Search

There is minimal information on COVID-19 pandemic’s national impact on pediatric neurosurgical operative volumes. In this study, using a national database, TriNetX, we compared the overall and seasonal trends of pediatric neurosurgical procedure volumes in the United States during the pandemic to pre-pandemic periods. In the United States, the incidence of COVID-19 began to rise in September 2020 and reached its maximum peak between December 2020 and January 2021. During this time, there was an inverse relationship between pediatric neurosurgical operative volumes and the incidence of COVID-19 cases. From March 2020 to May 2021, there was a significant decrease in the number of pediatric shunt (-11.7% mean change, p = 0.006), epilepsy (-16.6%, p < 0.001), and neurosurgical trauma (-13.8%, p < 0.001) surgeries compared to pre-pandemic years. The seasonal analysis also yielded a broad decrease in most subcategories in spring 2020 with significant decreases in pediatric spine, epilepsy, and trauma cases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report a national decline in pediatric shunt, epilepsy, and neurosurgical trauma operative volumes during the pandemic. This could be due to fear-related changes in health-seeking behavior as well as underdiagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

To conduct a national registry-based evaluation of the independent associations of chronological age and frailty, as measured by 5- and 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5, mFI-11) score, on postoperative outcomes of participants undergoing cochlear implantation (CI).Cross-sectional analysis.Multicenter national database.Adults 18 years or older who underwent CI during 2001 to 2018.Any postoperative complications (determined as the presence of major, minor, or implant-specific), extended hospital length of stay (eLOS) (≥75th percentile of study population), and nonhome discharge destination.There were 5,130 participants included with a median age of 60 years (interquartile range, 44-73 y) and slight female predominance (53.5%). Under mFI-5 scoring, there were 2,979 (58.1%) robust (mFI-5 = 0), 1710 (33.3%) prefrail (mFI-5 = 1), 362 (7.1%) frail (mFI-5 = 2), and 78 (1.5%) severely frail (mFI-5 ≥ 3) participants. Three hundred twenty-eight (6.49%) participants experienced a postoperative complication, with 320 (6.2%) discharged to a nonhome destination. Multivariate analysis showed no statistically significant correlation between increasing participant age or frailty status and postoperative complications; however, increasing baseline frailty tier showed an independent association with risk of eLOS (severely frail: odds ratio, 4..83; 95% confidence interval, 3.00-7.75; p0.001) and nonhome discharge (severely frail: odds ratio, 6.51; 95% confidence interval, 3.81-11.11; p0.001). The mFI-11 showed very similar trends.Among those evaluated, this study demonstrates that CI is a low-risk procedure in participants of all ages. Increasing frailty does not predispose to postoperative complications. However, frail patients are at additional risk for an eLOS and nonhome discharge. Short follow-up time, hospital-coding errors, and selection bias of more robust patients may limit the true results of this study.

With limited healthcare resources and risks associated with unwarranted interhospital transfers (IHT), it is important to select patients most likely to have improved outcomes with IHT. The present study analyzed the effect of IHT and frailty on postoperative outcomes in a large database of patients who underwent cranial neurosurgical operations.The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent cranial neurosurgical procedures (2015-2019, N = 47,736). Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcome variables were compared between IHT and n-IHT patients. Univariate and multivariable analyses analyzed the effect of IHT status on postoperative outcomes and the utility of frailty (modified frailty index-5 [mFI-5] stratified into "pre-frail, "frail", and "severely frail") as a preoperative risk factor. Effect sizes from regression analyses were presented as odds ratio (OR) with associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).Of 47,736 patients with cranial neurosurgical operations, 9612 (20.1%) were IHT. Patients with IHT were older, frailer, with a higher rate of functional dependence. In multivariable analysis adjusted for baseline covariates, IHT status was independent associated with 30-day mortality (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.2-3.6), major complication (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.1), extended hospital length of stay (eLOS) (OR: 3.8, 95% CI: 3.6-4.1), and non-routine discharge disposition (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.8-3.2) (all p 0.05). Within the IHT cohort, increasing frailty ("pre-frail", "frail", "severely frail") was independently associated with increasing odds of 30-day mortality (OR: 1.4, 1.9, 3.9), major complication (OR: 1.4, 1.9, 3.3), unplanned readmission (OR: 1.1, 1.4, 2.1), reoperation (OR: 1.3, 1.5, 1.9), eLOS (OR: 1.2, 1.3, 1.5), and non-routine discharge (OR: 1.4, 1.9, 4.4) (all p 0.05). All levels of frailty were more strongly associated with postoperative outcomes than chronological age.This novel analysis suggests that patients transferred for cranial neurosurgery operations are significantly more likely to have worse postoperative health outcomes. Furthermore, the analysis suggests that frailty (as measured by mFI-5) is a powerful independent predictor of outcomes in transferred cranial neurosurgery patients. The findings support the use of frailty scoring in the pre-transfer and preoperative setting for patient counseling and risk stratification.

Traumatic brain injury is a significant public health concern often complicated by hospital-acquired infections (HAIs); however, previous evaluations of factors predictive of risk for HAI have generally been single-center analyses or limited to surgical site infections. Frailty assessment has been shown to provide effective risk stratification in neurosurgery. We evaluated whether frailty status or age is more predictive of HAIs and length of stay among neurotrauma patients requiring craniectomy/craniotomy.In this cross-sectional analysis, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2015-2019 dataset was queried to identify neurotrauma patients who underwent craniectomies/craniotomies. The effects of frailty status (using the 5-factor modified frailty index [mFI-5]) and age on occurrence of HAIs and other 30-day adverse events were compared using univariate analysis. The discriminative ability of each measure was defined by multivariate modeling.Of 3284 patients identified, 1172 (35.7%) contracted an HAI postoperatively. Increasing frailty score predicted increased HAI risk (odds ratio [OR] = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-1.77, P = 0.022 for mFI-5 = 1 and OR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.30-3.11, P = 0.002 for mFI-5≥3), whereas increasing age did not (OR = 0.996, 95% CI = 0.989-1.002, P = 0.009). Median length of stay was significantly longer in patients with HAI (16 days [IQR = 9-23]) versus no HAI (7 days [IQR = 4-13]) (P0.001). Median daily costs on the ward and neuro-intensive care unit were higher with HAI than with no HAI (neuro-ICU: $111,818.08 [IQR = 46,418.05-189,947.34] vs. $48,920.41 [IQR = 20,185.20-107,712.54], P0.001).Increasing mFI-5 correlated with increased HAI risk. Neurotrauma patients who developed an HAI after craniectomy/craniotomy had longer hospitalizations and higher care costs. Frailty scoring improves risk stratification among these patients and may assist in reducing total hospital length of stay and total accrued costs to patients.

Increasing patient age has been associated with worse outcomes after pituitary adenoma resection in previous studies, but the prognostic value of frailty compared with advancing age on pituitary adenoma resection outcomes has not been clearly evaluated.The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2015 to 2019 was queried for data for patients aged18 years who underwent pituitary adenoma resection (n = 1454 identified patients). Univariate and multivariate analyses of age and frailty (5-factor modified frailty index [mFI-5]) were performed on 30-day mortality, major complications, extended length of stay (eLOS), discharge destination, and readmission and reoperation. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to compare effect of age and mFI-5.On univariate analysis, increasing frailty was significantly associated with greater risk of unplanned readmission (frail: odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.2; severely frail: OR, 6.9; 95% CI, 2.4-19.8) and a major complication (frail: OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.1-6.1). Severe frailty was also associated with nonhome discharge (OR, 10.6; 95% CI, 3.2-35.8) and eLOS (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.5-13.4). Increasing age was not associated with any of these outcome measures. Multivariate analysis also demonstrated similar trends. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the mFI-5 score showed higher discrimination for major complications compared with age (area under the curve: 0.624 vs. 0.503; P0.001).Increasing frailty, and not advancing age, was an independent predictor for major complications, unplanned readmissions, eLOS, and nonhome discharge after pituitary adenoma resection, suggesting frailty to be superior to age in preoperative risk stratification in this patient population.

Neurosurgery residents spend a significant amount of their time teaching patients, families, students, residents, and other health professionals. To help ensure competence in their residents’ teaching abilities, many specialties have established formal residents-as-teachers (RAT) curricula; however, such formalized curricula are often lacking in neurosurgery programs. The authors’ goal was to develop and implement a formal RAT curriculum, designed with neurosurgery residents’ other responsibilities in mind, to improve residents’ formal and informal teaching abilities. Here, the authors report on the design of a formalized teaching curriculum tailored for the needs of neurosurgical residents, with a focus on deliberate practice and minimal time needed for preparation. The curriculum, designed using Kern’s 6 steps of curriculum design as a framework, comprises 5 lecture series spread over 3 years, repeated twice through a resident’s training, with each lecture series outlined with its respective topics and objectives. Opportunities for observed teaching as well as informal and formal evaluation will be provided to residents. The program will be evaluated on a yearly basis using direct and anonymized resident feedback on the RAT curriculum. Measures of program success will also include pre- and postprogram medical student and peer evaluation of residents. These data will be used for continual improvement of the curriculum as it is implemented. Successes and shortcomings of this program will be disseminated by publication, presentations, and placement on the authors’ department website and social media. This paper may serve as a foundation for other neurosurgical programs to develop RAT curricula for greater enhancement of resident teaching abilities.