Search

Background: The SF-36 has frequently been used to measure health related quality of life (HRQOL) in hypertension. Recently, the SF-12, a shorter form of the SF-36, has been proposed. However, the validity of the SF-12 in hypertension has not yet been assessed., Objectives: To determine the extent to which the SF-12 provides similar measurements of HRQOL to those of the SF-36 in hypertensive individuals., Methods: A study assessing the impact of a pharmacy-based intervention program on hypertensive individuals served as background for this study. One hundred and twelve individuals participated in this study. We compared the SF-36 with the SF-12 on item scores and summary measures using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Pearson correlation coefficients and linear regression., Results: The concordance between the SF-12 and the SF-36 on both physical (ICC=0.88) and mental (ICC=0.92) component summary scores (PCS and MCS respectively) is high and the relationship is linear and positive. Most of the variance in the SF-36 PCS (R2=0.78) and MCS (R2=0.85) can be explained by their SF-12 counterparts. The SF-12 PCS and MCS are the only significant predictor variables for the corresponding measure of the SF-36., Conclusions: The SF-12 appears to be a valid alternative to the SF-36 for clinical practice or research purposes when studying hypertensive individuals and their treatment.

Background: Pharmaceutical care programs have been shown to improve outcomes in hypertension. However, most programs required direct access to patient medical chart and patient consultation sessions by appointment., Objective: To follow the current practice of community pharmacy, exploring the effect of an intervention program on blood pressure (BP) and factors affecting BP., Methods: Treated hypertensive patients were enrolled in a 9-month controlled study involving 9 community pharmacies. The PRECEDE-PROCEED model was used as conceptual framework to identify factors affecting BP, to incorporate those factors in an intervention program, and to evaluate the impact of the program. A computerized decision-aid tool was used by pharmacists from 4 pharmacies to provide pharmaceutical care to subjects (n = 41); pharmacists from the 5 other pharmacies performed usual care (n = 59). As there was a statistically significant interaction due to family income in describing the impact of pharmacists' intervention on BP, population was stratified by family income in the analyses., Results: Compared with the control group, the pharmacy program resulted in significant systolic BP reduction (-7.8 vs. 0.5 mm Hg; p = 0.01) and an increase in the proportion of controlled patients only for those with high incomes. In the high-income group, the program also had a positive impact on physical activity, self-reported adherence, health concerns, and information transmitted. The low-income group did not appear to benefit from the program., Conclusions: Pharmacist intervention can modify factors affecting adherence, improve adherence, and reduce BP levels in patients treated with antihypertensive agents. Impact of pharmacist intervention on BP differed according to patient income status.

Objective: To weigh the costs and benefits of a pharmacy-based health promotion programme implemented in four pharmacies of the Quebec City area, Canada. This programme was developed to improve blood pressure control through activities aimed at improving the quality of prescribing and the adherence to treatment., Design: Nine pharmacies in Quebec City were included, of which four pharmacies were assigned to the implementation of the health promotion programme. Each time a study participant came to one of these pharmacies to refill his/her antihypertensive medication, the pharmacist would measure and record the participant's blood pressure and assess adherence to drug treatment. The other five pharmacies delivered usual care. The duration of the intervention programme was 9 months. Costs included direct, indirect, and fixed costs, and the costs of pharmacist intervention. Benefits were measured using cost savings induced by pharmacist intervention. Willingness to pay was also considered. A bootstrap method was used to test the between-group difference., Perspective: The study was performed from a societal perspective., Study Participants: 100 individuals aged between 34 and 80 years residing in the Quebec City area and taking antihypertensive medication., Main Outcome Measures and Results: Participants exposed to the programme had a significant decrease in mean direct costs and a significant increase in mean indirect costs compared with non-exposed participants. Pharmacist interventions involved a mean cost of 30.68 Canadian dollars ($ Can) per participant exposed to the programme. On average, exposed participants were willing to pay $ Can 0.54 per month after the intervention period. Benefits were about ten times higher than costs (1998 values)., Conclusions: The implementation of this intervention programme seems promising in the quest to improve blood pressure control in terms of both costs and benefits.