESULTS 291 patients were included in the final analysis. The median HSS-DDI at 4-weeks, 8 weeks, and 4-6 months postoperatively, were 80.7, 92.7, and 98.4, respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that current smoking, previous cervical spine surgery, preoperative C2-7 angle, upper level surgery, multilevel surgery, opioid use, and a high preoperative NDI score, were independent contributing factors to a low HSS-DDI score at 4-weeks follow-up. Intraoperative topical steroid use was an independent protective factor for a low HSS-DDI score. Opioid use and high NDI score remained independent factors at 4-6 months. Sub-domain analysis demonstrated that prior cervical surgery, preoperative C2-7 angle, multilevel surgery, and intraoperative topical steroid use were significant for dysphagia only. Current smoking was significant for dysphonia only. CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that preoperative opioid use and a high preoperative NDI score are novel independent risk factors for postoperative dysphagia and dysphonia in addition to other known factors.

Retrospective case series.The aim of this study was to investigate the association of Modic type endplate changes with the risk of severe subsidence after standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SA-LLIF).It has been reported that certain endplate radiolographic features are associated with higher regional bone mineral density (BMD) in the adjacent vertebrae in the lumbar spine. It remains unclear whether these changes have protective effects against osteoporotic complications such as cage subsidence after lumbar surgery.We reviewed patients undergoing SA-LLIF from 2007 to 2016 with a follow-up6 months. Cage subsidence was assessed utilizing the grading system by Marchi et al. As potential contributing factors for cage subsidence, we measured the endplate volumetric BMD (EP-vBMD) and the standard trabecular volumetric BMD measurement in the vertebral body. Modic changes (MC) on magnetic resonance imaging were measured as a qualitative factor for endplate condition. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analyses with a generalized mixed model were conducted.Two hundred six levels in 97 patients were included in the final analysis. Mean age (± SD) was 66.7 ± 10.7. Sisty-sdpercent of the patients were female. Severe subsidence was observed in 66 levels (32.0%). After adjusting for age, bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) use, and number of levels fused, the presence of MC type 2 was significantly associated with lower risk of severe subsidence (OR = 0.28 [0.09-0.88], P = 0.029). Whereas, EP-vBMD did not demonstrate a statistical significance (p = 0.600).The presence of a Modic type 2 change was significantly associated with lower odds of severe subsidence after SA-LLIF. Nonetheless, this significant association was independent from regional EP-vBMD values. This finding suggests that microstructural and/or material property changes associated with Modic type 2 changes might have a protective effect in this patient population.4.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the predictive value of the hyoid horizontal positional change on the severity of dysphagia and dysphonia (PDD) after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) comparing pre-vertebral soft-tissue thickness (PVST).This is a retrospective observational study with prospectively collected data at a single academic institution. ACDF patients between 2015 to 2018 who had complete self-reported PDD surveys and pre- and postoperative lateral cervical radiographs were included in the analysis. PDD was assessed utilizing the Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory (HSS-DDI). The hyoid-vertebral distance (HVD) and PVST (the averages of C2 to C7 levels (PVSTC2-7) and all operating levels (PVSTOP)) were assessed preoperatively and upon discharge. The associations among postoperative changes of HVD, PVSTs, and the 4-week HSS-DDI score were evaluated.Of the 268 patients with a HSS-DDI score assessment, 209 patients had complete data. In univariate analyses, HVD and PVSTC2-7 changes demonstrated significant correlations with HSS-DDI, whereas PVSTOP showed no significant association. After adjusting with sex and operating level, the changes in HVD (p = 0.019) and PVSTC2-7 (p = 0.009) showed significant associations with the HSS-DDI score and PVSTOP showed no significant association. PVSTC2-7 could not be evaluated in 12% of patients due to measurement difficulties of PVST at lower levels.We introduce a novel potential predictive marker for PDD after ACDF. Our results suggest that HVD can be utilized for the risk assessment of PDD, especially in PVST unmeasurable cases, which accounts for over 10% of ACDF patients.

Background Postoperative dysphagia is a common complication after anterior cervical surgery, and it can be measured using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory (HSS-DDI) is a condition-specific PROM to evaluate dysphagia and dysphonia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the HSS-DDI has not, to our knowledge, been established. Other PROMs have been used to assess dysphagia (SWAL-QOL and MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory [MDADI]) in ACDF. Currently, few studies have addressed the MCIDs of these PROMs. Questions/purposes To determine (1) the minimum detectable changes (MDC) of the HSS-DDI, SWAL-QOL, and MDADI using a distribution-based approach, and (2) the MCID of the HSS-DDI, SWAL-QOL, and MDADI, using an anchor-based approach. Methods We used a longitudinally maintained database that was originally established for the HSS-DDI development and validation study. In all, 323 patients who underwent elective ACDF were assessed for enrollment eligibility; 83% (268 of 323) met the inclusion criteria and completed the HSS-DDI Week 4 survey. We set six outcomes: distribution-based MDCs for the (1) HSS-DDI, (2) SWAL-QOL, (3) MDADI, in addition to anchor-based MCIDs for the (4) HSS-DDI, (5) SWAL-QOL, and (6) MDADI. The HSS-DDI consists of 31 questions and ranges 0 (worst) to 100 (normal). We used the focused SWAL-QOL, which consists of 14 selected items from the original SWAL-QOL and ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (normal). The MDADI is a 20-item survey and ranges from 20 (worst) to 100 (normal). A distribution-based approach is used to calculate values defined as the smallest difference above the measurement error. An anchor-based approach is used to determine the MCIDs based on an external scale, called an anchor, which indicates the minimal symptom change that is considered clinically important. All 268 patients were used for the distribution-based (0.5 SD) HSS-DDI MDC analysis. The first 16% (44 of 268) of patients completed retesting of the HSS-DDI via a telephone interview and were used for another distribution-based (standard error of measurement: SEM) MDC analysis. The number of patients for the test-retest group was determined based on the previously reported minimum required sample size of reliability studies. The first 63% (169 of 268, SWAL-QOL and 168 of 268, MDADI) of patients completed two other surveys for the external validation of the HSS-DDI, and were used for the SWAL-QOL and MDADI 0.5 SD analyses. Among the patients, 86% (230 of 268) completed the Week 8 HSS-DDI survey that was used for the anchor-based HSS-DDI MCID analysis, and 56% (SWAL-QOL, 150 of 268 and MDADI, 151 of 268) of patients completed the Week 8 surveys that were used for the SWAL-QOL and MDADI MCID analyses. Subjective improvement grades from the previous assessment were used as the anchor. The MCIDs were calculated as the mean score changes among those who reported little better or greater in the improvement assessment and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. We adopted the higher value of these two as the MCID for each PROM. Results The distribution-based MDCs for the HSS-DDI total score, SWAL-QOL, and MDADI were 11 of 100, 9 of 100, and 8 of 80 points, respectively, using the 0.5 SD method. Using the SEM-based method, the MDC for the HSS-DDI total score was 9 of 100 points. Regarding the anchor-based MCIDs, the values calculated with the mean score change method were consistently higher than those of ROC analysis and were adopted as the MCIDs. The MCIDs were 10 for the total HSS-DDI total score, 8 for the SWAL-QOL, and 6 for the MDADI. Conclusions Improvements of less than 10 points for the HSS-DDI score, 9 points for the SWAL-QOL, and 6 points for the MDADI are unlikely to be perceived by patients to be clinically important. Future studies on dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery should report between-group differences in light of this, rather than focusing on p values and statistical significance. Level of evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

High body mass index (BMI) is positively correlated with bone mineral density (BMD) in healthy adults; however, the effect of BMI on regional segmental BMDs in the axial skeleton is unclear. In addition, obese patients often have glucose intolerance and patients with lumbar spine pathology commonly have a history of epidural steroid injections (ESIs). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of these patient factors on regional differences in BMD measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in a lumbar fusion patient cohort.The data were obtained from a database comprised of clinical and preoperative CT data from 296 patients who underwent primary posterior lumbar spinal fusion from 2014 to 2017. QCT-vBMDs of L1 to L5, S1 body, and sacral alae were measured. Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed with setting vBMDs as the response variables. As explanatory variables, age, sex, race, current smoking, categorized BMI, diabetes, and ESI were chosen a priori.A total of 260 patients were included in the final analysis. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that obese and morbidly obese patients had significantly higher vBMD in the sacral alae (SA). Diabetes showed independent positive associations with vBMDs in L1, L2, and the SA. Additionally, patients with an ESI history demonstrated significantly lower vBMD in the SA.Our results demonstrate that obesity, diabetes, and epidural steroids affected vBMD differently by lumbosacral spine region. The vBMD of the SA appeared to be more sensitive to various patient factors than other lumbar regions.

The rate of cervical spinal fusion has been increasing significantly. However, there is a paucity of literature describing trends based on surgical approach using complete population databases. We investigated the approach-based trends in epidemiology, indications, and in-hospital outcomes of cervical spinal fusion.New York's Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was queried to identify patients who underwent primary subaxial cervical fusion from 1997 to 2012. Demographic and clinical information was obtained. Subgroup analyses were performed based on surgical approach: anterior (A), posterior (P), and circumferential (C).A total of 87,045 cervical fusions were included. Over the study period, the population-adjusted annual fusion rate increased from 23.7 to 50.6 per 100,000 population (P0.001). A fusion was most common (85.2%), followed by P (12.3%), and C (2.5%). Mean ages were 49.8 ± 11.9, 59.9 ± 15.2, and 55.1 ± 14.5 years (P0.001), respectively. Although rates remained steady among younger patients, they increased for older patients. Overall, degenerative conditions were the predominant indications for surgery and increased in rate over time. The mean length of stay was: A, 3.1 ± 10.5; P, 9.1 ± 14.1; and C, 14.1 ± 22.5 days (P0.001). Rates of in-hospital complications were A, 3.0%; P, 10.5%; and C, 18.9% (P0.001), and mortality was A, 0.3%, P, 1.8%, and C, 2.5% (P0.001).The rate of subaxial spinal fusions increased 114% from 1997 to 2012 in New York State. Rates remained stable in younger patients but increased in the older population. Preoperative indications and postoperative courses differed significantly among the various approaches, with patients undergoing anterior fusion having better short-term outcomes.

Soccer is the most popular sport in the world, with more than 270 million participants. It is characterized by repetition of short and intense actions that require high-coordination capacity. It is a sport where interactions with other players put the athletes at risk for traumatic injuries. Lower-limb injuries are the most prevalent injuries in soccer. Spine injuries are less frequent; however, they can impose serious and debilitating sequelae on the athlete. These injuries can be associated with long recovery periods preventing return to play. Moreover, specific repetitive activities (heading, kicking, etc.) can lead to chronic injuries. The cervical spine is particularly at risk for degenerative changes. Considerations for when an athlete should undergo spinal surgery and the timing of return to play present a difficult challenge to spine specialists. The objective of this article is to review the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of spinal injuries in soccer.

Background Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) has often been associated with postoperative lumbar plexus symptoms, including pain, paresthesia, and motor deficits in the lower extremities, especially the anterior thigh regions. Previous studies have suggested that LLIF procedures at L4-L5 will be associated with a greater motor deficit rate than other levels. However, it is unclear which level has the greatest risk of pain and paresthesia. The purpose of the present retrospective observational study was to investigate the difference in the incidence of early postoperative thigh symptoms (pain and paresthesia) stratified by procedure level among patients who had undergone standalone LLIF. Methods We reviewed the data from consecutive patients who had undergone LLIF at a single academic institution. A total of 285 standalone LLIF cases without preoperative motor deficits were identified. The incidence of postoperative thigh pain and paresthesia at the 6-week postoperative follow-up examination was assessed at all levels from T12-L1 to L4-L5. Results A total of 81 patients (28.4%) had anterior thigh pain and 62 (21.8%) had anterior thigh paresthesia. The presence of ≥3 levels fused (odds ratio [OR], 2.96; P = 0.004) and surgery at L2-L3 (OR, 2.59; P = 0.001) were significant risk factors for postoperative anterior thigh paresthesia on univariate analysis but were not associated with anterior thigh pain. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that only surgery L2-L3 was an independent risk factor for anterior thigh paresthesia (OR, 2.09; P = 0.049). Conclusions Our results have demonstrated that standalone LLIF at the L2-L3 was significantly associated with a greater incidence of postoperative anterior thigh paresthesia but that the incidence of postoperative thigh pain showed no significant association with any operative level.

Bone mineral density (BMD) is not the sole predictor of fracture development. Qualitative markers including bone collagen maturity contribute to bone fragility. Bone and related type I collagen containing connective tissues degenerate in parallel fashion. With aging, changes in skin collagen content and quality have been observed that can be detected on ultrasound (US) as a decrease in dermal thickness and an increase in reticular layer echogenicity. We hypothesized that US dermal thickness and echogenicity correlate with bone collagen maturity. Data of 43 prospectively enrolled patients (mean age 61 years, 24 females), who underwent instrumented, posterior lumbar fusion was analyzed. Besides preoperative quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and skin US measurements, intraoperative bone biopsies were obtained and analyzed with Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Among men, there was no correlation between US measurements and collagen maturity. Among women, dermal layer thickness correlated negatively with collagen maturity in trabecular bone of the iliac crest (r = -0.51, p = 0.01) and vertebra (r = -0.59, p = 0.01) as well as in cortical bone of the iliac crest (r = -0.50, p = 0.02) and vertebra (r = -0.50, p = 0.04). In addition, echogenicity correlated positively with collagen maturity in trabecular vertebral bone (r = 0.59, p = 0.01). In both genders, US measurements showed no correlation with QCT BMD. In summary, ultrasound skin parameters are associated with bone quality factors such as collagen maturity, rather than bone quantity (BMD). Ultrasound of the skin may thereby be an easy and accessible take off point for diagnosis of bone collagen maturity and connective tissue degeneration in the future. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2508-2515, 2019.

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) at the L4-L5 level is a controversial topic in the spine data. The aim of the present study was to compare the rate of nerve-related motor deficits in patients undergoing LLIF with and without L4-L5 involvement.The clinical data from consecutive patients who had undergone LLIF from 2006 to 2016 at a single academic institution were retrospectively reviewed for new postoperative motor weakness of the quadriceps or tibialis anterior muscle. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to L4-L5 involvement. Regression analysis was performed to examine the association of LLIF at L4-L5 and the risk of new motor deficits.A total of 872 patients met inclusion criteria. The rate of new motor deficits at the 6-week postoperative visit in the L4-L5 group was 13.1%, which was significantly greater than that in the non-L4-L5 group at 5.5% (P0.001). After adjustment for potential confounders in multivariate logistic regression models, L4-L5 was still significantly associated with an increased risk of new motor deficit (odds ratio, 2.290; P = 0.008). Of the 686 patients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months, persistent nerve-related motor deficits at the last follow-up examination were recorded in 2.5% of the L4-L5 group and 0.4% of the non-L4-L5 group (P = 0.065).The results from the present large study are in line with previous investigations reporting an initial increased risk of new motor deficits for LLIF performed at L4-L5. However, most new motor deficits were transient in nature and had resolved over time.

BACKGROUND An injury of the vertebral artery (VA) is one of the most catastrophic complications in the setting of cervical spine surgery. Anatomic variations of the VA can increase the risk of iatrogenic lacerations. OBJECTIVE To propose a novel and reproducible classification system that describes the position of the VA based on a 2-dimensional map on computed tomography angiographs (CTA). METHODS This cross-sectional retrospective study reviewed 248 consecutive CTAs of the cervical spine at a single academic institution between 2007 and 2018. The classification consists of a number that characterizes the location of the VA from the medio-lateral (ML) aspect of the vertebral body. In addition, a letter describes the VA location from the anterior-posterior (AP) aspect. The reliability and reproducibility were assessed by 2 independent raters on 200 VAs. RESULTS The inter- and intrarater reliability values showed the classification's reproducibility. The inter-rater reliability weighted κ-value for the ML aspect was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.93-0.93). The unweighted κ-value was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86-1.00) for "at-risk" positions (ML grade ≥1), and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.75-1.00) for "high-risk" positions (ML grade ≥2). The weighted κ-value for the intrarater reliability was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.95-0.95). The unweighted κ-values for the intrarater reliability were 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.99) for "at-risk" positions, and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.78-0.96) for "high-risk" positions. CONCLUSION The proposed classification is reliable, reproducible, and independent of individual anatomic size variations. The use of this novel grading system could improve the understanding and interdisciplinary communication about VA anomalies.

This study aims to compare the early subsidence rate (6-12 months) of standalone novel 3D-printed titanium (Ti) versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody cages after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF).A retrospective study of 113 patients (186 levels) who underwent LLIF surgery with Ti or PEEK cages was conducted. Early subsidence was measured in each treated level using the Marchi et al. classification in radiographs or CT scans acquired at 6-12 months follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression analyses with generalized mixed models, setting subsidence as the outcome variable and including cage type (Ti vs PEEK) as well as significant and trending variables (p 0.10) in univariate analyses, were conducted.In total, 51 female and 62 male patients were analyzed. The median [IQR] age at surgery was 60.0 [51.0-70.0] years. Of the 186 levels, 119 levels were treated using PEEK and 67 levels with Ti cages. The overall subsidence rate for Grades I-III was significantly less in the Ti versus the PEEK group (p = 0.003). For high-grade subsidence (Grade II or III), Ti cages also demonstrated a subsidence rate (3.0%) that was significantly less compared to PEEK cages (18.5%) (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that patients treated with Ti cages were less likely to develop severe subsidence compared to those treated with PEEK (OR = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.01, 0.30) (p = 0.001).Our study demonstrated that 3D-printed novel Ti cages had a significantly lower early subsidence rate compared to PEEK cages in standalone LLIF patients.

Background Context Postoperative pain at the site of bone graft harvest for posterior spine fusion is reported to occur in 6%–39% of cases. However, the area around the posterior, superior iliac spine is a frequent site of referred pain for many structures. Therefore, many postoperative spine patients may have pain in the vicinity of the posterior iliac crest that may not in fact be caused by bone graft harvesting. The literature may then overestimate the true incidence of postoperative iliac crest pain. Purpose We performed a prospective study testing the hypothesis that patients will not report significantly higher visual analog scores over the graft harvest site when compared with the contralateral, non-harvested side. Study design/Setting This is a prospective, randomized cohort study. Patient Sample Patients aged 18–75 years undergoing elective spinal fusion of one to two levels between L4 and S1 for spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis were randomized to left-sided or right-sided iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) donor sites and blinded to the side of harvest. Outcome Measures Primary outcome was a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) for pain over the left and right posterior superior iliac spine. Methods Bone graft was harvested via spinal access incisions without making a separate skin incision over the crest. Each patient's non-harvested side served as an internal control. Data points were recorded by patients on their study visit sheets preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Results Forty patients were enrolled in the study (23 females) with an average follow-up of 8.1 months (1.5–12 months). Mean age was 51.7 years (23–77 years). Left- and right-side ICBG harvesting was performed equally between the 40 patients. The average volume of graft harvested from the left was 35.3 mL (15–70 mL) and 36.1 mL (15–60 mL) from the right. There was no statistical difference between preoperative VAS score on the harvested side compared with the non-harvested side (p=.415). Postoperatively, there were consistently higher VAS scores on the operative side; however, these differences were not statistically significant at 6 weeks (p=.111), 3 months (p=.440), 6 months (p=.887), or 12 months (p=.240). Both groups did, however, show statistically significant improvements in VAS scores over time within the operative and nonoperative sides (p Conclusions The current literature does not adequately illuminate the incidence of postoperative pain at the site of harvest and the relative magnitude of this pain in comparison with the patient's residual low back pain. This is the first study to blind the patient to the laterality of bone graft harvesting. Our randomized investigation showed that although pain on the surgical side was slightly higher, it was neither clinically nor statistically different from the nonsurgical side. Our conclusion supports surgeons' use of autologous bone graft, which offers a cost-effective, efficacious spinal fusion supplement.

Researchers and clinicians operate in an increasingly complex clinical and regulatory environment in which understanding the principles governing human research is essential. However, most orthopaedic surgeons have not received in-depth training in regulatory requirements and scientific research methods. Ensuring that research is conducted in accordance with state and federal laws and ethical principles is essential to guard compromising patient information and avoid severe penalties for noncompliance. The researcher must understand the regulations for compliance and proper data management, including the requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, proper application of informed consent, use of the Institutional Review Board, and data protection guidelines. Tools such as a regulatory binder can assist investigators in complying with requirements, maintaining regulatory standards, and ensuring a robust study design and conduct.

The process of clinical decision-making and the patient-physician relationship continue to evolve. Increasing patient involvement in clinical decision-making is embodied in the concept of "shared decision-making" (SDM), in which the patient and physician share responsibility in the clinical decision-making process. Various patients' decision aid tools have been developed to enhance this process.We therefore (1) describe decision-making models; (2) discuss the different types of patients' decision aids available to practice SDM; and (3) describe the practice and early impact of SDM on clinical orthopaedic surgery.We performed a search of the literature using PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library. We identified studies related to shared decision-making and the use of patients' decision aids in orthopaedics. The search resulted in 113 titles, of which 21 were included with seven studies on patients' decision aid use specifically in orthopaedics.Although limited studies suggest the use of patients' decision aids may enhance decision-making, conclusions about the use of these aids in orthopaedic clinical practice cannot be made and further research examining the best type, timing, and content of patients' decision aids that will lead to maximum patient involvement and knowledge gains with minimal clinical workflow interruption are needed.In clinical practice today, patients are increasingly involved in clinical decision-making. Further research on SDM in orthopaedic surgery examining the feasibility and impact on practice, on patients' willingness and ability to actively participate in shared decision-making, and the timing and type of patients' decision aids appropriate for use is still needed.

Background Dysphagia and dysphonia are common complications after anterior cervical spine surgery; however, reported prevalences vary greatly due to a lack of reliable clinical standards for measuring postoperative swallowing and speech dysfunction. The Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory (HSS-DDI) was developed as a patient-derived, patient-reported instrument to measure dysphagia and dysphonia more accurately after anterior cervical spine surgery than existing indices. Methods This multiphase survey-development study implemented a mixed-methods approach. Phase 1 involved qualitative assessment of postoperative patient-reported swallowing or speaking deficiencies to assemble a draft survey. Phase 2 established test-retest reliability and finalized the 31-item HSS-DDI. Phase 3 compared the HSS-DDI with the Swallowing-Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL) questionnaire and the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) for validity and responsiveness. Results Phase 1, performed to formulate the draft survey, included 25 patients who were asked about speech and swallowing dysfunction after anterior cervical spine surgery involving at least 3 vertebral levels. Phase 2 included 49 patients who completed the draft survey twice. The mean scores (and standard deviation) for each administration of the HSS-DDI were 67 ± 24 and 75 ± 22, the Cronbach alpha coefficients were both 0.97, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.80. The 31-item HSS-DDI was finalized with all but 2 items having weighted kappa values of ≥0.40. Phase 3 included 127 patients and established external validity, with most correlation coefficients between the HSS-DDI and the SWAL-QOL and MDADI ranging from 0.5 to 0.7. Internal validity was established by identifying worsening HSS-DDI scores with increases in the number of vertebral levels involved (p = 0.02) and in the Surgical Invasiveness Index (p = 0.006). HSS-DDI responsiveness ascertained by effect size (0.73) was better than that of the SWAL-QOL and MDADI. The average administration time for the HSS-DDI was 2 minutes and 25 seconds. Conclusions The HSS-DDI is efficient, valid, and more responsive to change after anterior cervical spine surgery than existing surveys. Clinical relevance The HSS-DDI fills a gap in postoperative assessment by providing a reliable, more clinically sensitive, patient and condition-specific evaluation of dysphagia and dysphonia prospectively and longitudinally.

Objectives To evaluate the use of decision aids for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) regarding the potential risks and benefits of different treatment options. Methods A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted of 147 patients with advanced hip or knee OA to compare the effect of two decision aids (booklet-only vs. booklet with DVD). Results Both decision aid programs were well received and demonstrated improvements in patient knowledge and willingness to participate in treatment decisions. The decision aids, however, had a marginal effect on patient willingness to participate in OA management, with an increase of 0.11 and 0.6 on a scale of 2 ( P = 0.58) between groups. Conclusions The decision aids were accepted for most patients and effective in improving patient knowledge and willingness to participate in the decision process. Nevertheless, the addition of a more expensive DVD to the booklet program did not improve patient acceptance or knowledge.