Search

Objectives: To compare the efficacy, safety, and side effects of hydromorphone and morphine administered as patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for postoperative pain therapy after cardiac surgery with median sternotomy., Design: A retrospective analysis of data from 2 prospective, single-blinded, randomized trials., Setting: A single-center intensive care unit at a university hospital., Participants: Forty-one adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with median sternotomy., Interventions: Postoperative pain therapy at the intensive care unit was performed by PCA with intravenously administered bolus doses of 0.2 mg of hydromorphone (n = 21) or 2 mg of morphine (n = 20)., Measurements and Main Results: Pain at rest and under deep inspiration regularly was assessed using the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). Blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate were monitored, and adverse events were registered. The median (range) NRS rating at rest was 1.5 (0-5) after hydromorphone and 0.5 (0-5) after morphine, respectively (p = 0.41). The median NRS rating under deep inspiration was 3 (0-6) after hydromorphone and 4 (0-7) after morphine, respectively (p = 0.074). The dose ratio of morphine to hydromorphone during PCA was 5.7 (95% confidence interval: 2.9-7.6). Hemodynamics and respiration were stable and did not differ significantly. Postoperative nausea and vomiting were the most frequent adverse events, which were observed in 29% of the patients after hydromorphone and in 35% after morphine, respectively (p = 0.74)., Conclusions: There were no significant differences in analgesic efficacy and safety between hydromorphone and morphine when used for postoperative pain therapy with PCA after cardiac surgery with median sternotomy., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The challenge of managing acute postoperative pain is the well tolerated and effective administration of analgesics with a minimum of side effects. The standard therapeutic approach is patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with systemic opioids. To overcome problems of oscillating opioid concentrations, we studied patient-controlled analgesia by target-controlled infusion (TCI-PCA) as an alternative., Objective: To compare efficacy, safety and side effects of standard PCA with TCI-PCA for postoperative pain therapy with hydromorphone., Design: Single-blinded, randomised trial., Setting: University Hospital, Germany from December 2013 to April 2015., Participants: Fifty adults undergoing cardiac surgery., Interventions: Postoperative pain therapy on the ICU was managed with intravenous (i.v.) hydromorphone and patients randomised to TCI-PCA with target plasma concentrations between 0.8 and 10 ng ml, or PCA with bolus doses of 0.2 mg. Pain was regularly assessed using the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). Blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and cardiac output were continuously monitored, and adverse events were registered throughout the study., Main Outcome Measures: NRS pain ratings, hydromorphone doses, haemodynamic effects and side effects., Results: NRS pain ratings, total doses of hydromorphone and haemodynamic data did not differ significantly between TCI-PCA and PCA. The number of bolus doses during PCA was significantly higher than the number of target increases during TCI-PCA (P = 0.006). The number of negative requests was also significantly higher during PCA than during TCI-PCA (P = 0.02). The respiratory rate on the first postoperative morning was 25 ± 6 min during TCI-PCA, compared with 19 ± 4 min during PCA (P = 0.022). Nausea occurred in 30% after TCI-PCA and 24% after PCA (P = 0.46)., Conclusion: TCI-PCA was effective and well tolerated in acute postoperative pain management after cardiac surgery. Further studies are needed to evaluate this approach in clinical practice., Trial Registration: EudraCT Number: 2013-002875-16, and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02035709.

Background and Objective: We recently developed a new population pharmacokinetic model for hydromorphone in patients including age and bodyweight as covariates. The aim of the present study was to evaluate prospectively the predictive performance of this new model during postoperative pain therapy., Methods: This was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, single-center study with two parallel arms. Fifty patients aged 40-85 years undergoing cardiac surgery involving thoracotomy were enrolled. Hydromorphone was administered postoperatively on the intensive care unit as target controlled infusion (TCI) for patient controlled analgesia (TCI-PCA) using the new pharmacokinetic model, or as conventional patient controlled analgesia (PCA). Arterial blood samples were taken for measurement of the hydromorphone plasma concentration. The predictive performance of the pharmacokinetic model was assessed by the median performance error (MDPE), the median absolute performance error (MDAPE), wobble and divergence. For comparison, the performance indices were also determined for three older models from the literature., Results: 903 plasma concentrations of 41 patients were analyzed. The mean values (95 % CI) of MDPE, MDAPE, wobble and divergence for the new pharmacokinetic model were 11.2 % (3.9 to 18.7 %), 28.5 % (23.9 to 33.0 %), 21.4 % (18.0 to 24.9 %) and -1.6 %/h (-2.3 to -0.8 %/h). When compared with older models from the literature, performance was better with less overshoot after bolus doses., Conclusion: The new pharmacokinetic model of hydromorphone showed a good precision and a better performance than older models. It is therefore suitable for TCI with hydromorphone during postoperative pain therapy., Trial Registration: EudraCT 2013-002875-16, Clinical Trials NCT02035709.

Background: Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is a common method for postoperative pain therapy, but it is characterized by large variation of plasma concentrations. PCA with target-controlled infusion (TCI-PCA) may be an alternative. In a previous analysis, the authors developed a pharmacokinetic model for hydromorphone. In this secondary analysis, the authors investigated the feasibility and efficacy of TCI-PCA for postoperative pain therapy with hydromorphone., Methods: Fifty adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery were enrolled in this study. Postoperatively, hydromorphone was applied intravenously during three sequential periods: (1) as TCI with plasma target concentrations of 1 to 2 ng/ml until extubation; (2) as TCI-PCA with plasma target concentrations between 0.8 and 10 ng/ml during the following 6 to 8 h; and (3) thereafter as PCA with a bolus dose of 0.2 mg until the next morning. During TCI-PCA, pain was regularly assessed using the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model was developed using ordinal logistic regression based on measured plasma concentrations., Results: Data of 43 patients aged 40 to 81 yr were analyzed. The hydromorphone dose during TCI-PCA was 0.26 mg/h (0.07 to 0.93 mg/h). The maximum plasma target concentration during TCI-PCA was 2.3 ng/ml (0.9 to 7.0 ng/ml). The NRS score under deep inspiration was less than 5 in 83% of the ratings. Nausea was present in 30%, vomiting in 9%, and respiratory insufficiency in 5% of the patients. The EC50 of hydromorphone for NRS of 4 or less was 4.1 ng/ml (0.6 to 12.8 ng/ml)., Conclusion: TCI-PCA with hydromorphone offered satisfactory postoperative pain therapy with moderate side effects.

Background: Our objective was to evaluate the effect of intensive care treatment on the protein binding of sufentanil and hydromorphone in cardiac surgery patients during postoperative analgesia using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)., Methods: Fifty adult patients were enrolled in this prospective randomized study; of which, 49 completed the study (age range 40-81 yr). Sufentanil was administered as an analgesic intraoperatively, and hydromorphone was dosed after operation with TCI and PCA until 8 a.m. on the first postoperative day. Arterial plasma samples were collected for drug and protein concentration measurements up to 24 h after cardiac surgery. Corresponding patient data were collected from the electronic patient data system. After explorative data analysis with principal component analysis, multivariate regression analysis and non-linear mixed effects modelling was used to study the effect of treatment on protein binding., Results: Data of 35 patients were analysed. The median protein binding of sufentanil and hydromorphone was 88.4% (IQ range 85.7-90.5%) and 11.6% (IQ range 9.5-14.3%), respectively. Free fraction of sufentanil increased towards the end of the study period, whereas hydromorphone free fraction remained nearly constant. The total sufentanil concentration and volume balance were identified as significant covariates for the protein binding of sufentanil. For the protein binding of hydromorphone, no significant covariate effects were found., Conclusions: Sufentanil protein binding was significantly dependent on changes in the total drug concentration and volume balance addressing the importance of adequate dosing and fluid-guided therapy. Hydromorphone protein binding was nearly constant throughout the study period., Clinical Trial Registration: EudraCT 2011-003648-31 and ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01490268., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Hydromorphone is a µ-selective opioid agonist used in postoperative pain therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of hydromorphone in cardiac surgery patients during postoperative analgesia with target-controlled infusion and patient-controlled analgesia., Methods: In this study, 50 adult patients were enrolled to receive intravenous hydromorphone during postoperative pain therapy. Arterial plasma samples were collected for measurements of drug concentration. Population pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Results were validated and simulations were carried out to evaluate results., Results: Data from 49 patients (age range, 40-81 yr) were analyzed. The pharmacokinetics of hydromorphone were best described by a three-compartment model. Age was incorporated as a significant covariate for elimination clearance and central volume of distribution. Scaling all parameters with body weight improved the model significantly. The final estimates of the model parameters for the typical adult patient (67 yr old, weighing 70 kg) undergoing cardiac surgery were as follows: CL1 = 1.01 l/min, V1 = 3.35 l, CL2 = 1.47 l/min, V2 = 13.9 l, CL3 = 1.41 l/min, and V3 = 145 l. The elimination clearance decreased by 43% between the age of 40 and 80 yr, and simulations demonstrated that context-sensitive half-time increased from 26 to 84 min in 40- and 80-yr-old subjects, respectively., Conclusions: The final pharmacokinetic model gave a robust representation of hydromorphone pharmacokinetics. Inclusion of age and body weight to the model demonstrated a significant influence of these covariates on hydromorphone pharmacokinetics. The application of this patient-derived population model in individualized pain therapy should improve the dosing of hydromorphone in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

A method for a sensitive and specific analysis of hydromorphone total and unbound drug concentrations in human plasma was developed and validated. Sample preparation was preceded with an ultrafiltration step to separate the unbound drug from the protein bound fraction of hydromorphone. Both the ultrafiltrate and plasma samples were extracted with solid-phase extraction and substituted with stable isotope-labeled hydromorphone that was used as internal standard. Chromatographic separation was performed by gradient elution with UPLC-like system and eluates were analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry equipped with an electrospray ionization source. Sample preparation was optimized for good recovery of hydromorphone and the results were consistent. Calibration curves demonstrated linearity in the concentration range of 78-5000pg/ml for analysis of both total and unbound concentrations of hydromorphone. The limit of detection was 1pg and the lower limit of quantification was 78pg/ml for both total and unbound hydromorphone plasma drug concentrations. Intra- and interassay reproducibility and inaccuracy did not exceed 10%. Hydromorphone was on the average 14% bound to plasma proteins, supporting the previously published unreferenced statements that the protein binding of hydromorphone is low. Method was applied to a clinical trial in patients undergoing open heart surgery to generate a target controlled infusion model for the postoperative patient controlled analgesia with hydromorphone., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)