Search

Lugol chromoendoscopy has been conventionally used for the detection and delineation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). However, the boundaries of some lesions are unclear even with Lugol chromoendoscopy, and there is a risk of residual lesions or over-excision. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of narrow-band imaging (NBI) for the delineation of esophageal SCC in endoscopic resection. Among 367 esophageal SCCs endoscopically resected between January and December 2019 at our institute, this retrospective study included consecutive lesions, which were first marked with NBI, followed by Lugol chromoendoscopy. The proportion of residual cancer, which was defined as histologically proven cancer confirmed adjacent to the scar within 1 year after endoscopic resection, was evaluated. To evaluate whether the marks added by Lugol chromoendoscopy after NBI marking were more reliable, we evaluated the presence of cancer in the iodine-unstained area outside the NBI-determined marks, i.e., the cancerous area missed by NBI. The presence of cancer in the iodine-stained areas inside the NBI-determined marks, i.e., the cancerous area missed by Lugol, was also evaluated. These were compared to assess the risk of residual cancer in endoscopic resection with NBI and Lugol chromoendoscopy. Among 304 lesions, 2 (0.7%) residual cancers were detected. The cancerous area missed by NBI and the cancerous area missed by Lugol were identified in 18 (6%) and 43 (14%) lesions, respectively (P = 0.001). NBI might be acceptable for delineating the extent of esophageal SCCs that are difficult to delineate with Lugol chromoendoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM Occasionally, colorectal tumors without characteristics of deep submucosal invasion are found to be invasive upon pathological evaluation after endoscopic resection (ER). Because the resection depth for underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has not been clarified, we evaluated the feasibility of UEMR for pathologically invasive colorectal cancer (pT1-CRC). METHODS We retrospectively investigated data on the backgrounds and outcomes of patients with pT1-CRC who underwent UEMR between January 2014 and June 2019 at our institute. As a reference standard, the backgrounds and outcomes of pT1-CRCs that had undergone conventional EMR (CEMR) were also investigated. RESULTS Thirty-one patients (median age, 68 years [range, 32-88 years]; 22 men [71%]) were treated with UEMR. Median lesion size was 17 mm (range, 6-50 mm). The endoscopic complete resection rate was 100%. The overall en bloc resection rate was 77%, and the VM0, HM0, and R0 resection rates were 81%, 58%, and 55%, respectively. In cases of pT1a (invasion

Previous guidelines have not described clear recommendations for performing endoscopic resection (ER) of T1a-muscularis mucosa (MM)/T1b-submucosal (SM1) cancers that have invaded ≤ 200 μm because these are considered to have a non-negligible risk of metastasis based on previous analyses of pathologically diagnosed (p)MM/SM1 cancers. Considering that the indication for ER is determined based on a clinical diagnosis, the applicability of ER should be investigated in clinical (c)MM/SM1 but not pMM/SM1 cancers. This study aimed to evaluate validity of ER for cMM/SM1 cancers.In total, 175 cMM/SM1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cases that were endoscopically or surgically resected between January 2008 and December 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. We histologically evaluated resected specimens and divided them into low- (n = 92) and high-risk (n = 83) cancers for metastasis.Univariate analysis showed that longer tumor length and larger circumferential extent were significantly correlated with high-risk cancer (P 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor circumference was an independent predictor of high-risk cancer (P = 0.036). The proportion of low-risk cancers among cases with ≤ 3/4, 3/4 and 1, and whole circumferential extent were 59, 17, and 14%, respectively, and the post-ER stricture rates of these groups were 12, 33, and 100%, respectively.ER is the first-line treatment for cMM/SM1 cancers with ≤ 3/4 circumferential extent considering that 59% of cMM/SM1 cancers were low-risk cancers for which ER is mostly curative. ER is not recommended for whole circumferential cMM/SM1 cancers given the low proportion of low-risk cancers and the high risk of stricture after ER.

Background and aims We investigated endoscopic findings of the soft palatal mucosa to identify factors associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods This study was conducted during endoscopic examinations of subjects at Osaka International Cancer Institute from January 2020 through May 2020. We took endoscopic images of the soft palate under non-magnifying and mild-magnifying observations. Subjects with ESCC or a history of ESCC were defined as the ESCC group. Two endoscopists who were blinded to subjects' clinical information interpreted ten endoscopic findings: melanosis, brownish changes, whitish epithelium, vasodilation, circular alignment of dilated vessels, uneven surface, uneven epithelial color, uneven vessel visibility, palate ridge, and erosion. Subjects were interviewed about their alcohol use, smoking, and flushing reactions. Results Two hundred eighty-two subjects, including 151 in the ESCC group and 131 in the non-ESCC group, were included in the analysis. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that melanosis, whitish epithelium, and vasodilation were significantly associated with ESCC. The positive likelihood ratios (PLRs) of melanosis, whitish epithelium, and vasodilation were 3.3, 4.2, and 2.8, respectively. Additionally, the PLRs for three of the endoscopic findings in subjects with drinking and smoking habits were higher than in those without these habits; PLRs ranging from 7.23 to 19.1. High PLRs for three endoscopic findings suggested a high possibility of ESCC. Interobserver agreement was substantial for whitish epithelium, moderate for melanosis, and fair for vasodilation. Conclusions Three endoscopic findings in soft palate were considered to be useful as alarming signs that indicate ESCC risk.

Inactivated alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) are related to esophageal carcinogenesis. We aimed to clarify the clinical features associated with the alcohol-degrading enzyme genotypes, ADH1B and ALDH2. We also investigated the risk factors for metachronous esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and head and neck SCC (HNSCC).We conducted a single-center, retrospective study including patients with ESCC treated by endoscopic resection. Patients were recruited between October 2020 and September 2021. Buccal mucosal swabs were obtained from them to analyze the genetic polymorphisms affecting ADH (ADH1B) and ALDH (ALDH2) activity. Patients were categorized into three groups: both inactivated = double-inactivated group; inactivated ADH1B or ALDH2 = single-inactivated group; and both activated = activated group.Among the 297 enrolled patients, patients in the double-inactivated group were significantly younger (P 0.001) and 60% of them were ≤ 50 years old. This group also had more ESCCs located in the upper esophagus (P 0.001) and more simultaneous multiple ESCCs (P = 0.044). More than half of the patients had multiple Lugol-voiding lesions (LVLs) (P 0.001) and heavy alcohol consumers (P = 0.012). Metachronous ESCC and HNSCC were more common in the double-inactivated group (P 0.001, P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified located in the upper esophagus, multiple LVLs and history of HNSCC as risk factors for metachronous ESCC.Activation patterns of alcohol-metabolizing enzymes were related to age at ESCC onset, lesion location, and metachronous ESCC and HNSCC. Different approaches to the prophylaxis and treatment of esophageal cancer should be considered, depending on the enzyme activity pattern.

With the population aging, the incidence of early gastric cancer (EGC) is increasing. We aimed to clarify the indications for endoscopic resection (ER) in late-elderly patients with EGC in terms of life expectancy.Patients aged ≥75 years who underwent ER for EGC at our institution from January 2007 to December 2012 were enrolled. Clinical data, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), Charlson comorbidity index, and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), were collected at the time of ER. Overall survival (OS) was the main outcome measure.Four hundred consecutive patients were enrolled. Mean patient age was 79.3 years (range, 75-93). The 5-year follow-up rate was 89.0% (median follow-up period, 5.6 years). Five-year OS was 80.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.4-84.4), and 5-year net survival standardized for age, sex, and calendar year was 1.09 (95% CI, 1.03-1.15). With a multivariate analysis, ECOG-PS 2 to 4 (hazard ratio, 8.84; 95% CI, 3.07-25.4), PNI 49.1 (hazard ratio, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.53-4.06), and eCura C-2 (hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.11-2.88) were independent prognostic factors. When none of these factors was met, the 5-year OS rate was 90.4% (95% CI, 84.0-94.3).ER for EGC in late-elderly patients may improve life expectancy. ER is recommended in patients with a good ECOG-PS and PNI and in whom ER is expected to be non-eCura C-2.

OBJECTIVES Endoscopic resection (ER) is a minimally invasive treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, stricture may develop after ER for widespread lesions. Application of ER is justified if these cancers are pathological T1a-epithelial/lamina propria (pEP/LPM) cancers that can be cured by ER. We conducted a study to clarify the association between pathological invasion depth and lesion size or circumference in clinical (c) EP/LPM cancers. METHODS From our database, we identified patients diagnosed with cEP/LPM ESCC via endoscopic examination who underwent endoscopic or surgical tumor resection. The accuracy of the cEP/LPM ESCC diagnosis was determined by histologically diagnosing cancer invasion depth as a reference standard. RESULTS Between January 2015 and December 2019, 1271 cancer patients were diagnosed with cEP/LPM ESCC, of which 1195 (94.0%) were correctly diagnosed with pEP/LPM cancer. The positive predictive value (PPV) classified according to lesion sizes of ≤25, 26-49, and ≥50 mm was 95.8% (981/1024 lesions), 89.7% (191/213 lesions), and 67.6% (23/34 lesions), respectively. PPV according to the circumferential extent of

Objectives Hypopharyngeal cancer is typically detected at a late stage by ear, nose, and throat (ENT) physicians, when the prognosis is poor. We evaluated how hypopharyngeal cancer (Tis, T1 and T2) were detected by ENT physicians and gastrointestinal endoscopists (GEs) according to the detection reasons. Materials and Methods A total of 109 consecutive patients with hypopharyngeal cancer (Tis, T1 and T2) who received treatment in our institution from January 2014 to February 2018 was enrolled. The detection detail of hypopharyngeal cancer lesions by ENT physicians and GEs, tumor size and location, and the characteristics of the lesions missed by ENT physicians and GEs were reviewed retrospectively. Results Twenty seven and 82 of 109 (24.8% and 75.2%) patients were detected by ENT physicians and GEs, respectively. The most frequent original reasons for ENT physicians and GEs were both pharyngeal discomfort screening and examination of swollen neck lymph nodes (12 of 27, 44.4% for each) and pre-treatment or follow-up screening for esophageal cancer (25 of 82, 30.5%), respectively. Among the 13 cases of upper gastrointestinal tract screening of the head-and-neck cancer other than pharyngeal cancer detected by GEs, 11 (84.6%) were missed by ENT physicians. In contrast, among the 25 cases of pre-treatment screening of the esophageal cancer detected by GEs, 12 (48%) were missed by other GEs just before the consultation from other institutions. Conclusions The percentage of detection of hypopharyngeal cancer (especially, Tis and T1) by ENT physicians is low. A careful examination of the pharynx should be conducted by GEs.

Background:Previous reports have shown favorable performance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems for diagnosing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) compared with endoscopists. However, these findings don’t reflect performance in clinical situations, as endoscopists classify lesions based on both magnified and non-magnified videos, while AI systems often use only a few magnified narrow band imaging (NBI) still images. We evaluated the performance of the AI system in simulated clinical situations.Methods:We used 25,048 images from 1,433 superficial ESCC and 4,746 images from 410 noncancerous esophagi to construct our AI system. For the validation dataset, we took NBI videos of suspected superficial ESCCs. The AI system diagnosis used one magnified still image taken from each video, while 19 endoscopists used whole videos. Results:We used 147 datasets including 83 superficial ESCC and 64 non-ESCC lesions. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for the classification of ESCC were, respectively, 80.9%, 85.5%, and 75.0% for the AI system and 69.2%, 67.5%, and 71.5% for the endoscopists. The AI system correctly classified all ESCCs invading the muscularis mucosa or submucosa and 96.8% of lesions ≥ 20 mm, whereas even the experts misdiagnosed some of them.Conclusions:Our AI system showed higher diagnostic ability for classifying ESCC and non-ESCC than endoscopists. It may provide valuable diagnostic support to endoscopists.

The association between severe adverse events (SAEs) and prior radiotherapy or stent type remains controversial. Patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junctional cancer who underwent stent placement (2005–2019) were enrolled in this retrospective study conducted at a tertiary cancer institute in Japan. The exclusion criteria were follow-up period of

Objectives Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have shown favorable performance in the detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, previous studies were limited by the quality of their validation methods. In this study, we evaluated the performance of an AI system with videos simulating situations in which ESCC has been overlooked. Methods We used 17,336 images from 1376 superficial ESCCs and 1461 images from 196 noncancerous and normal esophagi to construct the AI system. To record validation videos, the endoscope was passed through the esophagus at a constant speed without focusing on the lesion to simulate situations in which ESCC has been missed. Validation videos were evaluated by the AI system and 21 endoscopists. Results We prepared 100 video datasets, including 50 superficial ESCCs, 22 noncancerous lesions, and 28 normal esophagi. The AI system had sensitivity of 85.7% (54 of 63 ESCCs) and specificity of 40%. Initial evaluation by endoscopists conducted with plain video (without AI support) had average sensitivity of 75.0% (47.3 of 63 ESCC) and specificity of 91.4%. Subsequent evaluation by endoscopists was conducted with AI assistance, which improved their sensitivity to 77.7% (P = 0.00696) without changing their specificity (91.6%, P = 0.756). Conclusions Our AI system had high sensitivity for the detection of ESCC. As a support tool, the system has the potential to enhance detection of ESCC without reducing specificity. (UMIN000039645).