Search

The association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and venous thrombotic disorders is still unclear. We assessed the association between COVID-19 infection-related pneumonia and proximal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) in a cohort of patients admitted to our hospital during the European outbreak in the front line of Cremona, Lombardy. In a single-center cross-sectional study, all patients hospitalized for more than 5 days in Internal Medicine Department with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia received 2-point compressive ultrasound assessment (CUS) of the leg vein system during a single day. Ninety-four percent of patients received enoxaparin as standard pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. The presence of DVT was defined as incompressibility of popliteal or common femoral vein. Out of 121 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (mean age 71.8, 66.3% males) hospitalized on March 31st, 70 stayed in hospital for over 5 days and 66 of them underwent CUS of deep venous system of the legs. The presence of asymptomatic DVT was found in 9 patients (13.6%). No symptomatic DVT was found. Patients with DVT showed mean age = 75.7 years, mean D-dimer levels = 4.02 ng/ml and all of them received enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis, except one. Computed tomography pulmonary angiogram confirmed pulmonary embolism in five patients. One every seven patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia, hospitalized for more than 5 days, had asymptomatic proximal DVT and half of them had confirmed PE despite standard pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. This observational study suggests the need of an active surveillance through CUS in patients hospitalized with acute SARS-COV-2 and underline the need of a more intense thromboprophylaxis.

Aim Mortality is high in Coronavirus disease 2019 patients with pre-existing comorbidities and advanced age. Associated complications have added to the negative prognosis. Nevertheless, many have fully recovered, even among the most fragile. Factors associated with their survival was investigated. Methods Retrospective study of patients aged ≥90 years admitted for COVID-19 to the Internal Medicine wards of two hospitals in Lombardy, Italy. Results Among 34 patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, 33 (97.1%) had respiratory failure. Eighteen patients (52.9%) survived and 16 (47.1%) died during hospital stay. Survivors compared to deceased had a significantly longer hospitalization (19 vs. 10 days respectively; p = 0.02), a better PaO2:FiO2 ratio (241 vs. 171 respectively; p = 0.003), higher lymphocyte counts (p = 0.01) and lower serum LDH levels (p, Highlights • Advanced age and comorbidities are associated to worst outcome in Covid-19. • Treatment with low molecular weight heparin improves in-hospital survival. • Beta-blockers might have a protective role in Covid-19, however, more insight is needed. • A focused supportive care to prevent thrombotic and arrhythmic complications related to Covid-19 could result in a better clinical course.

Highlights • Canakinumab is an IL-1β antibody that neutralizes the activity of IL-1β. • The effects of canakinumab in patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia were studied. • 33 patients received canakinumab and 15 received institutional standard of care. • Treatment with canakinumab rapidly restored normal oxygen status. • Canakinumab was also associated with favorable prognosis versus SoC., Objectives Canakinumab is an IL-1β antibody that neutralizes the activity of IL-1β. We studied the efficacy and safety of canakinumab in patients with moderate COVID-19-related pneumonia. Design The aim of our study was to evaluate the reduction in duration of hospitalization with adequate oxygen status. Forty-eight patients with moderate COVID-19-related pneumonia were asked to participate in the prospective case-control study; 33 patients (Cases) signed informed consent and received canakinumab (Cohort 1); 15 patients (Controls) refused to receive the experimental drug and received institutional standard of care (SoC), (Cohort 2). Results Hospital discharge within 21 days was seen in 63% of patients in Cohort 1 vs. 0% in Cohort 2 (median 14 vs 26 days, respectively; p

Background Antiviral drugs are administered in patients with severe COVID‐19 respiratory syndrome, including those treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Concomitant administration of antiviral agents has the potential to increase their plasma concentration. A series of patients managed in the Cremona Thrombosis Center were admitted at Cremona Hospital for SARS‐CoV‐2 and started antiviral drugs without stopping DOAC therapy. DOAC plasma levels were measured in hospital and results compared with those recorded before hospitalization. Methods All consecutive patients on DOACs were candidates for administration of antiviral agents (lopinavir, ritonavir, or darunavir). Plasma samples for DOAC measurement were collected 2to 4 days after starting antiviral treatment, at 12 hours from the last dose intake in patients on dabigatran and apixaban, and at 24 hours in those on rivaroxaban and edoxaban. For each patient, C‐trough DOAC level, expressed as ng/mL, was compared with the one measured before hospitalization. Results Of the 1039 patients hospitalized between February 22 and March 15, 2020 with COVID‐19 pneumonia and candidates for antiviral therapy, 32 were on treatment with a DOAC. DOAC was stopped in 20 and continued in the remaining 12. On average, C‐trough levels were 6.14 times higher during hospitalization than in the pre‐hospitalization period. Conclusion DOAC patients treated with antiviral drugs show an alarming increase in DOAC plasma levels. In order to prevent bleeding complications, we believe that physicians should consider withholding DOACs from patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 and replacing them with alternative parenteral antithrombotic strategies for as long as antiviral agents are deemed necessary and until discharge.

Chest radiography is universally accepted as the method of choice to confirm correct positioning of a nasogastric tube (NGT). Considering also that radiation exposure could increase with multiple insertions in a single patient, bedside abdominal ultrasound (BAU) may be a potentially useful alternative to chest radiography in the management of NGTs.What is the accuracy of BAU in confirming the correct positioning of an NGT?After a specific course consisting of 10 h of training, the authors studied, in a prospective multicenter cohort, the validity of BAU to confirm correct NGT placement. All patients were also evaluated by auscultation (whoosh test) and by chest radiography. Every involved operator was blind to each other. Interobserver agreement and accuracy analyses were calculated.This study evaluated 606 consecutive inpatients with an indication for NGT insertion. Eighty patients were excluded for protocol violation or incomplete examinations and 526 were analyzed. BAU was positive, negative, and inconclusive in 415 (78.9%), 71 (13.5%), and 40 (7.6%), respectively. The agreement between BAU and chest radiography was excellent. Excluding inconclusive results, BAU had a sensitivity of 99.8% (99.3%-100%), a specificity of 91.0% (88.5%-93.6%), a positive predictive value of 98.3% (97.2%-99.5%), and a negative predictive value of 98.6% (97.6%-99.7%). The accuracy of BAU slightly changed according to the different assignments of the uncertain cases and was improved by the exclusion of patients with an altered level of consciousness.These results suggest that BAU has a good positive predictive value and may confirm the correct placement of NGTs when compared with chest radiography. However, considering its suboptimal specificity, caution is necessary before implementing this technique in clinical practice.

Essentials Ultrasound elastography uses tissue deformation to assess the relative quantification of its elasticity. Compression and duplex ultrasonography may be unable to correctly determine the thrombus age. Ultrasound elastography may be useful to distinguish between acute and chronic deep vein thrombosis. The exact determination of the thrombus age could have both therapeutic and prognostic implications. BACKGROUND: Background Ultrasound elastography (UE) imaging is a novel sonographic technique that is commonly employed for relative quantification of tissue elasticity. Its applicability to venous thromboembolic events has not yet been fully established; in particular, it is unclear whether this technique may be useful in determining the age of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the role of UE in distinguishing acute from chronic DVT. Methods Consecutive patients with a first unprovoked acute and chronic (3 months old) DVT of the lower limbs were analyzed. Patients with recurrent DVT or with a suspected recurrence were excluded. The mean elasticity index (EI) values of acute and chronic popliteal and femoral vein thrombosis were compared. The accuracy of the EI in distinguishing acute from chronic DVT was also assessed by measuring the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios. Results One-hundred and forty-nine patients (mean age 63.9 years, standard deviation 13.6; 73 males) with acute and chronic DVT were included. The mean EI of acute femoral DVT was higher than that of chronic femoral DVT (5.09 versus 2.46), and the mean EI of acute popliteal DVT was higher than that of chronic popliteal DVT (4.96 versus 2.48). An EI value of > 4 resulted in a sensitivity of 98.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 93.3-99.9), a specificity of 99.1% (95% CI 94.8-99.9), a positive predictive value of 91.1% (95% CI 77.9-97.1), a negative predictive value of 98.6% (95% CI 91.3-99.9), a positive likelihood ratio of 13.23 (95% CI 93-653) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.001 (95% CI 0.008-0.05) for acute DVT. Conclusions UE appears to be a promising technique for distinguishing between acute and chronic DVT. Larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm our preliminary findings.

Background and Objectives: The influence of smoking habits on mortality, VTE recurrence, and major bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been consistently evaluated. Materials and Methods: We used data from the RIETE (Registro Enfermedad TromboEmbólica) registry to compare mortality, VTE recurrence, and major bleeding risk in smoking versus non-smoking patients with acute VTE. Results: 50,881 patients (43,426 non-smoking and 7455 smoking patients) were included. After a median follow-up of 8.8 months, 7110 patients died (fatal PE 292 and fatal bleeding 281), 3243 presented VTE recurrence, and 1579 had major bleeding. At multivariate analysis, smoking behavior was associated with a higher hazard of death, (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.19–1.40). The risk of VTE recurrence was marginally increased in smoking patients compared to non-smoking patients (1.14; 95% CI: 1.02–1.27). Major bleeding did not differ in smoking and non-smoking patients (1.15; 95% CI: 0.96–1.38). The presence of cancer did not appear to influence the association between smoking habits and death (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.22–1.47 in cancer patients and HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.45 in non-cancer patients, respectively) Conclusions: the risk of death after an acute episode of VTE appeared to be higher in smoking than in non-smoking patients and this risk is higher between patients presenting PE at the onset of symptoms.

Introduction : Pulmonary embolism (PE) prevalence in acute exacerbations of COPD is highly variable. Methods : To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of PE in patients hospitalized in Departments of Internal Medicine because of AECOPD and suspected PE we conducted a retrospective multicenter study in patients with an AECOPD undergoing chest angio-computed tomography (angio-CT) because of clinical suspect of PE. Results 1043 patients (mean age 75.8 years ± 9.7 years, 34.5 % women) were included; 132 patients had PE (mean prevalence 12.66%, 95% confidence interval 10.73, 14.77%).) confirmed by angio-CT and 54 patients died during hospitalization (5.18 %). At multivariate analysis, age, female gender, clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of deep vein thrombosis, hypertension, PaCO2 ≤ 40 mmHg, and normal chest-x-ray were significantly associated with a higher PE prevalence. Prevalence of PE in patients with 0, 1, 2, 3 or ≥4 risk factors progressively increase from 1.76 to 30.43%. Mean length of hospitalization (LOH) (15.7 vs 14.2 days, p 0.07) and in-hospital mortality (6.1% vs 5.1%, P=0.62) were slightly but not significantly higher in in patients with PE (6.1% vs 5.1%, P=0.62). Conclusions : PE prevalence is not negligible in this setting. A number of risk factors may help clinicians in identification of patients at increased risk of PE.

The influence of morbid obesity on mortality in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for VTE has not been consistently evaluated.Data from the RIETE (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbólica) registry were used to compare the mortality risk during anticoagulation in patients with VTE and morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/mBy September 2018, there were 1,642 patients with VTE and morbid obesity and 14,848 with normal weight in RIETE. Of these, 245 (5.5%) and 1,397 (11.6%), respectively, had cancer. Median duration of anticoagulant therapy was longer in the morbidly obese patients, with cancer (185 vs 114 days) or without cancer (203 vs 177 days). Among cancer patients, 44 (18.0%) morbidly obese and 1,377 (32.8%) patients with normal weight died during anticoagulation. Among those without cancer, 44 (3.1%) morbidly obese died and 601 (5.6%) with normal weight died. On bivariate analysis, morbid obesity was associated with a lower mortality rate, both in patients with cancer (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.25-0.45) and in those without cancer (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.32-0.58). Multivariable analysis confirmed a lower hazard of death in morbidly obese patients with cancer (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.94) and without cancer (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49-0.96). The risk for VTE recurrences or major bleeding did not differ in patients with or without morbid obesity.In patients with VTE, the risk for death during anticoagulation was about one-third lower in morbidly obese patients than in those with normal weight, independently of the presence of cancer.

The decision concerning the introduction of primary and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with solid brain neoplasms and brain metastases is often challenging due to the concomitant increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage and to limited evidence from available literature. A standardized questionnaire composed of nine multiple-choice questions regarding primary VTE prevention in non-surgical patients during high-risk conditions and VTE secondary prevention in patients with a solid brain neoplasm or cerebral metastases was sent via electronic mail to all the members (n = 2420) of the Italian Federation of the Internal Medicine Hospital Executives' Associations (FADOI) in June 2015. Three hundred and fifty two physicians (14.5%) returned it (participants' median age 51 years; females 46.9%). The majority of respondents prescribe primary thromboprophylaxis (usually with heparin) in non-surgical patients with solid brain neoplasms and brain metastases in concomitance with high-risk conditions. Full-dose anticoagulation with either low-molecular-weight heparin or fondaparinux is the preferred option for acute VTE (69.6%), while a reduced dose is chosen by 21.0% of physicians. The presence of a highly vascular brain neoplasm histotype mandates the prescription of a reduced-dose antithrombotic regimen in a minority of respondents. Vena cava filter placement is an option for the treatment of acute VTE in more than 6% of respondents. Anticoagulants are often prescribed for both VTE primary prevention and treatment. In conclusion, physicians' managements are partially in contrast to recent guidelines, reinforcing the need for educational programs and other studies in this setting.

In patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism (VTE), the important issue of anemia influence on the risk of bleeding has not been consistently studied. We used the large registry data RIETE (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad Tromboembolica) to compare the rate of major bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for VTE according to the presence or absence of anemia at baseline. Patients with or without cancer were separately studied. Until August 2016, 63492 patients had been enrolled. Of these, 21652 (34%) had anemia and 14312 (23%) had cancer. Anemia was found in 57% of the patients with cancer and in 28% without (odds ratio 3.46; 95% CI 3.33-3.60). During the course of anticoagulant therapy, 680 patients with cancer had a major bleeding event (gastrointestinal tract 43%, intracranial 14%, hematoma 12%). Cancer patients with anemia had a higher rate of major bleeding (rate ratio [RR]: 2.52; 95% CI 2.14-2.97) and fatal bleeding (RR 2.73; 95% CI 1.95-3.86) than those without anemia. During the course of anticoagulation, 1133 patients without cancer had major bleeding (gastrointestinal tract 32%, hematoma 24%, intracranial 21%). Patients with anemia had a higher rate of major bleeding (RR 2.84; 95% CI 2.52-2.39) and fatal bleeding (RR 2.76; 95% CI 2.07-3.67) than those without. On a multivariable analysis, anemia independently predicted the risk for major bleeding in patients with and without cancer (hazard ratios: 1.66; 95% CI 1.40-1.96 and 1.95; 95% CI 1.72-2.20, respectively). During anticoagulation for VTE, both cancer- and non-cancer anemic patients had a higher risk for major bleeding than those without anemia. In anemic patients (with or without cancer), the rate of major bleeding during the course of anticoagulant therapy exceeded the rate of VTE recurrences. In patients without anemia the rate of major bleeding was lower than the rate of VTE recurrences.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in over-midlife patients. In addition to systolic heart failure, cerebral thromboembolism represents the most dramatic complication of this rhythm disorder, contributing to morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, anticoagulation has been considered the main strategy in preventing stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation patients and vitamin K-dependent antagonists have been widely used in clinical practice. Recently, the development of direct oral anticoagulants has certainly improved the management of this disease, providing, for the first time, the opportunity to go beyond vitamin K-dependent antagonists limits. In the RE-LY trial, dabigatran 150 mg twice daily was superior to warfarin in the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism and dabigatran 110 mg twice daily was noninferior. Both doses greatly reduced hemorrhagic stroke, and dabigatran 110 mg twice daily significantly reduced major bleeding compared with warfarin. Based on these results, dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, was the first direct oral anticoagulant to receive the regulatory approval for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. To date, a specific reversal agent has just been approved as an antidote for this molecule. This review provides a summary of randomized trials, postmarket registries and specific clinical-settings summary on dabigatran in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND Patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limb represent a diagnostic dilemma for general practitioners. Compression ultrasonography (US) is universally recognized as the best test of choice. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of compression US performed by general practitioners given short training in the management of symptomatic proximal DVT. METHODS From May 2014 to May 2016, we evaluated in a multicenter, prospective cohort study all consecutive outpatients with suspected DVT; bilateral proximal lower limb compression US was performed by general practitioners and by physicians expert in vascular US, each group blinded to the other’s findings. In all examinations with a negative or nondiagnostic result, compression US was repeated by the same operator after 5 to 7 days. Inter-observer agreement and accuracy were calculated. RESULTS We enrolled a total of 1,107 patients. The expert physicians diagnosed DVT in 200 patients, corresponding to an overall prevalence of 18.1% (95% CI, 15.8%–20.3%). The agreement between the trained general practitioners and the experts was excellent (Cohen κ = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.84–0.88). Compression US performed by general practitioners had a sensitivity of 90.0% (95% CI, 88.2%–91.8%) and a specificity of 97.1% (95% CI, 96.2%–98.1%) with a diagnostic accuracy for DVT of 95.8% (95% CI, 94.7%–97.0%). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that, even in hands of physicians not expert in vascular US, compression US can be a reliable tool in the diagnosis of DVT. We found that the sensitivity achieved by general practitioners appeared suboptimal, however, so future studies should evaluate the implementation of proper training strategies to maximize skill.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. Routine thromboprophylaxis has been the standard of care over the last 20 years. Currently available options for the prevention of VTE in major orthopedic surgery include low molecular weight heparins, vitamin K antagonists, and, more recently, the synthetic pentasaccharide fondaparinux. Although effective, all these drugs have several limitations and new oral antithrombotics offering predictable, effective and safe anticoagulation are strongly needed. This overview focuses on the most advanced oral direct inhibitors to factor Xa rivaroxaban, apixaban, LY517717 and YM150; specifically, the results of phase II and III studies and the designs of ongoing clinical trials in patients undergoing elective hip and knee replacement are reviewed.

It is well known that a number of patients affected by hemodynamic stable pulmonary embolism are admitted to the emergency department presenting chest pain without further symptoms of pulmonary embolism, such as dyspnea, cough, hemoptysis, syncope, and tachycardia, but in a few cases, the presenting symptoms are even more unusual. The gold standard for pulmonary embolism diagnosis is computed tomography pulmonary angiogram resulting in significant exposure to ionizing radiation and contrast, but recently bedside ultrasound has shown to be useful in diagnosing pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. We describe two cases of pulmonary embolism in young men evaluated in the emergency department for acute pain of the upper abdomen, preliminarily diagnosed as abdominal colic, in which bedside ultrasound ruled out abdominal diseases and showed basal pulmonary abnormalities consistent with infarction, suggesting the need of diagnostic completion with computed tomography pulmonary angiogram. Bedside ultrasound was useful as complementary imaging test in diagnosing pulmonary embolism in young patients admitted for abdominal pain of unknown origin.

Protein C (PC) is a vitamin K-dependent proenzyme with anticoagulant activity, and patients with congenital PC deficiency are at high risk for thrombotic episodes. In patients with PC deficiency, starting treatment with oral anticoagulant drugs is associated with a transient hypercoagulable state and clinically overt thromboembolic complications before reaching a full anticoagulant effect. This report describes a successful supplementation with PC concentrate in two adult patients with moderately severe PC deficiency during the initiation of oral anticoagulation and a course of therapeutic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin for acute venous thromboembolism. Plasma PC levels above 50% were observed in both patients and maintained during the entire supplementation treatment period with PC concentrate until a stable therapeutic anticoagulation level has been reached. These results have been obtained within a short time, thus allowing a safe administration of a loading dose of warfarin. No adverse reactions to the PC concentrate, i.e. skin necrosis and other thromboembolic complications, bleedings or allergic reactions, were observed. We conclude that PC concentrate seems to be effective for the prevention of thromboembolic complications and safe in patients with congenital PC deficiency while initiating oral anticoagulants.

Wake-up stroke (WUS) patients are typically excluded from reperfusion treatment, as the time of symptoms onset is unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome and safety of intravenous thrombolysis with rt-PA in patients with WUS eligible for therapy using computed tomography perfusion criteria (CTP), compared to patients treated with rt-PA within 4.5 h of symptoms onset (non-WUS). This is an experimental, open-label trial, controlled against the best therapy currently in use. Primary endpoints were functional independence after 3 months [modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤ 1] for clinical outcome and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) for safety. Secondary endpoints were no or only mild disability after 3 months (mRS ≤ 2) for clinical outcome, total intracerebral hemorrhage (TICH) and contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) for safety. 170 patients were treated, 143 non-WUS patients and 27 patients with WUS. Strokes of cardioembolic origin were most common in WUS patients (p < 0.001). Primary endpoints: mRS ≤ 1 was found in 35.8 % (non-WUS: 36.4% vs. WUS 33.3%; p = 0.62) and SICH was observed in 3.4 % of non-WUS patients and in WUS patients (p = 0.32). Secondary endpoints: mRS ≤ 2 was observed in 66.4 % of patients (non-WUS: 67.1% vs. WUS 62.9%; p = 0.67), TICH in 13.5 % of patients (13.9 % non-WUS vs. 11.1 % WUS; p = 0.69). CIN was documented in 3.7 % of WUS patients. rt-PA treatment carried out in WUS patients selected on the basis of CTP data demonstrate comparable clinical outcome and safety with respect to non-WUS patients. The study supports the hypothesis that a selected group of WUS patients may be suitable for thrombolysis.

Current guidelines recommend initial treatment with anticoagulants at home in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and in patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) with adequate home circumstances. However, most of the patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) are currently hospitalized regardless of their risk of short-term complications.To assess the proportion of outpatients with acute VTE initially treated in hospitals, to assess the mean duration of hospitalization, and to identify predictors for in-hospital or home treatment.Data of Italian patients enrolled in the RIETE registry from January 2006 to December 2013 were included.Altogether 766 PE and 1,452 isolated DVT were included. Among PE patients, mean PESI score was 84 points (SD 35), and 56% of patients had a low-risk PESI score (85). In all, 53.7% of DVT and 17.0% of PE were entirely treated at home, and 38.2% of DVT patients and 19.9% of PE patients were hospitalized for ≤5 days. On multivariate analysis, low PESI score was not independently associated with the hospitalization of PE patients.One in every two patients with DVT and five in every six with PE are still hospitalized.

Background: The optimal dose of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) after bariatric surgery remains controversial. The aim of this multicentre, open-label, pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different doses of the LMWH parnaparin administered to patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Methods: Patients were randomised to receive 4,250 IU/day (group A) or 6,400 IU/day (group B) of parnaparin s.c. for 7-11 days. Bilateral colour Doppler ultrasound of the lower limb was performed before surgery and at the end of the treatment period. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of asymptomatic and symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic pulmonary embolism and death from any cause during treatment. The primary safety endpoint was major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Results: A total of 258 patients underwent randomization; 8 subjects were excluded following the safety analysis. One hundred thirty-one patients [106 females; mean age, 40.3 years (standard deviation (SD) ±9.6); mean body mass index (BMI), 44.6 kg/m2 (SD ±5.4)] were assigned to group A and 119 patients [93 females; mean age, 41.5 years (SD ±9.9); mean BMI, 44.2 kg/m2 (SD ±5.4)] were assigned to group B. The rate of the primary efficacy outcome was 1.5 % (two cases; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.2-6.0 %) in group A as compared with 0.8 % (one case; 95 % CI, 0.4-5.3 %) in group B (p = ns). The composite incidence of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding was 6.1 % (eight cases; 95 % CI, 2.9-12.1 %) in group A and 5.0 % (six cases; 95 % CI, 2.1-11.1 %) in group B (p = ns). Conclusions: A parnaparin dose of 4,250 IU/day seems suitable for VTE prevention in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. © 2013 The Author(s).

International audience; BACKGROUND: The clinically appropriate duration of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with acute medical illnesses is unknown. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban administered for an extended period, as compared with subcutaneous enoxaparin administered for a standard period, followed by placebo. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients 40 years of age or older who were hospitalized for an acute medical illness to receive subcutaneous enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily, for 10±4 days and oral placebo for 35±4 days or to receive subcutaneous placebo for 10±4 days and oral rivaroxaban, 10 mg once daily, for 35±4 days. The primary efficacy outcomes were the composite of asymptomatic proximal or symptomatic venous thromboembolism up to day 10 (noninferiority test) and up to day 35 (superiority test). The principal safety outcome was the composite of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 8101 patients underwent randomization. A primary efficacy outcome event occurred in 78 of 2938 patients (2.7%) receiving rivaroxaban and 82 of 2993 patients (2.7%) receiving enoxaparin at day 10 (relative risk with rivaroxaban, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.31; P=0.003 for noninferiority) and in 131 of 2967 patients (4.4%) who received rivaroxaban and 175 of 3057 patients (5.7%) who received enoxaparin followed by placebo at day 35 (relative risk, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.96; P=0.02). A principal safety outcome event occurred in 111 of 3997 patients (2.8%) in the rivaroxaban group and 49 of 4001 patients (1.2%) in the enoxaparin group at day 10 (P

Summary. Background: Little information is available on the long-term clinical outcome of cerebral vein thrombosis (CVT). Objectives and methods: In an international, retrospective cohort study, we assessed the long-term rates of mortality, residual disability and recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in a cohort of patients with a first CVT episode. Results: Seven hundred and six patients (73.7% females) with CVT were included. Patients were followed for a total of 3171 patient-years. Median follow-up was 40 months (range 6, 297 months). At the end of follow-up, 20 patients had died (2.8%). The outcome was generally good: 89.1% of patients had a complete recovery (modified Rankin Score [mRS] 0–1) and 3.8% had a partial recovery and were independent (mRS 2). Eighty-four per cent of patients were treated with oral anticoagulants and the mean treatment duration was 12 months. CVT recurred in 31 patients (4.4%), and 46 patients (6.5%) had a VTE in a different site, for an overall incidence of recurrence of 23.6 events per 1000 patient-years (95% confidence Interval [CI] 17.8, 28.7) and of 35.1 events/1000 patient-years (95% CI, 27.7, 44.4) after anticoagulant therapy withdrawal. A previous VTE was the only significant predictor of recurrence at multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 2.70; 95% CI 1.25, 5.83). Conclusions: The long-term risk of mortality and recurrent VTE appears to be low in patients who survived the acute phase of CVT. A previous VTE history independently predicts recurrent events.

SummaryProthrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) are recommended as the treatment of choice in warfarin-related coagulopathy. However, the risk of thromboembolic complications associated with their use is not well defined. We performed a meta-analysis to estimate the rate of thromboembolic complications in patients receiving vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) treated with PCCs for bleeding or before urgent surgery. Medline and Embase databases were searched. Two reviewers performed study selection and extracted data independently. Studies providing data on incidence of thromboembolic complications in VKA-treated patients were eligible for the study. Weighted mean proportion of the rate of thromboembolic complications and the mortality rate were calculated. Twenty-seven studies (1,032 patients) were included. Seven studies used 3-factor, and 20 4-factor PCCs. Twelve patients had a thromboembolic complication (weighted mean 1.4%; 95% CI 0.8–2.1), of which two were fatal. The incidence of thromboembolic events was 1.8% (95% CI 1.0–3.0) in patients treated with 4-factor PCCs, and 0.7% (95% CI 0.0–2.4) in patients treated with 3-factor PCCs. Total mortality rate was 10.6% (95% CI 5.9–16.6). In conclusion, our results suggest there is a low but quantifiable risk of thromboembolism in VKA-treated patients receiving PCCs for anticoagulation reversal. These findings should be confirmed in randomised, controlled trials.

Several epidemiological studies have shown a high prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) complications in patients with acute heart failure; in addition, the level of risk associated with this disease is notable, ranging from 15 to 30%. Three large clinical trials have clearly demonstrated the efficacy and safety of pharmacological prophylaxis in internal medicine patients hospitalized for an acute medical disease; on the contrary, until now there are no studies which have evaluated antithrombotic prophylaxis in a selected population of patients with heart failure only. Moreover, discrepancies existing among recommendations reported in different guidelines may produce uncertainties in the management of VTE prevention in patients with heart failure and may contribute to an underuse of thromboprophylaxis in the daily clinical practice. The aim of this review is to analyze the existing evidence about VTE risk in patients with heart failure as well as the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic prevention, and to underline which are the most important unmet clinical issues for the optimal management of thromboprophylaxis in this particular clinical setting.