Search

Fresh beef products, such as steaks, may become contaminated with potential specified risk materials (SRMs), such as central nervous system tissue, during the fabrication of bone-in loin subprimals. The objective of this study was to evaluate current and alternative cutting methods that could be used to minimize the transfer of nervous system tissue (NST) tissue during preparation of steaks from bone-in short loins. Bone-in short loins were cut according to three methods. (i) Cutting method I-The vertebral column bones were removed prior to cutting the loin into steaks from the medial (vertebral column) to lateral (flank) side. (ii) Cutting method II--The loin was cut into steaks from the vertebral column side to the flank side prior to removal of the vertebral column bones. (iii) Cutting method III--The loin was cut into steaks from the flank side to the vertebral column side prior to removal of the vertebral column bones. Results indicated that surface areas along the vertebral column cutting line had detectable (0.10 and 0.22% NST/100 cm2) and, thus, higher potential SRM contamination than resulting steak surfaces or the cutting blade. Overall, there were no detectable (0.10% NST/100 cm2) differences in NST contamination of steaks produced by the three cutting methods. Immunohistochemical evaluation of areas on excised and ground steak surfaces indicated that regardless of cutting method, there was generally "no" to "moderate" staining, suggesting that detectable (0.137 to 0.201% NST) contamination from these samples was most likely due to peripheral nerve detection. These results imply that steaks may be cut from bone-in short loins prior to removal of the vertebral column bones without affecting the transfer of NST to resulting steaks at concentrations0.10% NST/100 cm2.

This communication deals with a longitudinal evaluation of C-reactive protein (CRP) analysis during a one-year period using a single lot of liquid control sera (3 levels) (BIOREF-CRP levels 1, 2 and 3) in different laboratories. A total of 652 sets of data were returned from 20 participating laboratories using 13 different reagent-measuring device combinations. The use of the control materials was defined in a standard operating procedure. Data was returned to the organizers on a monthly basis and questions could be asked or problems presented during the evaluation period. Although the performance of different reagents varied, the control materials were shown to be stable over the whole of the evaluation period when stored at 4-7 degrees C in a refrigerator/cold room. Typical problems were encountered, examples of which are presented here in graphical and tabular form.

Preevisceration carcass washing prior to bung bagging during beef slaughter may allow pooling of wash water in the rectal area and consequent spread of potential pathogens. The objective of this study was to compare protocols for bung bagging after preevisceration washing with an alternative method for bung bagging before preevisceration washing for the potential to spread enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, E. coli O157:H7, and Salmonella on carcass surfaces. The study evaluated incidence rates of pathogens in preevisceration wash water (10 ml) samples (n = 120) and on surface (100 cm2) sponge samples (n = 120) in the immediate bung region when bagging occurred before (prewash bagging) and after (postwash bagging) preevisceration washing. Surface sampling from postwash bagging yielded incidence rates of 58.3, 5, and 8.3%, whereas wash water sampling yielded 28.3, 1.7, and 5% for enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, E. coli O157:H7, and Salmonella, respectively. Surface sampling from prewash bagging yielded incidence rates of 35, 1.7, and 0%, whereas wash water sampling yielded 18.3, 0, and 8.3% for enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, E. coli O157:H7, and Salmonella, respectively. Results of this research indicate that the rectal area is a significant source of pathogen contamination on carcasses and that wash water is an important mechanism for potential transfer of pathogen contamination from the rectal area. Results from this study suggest that bung bagging, as proposed in this study, before (prewash bagging) rather than after (postwash bagging) preevisceration washing was generally more effective in controlling pathogen contamination and potential spread from the rectal area of carcasses.