Search

Allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is a well-established curative modality for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), yet large amounts of data describing alloHCT outcomes in Philadelphia (Ph)-like ALL are lacking. We retrospectively analyzed archived DNA samples from consecutive adults with B-cell Ph-negative ALL who underwent alloHCT in complete remission (CR) (n = 127) at our center between 2006 and 2020. Identification of fusions associated with Ph-like ALL was performed using cumulative results from RNA-seq, conventional cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and whole genome array studies. Fusions associated with Ph-like ALL were detected in 56 (44%) patients, of whom 38 were carrying CRLF2r. Compared with other non–Ph-like ALL (n = 71), patients with fusions associated with Ph-like ALL were more frequently Hispanic (P = .008), were less likely to carry high-risk cytogenetics (P < .001), and were more likely to receive blinatumomab prior to HCT (P = .019). With the median followup of 3.5 years, patients with Ph-like ALL fusions had comparable posttransplant outcomes compared with other B-cell ALL: 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) (41% vs 44%; P = .36), overall survival (OS) (51% vs 50%; P = .59), and relapse (37% vs 31%; P = .47). In multivariable analysis, age (P = .023), disease status at the time of transplant (P < .001), and donor type (P = .015) influenced OS. RFS (primary endpoint) was significantly influenced by disease status (P < .001) and conditioning regimen intensity (P = .014). In conclusion, our data suggest that alloHCT consolidation results in similarly favorable survival outcomes in adult patients with Ph-like fusions and other high-risk B-cell ALL.

Nucleic acid isolation is often the starting point for all downstream experiments in biomedical research. It is therefore the most crucial step in any molecular technique. DNA and RNA extraction follow protocols with standardized reagents, many of which are available in quality-controlled commercial kits. Irrespective of the protocol, successful extraction of high-quality nucleic acid from biological tissues requires sufficient disruption of the tissue and cellular structures, denaturation of nucleoprotein complexes, inactivation of nucleases, and nucleic acid purification. These steps can be modified based on nucleic acid of interest and biological sample source. This chapter addresses DNA and RNA extraction from a variety of sample and tissue types, including saliva, and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, which are often archived in clinical pathology laboratories. Special considerations and common pitfalls of each protocol will also be discussed, as will nucleic acid quantitation techniques.