Search

Recent advances in renewable energy research have suggested the fuel cell as a promising future energy source. Compared to the conventional power generation process, which has multiple-step conversion, a fuel cell is a single-step conversion process and produces power and sometimes heat. The efficiency of the individual existing conventional system is increased by integrating with fuel cells. The purpose of hybridization is to fulfill the demand and supply of power and heat. This paper starts with the historical development of fuel cell proceed with different categorize of hybrid systems. Discuss the possibilities of integration of existing fuel cell with other existing technologies such as SOFC-PEMFC, FC-CHP, FC-GT-ST, FC-Hybrid Vehicle, FC-PV/Battery. Numerical modeling can be done for each hybrid system considering mass balance, energy-exergy balance. At the end of the paper a discussion on the technical, economical, and commercial challenges and their solutions with future possibilities is presented. [Display omitted] • Study the integration potential of fuel cell with other power generating systems. • Fuel-cell hybrid configurations are analyzed. • Modelling aspect of various fuel cell hybrid configurations were summarized. • Fuel cell behavior with power and heat generation is presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper contributes a novel sustainability index and modified exergy indicators for conventional gas turbines and solid oxide fuel cell integrated gas turbine (SOFC-GT) hybrid power cycles. In this work, an intercooled gas turbine (Ic-GT) cycle is considered as a base cycle, which gives an additive advantage in lowering the power required for the compressor. Moreover, on SOFC integration with Ic-GT, the qualitative and quantitative performance are examined. Numerical modeling is done using MATLAB and an exclusive comparison has been made based on energy-exergy and sustainability analysis for the system and its components. On comparing the first law efficiency at turbine inlet temperature, TIT 1250K and rp = 18 for Ic-GT, intercooled recuperated gas turbine (Ic-RGT), and Ic–SOFC–RGT, it is 25.82%, 36.04%, and 64.78%, respectively. Similarly, second law efficiency is 11.43%, 22.33%, and 61.11% and the overall sustainability index is 1.12, 1.28, and 2.57 for Ic-GT, Ic-RGT, and Ic–SOFC–RGT, respectively. Nine other modified exergy-based parameters are used to identify the role of fuel and product exergy and then compare the most affected component in three configurations. [Display omitted] • Gas turbine exhaust waste heat has been examined to power fuel cell. • Two typical intercooled gas turbines and a fuel-cell hybrid system are compared. • Energy efficiency, exergy efficiency, sustainability index are compared. • Configurations are compared using nine modified exergetic performance indicators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, six novel modified exergy relations are explored to determine the precise estimation of exergy destruction and to identify which component has the most improvement potential. For this, three power generation cycles are considered, i.e., simple gas turbine (SGT), recuperated gas turbine (RGT), are compared with a novel hybrid system (SOFC-RGT: Solid Oxide Fuel Cell-RGT), which operates with fuel flexibility as well as enhanced work-output and thermal efficiency. For energy, exergy, and sustainability studies, numerical modeling is conducted using MATLAB. At r p = 4, TIT = 1250 K, an exclusive comparison has been made between proposed configurations based on thermodynamic modeling and exergy-based sustainability index. It is found that with the inclusion of a recuperator and a fuel cell in the proposed cycles, the thermal and sustainability performance tend to increase significantly. Whereas, exergy destruction increases but has minimal impact on comparing thermal performance and sustainability index. In terms of sustainability, RGT is 30.76% more sustainable than SGT, while SOFC-GT is 63.39% more sustainable than RGT. [Display omitted] • The gas turbine exhaust waste heat generated has been examined for powering the fuel cell. • A comparative sustainable, qualitative and quantitative performance comparison has been made between SGT, RGT and SOFC-RGT. • As per sustainability index the performance order is SGT < RGT < SOFC-RGT (lower to higher). • 6-Modified exergy indicator is used for performance comparison. • A novel performance map has been drawn for SGT, RGT and SOFC-RGT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]