Search

Objectives: (1) To assess whether home blood pressure measurement is a reliable alternative to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for the evaluation of treated patients with inadequate blood pressure control at the clinic; and (2) to evaluate the relationship between home blood pressure and several target-organ damage markers., Basic Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed in 225 treated hypertensive patients with persistently high blood pressure values at the clinic (systolic blood pressure 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure 90 mmHg). All study participants underwent clinic blood pressure measurement, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and home blood pressure monitoring. A subgroup of patients underwent the following procedures: carotid echography (n=74), microalbuminuria determination (n=88) and echocardiography (n=43). We defined out-of-clinic normotension as an average ambulatory or home blood pressure less than 135 mmHg (systolic) and 85 mmHg (diastolic)., Main Results: The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of the home blood pressure method for predicting out-of-clinic normotension (with the ambulatory method used as reference), expressed as percentages, were 50, 87, 64 and 79%, respectively. Systolic home blood pressure correlated significantly with left ventricular mass (r=0.33, P<0.05) and microalbuminuria (r=0.24, P<0.05). Similar correlation coefficients were found for systolic ambulatory blood pressure (r=0.32, P<0.05 and r=0.24, P<0.05, respectively). Clinic blood pressure did not correlate with either left ventricular mass or microalbuminuria (r=0.19, P=0.09 and r=0.19, P=0.24, respectively). Diastolic home blood pressure, but not ambulatory blood pressure, correlated negatively with mean carotid intima-media thickness (r=-0.27, P<0.05)., Conclusion: Our results suggest that, in patients with poorly controlled hypertension at the clinic, home blood pressure represents a complementary test rather than an alternative to ambulatory blood pressure, and correlates with several target-organ damage markers.

We have examined whether hyperuricemia in essential hypertension may be related to an increased insulin secretion thereby enhancing the tubular reabsorption of sodium and thus uric acid. Insulin hypersecretion, as elicited by the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), increased a mean of 5-fold in 12 essential hypertensive patients. Urinary uric acid to creatinine ratio significantly diminished by a mean of 62% after the OGTT. Simultaneously, urinary sodium to creatinine ratio decreased by a mean of 54%. These results suggest that insulin may mediate uric acid underexcretion due to its tubular sodium retaining effect in essential hypertensive patients.

Background: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an important predictor of cardiovascular risk, and its detection contributes to risk stratification. The aims of the present study were to estimate the prevalence of echocardiographic LVH and to evaluate the influence of echocardiography (ECHO) on cardiovascular risk stratification in hypertensive patients presenting in primary care., Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 250 patients recently diagnosed with mild hypertension underwent clinical evaluation including electrocardiography (ECG), microalbuminuria measurement, 24-h blood pressure monitoring and ECHO. Level of cardiovascular risk was stratified, initially using routine procedures including ECG to assess target organ damage and then again after detection of LVH by ECHO., Results: The frequency of echocardiographic LVH was 32%, substantially higher than that detected by ECG (9%). Initial cardiovascular risk stratification yielded the following results: 30% low risk, 49% medium risk, 16% high risk, and 5% very high risk subjects. The detection of LVH by ECHO provoked a significant change in the risk strata distribution, particularly in those patients initially classified as being at medium risk. In this group, 40% of subjects were reclassified as high risk subjects according to ECHO information. The new classification was as follows: 23% low risk, 30% medium risk, 42% high risk, and 5% very high risk subjects., Conclusions: A substantial proportion of mildly hypertensive patients presenting in primary care have LVH determined by ECHO. Our results suggest that this procedure could significantly improve cardiovascular risk stratification in those patients with multiple risk factors, but no evidence of target organ damage by routine investigations.