Search

To report our experience of percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of renal tumors located within 10 mm of the pyeloureteric junction (PUJ) and/or ureter, with hydrodissection as a stand-alone thermoprotective technique. All patients who were offered combined hydrodissection and cryoablation of the PUJ/ureter to treat stage-1 renal cell carcinoma were retrospectively reviewed. Data regarding patients, lesions, and outcomes were collected. Twenty tumors in 20 patients (13 males:7 females) with a mean age of 74.4 ± 7.5 were included. Mean tumor size was 27.6 ± 6.4 mm. Nearby vulnerable structure(s) were identified as the ureter in 5/20 cases, the PUJ in 8/20 cases and both the PUJ and the ureter in the remaining 7/20 cases (35%) cases. Mean minimal distance between the tumor and the vulnerable organ(s) was 4.8 ± 2.6 mm (range 0–10). A mean of 1.7 ± 0.6 spinal needles were used per intervention with a mean time to complete hydrodissection of 18.6 ± 13.4 min. Primary and secondary technical efficacy rates were 90% and 95%, respectively. Mean follow-up was 23.1 ± 9.2 months. There were no immediate or delayed complications, in particular no urothelial strictures. Two tumor recurrences occurred during follow-up, with a time to disease progression of 13 and 31 months, respectively. hydrodissection of the PUJ/ureter to prevent thermal injury during cryoablation is an effective technique and does not seem to compromise the efficacy of ablation at short or mid-term follow-up.

BackgroundPerforming spinal anaesthesia using the conventional popping method with a 27-gauge (27G) spinal needle is technically difficult. In this study, we compared the aspiration and conventional popping method for spinal anaesthesia using 27G Quincke-type needles.MethodsThis prospective, randomized study enrolled 90 patients, aged 19 to 65 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III, who were undergoing spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups using a computer-generated random number table: patients receiving spinal anaesthesia using the aspiration method, in which the needle is advanced with continuous aspiration, or the conventional popping method. The primary outcome measure was the success rate of the first attempt to perform dural puncture. Number of attempts and passages, withdrawal cases, successful attempt time, total procedure time, and actual depth of dural puncture were recorded.ResultsEighty-eight patients were included in the study. In the aspiration group, the success rate of first attempt for dural puncture was 93.3%, compared with 72.1% in the popping group (P = 0.019). Success involving needle withdrawal was recorded in 4 (8.9%) patients in the aspiration group and 13 (30.2%) in the popping group (P = 0.024). In the popping group, the number of attempts was significantly higher (P = 0.044), and total procedure time was significantly longer (P = 0.023). Actual depths of dural puncture were deeper in the popping group than in the aspiration group (P = 0.019).ConclusionsThe aspiration method using a 27G Quincke-type needle offers clinical benefits for dural puncture compared with the conventional popping method for spinal anaesthesia.Trial registrationClinical research information service number:KCT0002815, registered 21/Apr/2018. Retrospectively registered.

BACKGROUND Concern has been raised that Sprotte needles predispose to spinal anes-thesia failure. Nevertheless, these needles are associated with a low incidence of postdural puncture headache. The impact of the paramedian approach to postdural puncture headache remains controversial. The objective of this prospective randomized study was to compare Sprotte, Quincke and Atraucan needles as well as the midline and the paramedian approach in terms of postdural puncture headache and spinal anesthesia failure in patients undergoing Caesarean section. METHODS 655 patients were randomized to 5 groups. A midline approach was used in four groups. The spinal needles were the 25G Sprotte, 27G Sprotte, 26G Atraucan and 25G Quincke. In the fifth group a 25G Quincke needle was used by the paramedian approach. RESULTS The incidence of postdural puncture headache was 0% in both 25G and 27G Sprotte groups, 2.5% in the 26G Atraucan group, and 7.2% and 2.7% in the 25G Quincke midline and paramedian approach respectively. A significant difference in terms of postdural puncture headache was found between 25G Sprotte and 25G Quincke needles (P = 0.004), while the failure rate was similar between these two needles. A significant difference in spinal anesthesia failure rate was observed between midline and paramedian approaches (P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS Sprotte but not Atraucan needle design correlates with lower incidence of postdural puncture headache compared to Quincke design. Sprotte needles are not associated with a higher spinal anesthesia failure compared to Quincke needles. The incidence of postdural puncture headache by the paramedian approach is not significantly reduced whereas the spinal anesthesia failure rate is increased in comparison to the midline approach.

Study objective This systematic review aimed to summarize the evidence derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing dural puncture epidural analgesia (DPEA) and conventional lumbar epidural analgesia (LEA) for women undergoing labor. Interventions The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to July 2018 in order to find RCTs published in the English language, which investigated DPEA in laboring women. Main results Six RCTs were included in the final analysis. Their collective results remain ambiguous. Dural puncture with small (i.e., 26- or 27-gauge) spinal needles seems to confer either minimal benefits or improved analgesic quality and lower pain scores in the first 10 min. Dural puncture with 25-gauge spinal needles has been reported to provide higher success rate than conventional LEA in one trial; however two other studies could only agree on the fact that DPEA results in improved sacral blockade and fewer unilateral blocks compared to LEA. Conclusions The current evidence regarding DPEA for labor analgesia remains ambiguous. Future research should investigate the optimal (spinal) needle size for dural puncture as well as factors governing transmeningeal flux of local anesthetics and opioids in the presence of a dural hole.

Spinal needles with different diameters can be used to prevent side effects in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia. However, the velocity of local anaesthetic changes through the spinal needle depending on the diameter of it. Local anaesthetic injection velocity has been reported to be associated with the spinal block level. We aimed to compare spinal needles of different diameters with the same local anaesthetic volumetric flow rate in terms of spinal blockade and hemodynamics in obstetric patients. Eighty-four patients received spinal anaesthesia by either a 25G needle or 29G with the same volumetric flow rate. Block levels, adverse effects, ephedrine given and a success rate of spinal anaesthesia were significantly higher in 25G than in 29G (p .05). Athough the use of 29G was associated with a low level of block, a sufficient block level was generated for caesarean section. Furthermore, in spite of the technical difficulty, use of 29G was accompanied by a decreased incidence of maternal hypotension, bradycardia and a lowered ephedrine administration. Impact statement Local spinal anaesthetic injections at faster flows cause turbulent flow leading to lower anaesthesia concentrations. The control of spinal anaesthesia levels has some difficulties due to anatomical repositioning, especially in pregnant patients. Also, it can cause frequent hemodynamic complications including hypotension and bradycardia, complications that may also have inadvertent effects on foetus. In this study, we showed that smaller diameter spinal needles provided safer spinal anaesthesia levels and a lower incidence of hemodynamic complications.

We investigated the flow rates of 25-G and 27-G spinal needles, of 90-mm and 120-mm lengths, from Vygon, BD, B. Braun and Pajunk; the needles had either a Luer connector, or a Surety® or UniVia® non-Luer connector. We used a bench-top model of entering the spinal space, pressurised to 35 cmH2 O to simulate cerebrospinal fluid pressure in the sitting position. We examined the time to first appearance of simulated cerebrospinal fluid in the needle hub, as well as the amount of fluid collected over 120 s after the needle was introduced. The mean (SD) times to first appearance of fluid in the needle hub of Luer spinal needles varied from 0.36 (0.22) s for the 25-G 90-mm BD to 3.14 (0.72) s for the 27-G 120-mm B. Braun, and in the non-Luer spinal needles from 0.22 (0.17) s for the 25-G 90-mm B. Braun to 2.99 (0.71) s for the 27-G 120-mm Pajunk. There was a significant difference in the time to first appearance of fluid in the needle hub between Luer and non-Luer needles of the same type for seven of 14 comparisons made, of which four showed slower appearance of fluid in the non-Luer version. In some of these cases, the time to appearance of fluid was nearly twice as long with the non-Luer counterpart. The mean (SD) weight of fluid collected in 120 s using the Luer spinal needles varied from 0.21 (0.05) g for the 27-G 120-mm Pajunk to 1.21 (0.18) g for the 25-G 90-mm Vygon, and using the non-Luer spinal needles from 0.25 (0.05) g for the 27-G 120-mm Pajunk to 1.55 (0.05) g for the 25-G 90-mm B. Braun. All of the needle types showed a greater weight of fluid collected using the non-Luer compared with the Luer version, with six of the 14 needle types showing a significant difference. Significant variations in flow were also seen between the same needle type from different manufacturers. We conclude that changing from Luer to non-Luer versions of spinal needles does not merely change the hub design and connection, but may introduce important differences in function.

To evaluate the accuracy of a fusion imaging guidance system using ultrasound (US) and computerized tomography (CT) as a real-time imaging modality for the positioning of a 22-gauge needle in the liver.The spatial coordinates of 23 spinal needles placed at the border of hepatic tumors before radiofrequency thermal ablation were determined in 23 patients. Needles were inserted up to the border of the tumor with the use of CT-US fusion imaging. A control CT scan was carried out to compare real (x, y, z) and virtual (x', y', z') coordinates of the tip of the needle (D for distal) and of a point on the needle located 3 cm proximally to the tip (P for proximal).The mean Euclidian distances were 8.5 ± 4.7 mm and 10.5 ± 5.3 mm for D and P, respectively. The absolute value of mean differences of the 3 coordinates (|x' - x|, |y' - y|, and |z' - z|) were 4.06 ± 0.9, 4.21 ± 0.84, and 4.89 ± 0.89 mm for D and 3.96 ± 0.60, 4.41 ± 0.86, and 7.66 ± 1.27 mm for P. X = |x' - x| and Y = |y' - y| coordinates were7 mm with a probability close to 1. Z = |z' - z| coordinate was not considered to be larger nor smaller than 7 mm (probability7 mm close to 50%).Positioning errors with the use of US-CT fusion imaging used in this study are not negligible for the insertion of a 22-gauge needle in the liver. Physicians must be aware of such possible errors to adapt the treatment when used for thermal ablation.

Background We hypothesized that the click perceived when puncturing the dura-arachnoid with fine-gauge spinal needles can be subjectively identified, and investigated whether it may be distinguishable among different needle types. Methods Subjective and objective evaluations were performed. First, physicians punctured the polyamide film or porcine dura mater (n = 70 and n = 20, respectively) with seven types of spinal needles and numerically evaluated the perceived click sensations. Using an 11-point numerical rating scale (from “0” for “no click sensation” to “10” for “the strongest click perceived”) data, subjective differentiation among needle types was assessed. Second, in the objective part of the study, total forces elicited by polyamide film or porcine dura mater punctures with each needle were measured using a biomechanical testing device, and load-displacement curves evaluated. Third, the results of subjective and objective evaluations were compared. Results All participants recognized the click and could discriminate among needles of different tip shape. The load-displacement curves for polyamide film and porcine dura mater were similar and needle-specific. The subjective numerical rating scale values corresponded well with the objectively measured changes in total forces (R2 = 0.862 and R2 = 0.881 for polyamide film and porcine dura mater, respectively), indicating that an increase in the largest drop in total force value of 0.30 N or 0.21 N would produce an increase of numerical rating scale value of 1 for polyamide film and porcine dura mater, respectively. Conclusions We provide an objective proof of the click sensation felt upon dural puncture using different fine-gauge spinal needles. Click recognition could be used as an additional indicator of successful spinal puncture.

Background and objectives: To investigate the differences in the number of squamous epithelial cells carried to the spinal canal by three different types of spinal needle tip of the same size. Methods: Patients were allocated into three groups (Group I, Group II, Group III). Spinal anesthesia was administered to Group I (n = 50) using a 25G Quincke needle, to Group II (n = 50) using a 25G pencil point spinal needle, and to Group III (n = 50) using a non-cutting atraumatic needle with special bending. The first and third drops of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) samples were taken from each patient and each drop was placed on a slide for cytological examination. Nucleated and non-nucleated squamous epithelial cells on the smear preparations were counted. Results: There was statistically significant difference between the groups in respect to the number of squamous epithelial cells in the first drop (p 0.05 for each group). Conclusions: In this study of different needle tips, it was seen that with atraumatic needle with special bending a significantly smaller number of cells were transported when compared to the Quincke tip needles, and with pencil point needles. Resumo: Justificativa e objetivo: Investigar as diferenças no número de células epiteliais escamosas transportadas para o canal medular por três tipos diferentes de pontas de agulhas espinhais do mesmo tamanho. Métodos: Os pacientes foram alocados em três grupos (Grupo I, Grupo II, Grupo III). Raquianestesia foi administrada aos pacientes do Grupo I (n = 50) com agulha Quincke de 25G, do Grupo II (n = 50) com agulha espinhal ponta de lápis de 25G e do Grupo III (n = 50) com agulha atraumática não cortante de curvatura especial. A primeira e terceira gotas de líquido cefalorraquidiano (LCR) foram colhidas de cada paciente para amostra e cada gota foi colocada em lâmina para exame citológico. As células epiteliais escamosas nucleadas e não nucleadas sobre as lâminas de esfregaço foram contadas. Resultados: Houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os grupos em relação ao número de células epiteliais escamosas na primeira gota (p 0,05, para cada grupo). Conclusões: Neste estudo de pontas de agulha diferentes, verificamos que com a agulha atraumática de curvatura especial o número de células transportadas foi significativamente menor, em comparação com as agulhas Quincke e ponta de lápis. Keywords: Spinal anesthesia, Cerebrospinal fluid, Spinal needles, Epithelial cells, Palavras-chave: Raquianestesia, Líquido cefalorraquidiano, Agulhas espinhais, Células epiteliais

We investigated the strength of commonly used spinal needles in relation to the amount of deformation, and registered forces during standardised testing. We investigated differences between manufacturers for the same length and gauge of Luer and non-Luer needles, and examined the effect of the internal stylet in terms of needle strength. A specialised rig was designed to perform the testing in both the horizontal and axial plane, reflecting common industrial tests and clinical use. Needles from four commonly used manufacturers were used (Vygon, Becton Dickinson, B Braun, and Pajunk). Needles of 25 G and 27 G were tested in 90-mm and 120-mm lengths. We found significant differences in terms of the size of final deformation and 'toughness'/resistance to deformation between needles of different brands. There were also significant differences between horizontal tests conducted as an industry standard and our own axial test. This may have bearing on clinical use in terms of the incidence of bending and breakage. The presence of the internal stylet resulted in significantly greater toughness in many needles, but had little effect on the degree of deformation. Comparison of Luer and non-Luer needles of the same brand and size showed few significant differences in strength. This result is reassuring, given the imminent change from Luer to non-Luer needles that is to occur in the UK.

Standard external landmarks have been suggested as a guide for in-office percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE), but validity of these landmarks has not been assessed. Our objective was to determine whether the standard 9 cm from the tip of the coccyx indicates the position of the S3 sacral foramen and whether other boney landmarks and measurements improved positioning. Measurements and distances between external boney landmarks were obtained in 22 embalmed cadavers. Spinal needles were placed 9 cm superior to the coccyx and 2 cm lateral to midline bilaterally. After dissection, internal measurements relating to sacral length, position of S3, and location of the needle in relation to S3 were recorded. Correlations among measured variables were assessed using descriptive statistics. Mean distance from the tip of coccyx to S3 was 9.26 cm (±0.84), from S3 to midline 2.30 cm (±0.2); from needle to S3 1.25 cm, and needle placement was as likely to be placed above or below S3; and S2-S3 and S3-S4 interforamenal distance 1.48 cm (±0.30) and 1.48 cm (±0.24), respectively. Mean distance from S3 to sacroiliac joint (SIJ) was shorter than S2 to SIJ. All associations between external measurements and length from tip of coccyx to S3 were not significant. A distance 9 cm from the tip of the coccyx is a reasonable starting landmark for in-office blind PNE. However, given the variability in coccyx length, caution should be taken; also, sensory-motor response is necessary to confirm proper placement.

In this article, we provide a literature review of cranial nerve (CN) VI injury after dural-arachnoid puncture. CN VI injury is rare and ranges in severity from diplopia to complete lateral rectus palsy with deviated gaze. The proposed mechanism of injury is cerebrospinal fluid leakage causing intracranial hypotension and downward displacement of the brainstem. This results in traction on CN VI leading to stretch and neural demyelination. Symptoms may present 1 day to 3 weeks after dural-arachnoid puncture and typically are associated with a postdural puncture (spinal) headache. Resolution of symptoms may take weeks to months. Use of small-gauge, noncutting spinal needles may decrease the risk of intracranial hypotension and subsequent CN VI injury. When ocular symptoms are present, early administration of an epidural blood patch may decrease morbidity or prevent progression of ocular symptoms.

This cross-sectional survey was designed to evaluate the current practice of anaesthetists in Australia and New Zealand with regard to aseptic technique and needle type during the performance of single-shot caudal blocks. Professional bodies suggest that full aseptic precautions be taken during the administration of caudal or epidural blocks. It has been suggested that using an intravenous cannula or a styletted needle may obviate the occurrence of epidermoid tumours. A total of 202 members of the Society for Paediatric Anaesthesia in New Zealand and Australia were invited to participate in this internet-based survey. Eighty-four responses were received. Most respondents used some form of antiseptic handwash (81%), wore sterile gloves (85.7%), used antiseptic skin preparation (100%) and draped the site (57.1%). When performing caudal blocks, 43.1% used unstyletted needles, 27.2% used styletted spinal needles and 29.6% used intravenous cannulas. However, 11.9% did not wash hands, 10.7% did not wear gloves and 42.9% did not drape the site. Three respondents reported neither handwashing, wearing gloves or draping, instead only using an alcohol swab for skin preparation. The majority of respondents in our region appear to use some level of aseptic precautions, albeit to a variable degree. Published recommendations may either be perceived as overly cautious or as ambiguous in that they do not specify caudal practice as distinct from other epidural blocks. There is a need for clearer professional guidance to support a minimum level of aseptic precaution for single-shot caudal epidural blocks.

A wide variety of spinal needles are used in clinical practice. Little is currently known regarding the impact of needle length, gauge, and tip type on the needle's ability to measure spinal canal opening pressure. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between these factors and the opening-pressure measurement or time to obtain an opening pressure.Thirteen distinct spinal needles, chosen to isolate the effects of length, gauge, and needle-point type, were prospectively tested on a lumbar puncture simulator. The key outcomes were the opening-pressure measurement and the time required to obtain that measure. Pressures were recorded at 10-s intervals until 3 consecutive, identical readings were observed.Time to measure opening pressure increased with increasing spinal needle length, increasing gauge, and the Quincke-type (cutting) point (P0.001 for all). The time to measurement ranged from 30s to 530s, yet all needle types were able to obtain a consistent opening pressure measure.Although opening pressure estimates are unlikely to vary markedly by needle type, the time required to obtain the measurement increased with increasing needle length and gauge and with Quincke-type needles.

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a well-known neurological outcome caused by leakage of cerebrospinal fluid during neuraxial anesthesia. Studies aimed at assessing the efficacy of finer gauged spinal needles to reduce the incidence of PDPH have produced conflicting results. We have therefore examined the effect of the gauge of cutting needles and pencil-point needles, separately, on the incidence of PDPH. The PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases were searched for randomized studies which compared PDPH incidence in a head-to-head analysis of individual needle gauges of similar needle designs (cutting and pencil-point). A meta-regression analysis was performed taking into account various covariates, such as needle gauge and design, mean age of patient population, surgery type, percentage of males and females in study population and year of publication. Of the 22 studies (n = 5631) included in the analysis, 12 (n = 3148) and ten (n = 2483) compared different gauges of cutting needles and pencil-point needles, respectively. After adjusting for covariates, meta-regression analysis was performed for all studies that randomly compared individual needle gauges of similar needle design. Whereas the incidence of PDPH inversely correlated with gauge in cutting needles (β = −1.36 % per gauge, P = 0.037), no relationship was noted in pencil-point needles (β = −0.32 % per gauge, P = 0.114). Female gender was the only covariate that reached a statistically significant correlation with the incidence of PDPH in both models. A significant relationship between needle gauge and subsequent rate of PDPH was noted in cutting needles, but not pencil-point needles.

Background Spinal syringes, needles, and other devices with connectors that will not also connect with Luer devices could substantially reduce wrong-route drug administration errors. This study aimed to evaluate a newly designed non-Luer safety connector system for neuraxial procedures in terms of clinical acceptability and cross-connectivity with conventional Luer devices. Methods A non-Luer safety connector system (BD UniVia-6 Safety Connector system), which included non-Luer spinal needles, syringes, and blunt fill filter needles, was evaluated in a prospective, simulated use, randomized study. Clinicians evaluated the acceptability and performance characteristics using a normal saline injectate on an artificial back model. Results Forty-nine clinicians participated in the study. For 93 of 98 spinal injection procedures, clinicians agreed that overall, the safety system was clinically acceptable (94.9%; 95% lower bound 89.6%). Forty-eight clinicians (98%; 95% lower bound: 90.7%) agreed that the safety system prevented or reduced the risk of misconnection between a conventional syringe and a safety spinal needle. A lower proportion (63.3%; 95% lower bound: 50.5%) agreed that the safety system would prevent or reduce the risk of misconnections between a safety syringe filled with medication intended for spinal injection and an i.v. Luer device. Conclusions Our study demonstrated that study clinicians found the safety system to be acceptable with minimal impact on technique in a simulated-use setting. The non-Luer system also appeared to decrease the risk of administration of i.v. medications into the intrathecal space. Further modifications will be required to completely eliminate the risk of administering intrathecal medication i.v. and evaluation in a clinical setting will help determine the true impact of this non-Luer system on patient safety.

Pencil-point spinal needles are popular for combined spinal-epidural analgesia because they cause less dural puncture headache than cutting-edge spinal needles. However, many parturients move, grimace, vocalise or experience paraesthesia or dysaesthesia during dural puncture when performing ‘needle through needle’ combined spinal-epidural analgesia. We compared dural puncture responses induced by pencil-point and cutting-edge needles (both 27 gauge). With institutional approval, 115 parturients presenting for elective caesarean section or labour analgesia were audited. After lignocaine infiltration, a Tuohy-type needle was inserted to loss of resistance to saline at a mid-lumbar interspace, and either a 27 gauge cutting-edge or 27 gauge pencil-point needle was inserted ‘needle through needle’ through the dura. During dural penetration, the occurrence of patient movement, grimacing or vocalisation was noted by a blinded observer, as was the patient's response to the question “Did you feel that?” asked by the anaesthetist. The audit comprised two similar groups of patients (caesarean section, n=30; labour analgesia, n=85). In both groups, grimacing and movement during thecal penetration occurred more frequently with pencil-point needles (P Dural puncture by a 27 gauge pencil-point needle inserted ‘needle through needle’ when instituting combined spinal-epidural analgesia induces more iatrogenic responses than a 27 gauge cutting-edge needle.

Background: Cutting needles remain the most commonly used needle design for lumbar puncture in the neurology community, although atraumatic (noncutting) needles have become common and popular for anesthesiologists performing spinal anesthesia. Review Summary: The use of atraumatic spinal needles for lumbar puncture has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of postdural puncture headache compared with cutting needles, without loss of efficacy or ease of use. Conclusion: The use of noncutting or pencil-point spinal needles should become the standard for performing diagnostic lumbar puncture.

Background Accidental dural puncture (ADP) and post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) are important complications of obstetric regional anaesthesia. Methods Between January 1997 and October 2006 in our tertiary obstetric referral centre 17 198 neuraxial blocks were recorded; 965 epidural, 16193 combined spinal-epidural and 40 spinal. Records of all parturients who experienced either ADP or PDPH were reviewed. Results There were 89 ADPs (0.5%), 55 observed and 34 in which PDPH followed unrecognised dural puncture. Following known ADP, 28 women had epidural catheters re-sited at a different lumbar interspace and 27 had intrathecal catheters for at least 24 h. Thirty-one women developed PDPH after observed ADP; the incidence of PDPH was similar after puncture with needle and catheter, after epidural and CSE techniques, after 27- and 29-gauge pencil-point spinal needles and after spinal and epidural catheter insertion (61% vs 52%; P >0.05). All headaches presented within 72 h. A blood patch was needed in 26/55 women after known ADP and 27/34 unrecognised ADP. A repeat blood patch was needed in 8 (15%). Discussion The incidence of ADP, PDPH, blood patching and repeat blood patching is similar to previous studies. Many ADPs are unrecognised during epidural insertion. CSE does not appear to increase the risk of ADP or PDPH; 29-gauge rather than 27-gauge pencil-point spinal needles conferred no benefit. Inserting the epidural catheter intrathecally did not significantly reduce the incidence of PDPH and blood patching in our series.

The objective of our study was to compare the incidence of blood patch as the best objective indicator of postdural puncture headache after elective fluoroscopic lumbar puncture with the use of a 22-gauge Whitacre (pencil point) needle versus standard 22- and 20-gauge Quincke (bevel-tip) needles and to determine the best level of puncture.The records of 724 consecutive patients who were referred to St. Mary's Medical Center department of radiology for fluoroscopic lumbar puncture from January 2003 through April 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Emergency requests (191) were discarded along with those for patients with clinical signs of pseudotumor cerebri (21), normal pressure hydrocephalus (3), and failed attempts (4). The collective total was 505 elective lumbar punctures.The blood patch rate for the 22-gauge Whitacre needle was 4.2%. The result for the 22-gauge Quincke point needle was 15.1% whereas that for the 20-gauge Quincke point needle was 29.6%. In addition, the level of puncture showed a blood patch rate that increased as the level of lumbar puncture lowered. The highest level of lumbar puncture was L1-L2 with the lowest recorded level being L5-S1.The Whitacre needle is associated with a significantly lower incidence of blood patch rate after lumbar puncture. The highest level of puncture (L1-L2) also provides the lowest level of blood patch rate.

STUDY DESIGN An in vitro biomechanical study using aged human and adolescent porcine discs. OBJECTIVES To find the leakage pathway and effect of needle gauge on the degree of disc injury post anular puncture. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Spinal needles are widely used for minimal invasive disc surgeries and disc degeneration/regeneration research. Applications of anular puncture require different diameters of spinal needles. However, the effect of needle diameters on the disc injury has not been systematically studied yet. METHODS Four groups of experiments were conducted: 1) porcine thoracic disc, 2) human thoracic disc, 3) porcine thoracic disc with 200 N external loading, and 4) porcine lumbar discs. The disc was punctured consecutively with needles from smaller diameter to larger diameter. After each anular puncture, the quantitative discomanometry technique was conducted to quantify the disc rupture pressure and volume. The association between needle gauge and rupture pressure and volume was analyzed. RESULTS The degree of disc injury increased with the diameter of needle. For an aged human thoracic disc, the anulus fibrosus cannot hold pressure more than 2 MPa after a 21-gauge-needle-anular-puncture. The leakage pathway of injected saline was through the anular fissure but was through the endplate when the disc was next to an osteoporotic vertebrae. The pressure holding power of porcine disc is stronger than of human disc. The rupture pressure of porcine lumbar disc is higher than of porcine thoracic disc. The axial compressive external loading increased the disc rupture pressure. The rupture volumes were not affected by the dimension of injury fissure. The rupture volume was at level of 0.3 mL without external loading and at 0.2 mL with external loading. CONCLUSION A spinal needle of < or = 22 gauge and injection volume of < or = 0.2 mL are recommended to prevent postsurgery leakage.

Aims: The dural and arachnoid hole caused by lumbar puncture needles is a determining factor in triggering headaches. The aim of this study is to assess the dimensions and morphological features of the dura mater and arachnoids when they are punctured by a 22 gauge Quincke needle having its bevel either in the parallel or in the transverse position. Methods: Fifty punctures were made with 22 gauge Quincke needles in the dural sac of four fresh cadavers using an “in vitro” model especially designed for this purpose. The punctures were performed by needles with bevels parallel or perpendicular to the spinal axis and studied under scanning electron microscopy. Results: Thirty five of the 50 punctures done by Quincke needles (19 in the external surface and 16 in the internal) were used for evaluation. When the needle was inserted with its bevel parallel to the axis of the dural sac (17 of 35), the size of the dura-arachnoid lesion was 0.032 mm 2 in the epidural surface and 0.037 mm 2 in the subarachnoid surface of the dural sac. When the needle’s bevel was perpendicular to the axis (18 of 35) the measurement of the lesion size was 0.042 mm 2 for the external surface and 0.033 mm 2 for the internal. There were no statistical significant differences between these results. Conclusions: It is believed that the reported lower frequency of postdural puncture headache when the needle is inserted parallel to the cord axis should be explained by some other factors besides the size of the dura-arachnoid injury.

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the postdural puncture headache after spinal anesthesia with Whitacre spinal needles compared with Quincke spine needles.We searched several databases, including PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until October 10th, 2014, for randomized controlled trials that compared spinal anesthesia with Whitacre spinal needles or Quincke spine needles for postdural puncture headache. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, assessed the risk for bias and extracted data. We used RevMan 5.3 software to perform the meta-analysis. Studies were included for the main end points if they addressed the following: frequency of postdural puncture headache, severity of postdural puncture headache as assessed by limitation of activities, and frequency of epidural blood patch.Nine randomized controlled trials were included for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that spinal anesthesia with Whitacre spinal needles achieved lower incidence of postdural puncture headache(RR 0.34; 95% CI [0.22, 0.52]; P .00001); in addition, the severity of postdural puncture headache was lower in the Whitacre spinal needle group (RR 0.32; 95% CI [0.16, 0.66]; P = .002). Furthermore, the frequency of an epidural blood patch in the Whitacre spinal needle group was lower compared with that in the Quincke spine needle group (RR 0.15; 95% CI [0.04, 0.51]; P = .002).We suggest the Whitacre spinal needles as a superior choice for spinal anesthesia compared with Quincke spine needles.

Ever since the first spinal anesthetic in the late 19th century, the problem of "spinal headache" or post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) has plagued clinicians, and more importantly, patients. It has long been realized that the headache and other symptoms that often occur after the entry of a needle into the subarachnoid space is somehow related to fluid loss, although the exact pathophysiology of the headache has really never been defined. With the introduction of pencil-point spinal needles for spinal anesthesia in pregnant women over the past 2 decades, the problem of PDPH in obstetrics has been more associated with accidental dural puncture during attempted epidural procedures. Accidental puncture probably occurs in about 1% of procedures, so with over 60% of pregnant women receiving epidural analgesia for labor, there are probably 20,000-50,000 obstetric patients with PDPH in the United States each year. In this article, we will discuss the current state of knowledge in this area, suggesting that the PDPH syndrome is more severe and often more long-lasting, with some potentially life-threatening complications (cerebral hemorrhage) than usually appreciated or admitted. While prevention and treatment options are still limited, with the only clearly effective treatment being the epidural blood patch, recognition of the PDPH syndrome in postpartum women by anesthesiologists and obstetricians, with aggressive follow-up and treatment, may help limit the associated morbidity and mortality.

Objective.—To evaluate atraumatic spinal needle use among US neurologists. Background.—Postdural puncture headache following lumbar puncture may be dramatically reduced through the use of atraumatic pencil-point spinal needles. It was hypothesized that atraumatic spinal needles are rarely used by members of specialties outside of anesthesiology. To determine the extent to which atraumatic spinal needles are currently being used for lumbar puncture in the United States, American neurologists (one group of physicians who regularly perform lumbar punctures) were surveyed. Methods.—A questionnaire was mailed to all 7798 members of the American Academy of Neurology listed in the membership directory. The questionnaire included items pertaining to age, practice setting, knowledge of pencil-point (atraumatic) spinal needles, and lumbar puncture practices. Results.—Only a fraction (2%) of the neurologists surveyed routinely use atraumatic spinal needles. Almost half of the responding neurologists reported having no knowledge of pencil-point spinal needles. Among those who did have knowledge of these new spinal needles, the most common reasons given for not using them were nonavailability and expense. Conclusions.—Atraumatic spinal needles for lumbar puncture have been shown to dramatically decrease the risk of postdural puncture headache. Although the use of these needles is standard practice among anesthesiologists, they have not been adopted by other medical specialties. This may lead to unnecessary morbidity among patients undergoing lumbar puncture.

Background and Objectives Previous studies have shown the vulnerability of the tips of cutting type thin spinal needles and the possibility of foreign material passing into the subarachnoid space during the lumbar puncture. We made a microscopic analysis to compare two commonly used noncutting pencil-point spinal needles with different tip designs. Needles with a cutting tip design were included as reference. Methods Four fresh cadavers were placed in the lateral position and their backs were scrubbed with disinfectant solution containing 0.1% fluorescein. Thirty-two spinal needles (27 gauge) of each type (modified Quincke, modified Sprotte, and modified Whitacre) were inserted through an introducer at interspaces L2-5 into the subarachnoid space. Under visual control (spinal canal opened ventrally) all the needle tips were cut after successful subarachnoid puncture; 16 needles of each tip design were investigated under a fluorescence microscope, and another 16 needle tips were collected into test tubes and cytocentrifuged smears were prepared. The tips and smears with the most obvious findings were photographed under a microscope. Results On microscopy, only 2 needle tips were damaged (1 modified Quincke and 1 modified Whitacre). Visible fluorescent tissue particles were more frequently seen on modified Quincke needles (56%) compared with modified Sprotte (37%) and Whitacre (37%) needles (NS). In the cytocentrifugation smears, the largest clusters of epithelioid cells and muscle fibers were observed in the Quincke group. In the Whitacre group many fewer and smaller cell clusters including small muscle particles were seen, and only minor epithelioid cells were found in the Sprotte group. Conclusions Tissue coring seems to be a common phenomenon during lumbar puncture. The most prominent attachments appeared with a cutting Quincke-type spinal needle.

Albert Woolley and Cecil Roe were healthy, middle-aged men who became paraplegic after spinal anaesthesia for minor surgery at the Chesterfield Royal Hospital in 1947. The spinal anaesthetics were given by the same anaesthetist, Dr Malcolm Graham, using the same drug on the same day at the same hospital. The outcome for the patients and their families was devastating, as it was for the use of spinal anaesthesia in the UK. At the trial 6 yr later, and against the opinion of leading neurologists, the judge accepted Professor Macintosh's suggestion that phenol, in which the ampoules of local anaesthetic had been immersed, had contaminated the local anaesthetic through invisible cracks. In an interview 30 yr after the verdict, Dr Graham believed tha the tragedy was caused by contamination of the spinal needles or syringes during the sterilization process. The subsequent explanation that, on the day in question, descaling liquid in the sterilizing pan had not been replaced by water, supported his belief and finally offered a credible explanation. We review the Woolley and Roe case, the status of spinal anaesthesia before and after 1947, and the relevant medico-legal judgments in claims for negligence in the early days of the National Health Service.

Background and Objectives. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study compares the efficacy of two spinal needles in terms of their performance characteristics and associated perioperative complaints in young patients. Methods. ASA I and II patients aged from 20 to 40 years undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery were included during a 12-month period. After application of the protocol, 158 patients were recruited. The patients were randomized to two groups: group I: 26-gauge Atraucan (n = 79) and Group II: 27-gauge Whitacre (n = 79). A study was made of the demographic parameters, technical characteristics, and peri- and postoperative complications. Results. No significant differences were found in the technical handling of the needles, number of attempts made to achieve the puncture, or the time required to perform the technique. No technical failures (spinal anesthesia inadequate for the planned surgery) were reported, and the frequency of complications during the procedure was identical in both groups. Frequency of postdural puncture headache (3.8%) or severity and duration showed no difference between the two groups. The overall assessment of postoperative complications revealed similar scores for both needles. Conclusions. Technical handling (ease with which block was performed) of the needles analyzed was extremely easy, showing a high success rate which associated with the similar incidence of complications. Type of bevel does not appear to be a determining factor in the quality or morbidity associated with subarachnoid block when fine-gauge needles are used in young patients.

Objectives - This study was conducted to investigate complications after dural puncture. Material and methods - A 15 months' prospective observation study of routine clinical practice with dural puncture at a university hospital was conducted. Quincke spinal needles 0.90 to 1.0 mm O.D. (20-19 g) were used for diagnostic lumbar puncture, 0.70 mm O.D. (22 g) for myelography and 0.40 to 0.50 mm O.D. (27-25 g) for spinal anaesthesia. A questionnaire about post-puncture discomfort was given to the patients, to be returned after 1 week. Results - Of 679 questionnaires 537 (79.1%) were returned. Discomfort was experienced by 53.8% of the patients, most often after diagnostic lumbar puncture and myelography. The difference in incidence of headache after diagnostic lumbar puncture and myelography compared with spinal anaesthesia were 27.9% (95% CI: 18.6 to 37.2) and 18.3% (95% CI: 9.1 to 27.5). Conclusion - Small diameter and atraumatic spinal needles will reduce patients' discomfort after dural puncture.

Postspinal headache is one of the most common complications of spinal anesthesia and has repeatedly led to controversy concerning needle size and configuration. In an in vitro investigation, we measured cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage with Sprotte, Whitacre, Quincke, and Atraucan needles under physiological conditions in human dura. The puncture characteristics were examined under an electron microscope. The pencil-point needles show 2-3 times less leakage of CSF compared with the cutting Quincke needles of corresponding size. Between the Sprotte and the Whitacre needles, there were no significant differences. The least loss of CSF occurred with the 26-gauge Atraucan needle. Under the electron microscope, a sharply delineated, persistent perforation channel was shown with the Quincke needles, which may explain the high CSF loss. With pencil-point needles, which push the tissue apart bluntly, a large opening on the inside is found, with some tearing of the dura. However, in contrast to the cutting needles, a persistent perforation channel is not manifested. The 26-gauge Atraucan needle, which both cuts and pushes apart conically, shows a relatively discrete opening on the inside, with slight tears in the dura and arachnoidea but without a visible perforation channel. The results of our study show that larger needles (26-gauge Atraucan) that are easier to handle can lead to good and, in some cases even better, puncture results if they have characteristics of both the cutting and the pencil-point needles.We compared several brands of pencil-point and standard cutting spinal needles of varying sizes. All pencil-point needles had less cerebrospinal fluid leakage, the least loss occurring with 26-gauge Atraucan needles. Electron microscopic examination of the dura after puncture showed characteristic findings with each needle type. We conclude that the combined cutting and pencil-point characteristics seen in the Atraucan needle may have clinical advantages.

Two large studies reported a very low rate (0.5–1.8%) of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) with the use of 27-G spinal needles. We suspected that it might be higher in young ambulatory patients. The purpose of this study was to establish the rate prospectively in such a patient population using two types of needles. Two hundred male and female, outpatients, 18–45 yr, undergoing knee arthroscopy under spinal anaesthesia were randomly assigned to receive spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric lidocaine 5% using either a Quincke or a Whitacre 27-G needle. Twenty patients choosing general anaesthesia formed a comparative group. Using a previously validated questionnaire, the incidence and nature of PDPH were evaluated by telephone three to five days after surgery by an anaesthetist unaware of the anaesthetic technique used. Once all data were collected, an anaesthetist not involved in the study determined in a blinded fashion which headaches were likely to be PDPH. Grading and classification of headaches were based on several criteria: postural nature, duration, intensity and confinement to bed. The overall incidence of PDPH in both spinal groups was 9.3%. The incidence in women, 20.4%, was higherthan in men, 5.5%, (P < 0.05). Only one patient required a blood patch. Both types of needle were comparable with respect to the incidence, severity and duration of PDPH, number of dural punctures and failed spinal blocks. The rate of PDPH was higher than in large published studies with 27-G Quincke and Whitacre needles and greater in women than in men.

UNLABELLED An in vitro examination of 25-gauge Quincke and 25-gauge and 27-gauge Whitacre spinal needles was performed after insertion in 210 consenting adult patients. In addition, 300 unused Quincke needles and 300 unused pencil-point needles were examined under a dissecting microscope. When the microscopic evaluation was performed on the needles after spinal blockade, burrs or blunting of the needle tip were noted in 24% of the Quincke needles compared with only 3% of the 25-gauge Whitacre needles and 10% of the 27-gauge Whitacre (P < 0.05). Bony contact with 25-gauge Quincke and 27-gauge Whitacre needles resulted in an increased incidence of microscopic tip damage (versus 25-gauge Whitacre). Needle-tip damage with the Whitacre needles was limited to blunting of the tip. The analysis of unused needles revealed significant differences among manufacturers of the cut-bevel needles with respect to stylet-to-needle length and burrs on the end of the stylet. The leading edge of the stylet protruded beyond the opening of the needle tip in 7% of the Quincke needles. However, only minor needle-tip abnormalities were noted with the pencil-point needles (i.e., variability in the side-port opening to needle tip distance, side-port opening integrity). In conclusion, bony contact produced more damage to the cut-bevel than to the pencil-point needle tips. In addition, fewer inherent manufacturing defects were noted with the pencil-point versus cut-bevel needles. IMPLICATIONS It has been suggested that damaged needle tips may contribute to a higher incidence of headaches after spinal anesthesia. A microscopic examination revealed that the pencil-point (versus cut-bevel) needles had fewer manufacturing flaws and were less susceptible to tip damage when bony contact occurred during the placement of the spinal needle.

We examined the flow pattern produced when liquid dye was actively injected into a fluid medium at various flows through five different commonly used spinal needles. At all flows, the Whitacre-type needles produced a directional stream exiting at an angle from the longitudinal axis. At intermediate rates the stream developed tracks which disappeared at faster rates. The Quincke needle always produced an undeviated stream of dye and did not form tracks at any flow rate. When a perspex plate (representing the spinal cord) was interposed in front of the needle, the dispersion of dye was always unidirectional from the Whitacre needle and bidirectional from the Quincke needle. The dye adhered to the surface of the plate as a concentrated film at slow rates and at faster rates it dispersed turbulently for both types of needle.

We compared traditional bevel-tip end-hole spinal needles and pencil-point-tip side-hole needles for the incidence, severity, and duration of spinal headaches in subjects who had myelograms. Age, sex, and myelographic findings were examined.We studied 138 subjects referred for myelograms. For 108 procedures, we randomly used 22-gauge Quinke bevel-tip end-hole needles or 22-gauge Sprotte pencil-point-tip needles. The 30 additional subjects were examined with Gertie Marx pencil-point-tip needles. All myelograms were performed by one of two neuroradiologists using recommended doses of iohexol. The myelograms were examined by an independent neuroradiologist for quality of image and presence of extraarachnoid contrast material. Five to 14 days after myelography, subjects were telephoned by an independent observer and asked about the presence, severity, duration, and positional quality of headache. Spinal headache is defined by positional quality and increases in severity when the subject moves from horizontal to sitting or standing.We found that four (8%) of 52 subjects who had myelograms with Sprotte needles had spinal headaches. Likewise, 14 (25%) of 56 subjects who had myelograms with Quinke needles had spinal headaches. We calculated a statistically significant difference in the incidence of spinal headaches using chi-square analysis (p = .02). The average grade and duration of the spinal headaches did not differ significantly, although they were less marked in the Sprotte group. Spinal headaches occurred more frequently in young and middle-aged subjects than in older subjects. We found one definite extraarachnoid injection in each group. For the Gertie Marx needles, two (7%) of 30 subjects had spinal headaches. The average grade of postmyelogram headache was 2.5, and the mean duration was 1 day. There were no mixed injections.We found a significant reduction in spinal headaches after myelograms when we used the pencil-point-tip side-hole needle. These results support the routine use of these needles for myelography in young and middle-aged patients.

To compare the postdural puncture headache (PDPH) rates after myelography with use of 22-gauge Whitacre (blunt tip) versus standard 22-gauge Quincke (bevel-tip) spinal needles.At myelography, 340 patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups in which either the Whitacre (167 patients) or the Quincke (173 patients) needle was used. Follow-up was at 48 hours and at 4 days after the procedure. Crude and adjusted Whitacre/PDPH odds ratios and risk ratios were calculated.The crude Whitacre needle PDPH risk was 9.6%, and the crude Quincke needle PDPH risk was 15.6%. The absolute risk difference was 6.0% with a 95% confidence interval of -0.98% and 13.04%. The adjusted Whitacre/PDPH odds ratio was 0.492 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.241 and 1.003. The Whitacre needle group had a statistically significantly lower PDPH severity grade (P = .0151), similar PDPH duration, and more technical difficulty with the needle.The Whitacre needle is associated with an equal or lower PDPH risk; the lack of statistical significance is most likely related to sample size. Further study is necessary to determine whether the decreased PDPH rate justifies the added difficulty associated with use of the Whitacre needle.

Background: The tips of modern thin Quincke-type spinal needles may be easily damaged by bone contact during the puncture. The purpose of this study was to find out the frequency of tip deformation in routine clinical work and the appearance of the dural perforations made by such damaged needles. Methods: Two hundred and ninety-five Quincke-type needles (22G-29G) used in routine spinal anaesthesia were inspected by light microscopy. Scanning electron micrographs were taken of some of the damaged tips and of experimental dural perforations made by these. Results: Four per cent of the needle tips were clearly bent or hooked and 11% were slightly bent. When an introducer needle was used (19 cases), one needle was clearly bent and one slightly bent. A puncture with a bone contact was associated with clear tip damage in 7%; a puncture without bone contact resulted in an undamaged or slightly bent needle tip in 99% of the cases. The numbers of bent tips among the various sizes were: 22G-2/21, 25G-13/40, 27G-28/231, 29G-1/3. In scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of four clearly bent needle tips the deviation of the tip was between 10 μm and 20 μm. In SEM of eleven dural perforations, the holes made by needles with clearly bent tips were almost closed and three of them exhibited an “open tin can” appearance. None of the dural perforations was badly torn. Conclusions: We verified that the tips of modern thin spinal needles are vulnerable to damage due to contact with bone. However, the holes made in dura by needles with bent tips do not appear to be excessively torn.

A technique for real-time dynamic monitoring of force experienced by a spinal needle during lumbar puncture using a fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor is presented. The proposed FBG force device (FBGFD) evaluates the compressive force on the spinal needle during lumbar puncture, particularly avoiding the bending effect on the needle. The working principle of the FBGFD is based on transduction of force experienced by the spinal needle into strain variations monitored by the FBG sensor. FBGFD facilitates external mounting of a spinal needle for its smooth insertion during lumbar puncture without any intervention. The developed FBGFD assists study and analysis of the force required for the spinal needle to penetrate various tissue layers from skin to the epidural space; this force is indicative of the varied resistance offered by different tissue layers for the spinal needle traversal. Calibration of FBGFD is performed on a micro-universal testing machine for 0 to 20 N range with an obtained resolution of 0.021 N. The experimental trials using spinal needles mounted on FBGFD are carried out on a human cadaver specimen with punctures made in the lumbar region from different directions. Distinct forces are recorded when the needle encounters skin, muscle tissue, and a bone in its traversing path. Real-time spinal needle force monitoring using FBGFD may reduce potentially serious complications during the lumbar puncture, such as overpuncturing of tissue regions, by impeding the spinal needle insertion at epidural space. (C) 2016 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)

Reports have indicated that there are less postoperative complaints after the use of pencil pointed spinal needles. We compared a 24G Sprotte needle with a 27G Quincke needle in a randomised study of 200 healthy patients (49% females), aged 15-46 years. Four patients (2%) reported postdural puncture headache, three with the 24G Sprotte needle and one with the 27G Quincke needle. Thirteen patients (7%) suffered with nonspecific headache, with no significant difference between the two groups. Of the 57 (29%) who reported backpain, a significantly higher proportion had received spinal anaesthesia with the Sprotte needle (OR = 2.06). There was a significantly higher incidence of insufficient blocks after dural puncture with the Sprotte needle. Ease of needle insertion and number of puncture attempts was the same for both needle types.

Spinal needles with a pencil-point tip and those of a finer gauge are known to be associated with a lower incidence of postdural puncture headache. This study set out to determine if fine pencil-point needles were acceptably easy to use in routine clinical practice. Two hundred and twelve women undergoing elective Caesarean section were randomly allocated to receive a subarachnoid block using either a 25 G or 27 G Whitacre needle. Factors determining ease of needle use, adequacy of block, incidence of postdural puncture headache, backache and neurological sequelae were assessed. Successful intrathecal injection was achieved in all patients in the 25 G group. Using the 27 G needle, the anaesthetist failed to reach the subarachnoid space in eight patients of which seven subsequently had a successful intrathecal injection with a larger needle. These failures were attributed to excessive needle flexibility which was the only significant difference in ease of use between the 25 G and 27 G needles. In the 25 G group, there was one severe postdural puncture headache which required an epidural blood patch and three mild headaches which resolved spontaneously. There were no postdural puncture headaches in the 27 G group. We conclude that the final choice of needle is a compromise between the ease of use and lower failure rate of the 25 G needle and the, as yet unproven, possibility of a lower incidence of postdural puncture headache with the 27 G needle.

WOS: 000179516900016 PubMed: 12604283 Postdural puncture headache is one of the most serious complications of spinal anesthesia. In this study, spinal needles of various types and shapes were used to investigate the amount of fluid leakage in dural puncture under various pressures. Dura samples received from 10 cadavers were fixed in an in vitro model. The dural punctures were inflicted with 22 G, 25 G, and 27 G Quincke; 25 G Withacre; 25 G, 27 G Pencan, and 26 G Atraucan spinal needles. The fluid, which leaked during the process, was collected under the pressures of 0, 25, 50, 100, and 150cm H2O in a one-hour period for each level. The holes in the dura were studied under the light microscope. While 22 G and 25 G Quincke needles were used, the fluid leakage directly correlated with the amount of liquid, the diameter of the needle, and the pressure used. The puncture of 25 G Withacre and 25 G Pencan presented a leakage which did not significantly vary with the liquid pressure and was of lesser amount. In 26 G Atraucan, 27 G. Pencan, and 27 G Quincke inflicted punctures, little liquidwas collected and it did not vary with differing pressures. Thus, no significant correlation was established between the needle diameter and the puncture. It was concluded that the sharp-ended needles could not endure changes in the pressure. However, those needles with a very thin diameter and a pencil tip were considered as safe tools for anesthetic practice. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Parallel-walled spinal needles ≤ 22 G are routinely used for lumbar puncture, despite a reported ≥ 32% incidence of post-dural puncture headache. A tapered spinal needle (22 G shaft, 27 G tip) is in use in our institution. We hypothesized that despite the smaller dural puncture hole, this needle has similar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure equilibration times and CSF sampling times to a standard 22 G needle and assessed a range of spinal needles using an experimental pulsatile CSF reservoir.The pulsatile CSF reservoir had an oscillating pressure varying between 25 and 15 cm H(2)O at a cycle frequency of 80 s(-1). We tested seven parallel-walled spinal needles (18-27 G) and the tapered 22/27 G needle. CSF pressure was measured every 2 s by manometry. The time to collect 1 ml CSF samples was measured. Saline 0.9% and mannitol 20% were tested separately. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test was used to compare 22G, 27G and 22/27G needles.The mean [standard deviation (sd)] CSF pressure equilibration time (saline) was 40.7 (6.4), 108.7 (6.1), and 51.3 (4.6) s for the 22, 27, and 22/27 G needles (P0.0001 for comparisons between 27 G and other needles). The mean (sd) CSF sampling time (saline) was 40.3 (3.1), 225.3 (10.0), and 63.0 (5.2) s for the 22, 27, and 22/27 G needles (P0.0001 for comparisons between 27 G and other needles, and P= 0.019 between 22 and 22/27 G needles). Saline was different from mannitol for both measurements and all needles (P0.0001).A 22/27 G tapered spinal needle has similar flow properties to the 22 G needle, despite a 27 G tip.

We present a case of intravascular injection in a 41-year-old female during cervical selective nerve root injection using a 22-gauge 3.5-inch Whitacre-type pencil-point subarachnoid needle with a curve placed at the distal tip positioned using continual live fluoroscopic guidance. After negative aspiration for blood and cerebrospinal fluid and no elicited paresthesias during the procedure, 1 mL of contrast was injected. Initial imaging at C6 captured the outline of the nerve root along with a significant amount of transient vascular runoff. This case report demonstrates that Whitacre-type spinal needles do not prevent vascular injection, and that aspiration of the needle is not a reliable sign of intravascular injection.

The curare revolution in anesthesia, initiated at the suggestion of Lewis H. Wright,! had several parallels with its pre­ decessor, the local anesthesia revolution begun by Carl Koller with cocaine. Both were produced with an alkaloid, both ap­ plied pharmacologic information that had long been available, and in both a vast therapeutic advantage involved terrifying new dangers. The centenary of Koller's con­ tribution offers an opportunity to sketch its dramatic, not to say melodramatic, con­ text, accented with notes from the lullaby of the coca leaves and the early stabs with spinal needles. Koller's epochal finding, in Vienna in 1884, was that the ocular instillation of cocaine completely abolished sensibility of the cornea and conjunctiva. This was an­ nounced and demonstrated at the Congress of Ophthalmology in Heidelberg, Germany, by Dr. Josef Brettauer. Brettauer did so on Koller's behalf because Koller himself, at the age of 27, was an impecunious intern and could not afford the cost of the rail journey from Vienna. It was ill fortune enough that Koller had to pass up his mo­ ment of his triumph, but there was worse to come. Vienna in 1884 was gloomy, especially at night. There was no electric light. There was none anywhere in Europe. The first public power station had been built in New York in 1882, but a transatlantic follow-up was still 1 year away. Vienna was the capi­ tal of a turbulent multinational empire and a Mecca of medical education. Modern medicine was young, and drug action was poorly understood but surgery was already entering a new era in which Lister's sys­ tem of antisepsis had made it safe to open the abdomen. Although asepsis and surgi­ cal gloves still lay in the future, Billroth had performed the world's first gastrectomy in Vienna in 188l . The Austrian Novara expedition1 had brought back to German-speaking Europe a big batch of the leaves of ErythroxylulIl coca, the sacred plant of the Incas; an active principle had been isolated from the leaf, but its properties

The study, the first part of which was published in 2008, looked at, prospectively, how effective and safe new, non-traditional connectors were for use in spinal connector equipment such as spinal needles and infusion lines. The researchers analysed existing evidence on adverse incidents in this area, held workshops to discuss the problem, tested new devices with a simulator, and evaluated them in clinical practice trials at four different hospitals in England.

Four fine-needle aspiration biopsy needles with different tip configurations were used in 133 patients with abdominal lesions. The 20-gauge needles were used in random sequence by several physicians. The specimen from each of the 522 needle passes was evaluated by two cytopathologists for adequacy to render a diagnosis and for the presence of cell block material. The Franseen needle produced a 16% and 9% better yield for diagnostic material than did the cut biopsy and spinal needles (P less than .05), respectively. The Westcott needle was better than the cut biopsy needle by 13%, and the spinal needle produced an 11% better yield than did the cut biopsy needle. Differences did not exist in liver biopsies but were present in pancreatic biopsies. The spinal needle was the least successful in yielding cell block material. Use of the cut biopsy needle resulted in the largest proportion of inadequate specimens, except its yield in cell blocks in the liver was 25% higher than that of the Westcott needle. The authors conclude that not all unusual designs for 20-gauge needle tips render results superior to those of the simple spinal needle.

In the past, local field block anesthesia for retromammary breast augmentation has usually been performed with spinal needles. In this article, I present an alternative, a cannula-like needle that delivers large amounts of very dilute local anesthetic in an extremely quick fashion for retromammary breast augmentation. Besides being a time-saver, this needle also offers the patient better anesthesia and improved safety. Another advantage is that the retromammary pocket is partially hydrodissected by the large amount of dilute anesthesia delivered, thereby further decreasing intraoperative time. A description of the instrument, its usage, and its pros and cons are given.

Summary Background: In adults, pencil point spinal needles are known to be less traumatic and hence to be superior compared with cutting point needles in respect of postpuncture complications. In children, only a few trials have evaluated the difference in the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) using spinal needles with different tip designs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rate and the incidence of PDPH and backache following spinal anesthesia (SA) with the two types of needles currently in use for children. Methods: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data. The success rate and postpuncture complications of 26G cutting point (Atraucan®) spinal needle were compared with 27G pencil point (Pencan®) spinal needle in 414 children aged 2–17 years undergoing surgery with SA. Results: Both needles had similar first-attempt success rates: 87% in the cutting point group and 91% in the pencil point group (P = 0.16). Pencil point needles caused less PDPH compared to cutting point needles; 0.4% vs 4.5%, respectively (P = 0.005). Both needles caused similar backache (P = 0.08). No severe neurologic symptom was reported for both needles. Conclusion: The data suggest that 27G pencil point spinal needles lead to less PDPH compared to 26G cutting point spinal needles in children.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Recurrent, bilateral or unilateral, persistent or transient, mild or profound hearing loss has been reported after spinal anaesthesia. We studied the effects of the needle type (Quincke, ballpen, pencil-point spinal needles) on hearing loss after spinal anaesthesia with the use of pure-tone audiometry. METHODS Forty-five ASA physical status I patients scheduled for elective inguinal herniorraphy with spinal anaesthesia were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups. Group Q (n = 15) patients received spinal anaesthesia through a 25-gauge (G) Quincke spinal needle, group B (n = 15) patients received the same through a 25-G ballpen spinal needle and those in group P (n = 15) received the same through a 25-G pencil-point spinal needle. Patients were interviewed about postoperative complaints such as postdural puncture headache, vertigo, nausea-vomiting, transient neurological symptoms and major neurological deficits. Pure-tone audiometry was performed by an audiologist at specific time intervals. RESULTS The number of patients who had greater than 10 dB hearing loss in group Q was significantly more than that found in group B and group P at 250, 500, 4000 and 6000 Hz on postoperative day 1. When group B and group P were compared for change in hearing, no statistically significant difference was detected at any frequency tested. CONCLUSION Because the use of ballpen and pencil-point needles reduces hearing loss after spinal anaesthesia, these needles are preferred.

The compatibility between spinal needles and their introducers varies between manufacturers and can significantly influence the usable length of the spinal needle available resulting in failure to locate CSF in larger patients. The usable length of 90-mm pencil point spinal needles from four manufacturers ranged from 68 to 79 mm when the needle was used in combination with its introducer. A new purpose-built introducer needle is described which, when used with a 25 g or finer spinal needle, maximises the usable length of the needle. Using this new introducer the usable needle length of a 90-mm Whitacre needle was increased by a further 7 to 86 mm resulting in only a 4 mm loss of total needle length. The new introducer was well received by users.