1. Evaluation of Postoperative Pain Following Single-Visit Root Canal Treatment with Rotary and Reciprocal Ni–Ti File Systems in Children
- Author
-
Alp Abidin Atesci, Aslı Topaloglu-Ak, Ece Turan, Ozant Oncag, and Mehmet Emin Kaval
- Subjects
Medicine (General) ,Teeth ,Intensity ,Endodontic Treatment ,rotary motion ,Different Instrumentation Techniques ,Apical Extrusion ,Article ,R5-920 ,Nickel ,Prevalence ,Humans ,Flare-Up ,Periodontitis ,reciprocating motion ,Child ,Titanium ,Pain, Postoperative ,General Medicine ,Hand ,postoperative pain ,root canal treatment ,Debris ,Dental Pulp Cavity ,Root Canal Preparation - Abstract
Background and Objectives: Postoperative pain is a common symptom of a flare-up after root canal treatments (RCTs). Insufficient instrumentation, extrusion of irrigation solutions and debris, and the existence of a periapical lesion are the factors affecting postoperative pain after root canal treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative pain and instrumentation time of the single-file reciprocating system and multiple-file Ni-Ti rotary system in children ages 9-12 years old. Materials and Methods: Our study was conducted on 51 permanent mandibular molars with the diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups, and RCTs were completed with either the Reciproc Blue or Protaper NEXT file systems. Instrumentation time for each system was noted, and patients were given a pain scale that included a visual analog scale for 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment. Postoperative pain scores and instrumentation times were analyzed statistically with a chi-square test and Student's t-test. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain between the Reciproc Blue and Protaper NEXT systems at all time intervals. Instrumentation time was significantly shorter in the Reciproc Blue group in comparison with the Protaper NEXT group. Conclusions: Postoperative pain findings following RCT using single-file reciprocating systems were similar to the rotary system group. However, chair time in the reciprocating system group was significantly lower. This provided a comfortable and patient-friendly treatment approach for children, and could enhance their cooperation., Ege University Research Project Fund [16-DIS-013], FundingThis research project was funded by the Ege University Research Project Fund (16-DIS-013).
- Published
- 2021