Search

Purpose: Current approaches to accurately identify immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in large retrospective studies are limited. Large language models (LLMs) offer a potential solution to this challenge, given their high performance in natural language comprehension tasks. Therefore, we investigated the use of an LLM to identify irAEs among hospitalized patients, comparing its performance with manual adjudication and International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes., Methods: Hospital admissions of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy at a single institution from February 5, 2011, to September 5, 2023, were individually reviewed and adjudicated for the presence of irAEs. ICD codes and an LLM with retrieval-augmented generation were applied to detect frequent irAEs (ICI-induced colitis, hepatitis, and pneumonitis) and the most fatal irAE (ICI-myocarditis) from electronic health records. The performance between ICD codes and LLM was compared via sensitivity and specificity with an α = .05, relative to the gold standard of manual adjudication. External validation was performed using a data set of hospital admissions from June 1, 2018, to May 31, 2019, from a second institution., Results: Of the 7,555 admissions for patients on ICI therapy in the initial cohort, 2.0% were adjudicated to be due to ICI-colitis, 1.1% ICI-hepatitis, 0.7% ICI-pneumonitis, and 0.8% ICI-myocarditis. The LLM demonstrated higher sensitivity than ICD codes (94.7% v 68.7%), achieving significance for ICI-hepatitis ( P < .001), myocarditis ( P < .001), and pneumonitis ( P = .003) while yielding similar specificities (93.7% v 92.4%). The LLM spent an average of 9.53 seconds/chart in comparison with an estimated 15 minutes for adjudication. In the validation cohort (N = 1,270), the mean LLM sensitivity and specificity were 98.1% and 95.7%, respectively., Conclusion: LLMs are a useful tool for the detection of irAEs, outperforming ICD codes in sensitivity and adjudication in efficiency.

Background & Aims: Guidelines recommend hospitalization for severe immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) hepatitis. We compared patient outcomes in the inpatient versus outpatient settings., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 294 ICI-treated patients who developed grade 3-4 ICI hepatitis. The primary outcome was time to alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization (≤40); secondary outcomes included time to ALT ≤100 U/L and time to death. To account for confounding by indication, inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to perform Cox regression. A sensitivity analysis was performed excluding patients with grade 4 hepatitis., Results: One hundred and sixty-six patients (56.5%) were hospitalized for a median of 6 (interquartile range, 3-11) days. On inverse probability of treatment weighting Cox regression, hospitalization was not associated with time to ALT normalization (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.43; P = .436) or time to ALT ≤100 U/L (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.86-1.43; P = .420). In the sensitivity analysis limited to patients with grade 3 hepatitis, hospitalization was also not associated with time to ALT normalization (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.83-1.50; P = .474) or time to ALT ≤100 U/L (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.90-1.58; P = .225). In a subgroup analysis of 152 patients with melanoma, hospitalization was not associated with reduced risk of all-cause death (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.53-1.64; P = .798). Notably, despite their Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events classification of high-grade hepatitis, 94% of patients had "mild" liver injury based on International Drug-Induced Liver Injury Criteria., Conclusions: Hospitalization of patients with high-grade ICI hepatitis was not associated with faster hepatitis resolution and did not affect mortality. Routine hospitalization may not be necessary in all patients with high-grade ICI hepatitis and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria may overestimate severity of liver injury., (Copyright © 2024 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective oncologic agents which frequently cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) which can impact multiple organ systems. Onco-Gastroenterology is a novel and emerging subspecialty within gastroenterology focused on cancer treatment-related complications. Gastroenterologists must be prepared to identify and manage diverse immune-mediated toxicities including enterocolitis, hepatitis, pancreatitis and other ICI-induced toxicities., Aim: To provide a narrative review of the epidemiology, diagnostic evaluation and management of checkpoint inhibitor-induced gastrointestinal and hepatic toxicities., Methods: We searched Cochrane and PubMed databases for articles published through August 2023., Results: Gastrointestinal and hepatic irAEs include most commonly enterocolitis and hepatitis, but also pancreatitis, oesophagitis, gastritis, motility disorders (gastroparesis) and other rarer toxicities. Guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology, in combination with emerging cohort and clinical trial data, offer strategies for management of ICI toxicities. Evaluation of irAEs severity by formal classification and clinical stability, and a thorough workup for alternative etiologies which may clinically mimic irAEs underlie initial management. Treatments include corticosteroids, biologics and other immunosuppressive agents plus supportive care; decisions on dosing, timing and choice of steroid adjuncts and potential for subsequent checkpoint inhibitor dosing are nuanced and toxicity-specific., Conclusions: Expanding clinical trial and cohort data have clarified the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of gastrointestinal, pancreatic and hepatic toxicities of ICIs. Guidelines, though valuable, remain based principally on retrospective cohort data. Quality prospective, controlled studies may refine algorithms for treatment and potential immunotherapy rechallenge., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: We evaluated the impact of gastroenterology/hepatology consultation, as recommended by guidelines, on the management of severe immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced hepatitis., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 294 patients who developed grade ≥3 (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] >200 U/L) ICI-induced hepatitis, with early gastroenterology/hepatology consultation defined as occurring within 7 days of diagnosis. The primary outcome was time to ALT normalization (≤40 U/L), and the secondary outcome was time to ALT improvement to ≤100 U/L., Results: A total of 117 patients received early consultation. In the 213 patients with steroid-responsive hepatitis, early consultation was not associated with faster ALT normalization (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% CI, 0.83-1.51; P=.453). A total of 81 patients developed steroid-refractory hepatitis, with 44 (54.3%) receiving early consultation. In contrast to the patients whose hepatitis responded to steroid treatment, early consultation in those with steroid-refractory disease was associated with faster ALT normalization (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.12-3.19; P=.017) and ALT improvement to ≤100 U/L (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.04-2.84; P=.034). Notably, additional immunosuppressive therapy for steroid-refractory disease was initiated sooner after diagnosis in the early consult group (median 7.5 vs 13.0 days; log-rank P=.001). When time to additional immunosuppression was added as a covariate to the Cox model in mediation analysis, early consultation was no longer associated with time to ALT normalization (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.82-2.38; P=.226) or with time to ALT improvement to ≤100 U/L (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.74-2.11; P=.404). Time to additional immunosuppression remained associated with faster ALT normalization and faster ALT improvement to ≤100 U/L in the model, suggesting that the faster hepatitis resolution in the early consultation group was primarily attributable to earlier initiation of additional immunosuppression., Conclusions: Early gastroenterology/hepatology consultation is associated with faster resolution of biochemical abnormalities in patients with steroid-refractory hepatitis. This beneficial effect appears to be mediated by earlier initiation of additional immunosuppressive therapy in those receiving early consultation.

Background and Aims: Consensus guidelines recommend high-dose corticosteroids (1-2 mg/kg/day methylprednisolone equivalents) for treating grade ≥3 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) hepatitis. We examined the effect of corticosteroid dosing on time to alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization, need for additional immunosuppression, and steroid-related complications., Approach and Results: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 215 ICI-treated patients from 2010 to 2020 who developed grade ≥3 (ALT > 200 U/L) ICI hepatitis. Patients were grouped by initial corticosteroid dose (≥1.5 mg/kg or <1.5 mg/kg methylprednisolone equivalents). Propensity scores were calculated predicting the risk of receiving the higher steroid dose and used in inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) logistic or Cox regression. The 87 patients in the ≥1.5 mg/kg group received higher initial (2.0 vs. 0.8 mg/kg/day, p < 0.001) and maximum (2.0 vs. 1.0 mg/kg/day, p < 0.001) steroid doses than the 128 patients in the <1.5 mg/kg group. There was no difference between the higher versus lower-dose groups in development of steroid-refractory hepatitis (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.79-1.89, p = 0.365) on IPTW-logistic regression. In patients with steroid-responsive disease, there was no difference between the two groups in time to ALT normalization using either standard Cox regression (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.72-1.45, p = 0.903) or IPTW-Cox regression (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.78-1.51, p = 0.610). The ≥1.5 mg/kg group had longer exposure to corticosteroids (median 60 vs. 44 days, p = 0.005) and higher incidences of infection (18.4% vs. 7.0%, relative risk [RR] 2.6, 95% CI 1.2-5.6, p = 0.011) and hyperglycemia requiring treatment (23.3% vs. 7.8%, RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.5-6.0, p = 0.001)., Conclusions: In patients with high-grade ICI hepatitis, initial treatment with 1 mg/kg/day methylprednisolone equivalents provides similar hepatitis outcomes with reduced risk of steroid-related complications when compared with higher-dose regimens., (© 2021 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved outcomes in patients with various malignancies; however, they can cause immune-related hepatitis and enterocolitis. Patients on ICI may also develop upper gastrointestinal symptoms and undergo measurement of gastric emptying., Aims: Our aim was to review records of patients with gastroparesis following ICI therapy at two medical centers., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients at Mayo Clinic and Brigham and Women's/Dana-Farber Cancer Center (BWH/DFCC) who underwent gastric scintigraphy for the assessment of symptoms of gastroparesis following ICI treatment up to January 2020. Clinical presentation, medical history, laboratory evaluation, imaging, treatment, and outcomes were retrieved from the records. Gastroparesis was diagnosed as delayed gastric emptying (GE) measured by gastric scintigraphy., Results: At Mayo Clinic, 2 patients (median age 59 years, 1 male [M], 1 female [F]) had delayed GE, while 4 patients (median age 53 years, 3M, 1F) had normal GE following ICI use. Of those with delayed GE (diagnosed after 38 and 2 months of ICI initiation), 1 patient was treated for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and melanoma with ipilimumab; a second patient with breast cancer was treated with pembrolizumab. At BWH/DFCC, 2 patients (median age 56 years, 1M, 1F) had normal GE after ICI treatment, while a 62-year-old female with non-small cell lung cancer developed gastroparesis 3 months following initiation of nivolumab., Conclusion: This report documents gastroparesis as a potential adverse effect of ICI. Further studies should explore the potential for ICI therapy to damage anti-inflammatory macrophages that preserve the enteric neurons.

Aims: A varied spectrum of histopathological changes has been associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) colitis. This study was performed to evaluate the prevalence of different histopathological patterns of injury in patients with ICI colitis and their association with specific immune check-point inhibitors., Methods and Results: Biopsies from patients with clinically and histologically confirmed ICI colitis were reviewed blindly to determine the predominant pattern of injury and to quantitate discrete histological parameters using the Geboes score. Paneth cell metaplasia, intraepithelial lymphocytes, abnormal subepithelial collagen and degree of crypt epithelial apoptosis was also recorded. A total of 86 patients with ICI colitis (ipilimumab, n = 14; ipilimumab + nivolumab, n = 29; nivolumab, n = 20 and pembrolizumab, n = 23) were included. The patterns of injury identified included diffuse active colitis (n = 22), chronic active colitis (n = 22), lymphocytic colitis (LC, n = 16), collagenous colitis (CC, n = 14), graft-versus-host disease-like colitis (n = 7) and mixed colitis (n = 5). Patients on ipilimumab were more likely to have a diffuse active colitis pattern without features of chronicity (P < 0.01) and less likely to have LC (P < 0.05) compared to other ICIs. LC and CC were more common in patients on nivolumab and pembrolizumab relative to other groups (P < 0.05). Chronic active colitis was most frequent in nivolumab patients (P < 0.05), and these patients had received more ICI doses and had been on ICI treatment longer compared to other treatment groups., Conclusions: ICI colitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of all the common inflammatory patterns of colitis and shows medication specific differences in patterns of injury., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: In the current study, the authors assessed the risks and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with resolved grade 3 to 4 ICI hepatitis because current guidelines recommend permanent ICI discontinuation in these patients., Methods: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study from 2010 through 2019 of patients with melanoma who were treated with ≥1 ICIs and who recovered from grade 3 to 4 ICI hepatitis. The primary outcome was hepatitis recurrence and the secondary outcome was the development of any immune-related adverse event (irAE) requiring the discontinuation of ICI rechallenge. Best overall response and time to all-cause death were compared between the patients who did and those who did not undergo ICI rechallenge. Grading was performed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0)., Results: Of the 102 patients with melanoma who developed high-grade ICI hepatitis, 31 underwent ICI rechallenge. Although 15 of 31 patients (48%) developed an irAE of any grade, only 6 patients (19%) required ICI discontinuation due to irAE severity (4 of 29 patients [14%] rechallenged with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 and 2 of 2 patients [100%] rechallenged with ipilimumab). Recurrent hepatitis accounted for 4 of these 6 cases. Rechallenged patients who did not require ICI discontinuation were found to be significantly less likely to receive ipilimumab rather than anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monotherapy (0% vs 33%; relative risk (RR), 0.1 [95% CI, 0.1-0.3; P = .032]) and significantly less likely to be rechallenged with their original ICI (8% vs 50%; RR, 0.2 [95% CI, 0.1-0.7; P = .038]). There was no difference noted with regard to best overall response or time to death between rechallenged and non-rechallenged patients., Conclusions: ICI therapy can be resumed in patients with melanoma who have recovered from grade 3 to 4 ICI hepatitis with a modest risk of serious irAEs. It remains unclear whether ICI retreatment improves clinical outcomes., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Gastrointestinal immune‐related adverse events are frequently caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and often require interruption of cancer treatment. Compared with ICI colitis and enteritis, limited information exists about ICI gastritis. This study characterized clinical features and treatment outcomes of ICI gastritis. Methods: Consecutive cancer patients who received ICIs and underwent endoscopy with gastric biopsies while on ICIs from 2011 to 2021 were retrospectively assessed. Specific histopathologic features identified ICI gastritis. Results: Of 6450 ICI‐treated patients, 162 (2.5%) underwent endoscopy with gastric biopsies. ICI gastritis was identified in 54 (33%) biopsied patients; 38 (70%) had concurrent ICI enteritis/colitis and 16 (30%) had isolated ICI gastritis. Dyspepsia (38%) and bloating (25%) were the most frequent symptoms of isolated ICI gastritis. Compared with patients with concomitant enteritis/colitis, patients with isolated gastritis were less likely to have diarrhea (13% vs 68%; p <.001) or abdominal pain (19% vs 47%; p =.07). Patients with isolated ICI gastritis less frequently required glucocorticoids (69% vs 92%; p =.04) and had lower incidence of ICI hold/withdrawal (13% vs 42%; p =.06). There was no association between severity or extent of luminal inflammation and antitumor response (p =.85 and p =.44, respectively). Endoscopically, gastric mucosa appeared normal in 11 (20%) patients with biopsy‐proven ICI gastritis. Conclusion: ICI gastritis may present alone or more commonly with concurrent enteritis/colitis, which may differentiate its clinical course. Gastric biopsies are required to diagnose a substantial minority of endoscopically normal, clinically significant cases. Most patients with isolated gastritis can continue ICI therapy uninterrupted, but a notable proportion require glucocorticoids. Plain language summary: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective anticancer treatments, but can cause inflammatory toxicities, including of the stomach (gastritis), intestine, and colon. Limited information is available on gastritis triggered by these agents.Adult patients with cancer who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and had an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsies of the stomach were examined. More than two‐thirds (70%) of people with checkpoint inhibitor gastritis also had inflammatory changes of the small intestine and/or colon.Compared with patients with isolated checkpoint gastritis, the subgroup with concomitant enteritis/colitis more frequently had abdominal pain, diarrhea, needed steroids, and/or needed to pause or stop antitumor therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) gastritis frequently presents with concomitant enteritis/colitis, which differentiates its clinical presentation and management from patients with isolated gastric involvement. A substantial minority of ICI gastritis cases are diagnosed histologically despite normal endoscopic appearance, highlighting the importance of gastric biopsies in patients with suspicious symptoms of or risk factors for checkpoint inhibitor gastritis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The evaluation and management of patients with cancer with suspected immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) colitis have distinct challenges within the setting of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. The approach to the treatment of patients with ICI colitis requires consideration of the risks and benefits of individual immunosuppressive medications and varies based on the presence of a concurrent COVID‐19 infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is a lack of predictive markers informing on the risk of colitis in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The aim of this study was to identify potential factors associated with development of ICI colitis.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of melanoma patients at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute who received PD-1, CTLA-4, or combination ICIs between May 2011 to October 2017. Clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with pathologically confirmed ICI colitis were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analyses. External confirmation was performed on an independent cohort from Massachusetts General Hospital.Results: The discovery cohort included 213 patients of whom 37 developed ICI colitis (17%). Vitamin D use was recorded in 66/213 patients (31%) before starting ICIs. In multivariable regression analysis, vitamin D use conferred significantly reduced odds of developing ICI colitis (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.1-0.9). These results were also demonstrated in the confirmatory cohort (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.2-0.9) of 169 patients of whom 49 developed ICI colitis (29%). Pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥5 predicted reduced odds of colitis (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.1-0.9) only in the discovery cohort.Conclusions: This is the first study to report that among patients treated with ICIs, vitamin D intake is associated with reduced risk for ICI colitis. This finding is consistent with prior reports of prophylactic use of vitamin D in ulcerative colitis and graft-versus-host-disease. This observation should be validated prospectively in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Immune check‐point inhibitors are frequently used in the treatment of a variety of solid tumours. The mechanism of action of these drugs involves up‐regulation of cytotoxic T cells, which can lead to a lack of self‐tolerance and immune‐related adverse events, including those involving the gastrointestinal tract. This study was performed to characterise the histological features of immune check‐point inhibitor therapy‐associated gastritis. Methods and results: Gastric biopsies from patients on immune check‐point inhibitor therapy with clinical suspicion of drug‐associated gastrointestinal injury were identified. The predominant histological pattern of injury, distribution of injury, degree of tissue eosinophilia and prominence of apoptosis were recorded. Presenting symptoms, treatment and follow‐up data were obtained by medical chart review. The 12 patients included in the study group were treated with ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab for a variety of tumours. Symptoms at presentation included nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea. Chronic active gastritis with intra‐epithelial lymphocytosis and prominent apoptosis was seen in eight of 12 patients, and was the most useful combination for the diagnosis of drug‐induced gastritis in these patients. Four patients showed focal enhancing gastritis with a lymphohistiocytic cuff around inflamed glands reminiscent of Crohn's disease. One of those four patients was homozygous for the ATG16L1 Crohn's disease‐associated gene variant, but had no history of inflammatory bowel disease. Ten patients responded to medication withdrawal and steroid therapy, while two required treatment with infliximab. Conclusions: Awareness of the morphological spectrum of immune check‐point inhibitor therapy‐associated gastritis is important for the accurate diagnosis and prompt management of these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The original version of the article unfortunately contained an error in the Table 2. In the column 'Motilityimmune-related adverse event' of Table 2, the term 'Intestinal pseudo-obstruction' was inadvertently removed in the final version. Corrected Table 2 is given below. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]