1. Refining Patient Selection for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy before Radical Cystectomy
- Author
-
Culp, Stephen H, Dickstein, Rian J, Grossman, H Barton, Pretzsch, Shanna M, Porten, Sima, Daneshmand, Siamak, Cai, Jie, Groshen, Susan, Siefker-Radtke, Arlene, Millikan, Randall E, Czerniak, Bogdan, Navai, Neema, Wszolek, Matthew F, Kamat, Ashish M, and Dinney, Colin PN
- Subjects
Urologic Diseases ,Cancer ,Clinical Research ,4.2 Evaluation of markers and technologies ,Detection ,screening and diagnosis ,Aged ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Carcinoma ,Transitional Cell ,Cystectomy ,Female ,Humans ,Male ,Middle Aged ,Neoadjuvant Therapy ,Neoplasm Staging ,Patient Selection ,Survival Analysis ,Urinary Bladder Neoplasms ,3-D ,3-dimensional ,BC ,CSM ,DSS ,EUA ,HR ,LR ,LVI ,MDACC ,MIBC ,NAC ,OS ,PFS ,RC ,TUR ,USC ,University of Southern California ,University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center ,VH ,bladder cancer ,cause specific mortality ,cystectomy ,disease specific survival ,examination under anesthesia ,high risk ,low risk ,lymphovascular invasion ,muscle invasive bladder cancer ,neoadjuvant chemotherapy ,neoadjuvant therapy ,outcomes assessment ,overall survival ,progression-free survival ,radical cystectomy ,risk ,transurethral resection ,urinary bladder neoplasms ,variant histology - Abstract
PurposeWe evaluated the survival of patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy to confirm the utility of existing clinical tools to identify low risk patients who could be treated with radical cystectomy alone and a high risk group most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Materials and methodsWe identified patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy at our institution between 2000 and 2010. Patients were considered high risk based on the clinical presence of hydroureteronephrosis, cT3b-T4a disease, and/or histological evidence of lymphovascular invasion, micropapillary or neuroendocrine features on transurethral resection. We evaluated survival (disease specific, progression-free and overall) and rate of pathological up staging. An independent cohort of patients from another institution was used to confirm our findings.ResultsWe identified 98 high risk and 199 low risk patients eligible for analysis. High risk patients exhibited decreased 5-year overall survival (47.0% vs 64.8%) and decreased disease specific (64.3% vs 83.5%) and progression-free (62.0% vs 84.1%) survival probabilities compared to low risk patients (p
- Published
- 2014