Search

Introduction: Paragangliomas of the gallbladder are exceptionally rare. To date, only a few cases of this disease have been reported globally, and the majority were found incidentally during surgery. Although complete resection can achieve a curative effect, specific targeted drugs may have survival benefits for patients with potential recurrence and metastasis risks. Case presentation: A 48-year-old woman was scheduled for anatomical central hepatectomy due to the discovery of a liver mass. Surprisingly, a gallbladder tumor accompanied by intrahepatic invasion was found rather than primary liver lesions during the operation. Postoperatively, the lesion was confirmed to be a paraganglioma originating from the gallbladder with intrahepatic invasion detectable on histopathology. After surgery, the patient was treated with a new targeted drug, surufatinib {200 mg, q.d. [quaque die (every day)]}, and no recurrence was observed during the regular follow-up. Discussion: Gallbladder paraganglioma is rare and occult, and surgeons do not know it well, so it is easily misdiagnosed before surgery. Postoperative pathological examination is the gold standard for diagnosis. Conclusion: Given that the tumor contained abundant blood sinuses, the early and continuous enhancement of dynamic enhanced CT scanning was its characteristic manifestation. We presented a case in which a primary gallbladder paraganglioma was identified accidentally in a patient who was misdiagnosed with a liver lesion before surgery. Based on our experience in this work, the en bloc resection technique in combination with surufatinib might have a survival benefit to patients at risk of potential recurrence or metastasis; however, further follow-up observations are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the 5th NIKE (Neuroendocrine tumors Innovation in Knowledge and Education) meeting, held in Naples, Italy, in May 2019, discussions centered on the understanding of pathology reports of gastroenetropancreactic neuroendocrine neoplasms. In particular, the main problem concerned the difficulty that clinicians experience in extrapolating relevant information from neuroendocrine tumor pathology reports. During the meeting, participants were asked to identify and rate issues which they have encountered, for which the input of an expert pathologist would have been appreciated. This article is a collection of the most rated questions and relative answers, focusing on three main topics: 1) morphology and classification; 2) Ki67 and grading; 3) immunohistochemistry. Patient management should be based on multidisciplinary decisions, taking into account clinical and pathology-related features with clear comprehension between all health care professionals. Indeed, pathologists require clinical details and laboratory findings when relevant, while clinicians require concise and standardized reports. In keeping with this last statement, the minimum requirements in pathology datasets are provided in this paper and should be a baseline for all neuroendocrine tumor professionals.

During the 5th NIKE (Neuroendocrine tumors Innovation in Knowledge and Education) meeting, held in Naples, Italy, in May 2019, discussions centered on the understanding of pathology reports of gastroenetropancreactic neuroendocrine neoplasms. In particular, the main problem concerned the difficulty that clinicians experience in extrapolating relevant information from neuroendocrine tumor pathology reports. During the meeting, participants were asked to identify and rate issues which they have encountered, for which the input of an expert pathologist would have been appreciated. This article is a collection of the most rated questions and relative answers, focusing on three main topics: 1) morphology and classification; 2) Ki67 and grading; 3) immunohistochemistry. Patient management should be based on multidisciplinary decisions, taking into account clinical and pathology-related features with clear comprehension between all health care professionals. Indeed, pathologists require clinical details and laboratory findings when relevant, while clinicians require concise and standardized reports. In keeping with this last statement, the minimum requirements in pathology datasets are provided in this paper and should be a baseline for all neuroendocrine tumor professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]