1. Essentials of neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship: scholarship perspective
- Author
-
Misty Good, Margarita M. Vasquez, Melissa Bauserman, Patricia R. Chess, and Melissa M. Carbajal
- Subjects
education ,MEDLINE ,Article ,Competition (economics) ,Mentorship ,Pregnancy ,Physicians ,Humans ,Medicine ,Attrition ,Fellowships and Scholarships ,Neonatal perinatal medicine ,Child ,health care economics and organizations ,Medical education ,business.industry ,Pediatric research ,Perspective (graphical) ,Infant, Newborn ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,medicine.disease ,humanities ,Scholarship ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,Female ,Neonatology ,business - Abstract
Neonatal-perinatal medicine fellows must achieve a meaningful accomplishment in scholarly activity as part of their training. Despite the requirement for scholarly training in fellowship, there is a vanishingly small number of MD-only physician-scientists pursuing a research-oriented career. Recent neonatal trainees have identified several factors that preclude their careers in research-focused academic neonatology, including lower pay in academic positions, inadequate training in research techniques, and the perception that individuals in research careers have a poor work-life balance. High competition for limited pediatric research funds also contributes to a diminishing pool of physician-scientists in neonatology. This small number of physician-scientists is threatened by a high rate of attrition among physicians who enter this career path. In order to prevent further declines in the number of neonatal physician-scientists, we need improvements in funding and strong intra- and cross-institutional mentorship to foster individuals interested in a career as a physician-scientist.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF