Search

Objective: This was a singledose, randomized, positive- and placebo-controlled, double-dummy, double-blinded, 3-period crossover thorough QT study of exenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes that enhances insulin secretion in a glucose- dependent fashion., Methods: Healthy subjects (n = 70) underwent an initial tolerability screening, receiving subcutaneous exenatide 10 μg daily for 3 consecutive days. Subjects who passed tolerability screening (n = 62) received exenatide 10 μg, placebo, and moxifloxacin (400 mg orally; positive control) separated by washout periods of approximately 5 days. Twelve-lead electrocardiograms and blood samples for plasma exenatide, glucose, and insulin were collected. QT intervals were heart rate-corrected using Fridericia's correction (QTcF) and an individual correction (QTcI) and were analyzed as change from predose (ΔQTcF, or ΔQTcI). The relationships between the QTc interval and plasma exenatide, glucose, and insulin concentrations were also explored., Results: Based on ΔQTcF and ΔQTcI assessments, exenatide 10 μg did not show a clinically significant prolongation of QT compared with placebo; the upper bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for the largest mean difference from placebo was < 10 msec with both corrections. A positive slope was observed between plasma exenatide and ΔΔQTcF (0.02 (95% CI 0.01, 0.03), p < 0.001); no significant slope was observed between plasma exenatide concentrations and ΔΔQTcI (0.01 (95% CI 0.00, 0.02), p = 0.064). The plasma exenatide versus QTc analyses may be confounded by exenatide's glucose-lowering effect. A negative slope was observed between plasma glucose and [delta]QTcF (-1.5 (95% CI -2.2, -0.7), p < 0.001) and between plasma glucose and ΔQTcI (-1.6 (95% CI -2.3, -0.9), p < 0.0001). Plasma insulin and ΔQTcF were not correlated., Conclusion: This study demonstrated that single-dose exenatide 10 μg was not associated with clinically meaningful prolongation of the QTc interval.

Objective: This study evaluated pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics,safety, and tolerability of single doses of exenatide in elderly Type 2 diabetes (T2D)patients., Methods: This placebo-controlled,patient-blind, crossover study compared elderly patients (≥ 75 y, n = 15) to controls( ≥ 45 to ≤ 65y, n = 15) with T2D. Patients were randomized to single subcutaneous doses of exenatide 5μg, placebo or exenatide 10 μg (Sequence 1) or placebo, exenatide 5 μg or exenatide 10 μg (Sequence 2) before a standardized breakfast over three consecutive days. Serial blood samples were collected for plasma exenatide and serum glucose concentrations.Pharmacokinetic data from this study were also integrated with those from six other clinical pharmacology studies to further evaluate the impact of age on plasma exenatide apparent clearance (CL/F) (139 controls ( ≤ 65 y); 28 elderly patients (> 65 y))., Results: Mean ± SD ages for control and elderly patients were 57 ± 6 y and 78 ± 3 y, respectively.All elderly patients had renal impairment at baseline, as compared with one third of controls. Dose-normalized plasma exenatide maximum concentration and exposure were greater in elderly patients, but between-age group differences were neither statistically significant nor considered clinically relevant. The integrated pharmacokinetic analysis showed a significant linear relationship between plasma exenatide CL/F and renal clearance (test of slope = 0, p < 0.001),with no additional effect from age. Exenatide dose-dependently blunted postprandial serum glucose excursions in both age groups. No hypoglycemia or serious adverse events were reported, and exenatide was generally well tolerated in both age groups., Conclusions: Exenatide dose adjustments should be determined by renal function rather than age in elderly T2D patients.

Background and Objectives: Exenatide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, available in an immediate-release (IR), twice-daily formulation, which improves glycaemic control through enhancement of glucose-dependent insulin secretion, suppression of inappropriately elevated postprandial glucagon secretion, slowing of gastric emptying and reduction of food intake. The objectives of these studies were to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an extended-release (ER) exenatide formulation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus., Patients and Methods: Patients with type 2 diabetes participated in either a single-dose trial (n = 62) or a repeated-administration trial (n = 45). The pharmacokinetic and safety effects of single-dose subcutaneous administration of exenatide ER (2.5 mg, 5 mg, 7 mg or 10 mg) versus placebo were studied over a period of 12 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes. These results were used to predict the dose regimen of exenatide ER required to achieve steady-state therapeutic plasma exenatide concentrations. A second clinical study investigated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of weekly exenatide ER subcutaneous injections (0.8 mg or 2 mg) versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes over a period of 15 weeks. Furthermore, population-based analyses of these studies were performed to further define the exposure-response relationships associated with exenatide ER., Results: Exenatide exposure increased with dose (2.5 mg, 5 mg, 7 mg or 10 mg) and exhibited a multiple-peak profile over approximately 10 weeks. Multiple-dosing pharmacokinetics were predicted from superpositioning of single-dose data; weekly administration of exenatide ER 0.8 mg and 2 mg for 15 weeks confirmed the predictions. Weekly dosing resulted in steady-state plasma exenatide concentrations after 6-7 weeks. Fasting plasma glucose levels were reduced similarly with both doses after 15 weeks (-42.7 ± 15.7 mg/dL with the 0.8 mg dose and -39.0 ± 9.3 mg/dL with the 2 mg dose; both p < 0.001 vs placebo), and the integrated exposure-response analysis demonstrated that the drug concentration producing 50% of the maximum effect (EC(50)) on fasting plasma glucose was 56.8 pg/mL (a concentration achieved with both the 0.8 mg and 2 mg doses of exenatide ER). The 2 mg dose reduced bodyweight (-3.8 ± 1.4 kg; p < 0.05 vs placebo) and postprandial glucose excursions. Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels were reduced with the 0.8 mg dose (-1.4 ± 0.3%; baseline 8.6%) and with the 2 mg dose (-1.7 ± 0.3%; baseline 8.3%) [both p < 0.001 vs placebo]. Adverse events were generally transient and mild to moderate in intensity., Conclusion: These studies demonstrated that (i) a single subcutaneous dose of exenatide ER resulted in dose-related increases in plasma exenatide concentrations; (ii) single-dose exposure successfully predicted the weekly-dosing exposure, with 0.8 mg and 2 mg weekly subcutaneous doses of exenatide ER eliciting therapeutic concentrations of exenatide; and (iii) weekly dosing with either 0.8 or 2 mg of exenatide ER improved fasting plasma glucose control, whereas only the 2 mg dose was associated with improved postprandial glucose control and weight loss. [Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00103935].

Objectives: This study evaluated the potential effect of exenatide on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lisinopril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension., Methods: 22 patients with mild-to-moderate primary hypertension participated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study. Patients on stable lisinopril therapy were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous exenatide (10 microg b.i.d.) and placebo b.i.d. separated by at least 2 days washout period. The primary pharmacodynamic parameters were baseline-adjusted 24-hour mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Steady state plasma lisinopril concentration-time profiles were also assessed., Results: Mean blood pressure changes were not significantly different between exenatide and placebo coadministered with lisinopril. The least squares mean differences (95% CI) between treatments were +1.38 mmHg (-1.41, 4.17) for diastolic and +1.38 mmHg (-1.95, 4.71) for systolic blood pressure. Exenatide delayed the time to attain maximum lisinopril concentration (tmax,ss) by 2 hours but did not significantly alter maximum lisinopril concentration (Cmax,ss) or area under the concentration-time profile (AUCtau,ss) over the 24-hour steady-state dosing interval., Conclusions: This study demonstrated that concurrent administration of exenatide did not produce clinically relevant changes in blood pressure and did not significantly alter lisinopril pharmacokinetics in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Objective: This study assessed the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of single doses of exenatide in adolescent patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)., Methods: This was a randomized, single-blind, dose-escalation, crossover study in adolescent (age 10-16 years) patients with T2DM who were being treated with diet and exercise or a stable dose of metformin, a sulfonylurea, or a combination of metformin and a sulfonylurea for at least 3 months before screening. Eligible patients were allocated to receive single subcutaneous doses of exenatide 2.5 microg, exenatide 5 microg, and placebo, each followed by a standardized meal, on 3 separate days (maximum interval between first and third doses, 5 weeks). Exenatide 2.5 microg always preceded exenatide 5 microg in each treatment sequence. The primary end points were the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of exenatide; secondary end points included postprandial plasma glucose, serum insulin, and plasma glucagon concentrations., Results: The study enrolled 13 adolescent patients with T2DM (7 females, 6 males; mean [SD] age, 15 [1] years; body mass index, 32.5 [5.0] kg/m(2); glycosylated hemoglobin, 8.2% [1.5%]). After administration of exenatide 5 microg, the geometric mean (SE) exenatide AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) were 339.5 (39.6) pg * h/mL and 85.1 (11.5) pg/mL, respectively (n = 12). The exenatide AUC appeared to be dose dependent, although exenatide was not quantifiable in all patients at the 2.5-microg dose; after administration of exenatide 2.5-microg, the geometric mean AUC(0-infinity)) was 159.2 (23.1) pg * h/mL (n = 6) and the geometric mean C(max) was 56.3 (10.1) pg/mL (n = 9). Both exenatide doses were associated with significant reductions in postprandial plasma glucose excursions compared with placebo (P < 0.01); the incremental mean (SE) AUC(15-360min) was -3465.6 (1587.3) mg * min/dL for exenatide 2.5 pg, -4422.2 (2434.4) mg * min/dL for exenatide 5 microg, and 3457.4 (1615.5) mg * min/dL for placebo. The 2 exenatide doses were also associated with significant reductions in postprandial plasma glucagon concentrations compared with placebo (P < 0.01); the respective incremental mean values for AUC(15-180min) were 125.5 (658.4), -1403.8 (632.1), and 1843.1 (540.6) pg * min/mL. There were no significant differences in serum insulin concentrations between exenatide and placebo. Exenatide was generally well tolerated, with no hypoglycemic events recorded during the study., Conclusions: In these adolescent patients with T2DM, administration of single 2.5- and 5-microg doses of exenatide were associated with dose-dependent increases in plasma exenatide concentrations and improved postprandial glucose concentrations compared with placebo. Both doses appeared to be well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00254254.

Objectives: Exenatide is an adjunctive treatment for Type 2 diabetes. This was the first study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of therapeutic doses (5 microg and 10 microg) of exenatide after single and multiple subcutaneous injections in healthy adult Chinese subjects., Methods: 24 healthy volunteers were randomized to receive either 5 microg or 10 microg of exenatide by subcutaneous injection. Subjects received a single injection of exenatide on Day 1, twice daily on Days 2 and 3, and once on Day 4. Serial blood samples were drawn for pharmacokinetic assessment at pre-dose and up to 12 h post dose on Day 1 and Day 4. Adverse events, vital signs, 12-lead ECG, body weight and clinical laboratory evaluations were assessed., Results: Exenatide, 5 microg and 10 microg, was rapidly absorbed with a median tmax of 1 h after single and multiple doses. Exenatide Cmax and AUCtau,ss were (geometric mean (90% CI)) 145 (119 - 176) pg/ml and 370 (297 - 460) pg x h/ml, respectively, after multiple dosing with 5 microg. The Cmax and AUCtau,ss were 311 (271 - 357) pg/ml and 878 (785 - 983) pg x h/ml, respectively, for 10 microg. Mean half-life (t1/2, range 0.99 - 1.25 h), apparent volume of distribution (Vz/F, 19.2 - 22.3 l), and apparent clearance (CL/F, range 11.4 - 13.5 l/h) remained consistent between single and multiple doses and across the two dose levels. Both the accumulation ratios and linearity index approached 1.0. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal in nature and mild in severity. The frequency of adverse events increased with dose, such that 8% of subjects who received 5 microg and 42% of subjects who received 10 microg experienced adverse events., Conclusions: Exenatide was rapidly absorbed, with similar pharmacokinetic properties following single and multiple doses. Exenatide exposure after multiple doses approximately doubled from 5 microg to 10 microg.

Objective: Exenatide is an adjunctive treatment for type 2 diabetes. Many patients with type 2 diabetes have dyslipidemia, which requires treatment with three hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins), hence, concurrent use of exenatide and statins is likely. Exenatide slows gastric emptying, which may alter the absorption rate of co-administered oral medications. Thus, the potential interaction between exenatide and statins was evaluated in two study settings., Methods: In an open-label, fixed-sequence, clinical pharmacology study, the plasma pharmacokinetics of lovastatin (40 mg after breakfast) in the presence and absence of exenatide (10 microg before breakfast and dinner) was evaluated in 21 healthy subjects. In a second clinical setting, changes in lipid profiles and statin dosage over 30 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes were retrospectively compared (n = 180 exenatide 10 microg twice daily (BID), n = 168 placebo BID) in a combined analysis of three placebo-controlled, randomized exenatide Phase 3 trials., Results: In healthy subjects, exenatide decreased mean lovastatin area under the plasma concentration time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) by 40 and 28%, respectively, and increased median time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax) by 4 hours. In the exenatide Phase 3 trials, 30-week changes from baseline for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol, triglycerides and statin dosage were not significantly different between the exenatide and placebo groups treated with statins., Conclusions: Despite observed changes in lovastatin bioavailability in the pharmacokinetic drug interaction study, exenatide did not negatively affect long-term lipid profiles or statin dosage in patients with concurrent statin therapy. Thus, co-administration of exenatide does not require adjustment in statin dosage.

Aims: Exenatide is an incretin mimetic whose effect on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes is currently under investigation. This study assessed the effect of injection time relative to a standardized meal on postprandial pharmacodynamics of exenatide in patients with Type 2 diabetes., Methods: Eighteen patients participated in this single-centre, open-label, placebo-controlled, randomized, six-way crossover study. Patients received subcutaneous injections of either placebo (-15 min) or 10 microg of exenatide at -60, -15, 0, +30 or +60 min relative to a standardized breakfast meal on six consecutive days. Serial blood samples were assayed for plasma glucose and insulin concentrations., Results: For all exenatide treatments, incremental postprandial glucose area under the postprandial plasma glucose curve from zero to 6 h (AUC0-6 h) was significantly reduced compared with placebo. When exenatide was administered before (-60, -15 min) or with the meal (0 min), peak postprandial glucose concentrations were significantly decreased (P < 0.0001 for all treatments) compared with placebo. Post-meal exenatide administration (+30, P < 0.05; +60 min, P = 0.21) resulted in smaller peak glucose reductions and in some patients transient low plasma glucose concentrations were reported. Peak plasma insulin concentrations in the pre-meal treatments were significantly lower than placebo (P < 0.05 for all treatments), while post-meal dosing groups exhibited a trend towards higher insulin peaks compared with placebo. The most common adverse events related to exenatide were headache, nausea, dyspepsia and vomiting, and were generally of mild-to-moderate intensity., Conclusions: In this study, all exenatide treatments demonstrated reductions in postprandial plasma glucose excursions compared with placebo. Pre-meal and with meal administration of exenatide produced greater reduction of postprandial glucose excursions compared with post-meal administration. These data support flexible dosing of exenatide at any time within 60 min before a meal.