Search

Background: Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) can aid radiologists in quantifying prostate cancer, and MRI segmentation plays an essential role in CAD applications. Clinical experience shows that prostate cancer occurs predominantly in the peripheral zone (PZ) and there exist different evaluation criteria for different regions in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS)., Purpose: To develop a fully automatic approach to segmenting the prostate outer contour and the PZ contour with high efficacy., Population: In all, 163 subjects, including 61 healthy subjects and 102 prostate cancer patients. For each subject, all slices that contained prostate gland in diffusion-weighted images (DWIs) and T 2 -weighted images (T 2 WIs) were selected as the datasets., Field Strength: T 2 -weighted, DWI at 3.0T., Assessment: The computer-generated segmentation results were compared with the manual outlining results that were depicted by two experts with more than 5 years' experience. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), false-positive rate (FPR), and false-negative rate (FNR) were used to compared the algorithm and manual segmentation results., Statistical Tests: A paired t-test was adopted for comparison between our method and classical U-Net segmentation methods., Results: The mean DSC was 92.7 ± 4.2% for the total whole prostate gland and 79.3 ± 10.4% for the total peripheral zone. Compared with classical U-Net segmentation methods, our segmentation precision was significantly higher (P < 0.001)., Data Conclusion: By cropping the region of interest and cascading the two networks, our method balances the positive and negative sample gradually, and results in higher segmentation accuracy. This fully automatic strategy could provide satisfactory performance in prostate DWIs and T 2 WIs-based image segmentation., Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:1149-1156., (© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.)

Purpose: As part of a program to implement automatic lesion detection methods for whole body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in oncology, we have developed, evaluated, and compared three algorithms for fully automatic, multiorgan segmentation in healthy volunteers., Methods: The first algorithm is based on classification forests (CFs), the second is based on 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and the third algorithm is based on a multi-atlas (MA) approach. We examined data from 51 healthy volunteers, scanned prospectively with a standardized, multiparametric whole body MRI protocol at 1.5 T. The study was approved by the local ethics committee and written consent was obtained from the participants. MRI data were used as input data to the algorithms, while training was based on manual annotation of the anatomies of interest by clinical MRI experts. Fivefold cross-validation experiments were run on 34 artifact-free subjects. We report three overlap and three surface distance metrics to evaluate the agreement between the automatic and manual segmentations, namely the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), recall (RE), precision (PR), average surface distance (ASD), root-mean-square surface distance (RMSSD), and Hausdorff distance (HD). Analysis of variances was used to compare pooled label metrics between the three algorithms and the DSC on a 'per-organ' basis. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the pooled metrics between CFs and CNNs and the DSC on a 'per-organ' basis, when using different imaging combinations as input for training., Results: All three algorithms resulted in robust segmenters that were effectively trained using a relatively small number of datasets, an important consideration in the clinical setting. Mean overlap metrics for all the segmented structures were: CFs: DSC = 0.70 ± 0.18, RE = 0.73 ± 0.18, PR = 0.71 ± 0.14, CNNs: DSC = 0.81 ± 0.13, RE = 0.83 ± 0.14, PR = 0.82 ± 0.10, MA: DSC = 0.71 ± 0.22, RE = 0.70 ± 0.34, PR = 0.77 ± 0.15. Mean surface distance metrics for all the segmented structures were: CFs: ASD = 13.5 ± 11.3 mm, RMSSD = 34.6 ± 37.6 mm and HD = 185.7 ± 194.0 mm, CNNs; ASD = 5.48 ± 4.84 mm, RMSSD = 17.0 ± 13.3 mm and HD = 199.0 ± 101.2 mm, MA: ASD = 4.22 ± 2.42 mm, RMSSD = 6.13 ± 2.55 mm, and HD = 38.9 ± 28.9 mm. The pooled performance of CFs improved when all imaging combinations (T2w + T1w + DWI) were used as input, while the performance of CNNs deteriorated, but in neither case, significantly. CNNs with T2w images as input, performed significantly better than CFs with all imaging combinations as input for all anatomical labels, except for the bladder., Conclusions: Three state-of-the-art algorithms were developed and used to automatically segment major organs and bones in whole body MRI; good agreement to manual segmentations performed by clinical MRI experts was observed. CNNs perform favorably, when using T2w volumes as input. Using multimodal MRI data as input to CNNs did not improve the segmentation performance., (© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Prostate segmentation from transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images plays an important role in the diagnosis and treatment planning of prostate cancer. In this paper, a fully automatic slice-based segmentation method was developed to segment TRUS prostate images. The initial prostate contour was determined using a novel method based on the radial bas-relief (RBR) method, and a false edge removal algorithm proposed here in. 2D slice-based propagation was used in which the contour on each image slice was deformed using a level-set evolution model, which was driven by edge-based and region-based energy fields generated by dyadic wavelet transform. The optimized contour on an image slice propagated to the adjacent slice, and subsequently deformed using the level-set model. The propagation continued until all image slices were segmented. To determine the initial slice where the propagation began, the initial prostate contour was deformed individually on each transverse image. A method was developed to self-assess the accuracy of the deformed contour based on the average image intensity inside and outside of the contour. The transverse image on which highest accuracy was attained was chosen to be the initial slice for the propagation process. Evaluation was performed for 336 transverse images from 15 prostates that include images acquired at mid-gland, base and apex regions of the prostates. The average mean absolute difference (MAD) between algorithm and manual segmentations was 0.79±0.26mm, which is comparable to results produced by previously published semi-automatic segmentation methods. Statistical evaluation shows that accurate segmentation was not only obtained at the mid-gland, but also at the base and apex regions., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)