Search

Background Massachusetts began newborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) using measurement of T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) from dried blood spots. Objective We describe developments and outcomes from the first 10 years of this program (February 1, 2009, to January 31, 2019). Methods TREC values, diagnostic, and outcome data from all patients screened for SCID were evaluated. Results NBS of 720,038 infants prompted immunologic evaluation of 237 (0.03%). Of 237, 9 were diagnosed with SCID/leaky SCID (4% of referrals vs 0.001% general population). Another 7 were diagnosed with other combined immunodeficiencies, and 3 with athymia. SCID/leaky SCID incidence was approximately 1 in 80,000, whereas approximately 1 in 51,000 had severe T-cell lymphopenia for which definitive treatment was indicated. All patients with SCID/leaky SCID underwent hematopoietic cell transplant or gene therapy with 100% survival. One patient with athymia underwent successful thymus transplant. No known cases of SCID were missed. Compared with outcomes from the 10 years before SCID NBS, survival trended higher (9 of 9 vs 4 of 7), likely due to a lower rate of infection before treatment. Conclusions Our data support a single NBS testing-and-referral algorithm for all gestational ages. Despite lower median TREC values in premature infants, the majority for all ages are well above the TREC cutoff and the algorithm, which selects urgent (undetectable TREC) and repeatedly abnormal TREC values, minimizes referral. We also found that low naive T-cell percentage is associated with a higher risk of SCID/CID, demonstrating the utility of memory/naive T-cell phenotyping as part of follow-up flow cytometry.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in patients with predominant antibody deficiency (PAD) is associated with high morbidity, yet data regarding the response to SARS-CoV-2 immunization in PAD patients, including additional dose vaccine, are limited.To characterize antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in PAD patients and define correlates of vaccine response.We assessed the levels and function of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in 62 PAD patients compared with matched healthy controls at baseline, at 4 to 6 weeks after the initial series of immunization (a single dose of Ad26.COV2.S [Janssen] or two doses of BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech] or mRNA-1273 [Moderna]), and at 4 to 6 weeks after an additional dose immunization, if received.After the initial series of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, PAD patients had lower mean anti-spike antibody levels compared with matched healthy controls (140.1 vs 547.3 U/mL; P = .02). Patients with secondary PAD (eg, B-cell depletion therapy was used) and those with severe primary PAD (eg, common variable immunodeficiency with autoinflammatory complications) had the lowest mean anti-spike antibody levels. Immune correlates of a low anti-spike antibody response included low CD4Patients with secondary and severe primary PAD, characterized by low T helper cells, low B cells, and/or low class-switched memory B cells, were at risk for low antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 immunization, which improved after an additional dose vaccination in most patients.

A 9-day-old girl was admitted to this hospital because of vomiting, decreased oral intake, and decreased activity. On examination, she appeared to be dehydrated; laboratory evaluation revealed metabolic acidosis and azotemia. A diagnosis was made.

Although almond specific IgE-mediated food allergies have traditionally been equated with other tree nut allergies, outcomes of oral food challenges to almond and the utility of clinical testing to predict IgE-mediated almond hypersensitivity are not well known.To describe almond oral challenge outcomes and assess the predictive value of clinical testing.A total of 603 almond challenges performed for 590 patients, aged 1 to 66 years, were analyzed from Massachusetts General Hospital allergy practices. Reactions were graded using the Niggemann and Beyer allergic reaction grading system and the Sampson 2006 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases anaphylaxis definition.Almond challenges included 545 passes (92%), 15 (3%) indeterminates, and 30 (5%) failures, in contrast with 31% challenge failures for other foods. Most reactions were mild; 21 (4%) had grade 2/3 allergic symptoms, and 3 (0.5%) had anaphylaxis. Median almond specific IgE level was 0.89 kU/L (range,0.35 to100 kU/L), median skin prick test wheal diameter was 4.0 mm (range, 0-28 mm), and 475 subjects (81%) were sensitized to almond. Failure was associated with higher almond specific IgE level (P.001), larger almond skin prick test wheal diameter (P = .001), higher peanut IgE level (P = .003), and a history of almond reaction (P.029). Almond specific IgE level, almond skin prick test wheal diameter, and age at challenge combined demonstrated good predictive value for grade 2/3 allergic reactions by receiver-operating characteristic analysis (area under the curve, 0.83).The proportion of failed almond challenges (5%) was low in contrast with other allergens, suggesting that some almond challenges may be safely conducted with higher patient-to-staff ratios or potentially introduced at home. Although reactions are usually uncommon and mild, anaphylaxis is possible with high almond sensitization.

A major diagnostic intervention in the consideration of many patients suspected to have primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs) is the application and interpretation of vaccination. Specifically, the antibody response to antigenic challenge with vaccines can provide substantive insight into the status of human immune function. There are numerous vaccines that are commonly used in healthy individuals, as well as others that are available for specialized applications. Both can potentially be used to facilitate consideration of PIDD. However, the application of vaccines and interpretation of antibody responses in this context are complex. These rely on consideration of numerous existing specific studies, interpolation of data from healthy populations, current diagnostic guidelines, and expert subspecialist practice. This document represents an attempt of a working group of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology to provide further guidance and synthesis in this use of vaccination for diagnostic purposes in consideration of PIDD, as well as to identify key areas for further research.

The causes of angioedema are not well described, especially in the inpatient setting. The purpose of this study was to examine the causes of moderate to severe angioedema in patients requiring inpatient treatment. We performed a retrospective review in patients requiring inpatient consultation by the Division of Allergy and Immunology at our institution between 1995 and 2004. We focused on potential interactions among medications that elicited life-threatening angioedema requiring intubation. The allergy/immunology service was consulted on 69 patients with moderate to severe angioedema. Medications were the most common cause of angioedema (n = 64, 93%). In most cases (n = 46, 67%), the angioedema was attributed to two or more medications. Patients previously stable on ACE inhibitors (ACEI), aspirin (ASA), or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) appeared more likely to develop angioedema soon after the addition of another drug (i.e., ACEI, ASA/NSAIDs, direct mast cell degranulators, and antibiotics). ACEI, ASA/NSAID, and direct mast cell degranulators were contributing causes in 36 patients (56%), 45 patients (70%), and 23 patients (36%), respectively. Twenty patients required intubation, 14 (70%) patients were on ACEI, 12 (60%) patients were on ASA/NSAID, and 7 (35%) patients were on direct mast cell degranulators. ACEI, ASA/NSAID, or direct mast cell degranulators were a cause in 95% (n = 19) of patients requiring intubation. The combination of ACEI and ASA/NSAID was the most frequent cause of angioedema among all patients (n = 17, 25%) and those requiring intubation (n = 8, 40%). Moderate to severe angioedema often is a result of interactions between two or more medications involved in different pathways causing angioedema. In particular, combinations of ACEI, ASA/NSAID, or direct mast cell degranulators may lead to life-threatening angioedema requiring intubation.

Background One half to one third of the patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) do not achieve histological remission on initial treatment. We wondered whether these treatment failure patients are a distinct clinical subset. Objective To analyze EoE treatment outcomes in a predominantly pediatric population. Methods We reviewed 100 serial EoE cases at Massachusetts General Hospital starting from 2007. We defined histological remission as peak esophageal eosinophil count of less than 10/hpf. Results Ninety-seven patients with EoE underwent initial treatments: 54 of 81 (67%) responded to dietary therapy, and 9 of 16 (56%) responded to topical glucocorticoids. Of the 34 who failed initial treatment, 24 underwent various second treatment regimens and 54% (13 of 24) responded. Eight of the remaining 11 who failed second treatment underwent additional treatments and 2 ultimately responded. The overall response rate by intent-to-treat analysis increased from 65% (63 of 97) with initial treatment to 78% (76 of 97) with rescue treatment, and further to 80% (78 of 97) with multiple treatments. On a per-protocol basis, the overall response rate was 93% (78 of 84); however, patients who failed the first 2 rounds of therapy had only a 20% response rate. Patients who responded to initial treatment were found to have more symptoms and endoscopic abnormalities. Comparison of patients who failed both initial and rescue therapy with those who responded to rescue therapy did not identify any differentiating clinical features. Conclusions More than half of the patients who failed initial EoE treatment could still achieve histological remission with individualized rescue treatments. No clinical features could predict response to rescue treatment.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Integrins play diverse roles in cellular actions and signalling in the immune system. In the context of mucosal immune responses, the integrin alpha 4 beta 7 has received particular attention because of its intimate involvement in lymphocyte recruitment to normal gastrointestinal mucosa and associated lymphoid tissue. The aim of this study was to determine the functional relevance of alpha 4 beta 7 in the pathogenesis of colonic inflammatory disease using the colitic cotton-top tamarin, an animal model of human ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Chronically colitic cotton-top tamarins were given either a cross-reactive monoclonal antibody to human alpha 4 beta 7 or an irrelevant control monoclonal antibody. The animals were then evaluated clinically and mucosal biopsy specimens assessed by histological and quantitative morphometric analysis. RESULTS: A blocking monoclonal antibody to alpha 4 beta 7 integrin ameliorated inflammatory activity and rapidly improved stool consistency when administered to chronically colitic animals. Furthermore, using morphometric analysis of biopsy specimens, antibody therapy reduced the mucosal density of alpha 4 beta 7+ lymphocytes and alpha 4 beta 7 neutrophils and macrophages. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the alpha 4 beta 7 integrin represents a novel, potentially organ- specific therapeutic target for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. (Gastroenterology 1996 Nov;111(5):1373-80)

Management of patients with carboplatin-induced hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) has been complicated by high false-negative rates of carboplatin skin test (ST) results. These patients might be at risk for future carboplatin-induced HSRs. In this article we identify a strategy to improve risk stratification of patients with a history of carboplatin-induced HSRs by using a protocol that includes repeat skin testing and drug desensitization.We sought to identify a management strategy for patients with a history of carboplatin-induced HSRs with negative carboplatin ST results.From 2008-2010, patients with carboplatin-induced HSR underwent risk stratification per a protocol using 3 repeat STs with intervening drug desensitizations.Of the 44 patients with carboplatin-induced HSRs, 39 completed the protocol. Patients were classified as having positive ST results (n = 16), having negative ST results (n = 11), or ST converters when the ST result converted to positive after an initial negative result (n = 12). ST converters are more likely to have HSRs during subsequent desensitizations than patients with negative ST results (56.1% vs 4.5%, P .001). ST converters had a significantly longer time interval between their initial HSR and initial ST evaluation compared with either patients with true-negative ST results (22.1 vs 6.0 months, P = .03) or patients with positive ST results (22.1 vs 1.8 months, P = .001).Our experience suggests that repeat STs are necessary for risk stratification in patients with a remote clinical history of HSR and an initial negative ST result because there is a significant rate of conversion to a positive ST result. ST converters have an increased risk of HSRs during subsequent carboplatin treatment.

Women with ovarian cancer treated with chemotherapeutic platinum agents frequently develop hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). How best to risk-stratify patients for desensitization is uncertain.To evaluate skin test (ST) reactivity to carboplatin in patients with recent and remote histories of carboplatin HSR and to review the relationship between skin test reactivity and tolerance of subsequent carboplatin desensitization.Thirty-eight women with carboplatin HSR were evaluated by ST to carboplatin. Thirty women subsequently underwent 106 desensitizations to carboplatin.Carboplatin ST was positive in 25 of 38 patients (66%). Of patients with recent HSR (3 months), 20 of 24 (83%) tested positive, whereas 5 of 14 (36%) with remote HSR (9 months) tested positive (P.01). Nineteen carboplatin ST+ and 11 ST- patients underwent desensitization to carboplatin. Seven ST+ patients (37%) had mild HSR during desensitization but completed the desensitization with additional treatment or protocol modification. ST- patients with a recent history of HSR (n = 3) tolerated a rapid protocol without HSR and remained ST- with repeated testing. Six of 8 ST- patients (75%) with remote HSR reacted during desensitization. The HSRs were more severe and often associated with an elevated tryptase level. Five of 7 patients retested became ST+ before the second desensitization. Carboplatin desensitization was successfully completed in 105 of 106 (99%) treatment courses.The timing of carboplatin ST in relation to initial HSR is vital for risk stratification and subsequent desensitization. Initial ST- patients with a remote history of HSR are at high risk for conversion to ST+ and can develop more severe HSR.