Search

Background: Shiga toxin-producing, enteroaggregative Escherichia coli was responsible for the 2011 outbreak of haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS). The present single-centre, observational study describes the 1-year course of the disease with an emphasis on kidney function. Outcome data after 1 year are associated with treatment and patient characteristics at onset of HUS., Methods: Patients were treated according to a standardized approach of supportive care, including a limited number of plasmapheresis. On top of this treatment, patients with severe HUS (n = 35) received eculizumab, a humanized anti-C5 monoclonal antibody inhibiting terminal complement activation. The per-protocol decision--to start or omit an extended therapy with eculizumab accompanied by azithromycin--separated the patients into two groups and marked Day 0 of the prospective study. Standardized visits assessed the patients' well-being, kidney function, neurological symptoms, haematological changes and blood pressure., Results: Fifty-six patients were regularly seen during the follow-up. All patients had survived without end-stage renal disease. Young(er) age alleviated restoring kidney function after acute kidney injury even in severe HUS. After 1 year, kidney function was affected with proteinuria [26.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.8-39.6], increased serum creatinine (4.4%, CI 0.0-10.4), increased cystatin C (46.7%, CI 32.1-61.3) and reduced (<90 mL/min) estimated glomerular filtration rate (46.7%, CI 32.1-61.3). Nine of the 36 patients without previous hypertension developed de novo hypertension (25%, CI 10.9-39.1). All these patients had severe HUS., Conclusions: Although shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)-HUS induced by O104:H4 was a life-threatening acute disease, follow-up showed a good recovery of organ function in all patients. Whereas kidney function recovered even after longer duration of dialysis, chronic hypertension developed after severe HUS with neurological symptoms and could not be prevented by the extended therapy., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.)

Hypokalaemic hypertension is the classical presentation of primary hyperaldosteronism but may also result from other mineralocorticoid activity, such as liquorice ingestion. Onset of hypertension as well as serum renin and aldosterone levels are central for the diagnosis. Liquorice ingestion has been reported to induce hypertension, hypokalaemia and metabolic alkalosis due to inhibition of the enzyme 11-β-hydroxy steroiddehydrogenase 2. Here, we report the case of a hypertensive emergency with acute visual impairment due to hypertensive retinopathy in clear conjunction with a considerable consumption of liquorice.

Background: Obesity and arterial hypertension are tightly connected. Obese individuals show significant elevation of vasoconstrictory muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). Obesity-related hyperleptinemia might play a key role in mediating these effects. Leptin is synthesized in proportion to body fat mass and activates SNA in animal models. In humans, however, direct evidence linking hyperleptinemia to sympathetic activation has not yet been established. In the present study, we characterize the effects of acute hyperleptinemia on microneurographically recorded SNA in humans., Methods: In a balanced, double-blind crossover design, 12 healthy normal-weight males received an iv bolus of leptin or placebo. MSNA (bursts per minute) was continuously recorded using a microneurographic technique. Ten-minute periods were analyzed at resting periods before (t-100) and at 20 (t20), 60 (t60), and 140 (t140) minutes after substance administration. Blood pressure and heart rate (HR) were recorded simultaneously., Results: Baseline values of MSNA, blood pressure, and HR were comparable in both conditions (MSNA: t-100, 24.3 ± 1.6 vs 22.7 ± 1.7, not significant). After application of leptin, MSNA showed a significant increase (t20, 31.0 ± 1.9 vs. 24.9 ± 1.8, P = .05) that persisted until the end of the experiment (t60, P = .008; t140, P = .004). There were no significant changes in blood pressure and HR., Conclusions: Acute experimental hyperleptinemia has significant central nervous excitatory effects on vasoconstrictory sympathetic outflow as measured by MSNA in healthy men. These results suggest that leptin acts as an important mediator linking obesity to elevated MSNA and potentially to the development of hypertension.

Introduction: Medical societies have developed guidelines for the detection, treatment and control of hypertension (HTN). Our analysis assessed the extent to which such guidelines were implemented in Germany in 2003 and 2001., Methods: Using standardized clinical diagnostic and treatment appraisal forms, blood pressure levels and patient questionnaires for 55,518 participants from the cross-sectional Targets and Essential Data for Commitment of Treatment (DETECT) study (2003) were analyzed. Physician's diagnosis of hypertension (HTN(doc)) was defined as coding hypertension in the clinical appraisal questionnaire. Alternative definitions used were physician's diagnosis or the patient's self-reported diagnosis of hypertension (HTN(doc,pat)), physician's or patient's self-reported diagnosis or a BP measurement with a systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or a diastolic BP ≥ 90 (HTN(doc,pat,bp)) and diagnosis according to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HTN(NHANES)). The results were compared with the similar German HYDRA study to examine whether changes had occurred in diagnosis, treatment and adequate blood pressure control (BP below 140/90 mmHg) since 2001. Factors associated with pharmacotherapy and control were determined., Results: The overall prevalence rate for hypertension was 35.5% according to HTN(doc) and 56.0% according to NHANES criteria. Among those defined by NHANES criteria, treatment and control rates were 56.0% and 20.3% in 2003, and these rates had improved from 55.3% and 18.0% in 2001. Significant predictors of receiving antihypertensive medication were: increasing age, female sex, obesity, previous myocardial infarction and the prevalence of comorbid conditions such as coronary heart disease (CHD), hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus (DM). Significant positive predictors of adequate blood pressure control were CHD and antihypertensive medication. Inadequate control was associated with increasing age, male sex and obesity., Conclusions: Rates of treated and controlled hypertension according to NHANES criteria in DETECT remained low between 2001 and 2003, although there was some minor improvement.

Background: Treatment-resistant hypertension is a common problem in an outpatient setting and often results in hospital admission. Non-identified secondary hypertension, hypertensive nephrosclerosis and non-compliance are major reasons for treatment resistance., Case Report: A 75-year old woman was admitted to the emergency room because of a hypertensive crisis with alleged treatment-resistant hypertension and progressive headache. Two months ago, renal artery stenosis had been ruled out and a diagnosis of hypertensive cardiomyopathy was established. On admission, the patient had a blood pressure of 210/100 mmHg despite an antihypertensive treatment with nine different drugs. Further investigations ruled out secondary hypertension due to an endocrine cause but were consistent with hypertensive nephrosclerosis. With a supervised drug intake the blood pressure was rather normal to hypotensive, resulting in the need for significant reduction of the antihypertensive medication. The apparent discrepancies were discussed in detail with the patient who finally admitted a previous inconsistent intake of the antihypertensive drugs. Following thorough training and education on the purpose of continued antihypertensive therapy, the patient could be discharged with a normotensive blood pressure profile., Conclusions: Therapy of treatment-resistant hypertension should always consider non-compliance and secondary hypertension as possible reason.

Diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension are major cardiovascular risk factors with high co-morbidity. Microalbuminuria is an independent risk marker, and routine monitoring of urinary albumin is mandatory in patients with diabetes and hypertension. The therapeutic goal of antihypertensive treatment is < 130/80 mm Hg, however in the presence of nephropathy < 125/75 mm Hg should be achieved. Therapy is based on lifestyle-interventions including 1) weight reduction, 2) regular moderate physical activity, 3) modification of diet with restriction of salt- and alcohol consumption as well as 4) cessation of smoking. Renin- and ACE-inhibitors as well as AT1-receptor antagonists are drugs of first choice, delaying the progression of diabetic nephropathy most effectively., (Copyright Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart . New York.)

Background and Objective: It was the aim of this study to project the long-term clinical and cost outcomes of irbesartan treatment, based on data from the irbesartan in Reduction of Microalbuminuria-2 (IRMA-2) study and the irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT), in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and renal disease in Germany., Patients and Methods: A Markov model adapted to the German setting simulated progression of renal disease and associated changes in mortality in patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Early irbesartan 300 mg daily (initiated at microalbuminuria) and late irbesartan (initiated at overt nephropathy) were compared to a control scheme of antihypertensive standard medications with comparable blood pressure control, initiated at microalbuminuria. Cumulative incidence of ESRD, time to onset of ESRD, life expectancy (LE), quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and costs were projected over 25 years for 1,000 simulated patients, from a third party payer perspective. Clinical and cost outcomes were discounted at 5% per annum., Results: When compared to standard blood pressure control, both early and late treatment with irbesartan were projected to reduce the cumulative incidence of ESRD fromm23.80.3% to 9.10.6% and 19.83%, increase discounted LE by 0.670.04 and 0.030.00 years, and improve QALY by 0.750.04 and 0.070.01 years per treated patient, respectively. Early irbesartan treatment was associated with a cost savings of i 12,658825 per patient while late irbesartan treatment was associated with a cost savings of i 4,116575 per patient compared to control over the 25-year time horizon., Conclusions: Early irbesartan treatment was projected to improve LE and QALY, and reduce the onset of ESRD, with cost savings, in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria in Germany. Later use of irbesartan in overt nephropathy is also superior to standard care. These findings suggest that irbesartan should be started earlier and continued long-term.

DETECT is a nationwide epidemiological cross-sectional and longitudinal study program in a random probability sample of 3,795 primary care settings (response rate: 60.2%). Based on a target day total assessment of n=55,518 consecutive patients (RR 93.5%) in these settings all patients underwent standardized diagnostic assessment, using self-reporting, clinical interview and laboratory measures. DETECT aims at describing the point prevalence and comorbidity of coronary heart disease (CHD), hyperlipidaemia, arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus and at identifying the behavioural, clinical, laboratory and psychological risk factors associated with these conditions. A random subset of patients (n=7,519) also completed an extensive standardized laboratory screening program and a 12-month follow-up investigation. Findings reveal a high prevalence of hypertension (36.3%), dyslipidaemia (29.1%), diabetes mellitus (14.6%) and CHD (12.4%) in primary care as well as their close association among each other. The study describes for the first time in greater detail the prevalence of specific disorders and the frequency of high-risk constellations in primary care and allows for the evaluation of various risk scores.

Background: Although the relationship between body weight and blood pressure (BP) is well established, there is a lack of data regarding the impact of obesity on the prevalence of hypertension in primary care practice. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of hypertension and the diagnosis, treatment status, and control rates of hypertension in obese patients as compared to patients with normal weight., Methods: A cross-sectional point prevalence study of 45,125 unselected consecutive primary care attendees was conducted in a representative nationwide sample of 1912 primary care physicians in Germany (HYDRA)., Results: Blood pressure levels were consistently higher in obese patients. Overall prevalence of hypertension (blood pressure >/=140/90 mm Hg or on antihypertensive medication) in normal weight patients was 34.3%, in overweight participants 60.6%, in grade 1 obesity 72.9%, in grade 2 obesity 77.1%, and in grade 3 obesity 74.1%. The odds ratio (OR) for good BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) in diagnosed and treated patients was 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-0.9) in overweight patients, 0.6 (95% CI 0.6-0.7) in grade 1, 0.5 (95% CI 0.4-0.6) in grade 2, and 0.7 (95% CI 0.5-0.9) in grade 3 obese patients., Conclusions: The increasing prevalence of hypertension in obese patients and the low control rates in overweight and obese patients document the challenge that hypertension control in obese patients imposes on the primary care physician. These results highlight the need for specific evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacologic management of obesity-related hypertension in primary practice.

Background: In the treatment of hypertension, physicians' attitudes and practice patterns are receiving increased attention as contributors to poor blood pressure (BP) control. Thus, current use of antihypertensive drugs in primary care was analyzed and the association with selected physician and patient characteristics was assessed., Methods: The Hypertension and Diabetes Risk Screening and Awareness (HYDRA) study is a cross-sectional point prevalence study of 45,125 primary care attendees recruited from a representative nationwide sample of 1912 primary care practices in Germany. Prescription frequencies of the various antihypertensive drugs in the individual patients were recorded by the physicians using standardized questionnaires. We assessed the association of patient variables [age, gender; co-morbidities such as diabetes, nephropathy or coronary heart disease (CHD)] and physician variables (general practitioner vs internist, guideline adherence, etc.) with drug treatment intensity and prescription patterns., Results: Of all 43,549 patients for whom a physician diagnosis on hypertension or diabetes was available, 17,485 (40.1%) had hypertension. Of these hypertensive patients, 1647 (9.4%) received no treatment at all, 1191 (6.8%) received non-pharmacological measures only, and 14,647 (83.8%) were given one or more antihypertensive drugs. Drug treatment rates were lower in young patients (16-40 years: 57.4%). BP control was poor: 70.6% of all patients were not normalized, i.e., had BP >/=140/90 mmHg. Antihypertensive treatment was generally intensified with increasing age, or if complications or comorbidities were present. The use of the different drug classes was rather uniform across the various patient subgroups (e.g., by age and gender). Individualized treatment with regard to co-morbidities as recommended in guidelines was not the rule. Adherence to guidelines as self-reported by physicians as well as other physician characteristics (region, training etc.) did not result in more differentiated prescription pattern., Conclusions: Despite the broad armamentarium of drug treatment options, physicians in primary care did not treat hypertension aggressively enough. Treatment was only intensified at a late stage, after complications had occurred. Treatment should be more differentiated in terms of coexisting morbidities such as diabetes, nephropathy, or CHD.

Objective: To report: (1) on the background, design and methods of the Hypertension and Diabetes Risk Screening and Awareness (HYDRA) study, (2) on the point prevalence of hypertension in primary care and (3) on the proportion of treated, controlled, and uncontrolled hypertension., Design: Cross-sectional point prevalence study., Setting: Representative nationwide sample of 1912 primary care practices in Germany., Participants: A total of 45,125 unselected primary care attendees., Main Outcome Measures: Prevalence of hypertension based on doctor's diagnosis, self-reported diagnosis, and blood pressure (BP) measurements., Results: A total of 39% of all patients and 67% of patients aged 60 years or older, respectively, were diagnosed by their doctors as having hypertension. Eighty-four percent of diagnosed patients were on antihypertensive medication, 57% of which were rated by the physician as well controlled. When hypertension was defined as either current BP levels > or = 140/90 mmHg and/or current antihypertensive medication, the total point prevalence increased to 50%, while treatment and control rates (BP < 140/90 mmHg) dropped to 64 and 19%, respectively., Conclusions: Extrapolation of these findings to the entire primary care patient population seen in the over 20 000 primary care practices in Germany suggests that on an average day, over 700,000 patients with elevated BP are seen by primary care physicians, but that only around 132,000 of these patients are well controlled. Thus, this study not only documents the enormous burden of hypertensive patients in the primary health system, but also highlights the alarming lack of BP control in the vast majority of hypertensive patients.

The Hypertension and Diabetes Screening and Awareness (HYDRA) study is a cross-sectional point-prevalence study performed in September 2001; 45,125 primary care attendees were recruited from a representative nationwide sample of 1912 primary care practices in Germany. Around 42% of all patients presenting in these practices had hypertension (WHO definition). In approximately 70% of these patients, hypertension was diagnosed by doctors and 84% of diagnosed patients were on antihypertensive medication, but in less than 30% of treated patients was blood pressure controlled (< 140/90 mmHg). The control rate in all patients presenting with hypertension (including those patients unrecognized) was as low as 19%. The present analysis aimed to find explanations for this unsatisfactory outcome of hypertension control. The main finding was that the rate of diagnosis of hypertension is alarmingly low in young people, probably due to insufficient blood pressure screenings. The data further indicated that doctors still set their target of treatment according to outdated guidelines and that doctors still orientate their treatment primarily with regard to the diastolic pressure. These insights into the causes of unsatisfactory hypertension control may help to direct future educational programmes designed to improve hypertension management specifically to these deficits and thereby to improve control rates.

Background and Aims: In daily practice, nephropathy is diagnosed in a high percentage of type 2 diabetics, including those in whom blood pressure is well controlled. The aim of the present study was to reduce albuminuria in these patients by changing over antihypertensive treatment to the AT, blocker irbesartan. 9,838 general practitioners recruited a total of 38,016 type 2 diabetics aged at least 18 years to an open observational study: In the majority of cases, current antihyprertensive treatment was discontinued and patients given 300 mg (a small percentage received 150 mg or 75 mg) irbesartan, either as monotherapy or in combination with 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide (HCT). The primary target outcome for efficacy was the 6-months normalization rate in patients with microalbuminuria or proteinuria; secondary target parameters included the change in protein excretion (grades: negative, 20 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg), normalisation of the systolic or diastolic blood pressure, and responder and blood pressure normalization rates. The target criterion for tolerability was the number of patients with adverse events (AE)., Results: 46% of the patients were controlled with 300 mg irbesartan alone, and 40% with irbesartan in combination with HCT. Albumin excretion normalized in 60.5% of the patients, improved by at least one grade in 81.9%, remained unchanged in 17.5%, and increased in 0.7% of the cases. The beneficial response was found to be independent ofthe type of prior antihypertensive treatment (including ACE-inhibitors) and was also seen in normotensive patients. Only 0.4 % of the patients reported AEs., Conclusion: In type 2 diabetics, treatment with 300 mg irbesartan administered alone or in combination with 12.5 mg HCT produced a pronounced nephroprotective effect.

Aim of the study is a comprehensive clinical-epidemiological description of the prevalence of arterial hypertension and diabetes among primary care patients along with an assessment of doctor's recognition rates and prescription behaviour. The paper describes methods and design of the study and provides background information on the sampling process, instruments used as well as characteristics of doctors and patients. The study is based on a nationally representative sample of 1,912 primary care doctors and 45,000 patients that attended the doctors' office on the target days. The patients were also characterized by laboratory tests. The first stage of study consisted of a comprehensive description of the doctors' characteristics in terms of psychosocial, qualification- and provider aspects as well as attitudes towards hypertension and diabetes and their management. In the second stage all patients completed a questionnaire to describe their health behaviour and attitudes as well as the treatment history and therapy. In the third stage all patients were characterized by their doctors in terms of their diagnostic status and their past and current interventions.

Almost every second patient seeing a primary care doctor suffers from arterial hypertension and about every fifth has diabetes mellitus. These diseases often occur at the same time. They are associated in more than 80% of the cases with other severe concomitant and subsequent diseases (heart attack, stroke, renal failure, neuropathy etc.). The magnitude especially of subsequent and concomitant diseases, the dimension of the personal suffering and the immense diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for the doctors have been massively underestimated so far. The article informs about the prevalence of the above disease, and structure of the problem. Before the background of an extremely high patient load seen by German General Physicians, the mainstay challenge is highlighted how to achieve further improvements of the quality of care on the basis of scientific guidelines alone, without a concomitant change in the system structure.

With regard to the management of hypertension and diabetes, HYDRA reveals that doctors report multiple problems in their everyday practice. Being confronted with an average of 73 patients a day, with almost every second having either diabetes or hypertension, frequently associated with multiple comorbid conditions, the core obstacle is the time factor. Doctors do not have sufficient time to perform diagnostic tests and especially no time for non-drug interventions of any type. Further available treatment guidelines are only used in 1 out of 2 doctors. Further they seem not to affect doctors performance significantly.

The examination of renal function in the daily practice may give important information on the risk status of a given patient. For example, the diagnosis of microalbuminuria carries high predictive value for a future cardiovascular risk of patients with hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, as well as myocardial infarction. The findings of the Hypertension and Diabetes Screening and Awareness Study (HYDRA) indicate that screening for microalbuminuria is performed not often enough in patients with diabetes or hypertension, respectively, and a positive screening finding often does not trigger necessary consequences as for additional diagnosis or therapy.

Recent studies have shown the beneficial effects of a blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) not only for blood pressure reduction but also end organ protection. One of the markers that is closely correlated with the increased cardiovascular risk is microalbuminuria. A common mediator for the development of both, microalbuminuria and end organ damage seems to be Angiotensin II, the blockade of which apparently reduces microalbuminuria as well as end organ damage. Therefore we had a closer look into pathophysiology of microalbuminuria and the relevance for end organ damage and discuss current medical strategies to alleviate these diseases.

Microalbuminuria has been widely appreciated in recent years to be a valuable risk marker for an increased cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Thus guidelines for the treatment of type-2-diabetes in Germany and the US recommend an annual screening as soon as the diagnosis of diabetes is established and a quarterly control when microalbuminuria is present. While nationally representative epidemiologic data from the US have been available, data from Germany, especially from the primary care sector are missing. This is especially important in light of the gatekeeper function of the primary care physician. The "Hypertension and Diabetes Risk Screening Study" (HYDRA) has been identifying 37.8% of patients with hypertension and diabetes to have a positive dipstick test for microalbuminuria on the study day while only 12.5% of these are diagnosed by the doctor as having nephropathy. These patients additionally show a high burden of associated comorbidities and thus call for early detection and intervention especially because effective therapy is available. Although screening for microalbuminuria is recommended in the guidelines the value of a routine screening for microalbuminuria in primary care is under recognized.

Background: Microalbuminuria and hypertension are risk factors for diabetic nephropathy. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system slows the progression to diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes, but similar data are lacking for hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-II-receptor antagonist irbesartan in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria., Methods: A total of 590 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria were enrolled in this multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of irbesartan, at a dose of either 150 mg daily or 300 mg daily, and were followed for two years. The primary outcome was the time to the onset of diabetic nephropathy, defined by persistent albuminuria in overnight specimens, with a urinary albumin excretion rate that was greater than 200 microg per minute and at least 30 percent higher than the base-line level., Results: The base-line characteristics in the three groups were similar. Ten of the 194 patients in the 300-mg group (5.2 percent) and 19 of the 195 patients in the 150-mg group (9.7 percent) reached the primary end point, as compared with 30 of the 201 patients in the placebo group (14.9 percent) (hazard ratios, 0.30 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.61; P< 0.001] and 0.61 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.34 to 1.08; P=0.081 for the two irbesartan groups, respectively). The average blood pressure during the course of the study was 144/83 mm Hg in the placebo group, 143/83 mm Hg in the 150-mg group, and 141/83 mm Hg in the 300-mg group (P=0.004 for the comparison of systolic blood pressure between the placebo group and the combined irbesartan groups). Serious adverse events were less frequent among the patients treated with irbesartan (P=0.02)., Conclusions: Irbesartan is renoprotective independently of its blood-pressure-lowering effect in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria.

Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia have been suggested to precede and promote hypertension, possibly by impairing sodium balance. We examined insulin sensitivity and the influence of acute hyperinsulinemia on sodium excretion after acute sodium loading in hypertension-prone individuals. Insulin sensitivity and sodium excretion in response to a 1,000-mL isotonic saline bolus were examined in 24 strictly normotensive offspring of at least 1 hypertensive parent, 19 controls without a family history of hypertension, and 8 untreated, young hypertensive patients. After the saline bolus, urinary sodium excretion was measured at baseline and during a 2-hour euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp, and insulin sensitivity was determined. Insulin, pressor hormones, and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), were measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Results are given as means +/- SEM. Offspring and controls were well matched in age (23.7 +/- 0.5; 24.6 +/- 0.5 years, respectively), blood pressure (113.0 +/- 2.9/68.5 +/- 1.9; 110.6 +/- 2.5/71.7 +/- 2.2 mm Hg, respectively), bone mass index (BMI), plasma glucose, and lipid parameters. Insulin sensitivity index did not significantly differ between offspring and controls (0.102 +/- 0.012; 0.112 +/- 0.018 micromol/min/kg/body weight [BW]/pmol, respectively), but was markedly reduced in hypertensives (0.045 +/- 0.006, P <.001). In response to sodium loading, natriuresis increased significantly (P <.05) in both offspring and controls to a similar extent, despite the presence of hyperinsulinemia, but failed to increase in hypertensives. In normotensive offspring of hypertensive patients who have not yet developed any features of the metabolic syndrome, insulin sensitivity is not impaired. Acute hyperinsulinemia impairs the ability to excrete an acute sodium load in hypertensive patients, but not in offspring of hypertensives with normal insulin sensitivity., (Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company)

In this study, the effects of a six week treatment with the calcium channel blocking agent nitrendipine were assessed in 20 hypertensive type I diabetic patients who received a single oral dose of 20 mg daily. Plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), plasma renin activity (PRA) and active renin, aldosterone, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1) and fructosamines were determined at the beginning and the end of the study. Interactions of these endocrine parameters with blood pressure behaviour were analyzed by a correlation matrix. In response to the drug treatment, the blood pressure was significantly lowered from 158.0/97.2 to 145.7/88.2 mmHg. The plasma concentrations of ANP were also significantly reduced from 106.8 to 89.7 pg/ml. There were no changes in serum aldosterone, while PRA and active renin exhibited a significant increase following the six week treatment. HbA1 and fructosamines remained unaltered. There were no significant correlations for ANP and blood pressure values, as well as for ANP and PRA or aldosterone. We did find, however, a significant correlation of the ANP values with the difference of the systolic blood pressure levels pre- and post-treatment. These data fully confirm the blood pressure lowering properties of this calcium channel blocker and its possible interference with steroidogenesis, since the effects of increased PRA on aldosterone secretion were clearly blunted. The lowering of plasma ANP levels may represent a decreased ANP secretion due to calcium channel blockade or might also be due to the natriuretic effects of nitrendipine, thus allowing ANP levels to decline as a function of lessened sodium retention.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The effects of tryptophan in combination with two different diets (high-carbohydrate and high-protein diet) on behavioral parameters such as mood, sleep and performance were chronically studied in a group of 34 hypertensive patients undergoing a trial of testing the antihypertensive properties of l-tryptophan. While no major changes in mood were observed, there was a tendency for sleep latency to decrease and sleep duration to increase following tryptophan intake in the intragroup analysis. The administration of tryptophan caused a significant improvement on performance in a concentration task. No significant dietary effects were observed either in combination with tryptophan or in the placebo group. These data again demonstrate behavioral relevance of the precursor amino acid l-tryptophan and suggest a long-term improvement in partial aspects of performance behavior.

A multidimensional behavioral program was developed for the treatment of essential hypertension. Over a course of 6 weeks, 108 patients of a rehabilitation center were treated with this program consisting of health education, self-monitoring of blood pressure, relaxation techniques, and a social skill training in addition to standard medical treatment alone. Blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors were monitored for a period of 12 months. Blood pressure levels became normotensive in both groups at the end of the 6-week training program. However, the blood pressure reduction in the behavioral treatment group was achieved with fewer patients taking antihypertensive medication than in the control group. The number of patients taking antihypertensive drugs in the treatment group was 60.2% prior to treatment and 44.4% after treatment; figures for the control group were 68% and 73.8%, respectively (p less than or equal to 0.01). Almost identical data were obtained at the 6- and 23-month follow-up examinations. No consistent changes were observed in weight, smoking, or blood lipids. These results demonstrate beneficial and long-lasting effects of a combined medical and psychologic treatment of essential hypertension as compared to medical treatment alone.