Search

Objective: This study compared the outcomes of laparotomic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MISRH) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer., Methods: The clinical data of patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent LRH or MISRH (laparoscopic/robotic) at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, from 2002 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The surgical safety (operation time, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, length of postoperative stay, and perioperative complications), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence pattern were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) at a 3:1 ratio was performed to balance prognostic variables., Results: Of the 760 patients (entire cohort), 614 underwent LRH and 146 underwent MISRH. After PSM, 394 and 140 patients were included in the LRH and MISRH groups, respectively. The 5-year OS rate was significantly lower in the MISRH group than in the LRH group (85.6% vs. 93.2%, p=0.043), and the 5-year DFS rate (p=0.21) did not differ significantly. After PSM, the 5-year OS rates did not differ significantly between the MISRH and LRH groups (87.1% vs. 92.1%, p=0.393). The MISRH group had a significantly shorter operation time (p<0.001), lower intraoperative blood loss (p<0.001), lower blood transfusion rate (p<0.001), and shorter postoperative stay (p<0.001) but a significantly higher rate of intraoperative bladder injury (p<0.001) than the LRH group., Conclusion: After PSM, MISRH is associated with nonsignificantly lower OS but a significantly higher risk of intraoperative urological complications than LRH., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (© 2024. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Objective: Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy has been shown to be associated with poorer outcome in an influential prospective, randomized trial. However, many centers worldwide performing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy have data and experience that prove otherwise. We aim to review surgical and oncologic outcomes of patients operated by Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in a tertiary hospital, by experienced surgeons and standardization in radicality, for cervical carcinoma Stage 1A1-1B1 from January 2009 to May 2014., Materials & Methods: Standardised surgical technique with Parametrium & Paracolpium resection approach was adopted by qualified and experienced Gynecologic/Gyne-Oncologic Endoscopic & Minimally Invasive Surgeons in performing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer stage 1A1-1B1 from January 2009-May 2014, involving 53 patients. Electronic Medical Record system (EMR) Of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital(Tertiary Referral Centre), Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology was accessed for surgical and oncologic outcomes., Results: Fifty-Three patients operated from January 2009 to May 2014 were followed up for an average of 96.7 months with longest follow-up at 127 months. There were no cases of recurrence or death reported. 5 Year - Survival Rate and 5 Year Disease-Free Survival Rate were 100%. Two patients received post-operative pelvic radiation concurrent with chemotherapy using Cisplatin due to greater than 1/3 cervical stromal invasion., Conclusion: It is vital to standardize minimally invasive surgical techniques for early stage cervical cancer, with focus on adequate radicality and resection which may contribute to excellent survival outcomes. Further international multi-center randomized trial (Minimally Invasive Therapy Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy In Cervical Cancer) will provide justification for continued practice of MIS in early stage cervical cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Drs. Chyi-Long LEE, Kuan-Gen HUANG, Peng Teng CHUA, Marie Christine Valerie R. MENDOZA, Siew Yen LAI has no Conflict of interest or funding/financial ties to disclose. Ms. Pei San LEE has no Conflict of interest or funding/financial ties to disclose., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

This review aimed to evaluate the short term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) versus abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) for early-stage cervical cancer. A search of PubMed, Medline and Scopus databased from 2000 to 2018 was conducted. Thirty studies were retrieved including 22 retrospective cohort studies and 8 prospective cohort studies. LRH was comparable with ARH in 5-year overall survival (RR = 1.0. 95%CI 0.98-1.03; p = 0.33) and 5-year disease-free survival (RR = 1.02 95%CI 0.97-1.06; p = 0.98). The majority of included studies reported the negative cancer factors which drive adjuvant therapy were similar between two approaches. LRH was associated with lower blood loss and blood transfusion, less postoperative complication, shorter hospital stays and similar intraoperative complication rate compared to ARH. Our data suggested LRH for early-stage cervical cancer was as safe and effective in terms of long-term outcomes, but with lower surgical morbidities., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Vaginal cuff dehiscence is a rare but potentially grave complication after total hysterectomy. Abdominal or pelvic contents are at risk of evisceration through the vaginal opening. It is associated with significant risk for patient morbidity, such as peritonitis, bowel injury, and sepsis., Case Presentation: We report a case of vaginal cuff dehiscence in a 45-year-old multiparous Taiwanese woman who had undergone abdominal total hysterectomy and presented with vaginal cuff dehiscence precipitated by sexual intercourse. Immediate laparoscopic repair was done. Few authors have reported the utilization of the laparoscopic approach. It allows thorough inspection, visualization, and irrigation of the abdominal cavity. It is also associated with fewer intraoperative and postoperative complications., Conclusion: Laparoscopic repair is a safe treatment option to manage vaginal cuff dehiscence after total hysterectomy.

Objective: There are some reports of cervical cancer with uterus didelphys but a case of clear cell carcinoma (CCCC) with Obstructed Hemivagina and Ipsilateral Renal Anomaly (OHVIRA) syndrome is extremely rare. The aim of this paper was to report a case of CCCC with OHVIRA syndrome and the difficulty in making a preoperative diagnosis., Case Report: A 65 years old woman presented with postmenopausal bleeding and pelvic examination showed right paracervical mass. Preoperative confirmation of cervical carcinoma was difficult due to the location of the mass, which was inaccessible by cervical punch biopsy. Pelvic examination revealed a large mass in pelvic cavity without parametrial invasion and ultrasound showed approximately 70 mm cervical tumor. Laparoscopic surgery revealed clear cell carcinoma of the para-endocervix with OHVIRA syndrome., Conclusion: In the case of cervical carcinoma with OHVIRA syndrome, laparoscopic surgery is preferable for the diagnosis and management., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate a specific glomerular pattern for prognostication of endometrial cancer (EC)., Materials and Methods: The office hysteroscopy's picture and video of 4197 women were reviewed, 48 women who were suspected of type I EC were analyzed: 26 have glomerular pattern (group 1) and 22 without it (group 2)., Results: The histopathological grading after hysterectomy with glomerular pattern had grade 2 or grade 3 disease on final histology (n = 25; 96%). The sensitivity and specificity of this test were 84.6% and 81.8%, respectively, with a likelihood ratio of 4:6 in predicting and prognosticating those women who have high-grade tumor or invasive disease., Conclusions: This hysteroscopic picture might be used as a novel marker for risk stratification of EC.

Objective: To compare the methods of transcervical resectoscopy versus dilation and curettage (D&C) for endometrial biopsy and to compare these methods for the percentage of histological upgrades at the final posthysterectomy pathology findings in endometrial cancer., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 253 cases of uterine cancer diagnosed from May 1995 to January 2014. Included in the study were patients who received transcervical resectoscopy (TCR) or D&C biopsy as the diagnostic method and underwent laparoscopic staging at our institution. The International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) grade in the pathological report of the biopsy and final hysterectomy were recorded. The extrauterine risk was stratified using the initial FIGO grade and depth of myometrium invasion. It was compared to the actual risk using final pathological findings., Results: We identified 203 cases of endometrial cancer; 18 (8.9%) patients had a higher histological grade at the final hysterectomy. Among the 203 patients, 76 patients underwent TCR biopsy and 127 underwent D&C biopsy. The histological grade was upgraded in two (2.6%) patients in the TCR group. Three (3.9%) patients had positive peritoneal washings. In the D&C group, 16 (12.6%) patients with three (2.4%) positive peritoneal washings were upgraded., Conclusion: Transcervical resectoscopy could provide more precise grading information, compared to D&C (2.6% vs. 12.6%). Doctors could therefore make a more accurate staging plan, based on the preoperative risk evaluation., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: Our aim was to investigate the clinical features and outcomes following recurrence after primary radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer., Methods: Clinical data of 121 documented recurrent cervical cancer patients who received primary radical hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy between 1993 and 2000 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological variables, primary treatment, failure pattern, salvage treatment and outcomes were analyzed. Outcomes of the current study were compared to those treated between 1982 and 1992 (1982-1992 cohort)., Results: Cancer recurrence was documented at a median time to recurrence (TTR) of 28.4 months (1.2-129.9 months). Assessable failure patterns (n=106) included loco-regional in 46.3%, distant in 47.2% and combined pelvic-distant in 6.6%. 5-year survival of the 121 patients was 22.3% after cancer recurrence. The median survival after recurrence (SAR) was 16.4 months (range 0-144.2 months). By multivariate analysis, extravaginal sites of recurrence (HR 2.56, 1.28-5.12; p=0.008) and HPV16-positive (HR 0.60, 0.38-0.96; p=0.033) were significant prognostic factors for SAR. Non-squamous histology or pelvic node metastasis at primary surgery were not significant (5-year SAR of 16.4% and 20.0%, respectively), though they were (0% and 0%) in the 1993-2000 cohort. Salvage surgery and concurrent chemoradiation were more frequently used in the 1993-2000 cohort (48.3% versus 12.4%)., Conclusion: HPV16-negativity and extravaginal relapse were significant poor prognostic factors. Future randomized controlled trials for recurrent cervical cancer could be stratified for these two factors if further studies using external validation confirm these results., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the long-term disease-free and overall survival outcomes of laparoscopic treatment of early-stage cervical cancer., Study Design: This was a longitudinal study of prospectively registered patients of cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic surgery from June 1994 to December 2005., Results: A total of 139 patients were included, in which 60 patients were in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA, 76 in IB, and 3 in IIA. Mean operation time was 231.1 +/- 6.1 minutes. Median number of pelvic lymph node retrieval was 16. Major intraoperative complications included 1 great vessel injury, 1 ureteral injury, 1 colon injury, and 6 cystotomies. In a median follow-up of 92.1 months, the mean +/- SEM cumulative disease-free and overall survival rates were 91.01% +/- 2.77% and 92.78% +/- 3.06%, respectively., Conclusion: The laparoscopic approach has favorable long-term survival outcomes and perioperative morbidity. With the advantage of minimal invasiveness, laparoscopic treatment by experienced surgeons is an ideal alternative for early-stage cervical cancer., (Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare the efficacy, results and complications of using the pulsed bipolar system (PlasmaKinetic; Gyrus Medical, Maple Grove, MN) and conventional bipolar electrosurgery (Kleppinger bipolar forceps; Richard Wolf Instruments, Vernon Hills, IL) in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in the management of early invasive cervical carcinoma., Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study. We recruited consecutively 38 patients with cervical cancer for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pulsed bipolar system. For comparison, we recruited consecutively the latest 38 patients with cervical cancer for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with conventional bipolar electrosurgery in the same period. From Jan. 2001 to Dec. 2005, total 76 patients with cervical cancer for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy were recruited for statistical analysis., Results: No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of age, body weight, staging, and hospital stay. There were statistically significant difference in blood loss and operative time. The blood loss was more in conventional bipolar electrosurgery group (mean 564 ml, median 500 ml, range 50-2400 ml) compared with pulsed bipolar system group (mean 397 ml, median 350 ml, range 100-1200 ml) (p<0.03). But there was no statistically significant difference in blood transfusion between the two groups (p=0.454). The operation time for the conventional bipolar electrosurgery group (mean 229 min, median 232 min, range 121-352 min) was longer than that for the pulsed bipolar system group (mean 172 min, median 177 min, range 65-267 min) (p<0.001). None of the laparoscopic procedure was required to be converted to laparotomy. There was no significant difference in the intra-operative complication, but there was statistically less postoperative complication in the pulsed bipolar system group (p<0.01). There was no significant difference in recurrence rate in both groups., Conclusions: Our findings indicate that pulsed bipolar system is more effective in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy when compared with conventional bipolar electrosurgery. Pulsed bipolar system has advantage over conventional bipolar electrosurgery in less blood loss, shorter operative time, less postoperative complication and may offer an alternative option for patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.

Purpose: The role of positron emission tomography (PET) with [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) in early-stage cervical cancer is unclear. We aimed to investigate the clinical benefit of FDG-PET in primary staging before radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RH-PLND)., Patients and Methods: Patients with untreated stage IA2 to IIA adenocarcinoma (AD) or adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) or nonbulky (< or = 4 cm) squamous cell carcinoma cervical cancer with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) -defined negative nodal metastasis were enrolled onto a prospective study with a two-stage design. All patients had a preoperative dual-phase FDG-PET, technetium-99m-sulfur colloid lymphoscintigraphy, and intraoperative sentinel lymph node (LN) detection at RH-PLND. The gold standard of LN metastasis is histologic. A sample size of 120 patients was calculated to fit study aims (diagnostic efficacy of PET and sentinel LN sampling). An interim analysis was performed when 60 patients were accrued, which led to the current report., Results: There were 36 SCCs, 20 ADs, and four ASCs. Of the 60 patients, 10 (16.7%) had pelvic LN metastases, and one (1.7%) had para-aortic LN (PALN) metastasis histologically. FDG-PET detected the single PALN metastasis (one of one patient) but detected only one (10%) of the 10 pelvic LN metastases. The PET false-negative pelvic LN micrometastases measured a median of 4.0 x 3.0 mm (range, 0.5 x 0.5 to 7 x 6 mm). The second stage of this trial will be continued without PET., Conclusion: This study shows that dual-phase FDG-PET has little value in primary, nonbulky, stage IA2 to IIA and MRI-defined, LN-negative cervical cancer.

Study Objective: To compare efficacy, results, and complications of laparoscopic-assisted radical hysterectomy (LARH) and pelvic lymphadenectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) and pelvic lymphadenectomy in management of early (stages 1a2, 1b) invasive cervical carcinoma., Design: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2)., Setting: University-affiliated hospital., Patients: Sixty women enrolled for radical hysterectomy as most appropriate primary treatment., Intervention: Radical hysterectomy performed by laparoscopy or laparotomy., Measurements and Main Results: Thirty patients each underwent LARH and ARH. The groups did not differ in terms of age, weight, disease stage, operating time, and hospital stay. Mean blood loss was 962 +/- 543 ml for ARH and 450 +/- 284 ml for LARH. No laparoscopic procedure was converted to laparotomy. There was no significant difference in intraoperative and postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in recurrence rates., Conclusion: LARH with pelvic lymphadenectomy does not increase recurrence rates and morbidity when performed by experienced endoscopists and oncologists.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical hysterectomy with that of radiotherapy (R/T) for bulky early-stage cervical cancer., Patients and Methods: Women with previously untreated bulky (primary tumor >/= 4 cm) stage IB or IIA non-small-cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix were randomly assigned to receive either cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) and vincristine 1 mg/m(2) for 1 day and bleomycin 25 mg/m(2) for 3 days for three cycles followed by radical hysterectomy (NAC arm) or receive primary pelvic radiotherapy only (R/T arm). The ratio of patient allocation was 6:4 for the NAC and R/T arms. Women with enlarged para-aortic lymph nodes on image study were ineligible unless results of cytologic or histologic studies were negative., Results: Of the 124 eligible patients, 68 in the NAC arm and 52 in the R/T arm could be evaluated. The median duration of follow-up was 39 months. Thirty-one percent of patients in the NAC arm and 27% in the R/T arm had relapse or persistent diseases after treatment, and 21% in each group died of disease. Estimated cumulative survival rates at 2 years were 81% for the NAC arm and 84% for the R/T arm; the 5-year rates were 70% and 61%, respectively. There were no significant differences in disease-free survival and overall survival., Conclusion: NAC followed by radical hysterectomy and primary R/T showed similar efficacy for bulky stage IB or IIA cervical cancer. Further study to identify patient subgroups better suited for either treatment modality and to evaluate the concurrent use of cisplatin and radiation without routine hysterectomy is necessary.

Objective: This study was undertaken to investigate prognostic factors in patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma who had undergone a primary radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy., Study Design: A retrospective analysis of 177 patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB to II disease at a single institution was performed to evaluate clinicopathologic parameters, time to recurrence, pattern of failure, use of salvage therapy, and survival after recurrence., Results: The 5-year survival rate from diagnosis of recurrence in this series was 10.1%. Survival after recurrence was significantly decreased in patients with pelvic lymph node metastasis at primary surgery and adenocarcinoma-adenosquamous carcinoma histologic type. Patients with extravaginal recurrences receiving chemoradiation for recurrent cervical carcinoma had significantly better outcomes than those receiving radiation alone. Six patients who had a distant relapse at a sole site had prolonged survival after salvage therapy, which was accomplished by chemoradiation, surgery plus radiotherapy, or surgery alone., Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy in the treatment of recurrent cervical carcinoma. Salvage multimodality treatment should be offered to selected patients who have isolated relapse at a single distant site.

All patients with bulky (> or =4 cm) Stage Ib or IIa cervical carcinoma treated at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between August 1988 and December 1991 using a strategy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, vincristine, and bleomycin and radical hysterectomy were reviewed. Fifty-nine evaluable patients received 1 to 3 courses of chemotherapy, and 51 underwent subsequent hysterectomy. The remaining 8 patients, not completing planned surgery, were treated with definitive radiotherapy. The overall clinical response rate was 81.4% (48/59) with 18.6% complete response. Clinical response to chemotherapy was not different by stage, histologic type, tumor size, level of squamous cell carcinoma antigen, or DNA ploidy. However, tumors with DNA indices (DI) greater than 1.3 were associated with higher clinical response rates than tumors with DI < or = 1.3 (P = 0.043). Histologically proven pelvic node metastases was noted in 18.5% (10/54) who had laparotomy. Concomitant pregnancy and more than one node metastases had significant adverse influence on recurrence and death. The 5-year survival rate of those patients who received hysterectomy was 80.3%, while only 1 of the 8 patients without hysterectomy survived. Of the 7 patients received hysterectomy despite clinical poor response, only 2 had node metastases and 3 died, whereas all the 4 patients deterred hysterectomy for poor response died. This study demonstrates the value of DNA flow cytometry in predicting chemosensitivity. However, with a DI cutoff at 1.3, only 29.2% patients could be selected. Further studies are necessary to find additional indicators that predict histological response to select better candidates for this approach and to determine optimal adjunctive treatment in case that poor prognostic features are found.