Search

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is a frequent complication contributing to poor prognosis in chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients. High blood pressure (BP) is known to be associated with AS progression in the general population. In CHD patients, however, BP varies during and between hemodialysis sessions with ultrafiltration volume or inter-dialytic weight gain; therefore it is difficult to characterize the BP status with a conventional single measurement. Our purpose was to clarify the BP variables affecting AS progression in CHD patients. We retrospectively enrolled 32 consecutive CHD patients with AS [aortic valve area (AVA), 1.3 ± 0.3 cm(2); mean age 69 ± 8 years] who had serial transthoracic echocardiographic studies at least 6 months apart (mean 23 ± 9 months). AS progression was evaluated using absolute reduction in AVA per year. Pre-dialytic and intra-dialytic (every hour during sessions) BPs throughout the 3 consecutive visits were used to determine each patient's BP status. We calculated the mean values of pre-dialytic and intra-dialytic BPs and their variability. In univariate analysis, mean visit-to-visit pre-dialytic and intra-dialytic BP were associated with AS progression, whereas all variables of BP variability were not. Multiple regression analysis indicated that only mean visit-to-visit intra-dialytic systolic and diastolic BP remained independently associated with AS progression after adjustment for age, sex, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, and serum parathyroid hormone (p < 0.05). Although BP regulation in CHD patients is complex and multifactorial, mean visit-to-visit intra-dialytic BP was independently associated with AS progression. Prospective studies are necessary before considering intra-dialytic BP as a potential target for therapy.

Antecedent hypertension adversely affects mortality and heart failure after myocardial infarction (MI). In addition, accelerated ventricular remodeling is a contributor to the increased mortality observed after MI. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of antecedent hypertension to ventricular remodeling after MI. Ninety-four patients presenting with a first acute MI who were treated with reperfusion therapy within 12 h of their symptom onset were enrolled in this study. All of them underwent left ventriculography immediately after reperfusion therapy and again at 6 months after the occurrence of MI. Patients were divided into two groups: a hypertensive group and a normotensive group. End-diastolic volume index (EDVI), end-systolic volume index (ESVI), and ejection fraction (EF) values in the acute phase were compared to those at 6 months after acute MI in either group. The hypertensive group showed a significant increase in both EDVI and ESVI after 6 months, whereas the normotensive group did not. In addition, there was no change in EF in the hypertensive group, whereas EF increased significantly after 6 months in the normotensive group. As a result, the percent changes in ESVI and EF were significantly different between the hypertensive group and normotensive group. The results demonstrated that antecedent hypertension interacts with ventricular cavity dilatation after MI.

Background: Ventricular remodeling is an independent predictor of left ventricular function in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Accelerated ventricular remodeling is a probable contributor to the increased mortality observed after MI in hypertensive patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship of antecedent hypertension to ventricular remodeling after MI., Methods: Seventy-nine patients presenting with a first acute MI (AMI) who were treated and attained Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 with re-perfusion therapy within 12 hours of their symptom onset were enrolled in this study. All of them underwent left ventriculography (LVG) immediately after re-perfusion therapy and again at 6 months after the occurrence of MI. Patients were divided into two groups; hypertensive group and normotensive group. End-diastolic volume index (EDVI), end-systolic volume index (ESVI), and EF were compared between acute phase and 6 months after AMI in each group., Results: The hypertensive group showed a significant increase in both EDVI and ESVI after 6 months, whereas the normotensive group did not. In addition, there was no change in EF in the hypertensive group, whereas EF increased significantly after 6 months in the normotensive group. As a result, percent change in ESVI and EF showed significantly differences between the hypertensive group and normotensive group, whereas percent change in EDVI showed no significant difference between the two groups., Conclusions: Antecedent hypertension interacts with ventricular remodeling after MI.