Search

To evaluate the efficacy of the combined drug furamag (furasidine potassium and magnesium hydroxycarbonate) in combination with the third-generation cephalosporin cefotaxime versus cephalosporin monotherapy for nosocomial urinary tract infections (NUTI).The randomized open-label comparative parallel group clinical trial enrolled 52 male and female patients aged over 18 years with a documented diagnosis of NUTI. Group 1 (a study group) took oral furamag 300 mg/day in combination with intravenous cefotaxime 6 g/day; Group 2 (a control group) received cefotaxime monotherapy. The duration of therapy in both groups was 7 to 10 days until the efficiency levels were achieved.A final efficiency analysis was made in 24 and 25 patients from Groups 1 and 2 who had different forms of NUTI (catheter-associated NUTI, cystitis, pyelonephritis). On day 3 of treatment, most patients were noted to have a decreased systemic inflammatory response; lower C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels being in the study group patients. The clinical efficiency of antibacterial therapy, which had been evaluated both immediately after treatment termination and during further control, did not substantially differ in the furamag/cefotaxime combination and control groups although there was an obvious tendency towards the more marked effect of combined therapy 7-14 days after treatment (11.8% efficiency differences; p0.05). Analysis of bacteriological efficacy revealed its most pronounced and clinically significant differences between the groups: the cefotaxime/furamag combination led to higher pathogen eradication in all follow-up periods: after 3 days of treatment (82.6%) and following a complete therapy cycle (95.8%) versus the cefotaxime monotherapy group (43.5 and 70.8%, respectively; p0.01). Microbiological results showed that the major NUTI pathogens (Escherichia coli, enterococci) were more susceptible to potassium furasidine (furamag) versus cefotaxime. The in vitro higher activity of furamag versus cefotaxime was attended by the significantly higher eradication of one of the two important NUTI pathogens - Enterococcus faecalis.Furamag used in combination with the third-generation cephalosporin cefotaxime showed a higher bacteriological efficacy and a rapider reduction in the symptoms of a systemic inflammatory response in patients with NUTI. On the basis of the findings, the above combination of furamag and cefotaxime may be recommended as first-line therapy for NUTI when multidrug- resistant nosocomial infection pathogens are widely distributed now.

Moxifloxacin efficacy was studied in a prospective open controlled incomparable surveillance of 22 patients at the age of 24 to 78 years (the average of 56.6 +/- 15.9 years old) with extended secondary peritonitis that developed before the hospitalization or not later than 48 hours after the hospitalization. Moxifloxacin (Avelox) was used in a dose of 400 mg every 24 hours at first intravenously as infusions and then orally in the same dose. The abdominal infection was severe (APACHE II of 6 to 12, the average of 8.0 +/- 2.2), in 6 (27.3%) patients signs of severe sepsis with polyorganic insufficiency were observed. The intravenous therapy was used for 3 to 7 days (the average of 3.91 +/- 0.92 days) and the oral therapy was used for 2 to 7 days (the average of 4.50 + 1.37 days). The total time of the treatment was 7 to 12 days (the average of 8.45 +/- 1.53 days). The recovery was recorded in 20 out of the 22 patients (90.9%), disappearance of the main signs of peritonitis being observed within 3-5 days of the treatment. Before the treatment 34 microbial strains were isolated. The most frequent pathogens were E.coli (35.4%) and Enterococcus faecalis (20.6%). In the etiological structure of the community-acquired peritonitis gramnegative enterobacteria prevailed (65%). All the isolates (except 1 strain of E. faecalis) were susceptible to moxifloxacin. The pathogen eradication was stated in 17 out of 18 patients (94.4%). Moderate adverse reactions were observed in 3 patients. Moxifloxacin evidently showed high clinical and bacteriological efficacies in the hospitalized patients with complicated intraabdominal infection including severe abdominal sepsis with the syndrome of polyorganic insufficiency. It can be used for monotherapy of patients with secondary extended peritonitis.

The leading pathogens of severe infections in intensive care units were the following: respiratory tract infections--bacteria of the famility of Enterobacteriaceae (33.8%), Pseudomonas spp. (24.9%), Acinetobacter spp. (18.1%), Staphylococcus aureus (16.0%), blood flow infections--coagulase negative staphylococci (33.6%), S. aureus (26.1%), Enterobacteriaceae (17.6%), wound infections--Enterobacteriaceae (35.7%), coagulase negative staphyloccocci (17.8%), Pseudomonas spp. (14.3%). As for various species of Enterobacteriaceae, susceptibility was preserved in 91-100% of the isolates to meropenem, in 72-100% to cefoperazone/sulbactam, in 51-65% to cefepime, in 72-86% to amikacin, and in less than 50% to cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. As for P.aeruginosa, 28% of the isolates was resistant to all the antibacterials, except polymyxin. The highest susceptibility to cefoperazone/sulbactam and meropenem was revealed in the isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Oxacillin resistance was detected in 64.9% of the S.aureus isolates. The oxacillin resistance as a rule was associated with resistance to macrolides, aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones. As for coagulase negative staphylococci, oxacillin resistance was stated in 75.6% of the isolates. All the isolates of the Staphylococcus spp. preserved their susceptibility to vancomycin and linezolid.

During the 6-year observation period from 1998 to 2003 in Moscow there was recorded in 2000-2001 a decrease in the emergence of Streptococcos pneumoniae resistance to many antibacterials, while during the following years the respective index increased. The above dynamics in the resistance emergence was likely due to a decrease in the use of antibiotics in 1998-1999. In 2003 the rate of resistance to penicillin was 18.6%, 0.4 and 2.1% of the isolates were resistant to amoxicillin and cefotaxime respectively, the rate of resistance to erythromycin reached 19%, 65.4% of the resistant strains showed M phenotype. High rates of resistance were as well observed with respect to tetracycline (40.1%), co-trimoxazole (29.1%) and chloramphenicol (18.6%). Resistance to levofloxacin and moxifloxacin was detected only in rare strains.

The action of mupirocin as a nasal ointment (Bactroban) was studied on intranasal carriers of the hospital staphylococcal strains. The study included 37 medical workers from different and mainly problem units of the large general hospital. The tolerability of the ointment was good. After the Bactroban use no complications of the patients were recorded. The efficacy of Bacroban by the microbiological criteria in total amounted to 100 per cent. The eradication of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was observed in 93 per cent of the cases. A decrease of the level of the nasal passages dissemination by MRSA and methicillin resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRSC) up to such low titers as 100 and 90 per cent was stated. No difference in the action of Bactroban on MRSA, MSSA and MRSC was noted. The bacteriological monitoring for 3 to 4 months revealed a change of the staphylococcal strains in 94 per cent of the cases, recolonization by the same staphylococcal strain in 19 per cent, recolonization by some another staphylococcal strains in 33 per cent and no recolonization in 14 per cent. A stable decrease of staphylococcal strains was possible with simultaneous Bactroban sanitation of all the bacterial carriers of the hospital or its isolated unit.

Fifteen patients with severe hospital infections such as postoperative pneumonia or intraabdominal sepsis were treated with ofloxacin in a dose of 400 mg once a day for 7 to 14 days (11 days at the average). The drug was administered intravenously for the first 3-5 days and then orally till the end of the treatment course. The clinical effect was observed in 14 patients (93 per cent) and the positive bacteriological effect was stated in 11 out of 13 patients (85 per cent). Before the treatment 18 microbial cultures were isolated from the patients. 94 per cent of them was susceptible to ofloxacin. The isolates of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most frequent. The treatment resulted in the eradication of 15 cultures (83 per cent). The adverse reactions were observed in 3 patients but only in 1 of them they were for certain due to the drug use. All the adverse reactions were insignificant or moderate and did not require the treatment discontinuation. The trials showed that ofloxacin was a highly efficient agent useful in the empirical monotherapy of patients with severe hospital infection.

The efficacy of cefpirome was estimated in the treatment of 12 patients with severe hospital infection in the Municipal Hospital No. 7. The positive clinical effect at the background of the cefpirome use was recorded in 11 patients. The eradication of the primary pathogens was stated in 10 patients. 116 isolates were tested for their susceptibility to cefpirome. 92 per cent of the isolates from outpatients and 79 per cent of the isolates from inpatients proved to be susceptible to the antibiotic. The results of the cefpirome use in the treatment of patients with various infections in 6 hospitals of Moscow were analyzed. The positive clinical effect was observed in 103 out of 111 patients (93 per cent). The eradication of the primary pathogens was recorded in 90 out of 102 patients (88 per cent). In the treatment of the lower respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection and surgical infection the positive clinical results were stated in 91, 95 and 96 per cent of the cases respectively. Insignificant or moderate side effects of the drug were observed in 17 patients. Discontinuation of the drug use because of the side effects was required in 2 of them. The results showed that the use of cefpirome in the monotherapy of various severe hospital infections was efficient and safe.

The comparative study of the fibronectin-binding capacity of S. aureus and S. epidermidis of clinical etiology was carried out. Fibronectin binding was evaluated by original methods: the indirect hemagglutination test and the passive coagglutination test. In this study the occurrence of S. epidermidis isolates, as well as their level (evaluated by the titer) of fibronectin binding, was shown to be lower than those of S. aureus isolates. Fibronectin-binding representatives of S. epidermidis lost this capacity after storage in semiliquid agar at 4 degrees C for 2 months.