Search

Purpose: Severe hypotension caused by anesthetic administration for anesthesia induction, which might cause ischemic stroke, myocardial injury, acute kidney injury and postoperative mortality, should be prevented. Anesthesiologists are familiar with ultrasound examination of the internal jugular vein (IJV). This study aimed to clarify whether ultrasonographic IJV evaluation just before induction could predict the occurrence of such hypotension., Methods: Adult patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled after excluding patients with cardiovascular disease or ASA-PS ≥ III. Ultrasonographic IJV images were recorded in both the supine and 10° Trendelenburg positions immediately before induction. Using these images, IJV area (IJV-A), diameter and change rate with posture were measured. Hypotension during induction was defined as mean BP < 60 mmHg or > 30% decrease from baseline., Results: Hypotension during induction was observed in 37 of 82 patients. IJV-A in the Trendelenburg position was 2.02 ± 0.86 and 1.72 ± 0.68 in the hypotensive and non-hypotensive groups, respectively (P = 0.08). Logistic regression analysis performed using age, use of calcium antagonists, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, baseline mean BP and IJV-A in the Trendelenburg position as variables showed that IJV-A in the Trendelenburg position was an independent predictor of hypotension, with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.11 (95% CI 1.07-9.03, P = 0.04). Area under the curve was 0.595 (95% CI 0.469-0.722) for IJV-A in the Trendelenburg position., Conclusion: IJV-A in the Trendelenburg position was an independent predictor of hypotension during induction. Further study is required to examine the diagnostic accuracy of IJV-A as a predictor for hypotension during induction.

Background and Aim The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sedation with a combination of propofol (PF) and dexmedetomidine (DEX) compared with sedation with benzodiazepines in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical data for 40 consecutive patients who had undergone esophageal ESD at the Yokohama City University Hospital between July 2012 and August 2014. Of these patients, 20 were sedated with benzodiazepines (conventional group) and another 20 patients were sedated with a combination of PF and DEX (combination group). Parameters for efficacy and safety of sedation were evaluated by comparisons between the two groups. Results Median procedural times in the combination group were shorter than those in the conventional group (61 min vs 89 min, P = 0.03), and the percentage of patients who showed restlessness in the combination group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (25% vs 65%, P = 0.025). Incidences of hypotension and bradycardia in the combination group were higher than those in the conventional group (60% vs 15%, P = 0.008, and 60% vs 15%, P = 0.008, respectively). Conclusion This retrospective study suggests that a combination of PF and DEX may provide stable deep sedation with less body movement than benzodiazepines during esophageal ESD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]