Search

The multiple protective functions of the skin derive from the interactions between epithelial skin and immune cells as well as the commensal microbiota. Developed in the last trimester of intra‐uterine life, the skin barrier adapts dynamically after birth. Specific differences in the structure and physiology have been disclosed between infant and adult skin. The stratum corneum of infants is thinner and structured by thicker corneocytes with a more anisotropic surface in comparison to adult skin. Lower levels of the natural moisturizing factor and its constituents, together with the increased protease activity in the epidermis result in dry baby skin and ongoing adaptation of the desquamation to the extra‐uterine environment. Infant epidermis is characterized by an accelerated proliferation rate and clinically competent permeability barrier in term neonates, despite the higher baseline values of transepidermal water loss in infants. The skin surface of newborns is less acidic, which could increase susceptibility to diaper and atopic dermatitis. Immediately after birth, skin is colonized by commensal bacteria—a process dependent on the mode of delivery and of major importance for the maturation of the immune system. Skin bacterial diversity and dysbiosis have been related to different pathology such as atopic and seborrheic dermatitis. This paper focuses on the ongoing structural, functional and biochemical adaptation of the human skin barrier after birth. We discuss the interactions on the 'skin barrier/ microbiota/ immune system' axis and their role in the development of competent functional integrity of the epidermal barrier. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Skin microbiome and skin physiology are important indicators of the epidermal homeostasis status. Stress models can reveal pathological conditions and modulating effects. Here we investigated the cutaneous microbiome in relation to skin physiology after mild tape stripping (TS) without treatment compared to two cosmetic leave-on lotions (pH 5.5 vs. pH 9.3) in 25 healthy volunteers. Methods: The microbiome was analyzed by 16S-rRNA-gene amplicon sequencing and put in relation to the following skin physiology parameter: epidermal barrier function (TEWA-Meter TM300), stratum corneum hydration (Corneometer CM 825), surface pH (pH-Meter), and skin erythema (Mexameter). Results: TS reduced the alpha diversity with a recovery over 7 days without treatment. Both lotions significantly accelerated the recovery of the alpha diversity already after 2 days with a slightly higher rate for the acidic lotion. After TS, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria was increased, whereas Actinobacteria were reduced. The relative abundances of typical skin-associated genera were reduced after TS. Taxa compositions returned to normal levels after 7 days in all treatment groups. An accelerated normalization could be observed with both lotions already after 2 days. A significant difference in skin pH was observed on day 2 and day 7 with an increased pH for the alkaline lotion. Both lotions induced an increase in stratum corneum hydration. Conclusion: The study proved the suitability of an experimental stress model in the assessment of skin surface microbiome in relation to skin physiology. Stratum corneum hydration increased significantly with both lotions already at day 2. Microbiome parameters (alpha diversity, mean relative taxa, abundance of selected genera) normalized over 2–7 days. The following mechanisms could be responsible for the accelerated normalization of the microbiome: (a) optimized hydration during the recovery phase, (b) the composition of the lotion, (c) the induced repair mechanism. Thus, the formulation has a positive effect on the stratum corneum hydration and subsequently on cutaneous microbiome and skin physiology. Furthermore, this eventually has implications on the modulation of exogenous stress-induced epidermal alterations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic diathesis encompassing atopic dermatitis (AD), allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, food allergy, eosinophilic esophagitis, and asthma is a widely prevalent condition with a broad heterogeneity in clinical course, age of onset, and lifespan persistence. A primary event in AD is the commonly inherited epidermal barrier dysfunction. Together with the host-microbiome interactions, barrier defect and allergen exposure modulate both innate and adaptive immunity, thus triggering and maintaining the inflammatory response. Microbiome diversity, together with the host's contact with nonpathogenic microbes in childhood, is a prerequisite for functional maturation of the immune system, which is in part mediated by microbiome-induced epigenetic changes. Yet, whether microbiome alterations are the result or the reason for barrier impairment and inflammatory response of the host is unclear. Exposure to locally prevalent microbial species could contribute to further modification of the disease course. The objective of this review is to reveal the link between changes in the skin microbiota, barrier dysfunction, and inflammation in AD. Addressing unmet needs includes determining the genetic background of AD susceptibility; the epigenetic modifications induced by the microbiota and other environmental factors; the role of globally diverse provoking factors; and the implementation of personalized, phenotype-specific therapies such as a epidermal barrier restoration in infancy and microbiota modulation via systemic or topical interventions, all of which open gaps for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The intact skin represents a barrier to the uncontrolled loss of water, proteins, and plasma components from the organism. Owing to its complex structure, the epidermal barrier with its major layer, the stratum corneum, is the rate-limiting unit for the penetration of exogenous substances through the skin. The epidermal barrier is not a static structure. The status of different functions of the epidermis can be monitored by assessing specific biophysical parameters such as transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, and skin surface pH. Variables originating from the individual as well as exogenous factors have an important influence on the epidermal barrier parameters. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The antimicrobial treatment of wounds is still a major problem. Tissue-tolerable electrical plasma (TTP) is a new approach for topical microbial disinfection of the skin surface. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of TTP on a carotenoid profile in relation to skin physiology parameters (epidermal barrier function, stratum corneum (SC) hydration, surface temperature and irritation parameters). We were interested in the interaction of TTP and the antioxidative network, as well as the consequences for skin physiology parameters. These parameters are also indicative of TTP safety in vivo. For plasma application, 'Kinpen 09' was used (surface exposure 30-43°C) for 3 s. Beta-carotene and water profiles were assessed by in vivo Raman microspectroscopy (skin composition analyzer 3510). Skin physiology parameters were measured with Tewameter TM 300, Corneometer CM 825, skin thermometer and Chromameter CR 300. All parameters were assessed non-invasively on seven healthy volunteers before and after plasma application in vivo. We could show that TTP application leads to a decrease in beta-carotene especially in the superficial SC. Skin-surface temperature increased by 1.74°C, while the transepidermal water loss (TEWL) increase indicated an impaired barrier function. SC hydration decreased as seen in water profile especially in the superficial layers and capacitance values. A slight increase in skin redness was measurable. The induction of reactive oxygen species is probably the major contributor of TTP efficacy in skin disinfection. Skin physiology parameters were influenced without damaging the skin or skin functions, indicating the safety of TTP under in vivo conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is well known that the damaging effect of surfactants on the stratum corneum varies according to the surfactant used. The present investigations aim to compare four standard commercial cleansing solutions (Esemptan® Cleansing Lotion, Stephalen® Shower Gel, Manipur® Antimicrobial Cleansing Solution and Tork® Mevon 55TM Liquid Soap) with respect to their cleansing and skin barrier-damaging effects. The cleansing effect of the solutions was determined in relation to their concentrations in a first experimental series involving 15 subjects using a standardised test method. The product concentrations with the most divergent cleansing effects were tested for their dehydrating (corneometry), epidermal barrier-damaging (TEWL) and irritating effects (laser Doppler) in a standardised washing test. In a second experimental series, the concentration used for the cleansing solutions was based on the quantity of cleansing solution obtained from dispenser actuations (six actuations/L). These concentrations were used to test the cleansing and damaging effect on the stratum corneum using the same methods as in the first experimental series. There were no significant differences in the first experimental series. In the second experimental series, Stephalen® Shower Gel showed disadvantages in terms of a small cleansing effect, but without evidence of a smaller stratum corneum-damaging effect, and Tork® Mevon 55TM Liquid Soap showed advantages in terms of a smaller stratum corneum-damaging effect, but without evidence of a smaller cleansing effect. These studies showed that the relationship between the cleansing and the damaging effect on the stratum corneum can be properly assessed only by testing different concentrations. Furthermore, this experimental approach allowed to differentiate the four tested cleansing solutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The only known function of human sebaceous glands is the provocation of acne. We assessed here whether sebum influences stratum corneum hydration or permeability barrier function in asebia J1 and 2 J mice, with profound sebaceous gland hypoplasia. Asebia J1 mice showed normal permeability barrier homeostasis and extracellular lamellar membrane structures, but they displayed epidermal hyperplasia, inflammation, and decreased (>50%) stratum corneum hydration, associated with a reduction in sebaceous gland lipids (wax diesters/monoesters, sterol esters). The triglyceride content of both asebia and control stratum corneum was low, consistent with high rates of triglyceride hydrolysis within the normal pilosebaceous apparatus, despite high rates of triglyceride synthesis. Although a mixture of synthetic, sebum-like lipids (sterol/wax esters, triglycerides) did not restore normal stratum corneum hydration to asebia skin, topical glycerol, the putative product of triglyceride hydrolysis in sebaceous glands, normalized stratum corneum hydration, and the glycerol content of asebia stratum corneum was 85% lower than in normal stratum corneum. In contrast, another potent endogenous humectant (urea) did not correct the abnormality. The importance of glycerol generation from triglyceride in sebaceous glands for stratum corneum hydration was demonstrated further by (i) the absence of sebaceous-gland-associated lipase activity in asebia mice, whereas abundant enzyme activity was present in the glands of control mice; and (ii) the inability of high concentrations of topical triglyceride to correct the hydration abnormality, despite the presence of abundant lipase activity in asebia stratum corneum. These results show that sebaceous-gland-derived glycerol is a major contributor to stratum corneum hydration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Part II. Presents information on a study which compared five instruments used in measuring stratum corneum hydration in vivo. Measurement of different anatomical sites; Moisture-accumulation test results; Sorption-desorption test results.

The aim of the study was to disclose interactions between epidermal barrier, skin irritation and sensitization in healthy and diseased skin. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and stratum corneum hydration (SCH) were assessed in adult patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), rosacea and healthy controls. A 4-h patch test with seven concentrations of sodium lauryl sulphate was performed to determine the irritant threshold (IT). Contact sensitization pattern was revealed by patch testing with European baseline series. Subjects with a lower IT had higher TEWL values and lower SCH. Subjects with positive allergic reactions had significantly lower IT. In AD, epidermal barrier deterioration was detected on both volar forearm and nasolabial fold, while in rosacea, impeded skin physiology parameters were observed on the facial skin only, suggesting that barrier impediment is restricted to the face in rosacea, in contrast with AD where the abnormal skin physiology is generalized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]