Search

The benign esophageal stenoses (BES) are common complications owing to many etiologies: gastroesophageal reflux, ingestion of corrosive agents, esophageal surgery, radiotherapy, postendoscopic variceal sclerotherapy, drug ingestion, prolonged nasogastric intubation, extrinsic compression and esophageal webs. Esophageal dilatations are worldwide recommended to treat this complication, employing dilators of many types and diameters and facilitating the food ingestion.Evaluation of the results and advantages of the conservative treatment of the BES using esophageal dilatations, in outpatient service of upper digestive endoscopy.During the period from 1981 to 1999, 500 patients with BES were treated and followed up at the Gastrocenter - UNICAMP, in an individually Program of Esophageal Dilatation for each case. The highest number of cases was under ages from 31 to 60 years old (52,8%), and males (59,2%). The most predominant etiologies were: peptic stenosis (30,4%), caustic ingestion (23,6%), anastomosis (23,2%), megaesophagus (8,0%) and prolonged nasogastric ingestion entubation (6,4%), totalizing 91,6% of the BES. Most of patients (94,2%) were submitted to the maximum of 25 dilations. Dilators from 10,5 to 16 mm were employed in 95,6% of the cases. The duration of the treatment was 24 months in 76,2% of the BES. Esophageal perforations occurred in 6 patients (1,2%), without mortality.Were considered excellent, good and bad results, respectively in 76,2%, 18,2% and 5,6% of the cases. On the other hand, excellent results were recorded in 81,0% of the peptic stenosis, 66,1% of the caustic stenosis and 82,7% of the anastomotic stenosis. The conservative treatment failed in 9,3% of the caustic stenosis, 4,3% of the anastomotic stenosis and 3,9% of the peptic stenosis. Thus, the caustic stenosis were unsuccessfull in the highest percentage of unsuccessful.The conservative treatment using guidewire dilators (Savary-Gilliard and Eder-Puestow) is the first choice in the BES, is effective for long time, with short complications and the surgical treatment is indicated only when the dilatations failed.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is highly common worldwide and surgical treatment is being indicated more frequently. Currently, laparoscopic is the access of choice and several antireflux techniques may be used. We prefer a modified Nissen technique.To analyze preoperative clinical and functional parameters and compare with postoperative outcome of a modified valve technique performed by laparoscopy.A group of 59 patients underwent laparoscopic modified Nissen valve. Preoperative diagnosis was made by radiological contrast exams and endoscopy in all patients. Esophagus manometry was performed in 35 patients and scintigraphy scan in 15 patients. Complicated esophagitis occurred in 54.2%, with 21 (35.6%) patients presenting a Barrett's epithelium. Laparoscopic surgery was performed in all patients with no conversion to open surgery, with an average time of 123.9 minutes.There were no intraoperative complications. Hospital discharge occurred in an average of 47.6 hours. Symptoms as dysphagia, pain, regurgitation and flatus occurred in 48.1% of the patients in the first thirty days. Average follow-up was 20.8 months. Postoperative radiological, endoscopic, manometric and scintigrafic scan exams showed a significant improvement, as well as clinical assessment using Visick's classification, which showed excellent and good results in 93.1% of the patients.Comparative analysis of clinical assessment and exam results lad us to conclude that modified Nissen surgery by laparoscopic access corrects gastroesophageal reflux in most patients followed-up.

The laparoscopy has been more and more frequently indicated in the last years, for the complementary diagnosis of intraabdominal diseases and abdominal repercussion of systemic diseases. Modern equipaments including videolaparoscopy and the use of either forceps or biopsy needle permit higher safety and significant diagnostic capacity.To perform laparoscopy for the diagnosis of intraabdominal and sistemic diseases.During the last 9 years 168 patients were submitted to laparoscopy and the main indications were: ascites--43 cases (25.5%); liver diseases--42 cases (25%); gastric cancer--37 cases (22%); lymphoma--17 cases (10.1%); abdominal tumour--9 cases (5.4%); peritoneal tuberculosis--8 cases (4.8%); liver tumour--6 cases (3.6%); mesenteric cyst--1 case (0.6%) and other diseases--5 cases (3.0%). Ninety nine patients were male (58.9%) aging from 9 to 78 years old (median 47.6 years). Liver biopsies were performed in 92 cases (54.7%) and other tumour biopsies in 26 cases (15.4%).The diagnosis of the diseases were established or confirmed by laparoscopy in 145 patients (86.3%). In 25 cases of gastric cancer (67.5%) laparoscopy contraindicated the laparotomy, owing to advanced disease. Two patients presented bleeding (1.2%) after liver biopsies and laparotomy was immediately indicated. One of them, whose diagnosis was systemic lupus, presented abdominal abscess, bronchopneumony and died (0.6%).Laparoscopy has small number of complications, and when employed as a diagnostic complementary method therapeutic procedures, avoids laparotomies and accelerate therapeutic procedures.

Transmediastinal gastric transposition and pharyngogastric anastomosis is perhaps one of the most widely accepted methods for restoration of the alimentary continuity after pharyngoesophageal resection. The need of neck dissection, mediastinal tracheostomy, and previous radiotherapy may favor exposure and rupture of major vessels. Protection with omentum may prevent this complication. A comprehensive review of omentum flap use in surgery was undertaken.A modified omentum pedicled flap was used in 6 out of 36 patients submitted to total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy and gastric transposition (PLEGT).None of the patients had major vessel rupture as compared with a 13% carotid and innominate artery rupture of a series of 30 patients previously operated on without omentum pedicled flap protection.The omental pedicled flap, performed as described, may provide reliable protection for carotid and innominate artery exposure, adding little time to the procedure.

It is very important in the clinical practice to identify the individuals with Barrett's esophagus, because they are at risk to develop adenocarcinoma in the columnar epithelium. The objective of this research is to verify the incidence of this specific kind of epithelium at the "Gastrocentro", at State University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil, among the total of 15,976 upper digestive endoscopies, performed from january of 1992 to December of 1995. From the total examinations performed were identified 2,381 patients (14.9%) presenting reflux esophagitis (grades I-IV, Savary-Miller). Among this group of patients, the endoscopist suspected of Barrett's esophagus in 110 cases (4.6%) and biopsed the distal esophagus. However, only in 85 cases (77.3%) the pathologist confirmed the diagnosis of Barrett's epithelium. The patients with Barrett's esophagus were 53 males (62.3%), presenting the mean age of 52.2 years and the following grades of esophagitis: grade I-33 cases (38.8%); grade II-15 cases (17.7%); grade III-15 cases (17.7%), grade IV-12 cases (14.1%) and without esophagitis-10 cases (11.7%). The incidence of Barrett's esophagus among the patients with reflux esophagitis was 3.57%, and among the total of examinations performed at the "Gastrocentro" during the period of four years was 0.53%, totalizing 22,4 cases/100,000 habitants.

During the period from August 1st, 1990 to June 15, 1992, 117 patients with portal hypertension and upper gastrointestinal bleeding were examined at the "GASTROCENTRO"--State University of Campinas--UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil few hours after hospital admission. The objectives were to study the association of gastroduodenal acute lesions and esophageal varices. The predominant ages were thirties and sixties years (83.76%), being 70.08% of males. The hematemesis occurred in 94.02% of the cases. The etiologies of the bleeding were: esophageal varices, 47.87%; gastroduodenal acute mucosal lesions, 34.19%; gastric varices, 9.4%; gastric ulcers, 5.98% and duodenal ulcers, 2.56%. The authors concluded that exists a significant association of acute gastroduodenal lesions and esophageal varices causing upper gastrointestinal bleeding. It is essential to examine early and in detail the gastroduodenal mucosa during upper digestive endoscopy in the patient with portal hypertension and esophageal varices to diagnose the etiology of the bleeding. It is advisable to perform endoscopic examination twice a year when the dyspeptic symptoms are constant, with previous treatment for gastroduodenal acute mucosal lesions or peptic ulcers, and annual in the others.

gastroduodenal mucosa of two groups of patients with chronic liver disease was studied: schistosomotic mansoni patients (SH) and non-schistosomic patients (NSH). Results were compared to serum-gastrin levels. TYPE: prospective study.Unicamp University Hospital (Hospital das Clínicas), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.24 patients were included in the results, out of 26 patients studied. Two groups of study: 12 patients with schistosomiasis and liver fibrosis (SH), and 12 patients with liver cirrhosis (NSH) secondary to alcoholism or to hepatitis.esophagogastroduodenoscopies and biopsies of gastric antrum and duodenum. Function tests of the liver were also studied.results of gastrinemia were found within normal ranges in both groups. Student test ("t") did not show differences between groups at the 5% level. However, patients with chronic liver cirrhosis had more significant and severe endoscopic findings and chronic inflammatory processes of the gastroduodenal mucosa (acute gastritis, duodenitis and ulcers) than patients with liver fibrosis.patients with liver cirrhosis due to high risk of gastroduodenal bleeding should be maintained under continuous vigilance, appropriate diet and mucosa cytoprotectors. Furthermore, more research is required to study the etiology of gastroduodenal lesions in these specific groups of patients.

A case of mesenteric panniculitis is presented in which the main signal was an abdominal pulsable mass and severe obstruction of the lymphatic vessels of the mesentery. A review of the literature was done.

The authors study 84 patients that had damages of the duodenum and or pancreas and underwent different types of surgery. In 39 patients who had damage only in the duodenum; there were 2 (4.0%) duodenal fistulas, and 3 (6.0%) intraperitoneal abscess. In 38 patients who had injuries only in the pancreas; there were 6 (13.1%) acute pancreatities, pancreatic fistulas and 1 (2.2%) pancreatic pseudocyst. In 7 cases, injuries were found to both pancreas and duodenum. The author reports 1 case of duodenal fistula (14.3%) 1 case of acute pancreatitis (14.3%) and 3 cases of pancreatic fistula (43.0%). Only 7 patients died (8.3%), and of these 2 died for reasons not directly related to the operatory technic used. A simple suture can be performed in those cases where a complete section of the duodenum is unnecessary and there is no injury to the duodenal papilla. A burying suture of the stomas associated with a side-to-side duodenojejunal anastomosis should be preferred in the complete section of the duodenum localized beyond the ampulla of Vater. In all superficial wounds of small extension a suture of the pancreas should be performed. Distal pancreatectomy of body or tail should be made in the wounds with a possible lesion to the Wirsung duct and when there is an extensive glandular lesion. The associate wounds of duodenum and pancreas should be treated as if they were isolated lesions.

Benign neoplasms are rare events in the extrahepatic biliary ducts, and scanty literary references on the subject are available. Four cases of obstructive jaundice caused by benign tumours of the extrahepatic biliary ducts have been reviewed. Two of them have also displayed lithiasis of the gallbladder and common bile duct. In three cases histopathologic confirmation was obtained, in contrast to the remaining case in which only a gross pathologic presumptive diagnosis was possible. Three patients underwent surgical resection, and in one of them hepatojejunostomy was performed. The patient with a presumptive diagnosis of "inflammatory polyp" was not submitted to surgery, due to the special circumstances of the case. The undisturbed follow-up of the four cases attested to the worthiness of the surgical procedures.