1. Practice patterns in chronic graft-versus-host disease patient management and patient reported outcome measures across the EBMT allogeneic transplantation network
- Author
-
Vladimir Perovic, Ivan Sabol, Magdalena Grce, Marit Inngjerdingen, Drazen Pulanic, Zinaida Peric, Christophe Peczynski, Emmanuelle Polge, Christian Koenecke, Anne Dickinson, Hildegard Greinix, Grzegorz Basak, Olaf Penack, Angela Scherwath, Anna Barata, Attilio Olivieri, Anita Lawitschka, Patrycja Mensah-Glanowska, Hajnalka Andrikovics, Helene Schoemans, and Daniel Wolff
- Subjects
Graft vs Host Disease / therapy ,ddc:610 ,Transplantation ,Transplantation Conditioning ,Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ,610 Medizin ,cGVHD ,EBMT ,alloHSCT ,Graft vs Host Disease ,Basic Medical Sciences ,Hematology ,Clinical Medical Sciences ,Humans ,Transplantation, Homologous ,Patient Reported Outcome Measures - Abstract
Background Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) is one of the most common life-threatening complications following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Understanding outcome after alloHSCT requires a full evaluation of the patient’s health status, including cGvHD and patient reported outcomes (PROs). In an effort to better understand practice patterns across European countries, a survey was initiated by the Integrated European Network on cGvHD (an EU-funded COST Action CA17138 EUROGRAFT, www.gvhd.eu) and the Transplant Complications Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). This report shares results of the survey, offering a snapshot view of current practice patterns in the context of long-term care of cGvHD patients. Methods Our self-designed 38-item online survey (Supplementary Material) was intended to collect data regarding transplant center characteristics, data registration practices, the use of NIH criteria in clinical routine, biopsies/biomarkers for clinical assessment, cGvHD cell-based therapies, and PROs. The survey used computer adapted testing methods and took ~10 min to complete. All centers participating in the COST Action EUROGRAFT and all EBMT centers performing alloHSCT were invited by email for participation in the survey. Data were collected between July 2019 and July 2020. Appropriate descriptive statistics were used. In case of multiple entries for a single center (n = 4), only the entry from the most senior staff member was included for the analysis. Missing data was reported as such. Findings Center characteristics Survey results are summarized in Table 1. A total of 72 centers out of 424 invited centers from 24 countries responded to the survey, representing ~17% of all alloHSCT centers and 19.6% of all transplanted patients within the EBMT network [1]. The majority of participating alloHSCT centers were from Europe with exception of three centers based in Asia and one in Latin America. Survey responses were mainly submitted by physicians and data managers. Of note, the size of the transplant programs differed between responding (mean ± SD, n = 47 ± 40 transplants/year) vs. non-responding (mean ± SD, n = 39 ± 31 transplants/year) centers (Supplementary Material).
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF