Search

Evaluating overall survival in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can often be confounded by bias introduced by treatment switching. SERAPHIN was a large RCT that evaluated the effects of long-term treatment with the endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. In an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, a non-significant decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality up to study closure was reported with macitentan 10 mg versus placebo. As patients could switch treatment when experiencing symptoms of disease progression, this analysis attempts to adjust for the confounding effects on overall survival.The inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) and rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) models were used to estimate the treatment effect on overall mortality had there been no treatment switching in SERAPHIN. Time to all-cause death was evaluated up to study closure. Treatment switching was defined as patients in the placebo group switching to open-label macitentan 10 mg, and patients in the macitentan 10 mg group prematurely discontinuing macitentan.By study closure, 73.2% (183/250) of patients in the placebo group had switched to macitentan 10 mg. Among these patients, exposure time to macitentan 10 mg represented 28.2% of total study treatment exposure (cumulative exposure 134.6 patient-years). At study closure, 24.8% (60/242) of patients in the macitentan 10 mg group were not receiving open-label macitentan; mean time not receiving macitentan was 44.3 weeks. The adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival using the IPCW and RPSFT methods were lower (HR 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22, 0.81; p = 0.009, and HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04, 2.83, respectively) than the ITT unadjusted HR (0.80, 95% CI 0.51, 1.24).These results from the current analyses indicate that in SERAPHIN, the standard ITT analysis was confounded by treatment switching resulting in an underestimation of the benefit of macitentan 10 mg on overall survival. By adjusting for switching, the IPCW and RPSFT models estimated a 58% and 67% reduction in risk of mortality, respectively, with macitentan 10 mg versus placebo.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00660179.

BACKGROUND: Approaches to risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) include the noninvasive French risk assessment approach (number of low-risk criteria based on the European Society of Cardiology and European Respiratory Society guidelines) and Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) 2.0 risk calculator. The prognostic and predictive value of these methods for morbidity/mortality was evaluated in the predominantly prevalent population of GRIPHON, the largest randomized controlled trial in PAH. METHODS: GRIPHON randomized 1,156 patients with PAH to selexipag or placebo. Post-hoc analyses were performed on the primary composite end-point of morbidity/mortality by the number of low-risk criteria (World Health Organization functional class I-II; 6-minute walk distance >440 m; N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide

Background In pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), combination therapy is an important treatment strategy. Although randomized controlled trial data are available to support the combination of two therapies, data regarding triple combination therapy are few. Objective The phase III GRIPHON trial enrolled 1156 patients with PAH, including 376 receiving background double combination therapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of selexipag as a third agent in these patients and further analyzed this subgroup according to symptom burden at baseline as indicated by World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (FC). Methods In this post hoc analysis, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox proportional-hazard models to determine response to selexipag versus placebo on the composite primary endpoint of morbidity/mortality. Baseline characteristics and adverse events were summarized descriptively. Results Of 376 patients receiving background endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE-5i) therapy, 115 had WHO FC II symptoms and 255 had WHO FC III symptoms at baseline. The impact on the primary endpoint of adding selexipag versus placebo to double combination therapy was consistent with the effect in the overall population (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.44–0.90) as well as in patients with WHO FC II and III symptoms. Compared with the overall population, discontinuations due to an adverse event were higher when selexipag was added to background double combination therapy; no safety concerns were identified. Conclusion The addition of selexipag to background double combination therapy with an ERA and PDE-5i provides an incremental benefit similar to that seen in the overall population, including in patients with WHO FC II or III symptoms at baseline. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01106014. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40256-017-0262-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Background: NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide) levels are included in the multiparametric risk assessment approach for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) outlined in PAH guidelines. However, data supporting the use of NT-proBNP risk thresholds in assessing prognosis in PAH are limited. The GRIPHON trial (Prostacyclin [PGI2] Receptor Agonist In Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension) provides an opportunity to assess the prognostic value of NT-proBNP thresholds in a controlled clinical trial and to evaluate the response to selexipag according to these thresholds. Methods: The event-driven GRIPHON trial randomly assigned patients to selexipag or placebo. NT-proBNP was measured at regular intervals in GRIPHON. Here, patients were categorized post hoc into low, medium, and high NT-proBNP subgroups according to 2 independent sets of thresholds: (1) baseline tertiles: 1165 ng/L; and (2) 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines cutoffs: 1400 ng/L. Hazard ratios (selexipag versus placebo) with 95% CIs were calculated for the primary end point (composite morbidity/mortality events) by NT-proBNP category at baseline using Cox proportional-hazards models, and at any time during the exposure period using a time-dependent Cox model. Results: With both thresholds, baseline and follow-up NT-proBNP categories were highly prognostic for future morbidity/mortality events during the study (P

Aims: Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease (CHD-PAH) after defect correction have a poor prognosis compared with other CHD-PAH patients. Therefore, it is important that these patients are treated as early and effectively as possible. Evidence supporting the use of PAH therapies in patients with corrected CHD-PAH from randomised controlled trials is limited. The purpose of these analyses was to characterise the corrected CHD-PAH patients from the GRIPHON study and examine the response to selexipag. Methods and results: Out of the 110 patients diagnosed with corrected CHD-PAH, 55 had atrial septal defects, 38 had ventricular septal defects, 14 had persistent ducti arteriosus, and 3 had defects not further specified. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the primary composite endpoint were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models. Compared with the non-CHD patients from GRIPHON, patients with corrected CHD-PAH were slightly younger, with a greater proportion being treatment-naive and in World Health Organization functional class I/II. The rate of the primary composite endpoint of morbidity/mortality was lower in patients with corrected CHD-PAH who were treated with selexipag compared with those treated with placebo (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.25, 1.37). The most common adverse events were those known to be related to selexipag. Conclusions: These post-hoc analyses of GRIPHON provide valuable information about a large population of patients with corrected CHD-PAH, and suggest that selexipag may delay disease progression and was well-tolerated in patients with corrected CHD-PAH.

Parenteral prostacyclin analogs that target the prostacyclin pathway have been used to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) since the 1990s. Abrupt discontinuation of parenteral prostacyclin analogs can be associated with acute deterioration of PAH. Less is known about temporary interruption of oral therapies that target the prostacyclin pathway, such as selexipag.We evaluated the frequency, duration, reasons, and consequences of temporary selexipag interruptions among PAH patients enrolled in the Prostacyclin (PGIAt least 1 treatment interruption occurred in 111 of 574 patients (19.3%) in the selexipag group and in 58 of 582 (10.0%) in the placebo group. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with and without an interruption. Of the 111 patients in whom selexipag was temporarily interrupted, 94 (85%) were receiving background PAH therapy. Adverse events were the most common reason for selexipag interruption. Selexipag interruptions and reinstitution of treatment were well tolerated. There were no episodes of acute deterioration during treatment interruption.Based on observations from GRIPHON, selexipag interruptions can be expected in clinical practice. However, temporarily interrupting selexipag was well tolerated and manageable.

Introduction: Pemetrexed is an established second-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Everolimus has previously been shown to have some clinical activity when used as a single agent in NSCLC. The aim of this phase I study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of combining pemetrexed with everolimus in patients with NSCLC who had disease progression after one previous treatment. Methods: Patients with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC and one previous chemotherapy regimen were enrolled. A Bayesian dose-escalation model was used to determine the feasible doses of daily or weekly everolimus combined with pemetrexed (500 mg/m 2 q3w). The primary end point was rate of cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary end points included safety, relative dose intensity of pemetrexed, pharmacokinetics, and tumor response. Results: Twenty-four patients received daily everolimus (2.5, 5, 7.5, or 10 mg) and 19 received weekly everolimus (30 or 50 mg) with pemetrexed. Cycle 1 DLTs in the daily regimen included febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, rash/pruritus, and thrombocytopenia; in the weekly regimen, DLTs included neutropenia and stomatitis. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia, dyspnea, and thrombocytopenia. Three partial responses were observed with everolimus 5 mg/d and two with 50 mg/wk. Pharmacokinetics did not suggest an influence of everolimus on pemetrexed parameters; pemetrexed resulted in a minor decrease in everolimus exposure with both daily and weekly regimens. Conclusions: Everolimus 5 mg/d or 50 mg/wk with the standard regimen of pemetrexed are feasible dosages in patients with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC.

NVA237 is a novel, once daily inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist administered via a dry powder inhaler. This study aimed to assess the 24-h bronchodilatory effect following 14 days of treatment with inhaled NVA237 in patients with mild, moderate or severe COPD. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, crossover, multicenter study. A total of 33 patients (≥ 40 years; smoking history of ≥ 10 pack-years) were randomized to receive NVA237 50 μg once daily followed by placebo or placebo followed by NVA237 50 μg for 14 days. Treatment periods were separated by a 7-14 day washout period. The primary variable was the mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) derived from the area under the curve (AUC) between 0 and 24 h post-dose on Day 14. The 24-h FEV(1) profiles showed a consistent bronchodilator effect for NVA237 versus placebo on Day 14. Least square (LS) mean difference in FEV(1) AUC(0-24 h) values between NVA237 and placebo was 163 mL (P < 0.001). There were significant increases in mean FEV(1) AUC(0-12 h) (LS mean difference 165 mL, P = 0.001) and FEV(1) AUC(12-24 h) (161 mL, P < 0.001) versus placebo. NVA237 significantly improved peak FEV(1) (by 208 mL, P < 0.001) and trough FEV(1) (by 154 mL, P = 0.003) versus placebo on Day 14. NVA237 was well tolerated; all adverse events were mild or moderate in intensity and not related to study drug. NVA237 50 μg once daily was well tolerated and showed significant and sustained 24-h bronchodilation in patients with COPD.

Purpose: To evaluate the activity of imatinib in treating advanced, life-threatening malignancies expressing one or more imatinib-sensitive tyrosine kinases. Experimental Design: This was a phase II, open-label, single arm study. Patients ≥15 years old with malignancies showing histologic or molecular evidence of expression/activation of imatinib-sensitive tyrosine kinases were enrolled. Patients were treated with 400 or 800 mg/d imatinib for hematologic malignancy and solid tumors, respectively. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to identify evidence of imatinib activity with tumor response as the primary end point. Results: One hundred eighty-six patients with 40 different malignancies were enrolled (78.5% solid tumors, 21.5% hematologic malignancies). Confirmed response occurred in 8.9% of solid tumor patients (4 complete, 9 partial) and 27.5% of hematologic malignancy patients (8 complete, 3 partial). Notable activity of imatinib was observed in only five tumor types (aggressive fibromatosis, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, hypereosinophilic syndrome, myeloproliferative disorders, and systemic mastocytosis). A total of 106 tumors were screened for activating mutations: five KIT mutations and no platelet-derived growth factor receptor mutations were found. One patient with systemic mastocytosis and a partial response to therapy had a novel imatinib-sensitive KIT mutation (D816T). There was no clear relationship between expression or activation of wild-type imatinib-sensitive tyrosine kinases and clinical response. Conclusion: Clinical benefit was largely confined to diseases with known genomic mechanisms of activation of imatinib target kinases. Our results indicate an important role for molecular characterization of tumors to identify patients likely to benefit from imatinib treatment.

Patients with connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH-CTD) have a poor prognosis compared with other aetiologies. The underlying CTD can influence treatment response and outcomes. We characterised the GRIPHON study PAH-CTD subgroup and evaluated response to selexipag. Of 334 patients with PAH-CTD, PAH was associated with systemic sclerosis (PAH-SSc) in 170, systemic lupus erythematosus (PAH-SLE) in 82 and mixed CTD/CTD-other in 82. For the primary composite endpoint of morbidity/mortality, hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models. Compared with the overall GRIPHON population, the CTD subgroup was slightly older with a greater proportion of females and shorter time since diagnosis. Patients with PAH-SSc appeared to be more impaired at baseline, with a more progressive disease course. The converse was observed for PAH-SLE. Selexipag reduced the risk of composite morbidity/mortality events in patients with PAH-CTD by 41% (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.41–0.85). Treatment effect was consistent irrespective of baseline PAH therapy or CTD subtype (interaction p=0.87 and 0.89, respectively). Adverse events were predominately prostacyclin-related and known for selexipag treatment. GRIPHON has allowed the comprehensive characterisation of patients with PAH-CTD. Selexipag delayed progression of PAH and was well-tolerated among PAH-CTD patients, including those with PAH-SSc and PAH-SLE., Selexipag delays disease progression and is well tolerated in PAH-CTD, irrespective of subtype or other PAH therapy http://ow.ly/SvIV30cqo9J

In oncology studies with immunotherapies, populations of "super-responders" (patients in whom the treatment works particularly well) are often suspected to be related to biomarkers. In this paper, we explore various ways of confirmatory statistical hypothesis testing for joint inference on the subpopulation of putative "super-responders" and the full study population. A model-based testing framework is proposed, which allows to define, up-front, the strength of evidence required from both full and subpopulations in terms of clinical efficacy. This framework is based on a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with an interaction in combination with multiple comparison procedures. The ease of implementation of this model-based approach is emphasized and details are provided for the practitioner who would like to adopt this approach. The discussion is exemplified by a hypothetical trial that uses an immune-marker in oncology to define the subpopulation and tumor growth as the primary endpoint.

Kai M Beeh,1 Dave Singh,2 Lilla Di Scala,3 Anton Drollmann31insaf Respiratory Research Institute, Wiesbaden, Germany; 2University Of Manchester, Medicines Evaluation Unit, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK; 3Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, SwitzerlandIntroduction: Exercise limitation, dynamic hyperinflation, and exertional dyspnea are key features of symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We assessed the effects of glycopyrronium bromide (NVA237), a once-daily, long-acting muscarinic antagonist, on exercise tolerance in patients with moderate to severe COPD.Methods: Patients were randomized to a cross-over design of once-daily NVA237 50 µg or placebo for 3 weeks, with a 14-day washout. Exercise endurance, inspiratory capacity (IC) during exercise, IC and expiratory volumes from spirometry, plethysmographic lung volumes, leg discomfort and dyspnea under exercise (Borg scales), and transition dyspnea index were measured on Days 1 and 21 of treatment. The primary endpoint was endurance time during a submaximal constant-load cycle ergometry test on Day 21.Results: A total of 108 patients were randomized to different treatment groups (mean age, 60.5 years; mean post-bronchodilator, forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] 57.1% predicted). Ninety-five patients completed the study. On Day 21, a 21% difference in endurance time was observed between patients treated with NVA237 and those treated with placebo (P < 0.001); the effect was also significant from Day 1, with an increase of 10%. Dynamic IC at exercise isotime and trough FEV1 showed significant and clinically relevant improvements from Day 1 of treatment that were maintained throughout the study. This was accompanied by inverse decreases in residual volume and functional residual capacity. NVA237 was superior to placebo (P < 0.05) in decreasing leg discomfort (Borg CR10 scale) on Day 21 and exertional dyspnea on Days 1 and 21 (transition dyspnea index and Borg CR10 scale at isotime). The safety profile of NVA237 was similar to that of the placebo.Conclusion: NVA237 50 µg once daily produced immediate and significant improvement in exercise tolerance from Day 1. This was accompanied by sustained reductions in lung hyperinflation (indicated by sustained and significant improvements in IC at isotime), and meaningful improvements in trough FEV1 and dyspnea. Improvements in exercise endurance increased over time, suggesting that mechanisms beyond improved lung function may be involved in enhanced exercise tolerance. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01154127).Keywords: COPD, dyspnea, FEV1, exercise tolerance, LAMA, NVA237

Autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia (ARH) is a rare disorder, due to complete loss of function of an adaptor protein (ARH protein) required for receptor-mediated hepatic uptake of LDL. ARH is a phenocopy of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) due to mutations in LDL receptor (LDLR) gene; however, previous studies suggested that ARH phenotype is less severe than that of HoFH. To test this hypothesis we compared 42 HoFH and 42 ARH patients. LDLR and ARH genes were analysed by Southern blotting and sequencing. LDLR activity was measured in cultured fibroblasts. In ARH plasma LDL cholestrol (LDL-C) level (14.25+/-2.29 mmol/L) was lower than in receptor-negative HoFH (21.38+/-3.56 mmol/L) but similar to that found in receptor-defective HoFH (15.52+/-2.39 mmol/L). The risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) was 9-fold lower in ARH patients. No ARH patients

The clinical expression of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is highly variable even in patients carrying the same LDL receptor (LDL-R) gene mutation. This variability might be due to environmental factors as well as to modifying genes affecting lipoprotein metabolism. We investigated Apo E (2, 3, 4), MTP (-493G/T), Apo B (-516C/T), Apo A-V (-1131T/C), HL (-514C/T and -250G/A), FABP-2 (A54T), LPL (D9N, N291S, S447X) and ABCA1 (R219K) polymorphisms in 221 unrelated FH index cases and 349 FH relatives with defined LDL-R gene mutations. We found a significant and independent effect of the following polymorphisms on: (i) plasma LDL-C (Apo E, MTP and Apo B); (ii) plasma HDL-C (HL, FABP-2 and LPL S447X); (iii) plasma triglycerides (Apo E and Apo A-V). In subjects with coronary artery disease (CAD+), the prevalence of FABP-2 54TT genotype was higher (16.5% versus 5.2%) and that of ABCA1 219RK and KK genotypes lower (33.0% versus 51.5%) than in subjects with no CAD. Independent predictors of increased risk of CAD were male sex, age, arterial hypertension, LDL-C level and FABP-2 54TT genotype, and of decreased risk the 219RK and KK genotypes of ABCA1. These findings show that several common genetic variants influence the lipid phenotype and the CAD risk in FH heterozygotes.

Purpose To assess the incidence and radiographic and clinical presentation of pneumonitis associated with the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Patients and Methods A retrospective, centralized review of serial computed tomography scans and corresponding clinical data from patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with 10-mg oral once daily everolimus monotherapy in a phase II clinical study was conducted. Serial chest CT scans underwent a consensus read by two radiologists for presence of pneumonitis. These cases were then reviewed with corresponding clinical data by a pulmonologist to assess the suspected causality to everolimus and outcome. Results Twenty-four of 64 patients reviewed were found to have radiographic evidence of pneumonitis. In 16 of these 24 patients, pneumonitis was suspected as either possibly (12) or probably (4) related to everolimus. The most common radiographic manifestations were focal areas of consolidation at the lung bases or ground-glass opacities. Pneumonitis evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3) was grade 1 or 2 in 12 of 16 suspected cases, with 4 patients experiencing higher grades. In most of the patients, pneumonitis remained at the same or lower grade without discontinuation of therapy. Patients with evidence of interstitial lung disease at baseline had an increased risk of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade more than or equal to 3 pneumonitis. Conclusion Within the limitation of this retrospective study, results suggest that a mostly low-grade pneumonitis with a possible or probable relationship to everolimus was relatively frequent, occurring in 25% of evaluated patients. These results suggest a need for monitoring of pulmonary adverse events and the development of guidelines for managing pneumonitis in future studies with everolimus.