Search

Objective Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is widely used in the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma, both at initial presentation and in the setting of recurrent disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of confirmatory immunohistochemistry (IHC) and molecular analysis of the BRAF mutation in cytological preparations of metastatic melanoma. Methods A 2-year retrospective review of pathology reports was performed on cytological samples of metastatic melanoma at the University Health Network (Toronto, Canada) and the Santa Casa Medical School (Sao Paulo, Brazil). IHC was performed on cell block sections prepared from formalin-fixed, fresh samples or residuum of CytoLyt/PreservCyt post-fixed in formalin. BRAF V600E/K mutations were assessed by amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) analysis. Results A total of 104 samples (94 FNAs and 10 fluids) from 83 patients (20 women, 63 men) were included. IHC was attempted in 43 cases (41.3%) and successful in 41 (95.3%). The panel number of antibodies ranged from 1 to 15 (median 3). The most frequently used melanoma markers included HMB-45, melanoma cocktail and S100 protein, used in 25 (58.1%), 23 (53.5%) and 18 samples (41.9%). Thirty cases (69.8%) used three or fewer markers. The BRAF V600E/K mutation was tested in eight samples, being successful in seven (87.5%) and positive in three (37.5%). Conclusions Cytological samples are a reliable and sufficient source for IHC and subsequent molecular analysis, allowing a reduced diagnostic time and rapid, appropriate treatment options in patients with advanced melanoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Detection of Epstein-Barr virus ( EBV) status might help in the diagnosis of EBV-related neoplasms. The rate of successful assays for the detection of EBV-infected cells in cytological preparations has not been fully explored. Our aims were to examine the rate of successful in situ hybridization ( ISH) assays for EBV-encoded RNA ( EBER) in cytological specimens and to explore reasons for failure. Methods An electronic search selected cases with ISH- EBER assays performed on cytological preparations during a 10-year period. Data regarding patient age, gender and immune status, sample type and site, type of preparation, ISH- EBER results, immunophenotyping and immunohistochemistry results, final diagnosis and correspondent histopathological samples were retrieved. Results Sixty specimens from 58 patients with diagnoses of lymphoproliferative disorder ( n = 35), carcinoma ( n = 24) and sarcoma ( n = 1) were identified. ISH- EBER assays were performed on 50 cell block sections and on 10 cytospin preparations, with 22 positive and 32 negative results. Six tests (four cytospins and two cell block sections) failed owing to loss of material during the assay and background staining, with an overall failure rate of 10% and 4% if cytospins were excluded. Assays were performed on 13 cytology and surgical specimens from the same site, with only one discrepant result. Conclusions Cell block sections had more successful ISH- EBER assays when compared with cytospins. Reasons for failure were loss of material on the slide and background staining. A high concordance rate with surgical specimens emphasizes the usefulness of cytological samples for determining EBV status in patients with exhausted or no histological material available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]