Search

Objective: To compare the operation time and performance of two uterine manipulators used for total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH)., Material and Methods: Design: Retrospective cohort analysis. Design classification: Canadian Task Force Classification II-2., Setting: Tertiary-care university-based teaching hospital and academic affiliated private hospital., Patients: All consecutive patients who underwent for TLH between January 2014 and June 2017. All operations were performed by two expert endoscopic surgeons using one of the following uterine manipulators depending on surgeon preferences: Clermont-Ferrand (CF) or Vectec (VT) MAUT60. Patients were excluded if additional surgeries such as urogynecological procedures were performed, TLH was converted to laparotomy prior to colpotomy, and when their operation records could not be obtained. A total of 169 patients were added to final analysis. Operation time, colpotomy time and the subjective performance of manipulators such as movement of the uterus, visualization of the vaginal fornices, and maintenance of pneumoperitoneum were evaluated by watching un-edited operation videos., Results: A total of 169 patients (83 patients in CF group; 86 patients in VT group) were included in the final analysis. Patients' baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Operation time and time required for colpotomy were significantly shorter in the VT group. Lateral movements of the manipulators and elevation of the uterus were better with VT compared to CF (p = .001 for both). Compared to the CF, VT was superior for visualization of the vaginal fornices (p = .004) and maintenance of pneumoperitoneum (p < .001). Both surgeons had perfect agreement on the performance grading of manipulators (p < .001, Kappa values were between 0.86-0.92). There was no difference between groups in estimated blood loss and duration of hospital stay. Reinsertion or the need to change the manipulator was not required in either group. No pelvic or vaginal abscess, cuff cellulitis, dehiscence, or hematoma formations were noted., Conclusion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy assisted with the VT uterine manipulator is associated with shorter operation and colpotomy time. Furthermore, the movements of uterus, visualization of the vaginal fornices, and maintenance of pneumoperitoneum were significantly better with VT compared to the CF manipulator.

Aim: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of unidirectional barbed suture technique for vaginal cuff closure in total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH)., Methods: In a retrospective chart review, data were analyzed from 165 patients who underwent a TLH with an unidirectional barbed suture technique for vaginal cuff closure from January 2012 to June 2016 at tertiary-care university-based teaching hospital and academic affiliated hospital. Vaginal cuff was closed by single layer 3/0 V-Loc unidirectional 9″, 180 day Absorbable Wound Closure Device (Covidien Healthcare, Mansfield, MA) and the suture was not stitched backward to secure distal end., Results: A total of 165 patients were included and the median age was 50 years (range, 35-84 years). The median completion time for hysterectomy time was 100 min (range, 40-240 min) and the median vaginal cuff closure time was 7 min (range, 4-15 min). The median estimated blood loss was 87.8 mL (range 30-250 mL) and the median uterine weight was 200 g (range, 40-900 g). Intraoperative complication included bladder perforation (1.2%) and postoperative complications were vaginal cuff dehiscence (1.8%), cuff cellulitis (0.6%), vesicovaginal fistula (0.6%) and unexplained fever (0.6%)., Conclusion: According to the results of current study, the use of unidirectional barbed suture without backward stitching appears to be safe for the vaginal cuff closure in TLH., (© 2018 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Objective: The aim of this research was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PlasmaKinetic™ (PK) PKS OMNI® (Gyrus ACMI, Maple Grove, MN) sealing device in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Materials and Methods: For this retrospective observational study, 60 patients who underwent multiport total laparoscopic hysterectomy between January 2014 and January 2015 in a tertiary-care university-based teaching hospital and an academically affiliated hospital were included in this study. The PKS OMNI is a bipolar electrosurgical device that takes energy from a PK generator workstation G400. This pulsed wave system has two different modes; cutting (High Cut 1,2,3) and coagulation (Vaporization 1,2,3). Results: Records of 60 patients were analyzed. The median age was 50 (range: ages 40-84), median body mass index was 26 kg/m2 (range: 22-32 kg/m2), and median parity was 2 (range: 1-8). The median total operation time was 100 minutes (range: 70-240 minutes), estimated blood loss was 80 mL (range: 30-250 mL), and uterine weight was 207 g (range: 50-900 g). Degree of Surgical Difficulty and postoperative pain scores at rest were evaluated with a visual analogue scale system, from 0 to 10, and the medians of these scores were 5 (range: 3-7) and 4 (range: 2-6), respectively. The median recovery time of bowel movement was 16 hours (range: 8-26 hours), median spontaneous urination time was 7 hours (range: 4-29 hours), and median postoperative mobilization time was 8 hours (range: 6-10 hours). Conversion to laparotomy was needed in 1 patient due to severe pelvic adhesions. The median duration of hospital stay was 2 days (range: 2-4 days). Vaginal cuff dehiscence was detected in 1 (1.7%) patient who engaged in sexual intercourse on the 122nd day after surgery. Cuff cellulitis in 1 (1.7%) patient and unexplained fever in 1 (1.7%) patient were the other recorded complications. The median follow-up time was 12 months (range: 6-17 months). Conclusions: The PKS OMNI is a novel, underused energy modality that promotes quick recovery and acceptable operation time with minimal blood loss. (J GYNECOL SURG 33:253) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]