1. Driving Pressure Is a Risk Factor for ARDS in Mechanically Ventilated Subjects Without ARDS
- Author
-
Nicolás Nin, Manuel Jibaja, Jordi Riera, César Laborda, Marina García-de-Acilu, Fernando Frutos-Vivar, Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore, Lorenzo del-Sorbo, Pravin Amin, Nahit Cakar, Dimitros Matamis, Fernando Rios, Marco Antonio Soares, Oriol Roca, Alfonso Muriel, Maria del Carmen Marín, Antonio Anzueto, Andrew D. Bersten, Fekri Abroug, Gee Young Suh, Yuda Sutherasan, Oscar Peñuelas, Amine Ali Zeggwagh, Konstantinos Raymondos, Bin Du, Andrés Esteban, Bruno do Valle Pinheiro, Arnaud W. Thille, Marco González, and Judit Sacanell
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Mechanical ventilation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,ARDS ,Potential risk ,business.industry ,Respiration ,Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury ,medicine.medical_treatment ,General Medicine ,Odds ratio ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,Logistic regression ,medicine.disease ,Internal medicine ,Post-hoc analysis ,Tidal Volume ,medicine ,Cardiology ,Humans ,In patient ,Original Research Article ,Risk factor ,business ,Lung - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Driving pressure (ΔP) has been described as a risk factor for mortality in patients with ARDS. However, the role of ΔP in the outcome of patients without ARDS and on mechanical ventilation has received less attention. Our objective was to evaluate the association between ΔP on the first day of mechanical ventilation with the development of ARDS. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of a multicenter, prospective, observational, international study that included subjects who were on mechanical ventilation for > 12 h. Our objective was to evaluate the association between ΔP on the first day of mechanical ventilation with the development of ARDS. To assess the effect of ΔP, a logistic regression analysis was performed when adjusting for other potential risk factors. Validation of the results obtained was performed by using a bootstrap method and by repeating the same analyses at day 2. RESULTS: A total of 1,575 subjects were included, of whom 65 (4.1%) developed ARDS. The ΔP was independently associated with ARDS (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% CI 1.07–1.18 for each cm H(2)O of ΔP increase, P < .001). The same results were observed at day 2 (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07–1.21; P < .001) and after bootstrap validation (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04–1.22; P < .001). When taking the prevalence of ARDS in the lowest quartile of ΔP (≤9 cm H(2)O) as a reference, the subjects with ΔP > 12–15 cm H(2)O and those with ΔP > 15 cm H(2)O presented a higher probability of ARDS (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.32–10.04 [P = .01] and OR 7.31, 95% CI, 2.89–18.50 [P < .001], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In the subjects without ARDS, a higher level of ΔP on the first day of mechanical ventilation was associated with later development of ARDS. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02731898.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF