Search

The prognostic abilities of breast cancer gene expression signatures are due mostly to the detection of proliferation activity. One of the strongest, yet simple and well-reproducible proliferation-associated prognostic factors is the mitotic activity index (MAI). However: a) counting mitotic figures is regarded by many histopathologists as cumbersome and time-consuming, and b) most available immunohistochemical markers are much weaker predictors than the MAI. We have investigated the spatio-temporal sub-cellular distribution of the Serine 2481-autophosphorylated form of mTOR (PP-mTOR(Ser2481)) during the G(1)/S-to-M-phase transition both in cultured cancer cells and in cancer tissue specimens. Using a high-resolution, automated confocal high-content imaging system, we observed that mitotic cells notably accumulated a distinct pattern of nuclear and cytoplasmic immunolabelings of PP-mTOR(Ser2481). Parallel experiments examining site-specific phosphorylation (i.e., Serine 10 and Serine 28) of the G(2)/M marker Histone H3 (PP-H3) revealed that PP-H3(Ser10/Ser28) staining efficiently detected mitotic cells from prophase until the beginning of anaphase, but not during late anaphase, telophase and cytokinesis. PP-mTOR(Ser2481) staining associated near and between separating chromosomes not only during early mitotic stages but also to the midzone and to midbody at ana/telophase through cytokinesis. We then evaluated the usefulness of PP-mTOR(Ser2481) immunostaining for improving the efficiency of mitotic counting using. Anti-PP-mTOR(Ser2481)-labeled mitotic figures (MFs) were easily seen and permitted a quick identification of mitotic hotspots in formalin-fixed cancer tissues, even at low magnification. Importantly, average mitotic counts were significantly higher when using PP-mTOR(Ser2481) staining than with the hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) protocol in breast cancer core biopsies. Mitotic count based on PP-mTOR(Ser2481) immunostaining increased tumor grade by one grade in 2 of 9 breast carcinomas. These findings warrant forthcoming studies to confirm both the accuracy and the prognostic value of PP-mTOR(Ser2481) as a novel high-contrast immunohistochemical mitosis marker in larger populations of human breast carcinomas.

Primary pure neuroendocrine breast carcinomas (NEBC) have been considered special features within conventional breast carcinomas until recently. Indeed, the actual incidence of NEBC in BC populations has remained largely unknown due to the lack of unambiguous diagnostic criteria. In 2003, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of breast tumors definitely established that the immunohistochemical expression of NE markers in more than 50% of the tumor cell population is the unique requisite for NEBC diagnosis. Herein, we sought to determine the incidence, the clinico-pathological features and the immunohistochemical profile of NEBC in a large series of 1368 infiltrating breast tumors collected from 1989 to 2008 in our institution (Dr Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Catalonia). Twelve cases were initially selected to fulfil histopathological patterns compatible with NEBC. Clinical data along with histological and immunohistochemical profiles were collected in all cases. The criterion inclusion was the presence of more than 50% tumor immunoreactivity for one of NE markers including chromogranin, synaptophysin and CD56. Only 7 tumors fully satisfied the NEBC criteria established by the WHO (0.5% prevalence). All the NECB were grade 2 ductal carcinoma infiltrating (DCI) with tumor sizes ranging from 7 to 55 mm. Lymphovascular tumoral emboli was present in 4 cases (57.1% of NEBC) and mucinous features occurred in 2 cases (28.5% of NEBC). Axillary lymph nodes were metastatic in 3 cases (42.8% of NEBC). A positive status for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and synaptophysin was observed in 7 cases (100% of NEBC). None of the NEBC displayed HER2 overexpression. All the patients bearing NECB received hormone therapy and 4 of them underwent radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Of note, none of the NEBC patients died from BC-related causes after a median follow-up of 51 months. These findings revealed that: a) Pure solid NEBC do not significantly differ from other breast carcinomas in terms of general clinical features; b) NEBC do not exhibit an aggressive behavior despite the presence of adverse prognostic factors; and c) NEBC immunohistochemical profile mainly corresponds to that of the Luminal A BC subtype. Although it remains to be elucidated whether the good prognosis of NEBC relates to the intrinsic nature of the tumor and/or to a high rate of treatment responses, their immunohistochemical profile strongly suggest that NEBC belong to the Luminal A BC subtype. Forthcoming studies should definitely determine if the clinico-pathological features of NEBC indeed represent an independent good-prognosis subgroup of BC gene signature.