Search

INTRODUCTION Although lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is considered as a treatment option for advanced rectal cancer, it is technically demanding. Recently, the transanal approach for total mesorectal excision has become increasingly used. In this Technical Note, we describe lateral pelvic lymph node dissection using a 2-team method that was assisted by the transanal approach. TECHNIQUE First, the lateral pelvic area was entered from the anal side by dissection between the S4 sacral splanchnic nerve and levator ani muscle. Then, the fatty tissues including the obturator compartment and the distal part of the internal iliac compartment were separated from the inferior and superior vesical vessels and the bladder wall. Next, the fatty tissues were separated from the lateral pelvic wall. The obturator nerve was isolated and preserved, whereas the obturator vessels were resected at their peripheral end. Then, the fatty tissues were dissected from the bottom plane. Finally, the fatty tissues were dissected from the ventral bladder wall and were completely isolated from the obturator nerve in cooperation with the transabdominal team. RESULTS The 2-team method shortened the operative time dramatically and decreased mental and physical burden on the operators during lateral dissection. Assistance with the transanal approach helped with a secure and effective dissection, especially of the most distal parts, such as around the internal pudendal and inferior vesical arteries, because substantial skill is required for the transabdominal approach alone. CONCLUSIONS This procedure is useful for the safe and effective performance of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for patients with rectal cancer.

Although indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has been reported to be useful for assessing colorectal perfusion, unstable quantification remains an issue. We performed ICG fluorescence observation from the luminal side and examined the usefulness of the transanal approach. A total of 69 patients who underwent left-side colon surgery were enrolled in this cohort study. After the anastomosis had been constructed, ICG 0.2 mg/kg was injected intravenously. The anastomotic site was then observed by a scope inserted transanally. The following items were examined in the areas of the anastomotic site with the highest- and lowest-fluorescence intensity: maximum fluorescence (Fmax), time from ICG injection to Fmax (Tmax), time from start of dyeing to Fmax (ΔT), and the contrast pattern of the mucosa. Anastomotic leakage (AL) occurred in nine cases. Tmax and ΔT values of the lowest-fluorescence area in the distal intestine showed significant differences in the cases with AL (P = 0.015 and P = 0.040, respectively). Regarding the contrast pattern of the mucosa of the lowest-fluorescence area in the proximal and distal intestine, the patients in whom the vessels were not depicted in the area had a significantly higher incidence of AL than those in whom vessels were depicted in the area (P = 0.031 and P = 0.030, respectively). Some of the areas in which vessels were not depicted by ICG fluorescence observation from the luminal side corresponded to the points of leakage. There were heterogeneous changes that might not be grasped by observation from the serosal side. Transanal ICG fluorescence imaging can evaluate perfusion over the entire circumference of the anastomosis in detail and aid in assessing the risk of AL. Therefore, the examination of the detailed low-perfusion area enables us to take measures for AL and to search for safer operative managements.

Aim Synthetic rectal mesh erosion is a challenging complication following urogynaecological surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal management of rectal mesh erosion following urogynaecological surgery. Method A systematic review was undertaken following a pre-defined protocol registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018112425) in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Searches of MEDLINE online database, Cochrane Library and clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials, ISRCTN registry) were performed. The included articles were heterogeneous - therefore a narrative synthesis was performed. Results Fourteen studies were included in the review: 11 case reports, one case series, one retrospective cohort and one prospective multicentre trial. Fourteen rectal mesh erosions were identified. Eight (57%) of the rectal erosions underwent major abdominal surgery. In two of these cases, the abdominal approach was used only after failure of the transanal route. Five (36%) of the mesh erosions were managed using a transanal approach. In one case, the mesh passed without intervention. Conclusion Synthetic rectal mesh erosion can be managed successfully via either a transanal or a transabdominal approach with a partial or complete excision of the mesh. An examination under anaesthetic with an attempted transanal removal of mesh should be considered the first step in the management of this condition before consideration of more invasive surgery.

INTRODUCTION Head-mounted mixed-reality technologies may enable advanced intraoperative visualization during visceral surgery. In this technical note, we describe an innovative use of real-time mixed reality during robotic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision. TECHNIQUE Video signals from the robotic console and video endoscopic transanal approach were displayed on a virtual monitor using a head-up display. The surgeon, assistant, and a surgical trainee used this technique during abdominal and transanal robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision. We evaluated the feasibility and usability of this approach with the use of validated scales. RESULTS The technical feasibility of the real-time visualization provided by the current setup was demonstrated for both the robotic and transanal parts of the surgery. The surgeon, assistant, and trainee each used the mixed-reality device for 15, 55, and 35 minutes. All participants handled the device intuitively and reported a high level of comfort during the surgery. The task load was easily manageable (task load index

Background: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis and select patients with Crohn's disease. Minimally invasive techniques have been increasingly adopted including the transanal approach. However there remains a dearth of comparative data assessing the technical advantages and outcomes of a transanal approach to the IPAA against other minimally invasive techniques. Methods: In this review, we describe our learned approach with the transanal IPAA (ta-IPAA) and highlight key technical steps for a successful surgery in addition to evaluating the current literature on surgical and functional outcomes of this relatively novel procedure. Results: The ta-IPAA affords better visualization and access during a pelvic dissection translating to lower conversion rates. Lower odds of postoperative morbidity have been reported, but there was no difference in severity of complications when present. Though this technique has the advantages of a more accurate rectal transection obviating the need for multiple staple firings, the risk of anastomotic leak was similar between the two groups. Functional outcomes were found to be overall similar, though data is limited. Conclusions: The technical aspects of the IPAA have continued to evolve to mitigate the challenges posed by a deep pelvic dissection. While the ta-IPAA has been shown to be a safe and feasible procedure, the true advantages and functional benefits of this technique have yet to be elucidated with large-scale, quality data.

The transanal approach to pelvic dissection has gained considerable traction and utilization continues to expand, fueled by the transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer. The same principles and benefits of transanal pelvic dissection may apply to the transanal restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)-the TaPouch procedure. Our goal was to review the literature to date on the development and current state of the TaPouch. We performed a PubMed database search for original articles on transanal pelvic dissections, IPAA, and the TaPouch procedure, with a manual search from relevant citations in the reference list. The main outcomes were the technical aspects of the TaPouch, clinical and functional outcomes, and potential advantages, drawbacks, and future direction for the procedure. The conduct of the procedure has been defined, with the safety and feasibility demonstrated in small series. The reported rates of conversion and anastomotic leakage are low. There are no randomized trials or large-scale comparative studies available for comparative effectiveness compared to the traditional IPAA. The transanal approach to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is an exciting adaption of the transanal total mesorectal excision for refining the technical steps of a complex operation. Additional experience is needed for comparative outcomes and defining the ideal training and implementation pathways.

Total mesorectal excision has become the standard treatment for rectal cancer, and several investigators have shown that a transanal approach is a feasible option.This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer.This study was a prospective, single-arm phase II trial. It was registered on clinicaltrials.gov under identifier NCT02406118.Inpatients at a hospital specializing in oncology were selected.This prospective study enrolled 49 patients with rectal cancer located 3 to 12 cm from the anal verge who were scheduled to undergo radical surgery.Laparoscopy-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision was performed.The primary end point was total mesorectal excision quality and circumferential resection margin. Secondary end points included the number of harvested lymph nodes, operation time, and 30-day postoperative complications.From March 2015 to April 2016, 32 men and 17 women with rectal cancer were enrolled. The mean age was 61.2 years, and mean BMI was 23.3 kg/m. The mean operating time was 158 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 89.3 mL. There were no intraoperative complications and no conversions to open surgery. Successful treatment based on total mesorectal excision quality and circumferential resection margin was achieved in 45 patients (91.8%). Fifteen patients (30.6%) had 30-day postoperative complications, including 7 (14.3%) with anastomotic dehiscence, 5 (10.2%) with urinary retention, 2 (4.1%) with abdominal wound complications, and 1 (2.0%) with ileus. There was no postoperative mortality.This was a noncomparative single-arm trial conducted at a single institution.Transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision showed acceptable results based on perioperative and short-term oncologic outcomes. Further investigations are necessary to show the benefits and long-term outcomes of this procedure. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A563.

Background We compared the long-term outcomes of the bowel function (BF) in Hirschsprung's disease (HD) patients who underwent transanal endorectal pull-through (TA) with those who underwent the Soave–Denda (SD) procedure. Methods Patient data were collected from 1984 to 2015 from 110 HD patients who underwent definitive diagnosis and operation. The follow-up data were analyzed retrospectively. BF was evaluated according to the evacuation score (ES) of the Japan Society of Anorectal Malformation Study Group at 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11years of age. Results The operative procedures performed were as follows: SD: 71 (64.5%), TA: 38 (34.5%), and Duhamel: 1 (1.0%). We compared SD with TA. The ES improved chronologically after both procedures, and patients achieved satisfactory results at least 10years after operation. There was no significant difference in the total ES at all ages. The incontinence and frequency of bowel movement scores of TA patients were significantly lower than those of SD patients at several points. Conclusion TA is simple, less invasive, and adaptive for neonates and small infants. However, regarding the bowel function, TA is not always superior to SD. The surgical technique of TA must be improved according to a detailed understanding of the anatomy. Level of evidence Retrospective study – level III.

Over the past 3 years, colorectal surgeons have begun to adapt the technique of transanal total mesorectal excision. As international experience has been quickly forged, an improved recognition of the pitfalls and the practical details of this disruptive technique have been realized. The purpose of this technical note was to express the various nuances of transanal total mesorectal excision as learned during the course of its clinical application and international teaching, so as to rapidly communicate and share important insights with other surgeons who are in the early adoption phase of this approach. The technical points specific to transanal total mesorectal excision are addressed herein. When correctly applied, these will likely improve the quality of surgery and decrease morbidity attributable to inexperience with the transanal approach to total mesorectal excision.

Background Aim of this study was to evaluate functional outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in comparison to conventional laparoscopic approach (LaTME) in terms of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Methods Forty-six patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer between 2013 and 2017 were enrolled. Primary outcome was the severity of faecal incontinence, assessed both before the treatment and 6 months after ileostomy reversal. LARS score and Jorge-Wexner scale were utilized to analyze its severity. Results Twenty (87%) from TaTME and 21 (91%) from LaTME group developed LARS postoperatively. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of LARS occurrence (p = 0.63) and severity. The median Wexner score was comparable in both groups (8 [IQR: 4–12] vs 7 [3–11], p = 0.83). Univariate analysis revealed that postoperative complications were a risk factor for LARS development (p = 0.02). Perioperative outcomes, including operative time, blood loss and intraoperative adverse events did not differ significantly between groups either. Five TaTME patients developed postoperative complications, while there were morbidity 6 cases in LaTME group. Quality of mesorectal excision was comparable with 20 and 19 complete cases in TaTME and LaTME groups, respectively. Conclusions TaTME provided comparable outcomes in terms of functional outcomes in comparison to LaTME for total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancers. Having said that, LARS prevalence is still high and requires further evaluation of the technique.

The transanal approach for rectal resection is a promising approach, because it increases the circumferential radial margin, especially for difficult cases. Meanwhile, functional sequelae are frequent after rectal cancer surgery and are often due to neurological lesions. There is little literature describing surgical anatomy from bottom to top. We combined our surgical experience with our fetal and adult anatomical research to provide a bottom-up surgical description focusing on neurological anatomy (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A148).

The present video shows a rare case of erosion through the full rectal wall into the rectum after a transperineal implant of a double-arm polypropylene kit. A 70-year-old woman underwent a transperineal implant of a double-arm polypropylene kit. One year after surgery, she developed bothersome symptoms in the posterior perineum including heaviness, pain and rectal bleeding during defecation. A clinical examination showed the presence of a part of the prothesis traversing the rectal cavity. A minimally invasive transanal approach was performed to remove the mesh and restore the rectal integrity. This surgical technique demonstrates rectal mesh removal with a transanal approach. To our knowledge, this is a rare complication of rectal erosion of a posterior transperineal mesh kit. The aim of this video is to show a complete transanal approach to treating this serious complication avoiding the more invasive and traumatic abdominal procedure.

Total mesorectal excision is the standard surgical treatment for mid- and low-rectal cancer. Laparoscopy represents a clear leap forward in the management of rectal cancer patients, offering significant improvements in post-operative measures such as pain, first bowel movement, and hospital length of stay. However, there are still some limits to its applications, especially in difficult cases. Such cases may entail either conversion to an open procedure or positive resection margins. Transanal endoscopic proctectomy (ETAP) was recently described and could address the difficulties of approaching the lower third of the rectum. Early series and case-control studies have shown favourable short-term results, such as a low conversion rate, reduced hospital length of stay and oncological outcomes comparable to laparoscopic surgery. The aim of the proposed study is to compare the rate of positive resection margins (R1 resection) with ETAP versus laparoscopic proctectomy (LAP), with patients randomly assigned to each arm. The proposed study is a multicentre randomised trial using two parallel groups to compare ETAP and LAP. Patients with T3 lower-third rectal adenocarcinomas for whom conservative surgery with manual coloanal anastomosis is planned will be recruited. Randomisation will be performed immediately prior to surgery after ensuring that the patient meets the inclusion criteria and completing the baseline functional and quality of life tests. The study is designed as a non-inferiority trial with a main criterion of R0/R1 resection. Secondary endpoints will include the conversion rate, the minimal invasiveness of the abdominal approach, postoperative morbidity, the length of hospital stay, mesorectal macroscopic assessment, functional urologic and sexual results, faecal continence, global quality of life, stoma-free survival, and disease-free survival at 3 years. The inclusion period will be 3 years, and every patient will be followed for 3 years. The number of patients needed is 226. There is a strong need for optimal evaluation of the ETAP because of substancial changes in the operative technique. Assessment of oncological safety and septic risk, as well as digestive and urological functional results, is particularily mandatory. Moreover, benefits of the ETAP technique could be demonstrated in post-operative outcome. ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT02584985 . Date and version identifier: Version n°2 – 2015 July 6.

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction - Vol. 45 - N° 6 - p. 546-548

We report 2 patients with rectal and low sigmoid atresia operated on, respectively, at 6 and 3 months of age using the transanal approach, similar to the transanal technique for Hirschsprung disease, after exploratory laparotomy with colostomy at birth. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications after a follow-up time of 2 years. After closure of the colostomy, both patients had no fecal incontinence. The transanal approach is a safe and effective technique in the management of rectal and sigmoid atresia.

Background Both the Swenson and the Soave procedures have been adapted to a transanal approach. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes following the transanal Swenson and Soave procedures using a matched case control analysis. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all transanal Soave and Swenson pullthroughs done at 2 tertiary care children’s hospitals between 2000 and 2010. Patients were matched for gestational age, mean weight at time of the operation, level of aganglionosis, and presence of co-morbidities. Student’s t-test and chi-squared analysis were performed. Results Fifty-four patients (Soave 27, Swenson 27) had adequate data for matching and analysis. Mean follow-up was 4 ± 1.6 years and 3.2 ± 2.7 years for the Soave and Swenson groups, respectively. No significant differences in mean operating time (Soave:191 ± 55, Swenson:167 ± 61 min, p = 0.6), overall hospital stay (6 ± 4vs7.8 ± 5 days, p = 0.7), and number with intra-operative complications (3 vs 4, p = 1.0), post-operative obstructive symptoms (6 vs 9, p = 0.5), enterocolitis episodes (4 vs 4, p = 1.0), or fecal incontinence (0 vs 2, p = 0.4) were noted. Conclusion After controlling for potential confounders, there were no significant differences in the short and intermediate term outcome between transanal Soave and transanal Swenson pullthrough procedures.

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) represents a burgeoning but still largely experimental field. For surgeries involving the upper abdominal organs, the transanal approach promises to provide a more direct route in contrast to the often cumbersome retroflexion typically required with the transgastric approach. The potential disadvantages of the transanal route are also significant and include issues of sterility, the risk of inadvertent trauma to adjacent organs during transmural puncture, and the risk of colonic wall shearing. This article reviews the evolution of transanal access to the peritoneal cavity, highlights the various techniques that have been used for transanal access and closure, and discusses in further detail the relative advantages and disadvantages of this approach.

Hartmann procedure consists in a sigmoidectomy followed by a terminal colostomy. However, the stoma is associated with complications and suboptimal quality of life, so the restoration of colonic continuity should be, at least, considered in any case. Open restoration has been associated with significant morbidity and mortality; therefore, many authors have described the advantages of laparoscopic Hartmann reversal. We want to go a step further showing our experience using a combined laparoscopic and transanal approach in an attempt to improve the surgical technique.Patients with an end colostomy due to an emergency Hartmann procedure are selected for this intervention. This approach is performed simultaneously laparoscopically and transanally, with single-port devices, through the colostomy wound in the first case and trough anal canal in the second one. The previous stapler line is resected transanally and the proximal rectum and mesorectum are dissected until the peritoneal reflexion, where both teams work together to complete the adhesiolysis. Finally an end-to-end anastomosis is performed under laparoscopic control.As in patients with rectal cancer, dissection of the stump in Hartmann reversal procedure may be better and associated with shorter operative time.As with any new surgical procedure, it is probably too early to draw conclusions, but nowadays transanal combined with laparoscopic approach seems to be a safe and feasible technique to perform a Hartmann reversal.

Hirschsprung disease is a congenital disorder characterized by the absence of ganglion cells in the distal bowel, which results in functional obstruction, most commonly in the newborn period. Traditionally, surgical therapy for Hirschsprung disease has consisted of a proximal defunctioning colostomy, followed months later by a definitive reconstructive “pullthrough” procedure in which the aganglionic colon is resected and the normally innervated bowel is brought down and sutured to the area just above the anal sphincter. Although many types of pullthrough procedures have been described, the most commonly performed operations in North America have been the Swenson, Duhamel, and Soave (or endorectal pullthrough) procedures. In the past several decades, increasing numbers of pediatric surgeons have abandoned the routine use of a colostomy in favor of a 1-stage pullthrough, with multiple studies suggesting that this approach is safe and efficacious.1-3 Over the past few years, the popularity of minimal-access surgical techniques has led to a number of modifications to the standard 1-stage operations. Georgeson described a laparoscopic approach that has been adopted by many surgeons and that is associated with less pain and a shorter hospitalization than standard open procedures.4 Subsequently, a number of authors described a solely transanal approach, which appears to be associated with the same advantages without the need for any intraabdominal dissection.5-9 However, the results from this approach have been limited to single-center or small multicenter series with relatively short follow-up.10-14 The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the early results of the transanal Soave pullthrough. To optimize the number of patients and the length of follow-up, we combined data from 6 of the initial centers to perform the procedure.

Local excision of rectal lesions is being increasingly undertaken, especially in those unfit for major surgery. The traditional transanal approach is often cumbersome and limited to low and mid rectal lesions. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is being used to excise both benign and malignant rectal lesions, including those in the upper rectum.Prospective analysis of all patients undergoing a TEMS excision between January 1997 and December 2000 in a specialized colorectal unit.Forty patients underwent a TEMS resection, with a mean age of 72 years (SD, 10 years). The mean distance of the lesions from the anal verge was 9.8 cm (SD, 3.1 cm). In 24 patients, the lesion was locatedor=10 cm from the anal verge, making them unsuitable for traditional transanal resection. The mean operative time was 91 minutes (SD, 34 minutes), and the mean postoperative stay was 3 days (SD, 1.5 days). No mortality was associated with the procedure, and there was minimal morbidity in 15%. There has been no recurrence in the 18 patients who had a malignant lesion excised.The TEMS operating system provides the surgeon with a suitable alternative for the resection of benign and malignant rectal neoplasms in selected patients. It has the advantage of providing visual clarity of the operative field, allowing more precise dissection and a minimally invasive approach to mid and upper rectal lesions. There has been no mortality and minimal morbidity. We advocate its inclusion as part of a colorectal surgeon's operative armamentarium for these selected cases.

Due to the increase in screening programs, more rectal polyps and early rectal cancers are detected. Transanal resection of these lesions is less invasive than a transabdominal approach. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) has gained a lot of interest, but the technique has several drawbacks such as the expensive instrumentation and considerable learning curve. With the evolution of single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), new devices have become available. This led to the development of a hybrid technique of transanal surgery. The technique combines a transanal approach, a SILS port and standard laparoscopic instruments. We used this technique in 2 cases.

A modification of the dorsal rectal approach is described as an alternative to consider in selected low and middle rectal lesions unsuitable for the transanal approach. The dorsal rectal approach is performed through the sacrococcygeal joint and below the gluteus maximus muscle resulting in an easier, safe, and well-tolerated procedure.

In some cases, a J-pouch is not created after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (Lap-ISR), because this procedure usually does not involve laparotomy. This study aimed to develop a new technique for Lap-ISR and J-pouch reconstruction without laparotomy and to assess the short- and long-term outcomes of this technique. After a rectal specimen is excised using the transanal approach, the reconstructed intestine is reinserted into the intra-abdominal space. To create the J-shape, the reconstructed intestine is looped back using Allis forceps, and the septum of the J-shape is divided using a surgical stapler. We performed 20 surgeries using the new technique. Although three patients developed pelvic infections, no J-pouch-related complications were noted. Intestinal continuity could be maintained in all patients who received a diverting stoma.

Congenital H-type rectovestibular fistulas are rare in the spectrum of anorectal malformations. Repair is associated with recurrence rates of up to 30%, using perineal repair, vestibuloanal pull-through or anterior anorectoplasty. The rarity of the malformation has limited experience with the surgical approach; hence, the rate of wound breakdown. We describe the use of a modification of the transanal approach for the repair in a 7-month-old female patient.Key words: Anorectal malformation, H-type fistula, transanal

In the Soave procedure for Hirschsprung's disease, the mucosectomy of the aganglionic segment of colon is performed transabdominally. The authors describe an innovative modification of the standard Soave procedure, in which a transanal mucosectomy is performed as the abdominal incision is made. The transanal mucosectomy technique was compared with the conventional approach. From 1974 to 1993, 51 patients underwent a Soave procedure for Hirschsprung's disease. Twenty-six (51%) had the standard Soave procedure (STD) (1974-1984), and 25 (49%) had the modified procedure (MOD) (1984-1994). In the latter, the entire mucosal dissection was performed through a transanal approach. Surgical data were accumulated by database analysis. Each case was entered into a database at the time of operation, and follow-up data were obtained through mail-in questionnaires or personal communication. The two groups were comparable with respect to number, gender distribution, and average age at the time of operation. There were two superficial wound infections in the STD group and two superficial wound infections and one death (secondary to cardiac arrest in a patient with trisomy 21 and a severe congenital cardiac anomaly) in the MOD group. The average postoperative stay for the STD group was 10.8 days; that for the MOD group was 6.8 days (t test: P < .0001). The operating time was shorter for the MOD procedure. Follow-up data were available for 25 (96.2%) patients in the STD group and 25 (100%) in the MOD group. The two groups were comparable in all respects except for the average length of follow-up, which was longer for the STD group. No patients had, urinary incontinence or sexual dysfunction (when applicable). Overall, patients/parents in both groups rated the outcome as "good." This modification of the Soave technique for Hirschsprung's disease is both safe and effective. Compared with the standard procedure, it is associated with shorter operating time (because the transanal mucosectomy is performed as the abdomen is opened) and a shorter stay postoperatively. The results have been excellent.

AIM To assess the efficacy of a modified approach with transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) using simple customized instruments in male patients with low rectal cancer. METHODS A total of 115 male patients with low rectal cancer from December 2006 to August 2015 were retrospectively studied. All patients had a bulky tumor (tumor diameter ≥ 40 mm). Forty-one patients (group A) underwent a classical approach of transabdominal total mesorectal excision (TME) and transanal intersphincteric resection (ISR), and the other 74 patients (group B) underwent a modified approach with transabdominal TME, transanal ISR, and taTME. Some simple instruments including modified retractors and an anal dilator with a papilionaceous fixture were used to perform taTME. The operative time, quality of mesorectal excision, circumferential resection margin, local recurrence, and postoperative survival were evaluated. RESULTS All 115 patients had successful sphincter preservation. The operative time in group B (240 min, range: 160-330 min) was significantly shorter than that in group A (280 min, range: 200-360 min; P = 0.000). Compared with group A, more complete distal mesorectum and total mesorectum were achieved in group B (100% vs 75.6%, P = 0.000; 90.5% vs 70.7%, P = 0.008, respectively). After 46.1 ± 25.6 mo follow-up, group B had a lower local recurrence rate and higher disease-free survival rate compared with group A, but these differences were not statistically significant (5.4% vs 14.6%, P = 0.093; 79.5% vs 65.1%, P = 0.130). CONCLUSION Retrograde taTME with simple customized instruments can achieve high-quality TME, and it might be an effective and economical alternative for male patients with bulky tumors.

Rectal foreign bodies present a difficult diagnostic and management dilemma because of delayed presentation, a variety of objects, and a wide spectrum of injuries. An orderly approach to the diagnosis, management, and post-extraction evaluation of the patient with a rectal foreign body is essential. This article outlines and describes the stepwise evaluation and management of the patient with a rectal foreign body. The authors also describe the varied techniques needed to successfully remove the different foreign bodies that may be encountered.

To safely avoid the construction of a covering stoma in patients with advanced lower rectal cancer undergoing laparoscopy assisted colorectal surgery (LACS), we added circumferential manual reinforcing sutures via the transanal approach at the site of mechanical anastomosis. In June 2008, LACS was performed for a tumor of 6 cm in longer diameter in the Rb region of the lower rectum approximately 5 cm from the anal verge. After intraperitoneal coloproctal anastomosis was performed in the pelvis by the double stapling technique (DST), reinforcement was provided by manual trans-anal suturing (trans-anal reinforcing sutures: TARS). A covering stoma was constructed because this was a high-risk case. Complications such as mild wound infection and stoma trouble occurred, and the patient was discharged after conservative therapy. In June 2008, LACS was performed for a tumor of 5 cm in longer diameter in the Ra region of the lower rectum approximately 7 cm from the anal verge. After intraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis was performed in the pelvis by DST, TARS were added to avoid a covering stoma. Minor leakage occurred postoperatively, but this was controlled conservatively and the patient was discharged. In patients having surgical treatment of advanced lower rectal cancer, good results were obtained by adding circumferential reinforcing sutures via the trans-anal approach at the site of ultra-low anastomosis after DST.

A set of new instruments was designed to establish an access to the abdominal cavity for NOTES via the rectosigmoid. It comprehends a metal overtube which is positioned using a modified TEM device. The entry point is targeted by transrectal ultrasound and secured by a purse-string suture. Closure is achieved by means of a linear stapler application. The applicability of the system could already be confirmed in animal survival studies.

Aim The aim of this study is to present the details and outcomes of laparoscopic and transanal approach in the management of rectal atresia. Patients Two female patients with rectal atresia were operated upon using laparoscopic and transanal approach. There were no intraoperative and postoperative complications. Follow-up at 5 and 4 months, respectively, after closure of colostomy has shown both patients with good fecal continence. Conclusion Laparoscopic and transanal approach is a novel and good alternative to the current surgical techniques in the management of rectal atresia.

Despite the noninclusion of locally draining lymph nodes, limited resection of low-risk pT1 rectal cancer can achieve an adequate oncological outcome with lower morbidity and mortality compared with radical resection.Based on the data of a prospective multicenter observational study performed from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2001, patients with low-risk pT1 rectal cancer underwent analysis with regard to the early postoperative outcome and the oncological long-term results achieved after limited vs radical resection with curative intent.Two hundred eighty-two hospitals of all categories.Four hundred seventy-nine patients with low-risk pT1 rectal cancer treated for cure.Eighty-five patients (17.7%) underwent limited excision using a conventional transanal approach and 35 (7.3%) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery. The remaining 359 (74.9%) underwent radical resection.Postoperative morbidity and mortality, local recurrence rate, and tumor-free and overall survival.In comparison with radical resection, limited resection was associated with fewer general (25.1% vs 7.5%; P.001) and specific (22.8% vs 9.2%; P.001) postoperative complications. After a mean follow-up of 44 months, patients who underwent limited resection had a significantly higher 5-year local tumor recurrence rate than did those who underwent radical resection (6.0% vs 2.0%; P = .049), but tumor-free survival did not differ.Limited resection of pT1 low-risk rectal cancer can result in an oncologically acceptable outcome but must nevertheless be considered an oncological compromise compared with radical resection.

I predict that 2013 will be the year of endoscopic transanal approaches to radical low rectal dissection and anastomosis. The paper by Atallah et al. [1] and its video mirror the work of Lacy et al. [2] who recently presented in Barcelona and in Vienna the results of the first 40 cases of what he called abdomino-transanal TME. Last year, in this very journal, Zheng published the first case of transanal TME carried out entirely from below [3] shortly followed by Leroy et al. [4] who called it ‘‘no scar transanal TME’’, both using many of the same principles. It was too soon to claim oncological superiority to conventional laparoscopic TME, but Lacy’s principal message was that the dissection from below is ‘‘much easier’’ than either minimally invasive or open surgery from above. What could be more important for the management of a common cancer which continues to challenge the most experienced colorectal surgeons? You may never have heard of TAMIS TME which may or may not be the name finally attached by surgeons to the ideas in this paper—but these ideas are indeed of fundamental importance. The combination of the transanal approach, the use of a gas tight seal for anus or anorectum, and direct ‘‘holy plane’’ dissection around the mesorectum from below—these three together can revolutionise the practice of rectal cancer surgery. The authors of this paper describe the shortcomings of standard approaches from above—always particularly challenging in the obese male. They also describe the many problems of multi-stapling across the rectum which is almost entirely due to the obliquity of approach with straight instruments introduced via the abdomen. In my opinion, as a frequent ‘‘voyeur’’ of demonstration laparoscopic surgery, it is common for these difficulties to place the anastomosis lower down and nearer to the pubo-rectal sling than some cancers require from the oncological point of view. There is no doubt that the function enjoyed by a patient with an anastomosis at 6 cm from the anal verge is superior to that with one at 3 cm i.e. true colo-anal [5]. We can envisage an early approach to the lower end which starts by defining exactly the appropriate amount of ano-rectum to be retained for optimal function, washes out thoroughly beyond a carefully sealed tumour segment, and then optimises TME dissection and preservation of the autonomic nerves by gas assisted endoscopic ‘‘holy plane’’ dissection via the anus. The initial response by industry to the massively important challenge of optimising appropriate access is a space to watch over the coming months. At present the only specifically designed platform for TAMIS is the gel point path. Already approaches vary from the use of triports originally designed for single incision MIS through to the use of externally located robots, imaginatively introduced flexible cameras and the use of surgical gloves to convey a variety of instruments into the extra mesorectal space. The challenges are enormous but there will be rich rewards indeed for the companies that facilitate the access in the best possible way. More science will be required to measure the impact on anal function of the various devices and also the feasibility and indications for transanal extraction of the TME specimen. Whatever the instrumentation it seems probable that collaborative abdomino-transanal traction, counter-traction and peri-mesorectal dissection will achieve the major objectives better than our present reliance on the various trans-abdominal approaches. These are perhaps the means to achieve the precision that has hitherto eluded us in some areas of operative R. J. Heald (&) Pelican Cancer Foundation, Dinwoodie Drive, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG24 9NN, UK e-mail: j.peskett@pelicancancer.org

Several procedures have been described for the excision of perirectal tumours. Among them are the Kraske and York Mason operations, and the transanal approach, which may cause anal incontinence and rectal bleeding. A novel technique, i.e. the perianal intersphincteric excision (PIE), is reported here with the aim of minimising such postoperative complications, as it avoids both stretching the sphincters and endorectal wounding.The procedure has been carried out successfully in two patients: a woman with a low-grade rectal leiomyosarcoma and a man with a perirectal schwannoma. No postoperative complications were observed, and no recurrence was detected after 36 and 8 months respectively.In conclusion, PIE seems to be a safe and effective procedure for the management of perirectal masses.

Purpose: A new endorectal pull-through technique using a transanal approach is presented in this report. Methods: Mucosectomy, colectomy, and pull-through are performed transanally, and neither laparotomy or laparoscopy are required. Five patients affected with Hirschsprung's disease have been operated on with this technique. Conclusion: During the 6- to 15-month follow-up period, all of them have had postoperative normal bowel movements.

suction created in the colon with attempted extraction.We report on two patients with large rectal foreign bodies that we were able to successfully and easily remove through a transanal approach by injecting air into the rectum and the sigmoid colon. Technique for removing a rubber ball A37-year-oldmanintroducedastringofthreerubberballs (diameter of 6 cm each) into his rectum a few hours before coming to the emergency room.When he pulled them out the string broke and one of the balls was retained in the rectum. He had no complaint of anorectal or abdominal pain. Abdominal films confirmed a round ball in the low rectum. There was no evidence of extraluminal air. The objectcouldbeeasilyfeltjustabuttingtheupperanalcanal. The patient was taken to the operating room. He was placed in the lithotomy position under general anesthesia. With gentle and gradual dilatation of the anal canal, the surgeon’s hand could be introduced into the rectum. The entireballcouldbegraspedwithfingers.Anattempttopull out the ball was met with a strong counter suction force. A #18 Foley catheter was inserted into the rectum. The ball could not be extracted until 60 mL of air was injected into

Introduction: Rectoceles are frequently associated with feelings of pelvic discomfort and symptoms of obstructed defaecation (OD). Repair by a transvaginal or transanal approach might result in de novo dyspareunia in up to approximately 40% of the cases. This study was designed to investigate whether anterolateral rectopexy provides an adequate rectocele repair without dyspareunia as a side effect. Method: A consecutive series of 33 women (median age 55 years; range: 37-73) with a symptomatic rectocele (depth >3 cm) underwent anterolateral rectopexy. Before the operation, all patients underwent evacuation proctography (EP), which was repeated 6months after the repair in all but three patients. A standardized questionnaire concerning pelvic discomfort, OD and dyspareunia was used to assess the long-term effect of rectocele repair. The response rate was 91%. Results: Six months after the procedure, EP revealed a recurrent or persistent rectocele in six patients (20%). However, in four of these six patients, the depth of the rectocele was

Using a posterior repair and rectal suspension procedure for those patients who need surgical treatment of rectal prolapse, we have treated 46 patients over a period of 17 years at Children's Mercy Hospital in Kansas City, MO. One patient with caudal dysgenesis died of multiple congenital anomalies following two unsuccessful attempts at posterior repair and suspension. Four patients developed a recurrence afterwards, which was found to be due to sigmoid intussusception and, presumably, had played a major part in their original prolapse. Two of these required resection, one from the transanal approach and one from the transabdominal approach. One resolved spontaneously and another is as yet unresolved. Three patients had minor mucosal prolapse that was transient and two patients had extrusion of silk sutures but continued to have a very satisfactory result. Overall, 42 patients had satisfactory resolution of their rectal prolapse. Three of the four patients who had unsatisfactory results had associated anomalies that contributed to their poor outcome.

AIM: To summarize the operative experience of the transanal approach in acquired rectovestibular fistula repair. METHODS: Ninety-six cases of acquired rectovestibular fistula in young females were analyzed retrospectively. The etiology and operative procedure were discussed. Operative essential points were, the patient was laid in prone frog position, with the knees and hips flexed at 90o; the perineum was elevated; and the anal opening was exposed. Four stay sutures were applied to the margin of the fistular orifice in the anal opening at points 3, 6, 9 and 12 o’clock. A circular incision of mucosa surrounding the stay sutures was made. The fistula was dissected from its anal opening to its vestibular opening. The wound of vestibule was sutured, and the rectoanal wound was then sutured transversely. RESULTS: All the 96 patients recovered uneventfully from operation with a successful rate of 93.75%. CONCLUSION: The transanal approach in the treatment of the acquired rectovestibular fistula is a simple and feasible technique.

Each of the basic operative methods for Hirschsprung's disease (the rectosigmoidectomy developed by Swenson, the retrorectal transanal approach developed by Duhamel, and the endorectal procedure developed by Soave and modified by Denda and Boley) can give good results. A protective colostomy should be routine. If only an occasional case is prevented from progressing to incontinence or septicemia and death, then I think this outweighs the hazards of the colostomy.

Analysis of the 27 cases of heterotopic gastric mucosa reported in the literature and a new case described here elucidates the main features of this disease: 1) all but one asymptomatic case were diagnosed in infants or in adults under 26 years old; 2) although rectal bleeding occurred in 24 patients, rectal peptic ulceration was found in only 13; 3) six of the patients also had rectal duplication; and 4) 19 times the limited extension of the heterotopic gastric mucosa was compatible with a complete excision by a transanal approach.