Search

Introduction: Maintaining normothermia during anesthesia is imperative to provide quality patient care and to prevent adverse outcomes. Prolonged laparoscopic procedures have been identified as a potential risk factor for hypothermia, due to continuous insufflation of cold and dry carbon dioxide. Perioperative hypothermia is associated with increased hospital cost and many complications including; impaired drug metabolism, impaired immune function, cardiac morbidity, shivering, coagulopathy., Methods: In this experimental study, four pigs underwent four interventions each, resulting in 16 total trials. Using standardized general anesthesia in a randomized Latin-square sequence the four interventions include: 1. Control group without an administered pneumoperitoneum, 2. Administered standard pneumoperitoneum using 21°C insufflated gas and under-body forced-air warming, 3. Administered pneumoperitoneum with insufflation of warmed/humidified carbon dioxide, 4. Administered pneumoperitoneum with insufflation of warmed/humidified carbon dioxide and under-body forced-air warming. The primary outcome was distal esophageal temperature change 4 hours after trocar insertion., Results: Four hours after trocar insertion, pigs in the control group lost 2.1 ± 0.4°C; pigs with warmed and humidified insufflation lost 1.8 ± 0.4°C; pigs with forced-air warming group lost 1.3 ± 0.9°C; and pigs exposed to a combination of warmed and humidified insufflation with forced-air warming increased by 0.3 ± 0.2°C., Conclusion: This experimental animal study provides evidence that a combination of warmed and humidified insufflation of carbon dioxide (CO2) in conjunction with forced-air warming is an effective strategy in the prevention of perioperative hypothermia. Further clinical trials investigating humans are therefore indicated., Competing Interests: Laparoscopic Humigard insufflators were provided for free by Fisher & Paykel HealthCare. Pierre Diemunsch reported his participation in a research meeting sponsored by Fisher & Paykel in 2013. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Background: Various modifications of the physical status of CO2 have been used to reduce hypothermia caused by flow of insufflating gas. This animal study aimed to investigate the effects on core temperature, of insufflation with CO2 using two different humidification devices: unheated, humidified CO2 using the Modified-Aeroneb system (Nektar, San Carlos, CA) and warmed, humidified CO2 using the HME-Booster (Medisize, Hillegom, The Netherlands)., Methods: We undertook a prospective four-session study on a homogeneous group of four pigs. After general anesthesia, all animals were treated successively with the following protocols in a randomized order at 8-d intervals: Control (no pneumoperitoneum), Standard (unheated, unhumidified CO2), Modified-Aeroneb (unheated, humidified CO2 by cold nebulization), HME-Booster (heated, humidified CO2). The core temperature of the animals was recorded every 10 min., Results: The temperature decrease is significantly influenced by time (P=0.0001; ANOVA), by the insufflation method (P=0.01), and by the interaction between time and the insufflation method (P=0.0001). The method of contrasts showed the following results:--The temperature decrease in the Standard group and HME-Booster group became greater than in the Control group after 40 min (P=0.02)--The temperature decrease in the Modified-Aeroneb group became greater than in the Control group after 100 min (P=0.04)--The temperature decrease in the Modified-Aeroneb group was less than in the HME-Booster group after 40 min (P=0.04) and less than in the Standard group after 60 min (P=0.01)--The temperature decrease in the Standard group was greater than in the HME-Booster group after 160 min (P=0.005)., Conclusions: Compared with the HME-Booster system, the Modified-Aeroneb is at least as effective in limiting the drop in core temperature during laparoscopic insufflation., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prolonged abdominal laparoscopy is responsible for a significant drop in core body temperature. Various modifications of the conditioning for the insufflating carbon dioxide (CO(2)) to prevent the specific hypothermia related to the insufflated gas have been tested. This study aimed to investigate the effects on core temperature of insufflation with unheated humidified CO(2) using the Aeroneb system compared with the use of standard gas and gas made hot and wet using a warming and humidifying system (Pall system)., Methods: A prospective four-session study was conducted to investigate a homogeneous group of four pigs. After inducation of general anesthesia, all the animals were treated successively with the following protocols in a randomized order at 8-day intervals: control (no pneumoperitoneum), standard (unheated, unhumidified CO(2)), Aeroneb (unheated, humidified CO(2) by cold nebulization), and Pall (heated, humidified CO(2)). The core temperature of the animals was recorded every 10 min., Results: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed a difference between the insufflation conditions in the evolution of temperature over time (p = 0.004). The method of contrast showed the following results. After 30 min, the core temperature of the Aeroneb group fell significantly less than that of the standard group (p = 0.036). After 100 min, the core temperature of the Pall group fell significantly less than that of the standard group (p = 0.024). After 80 min, the core temperature of the standard group fell significantly more than that of the control group (p = 0.035). In the Aeroneb group, the core temperature dropped less than in the Pall and control groups, but the difference did not reach statistical significance., Conclusions: Cold humidification of insufflating CO(2) prevents heat loss associated with pneumoperitoneal insufflation at least as efficaciously as warmed humidification of the gas.