Search

Recent long‐term tree biodiversity experiments have shown that diversity effects on productivity tend to strengthen over time, as complementarity among constituent species increases over the course of forest development. However, these community‐level metrics only account for the net outcome of multiple interactions among species and, thus, do not inform about the individual species' responses to diversity.In this study, using 11 years of growth records from a large diversity experiment, we explored how species respond to diversity based on their functional traits and those of their heterospecific neighbours over time and analysed their contribution to the community‐level overyielding.We show species‐specific responses to diversity, with fast‐growing deciduous species rapidly performing better in mixtures relative to monocultures, than slow‐growing evergreen species. Moreover, we find that species productivity in mixtures enhances over time as the proportion of slow‐growing evergreen species in the heterospecific neighbourhood increases. These patterns of response of species scale up and explain community overyielding, which occurs primarily in deciduous‐evergreen mixtures and is explained by the overyielding of deciduous species overcompensating the poor performance of evergreen species.This study sheds light on the temporal dynamics of species responses to diversity, which together help improve our understanding of community‐level overyielding over the course of stand development. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is increasing evidence that the strength of tree diversity effects on productivity varies considerably over the course of forest development. Evidence points to canopy closure and the subsequent self‐thinning as key phases of forest development during which positive diversity effects emerge. A number of studies have shown that self‐thinning can differ among species, and also in mixtures compared with monocultures. Yet, how diversity influences the process of canopy closure and self‐thinning remains poorly understood.In this study, using 11 years of growth and mortality records from a large diversity experiment, we fitted self‐thinning trajectories for 37 tree communities with equal initial densities and explored whether and how functional diversity and identity may affect these trajectories. We then examined whether the diversity effects on self‐thinning were influenced by differences in growth or in mortality.We found that tree communities' functional diversity and identity strongly influence the self‐thinning process. First, we observed that tree communities dominated by early successional species, and slow‐growing evergreens begin self‐thinning at a larger mean tree size. Second, we found that mixing species with contrasting resource‐use strategies, and the dominance of deciduous, fast‐growing species, reduce tree mortality rate in relation to mean tree size during self‐thinning (i.e. shallower self‐thinning slope). The lower rates of self‐thinning in these functionally diverse communities seem to be explained by both an increase in tree growth and a reduction in density‐related mortality simultaneously over time.Synthesis. Overall, this study highlights that increasing tree diversity has the potential to enhance forest productivity in the long term through a better performance during the self‐thinning process when competition for resources is most intense. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although there is compelling evidence that tree diversity has an overall positive effect on forest productivity, there are important divergences among studies on the nature and strength of these diversity effects and their timing during forest stand development. To clarify conflicting results related to stand developmental stage, we explored how diversity effects on productivity change through time in a diversity experiment spanning 11 years. We show that the strength of diversity effects on productivity progressively increases through time, becoming significantly positive after 9 years. Moreover, we demonstrate that the strengthening of diversity effects is driven primarily by gradual increases in complementarity. We also show that mixing species with contrasting resource‐acquisition strategies, and the dominance of deciduous, fast‐developing species, promote positive diversity effects on productivity. Our results suggest that the canopy closure and subsequent stem exclusion phase are key for promoting niche complementarity in diverse tree communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]