Search

Chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria (CIU/CSU) causes significant impairments in quality of life and is often unresponsive to antihistamines. Although the anti-IgE mAb omalizumab has been an important addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for the management of patients with CSU, there are still a significant percentage of patients who do not respond to the combination of antihistamines and omalizumab. As a result, additional treatments are needed. With the expanding knowledge of the pathogenesis of CSU and the role of mast cells, novel therapeutic agents targeting unique pathways important in CSU are in development. This review focuses on the rationale behind, and results of, novel therapies trialed in CSU.

Treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is responsive to H1 antihistamines administered up to four times the recommended US Food and Drug Administration dose in approximately 50% of patients. However, when patients do not respond to these first-line agents, evidence-based guidelines using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology have provided direction for second- and third-line treatments that can effectively treat patients with CSU. Some patients remain refractory to these advanced treatments; therefore, alternative treatments with a lower certainty of evidence may be necessary. Regardless of the therapies used to treat CSU patients, it is essential for clinicians to be knowledgeable about the mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety and monitoring recommendations of the treatments prescribed. This review provides a comprehensive review of the adverse effects and monitoring recommendations for agents in use for CSU treatment as well as those currently undergoing investigation for CSU treatment.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is characterized by recurring wheals that last 6 weeks or longer without an identifiable cause. The estimated point prevalence of CSU worldwide is 1%. Furthermore, it has a significant impact on quality of life in both adults and pediatric patients and their families. Although it is most often a self-limited disease, some patients have urticaria refractory to first-line treatment: second-generation H1 antihistamines. In these patients, the use of targeted monoclonal antibodies is necessary. While omalizumab is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved monoclonal antibody for CSU, others, including ligelizumab, dupilumab, benralizumab, and several orally administered Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are also promising therapeutics for reducing the morbidity of CSU. Novel therapies, among others discussed here, are rapidly being developed with new trials and therapeutics being released nearly monthly. Thus, we performed a scoping literature review of randomized controlled trials studying targeted therapies for CSU. We also discuss the pathophysiology, diagnosis, prognosis, and future research directions in CSU.

Chronic urticaria (CU) appears with daily or intermittent/recurrent wheals with/without angioedema for more than six weeks. When no specific eliciting factors are found, chronic urticaria is defined as spontaneous (CSU). Up to 50% of patients with CSU do not respond to therapy, leading to a prolonged disease course and the need for expensive therapies, impacting the quality of life (QoL) and healthcare resources.Diagnosis of CSU is made when other potential causes of chronic urticaria are excluded. CSU therapy aims to achieve complete control of symptoms and normalization of QoL. Current treatment options for urticaria aim to target mast cell mediators such as histamine, or activators, such as autoantibodies. Guidelines recommend starting with second generation antihistamines (sgAHs) and adding omalizumab therapy if symptoms are not controlled. This review aims to provide a practical guide for CSU in the pediatric population.Treatment options for pediatric CSU are primarily based on adult data that have been extrapolated for children. Current guidelines should be reevaluated based on pediatric data, new biological treatments, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research is needed to investigate strategies to personalize current treatments and identify potential predictive biomarkers.

Objective: During its first year, the AWARE study assessed disease activity, patient quality of life (QOL), and treatment patterns in chronic urticaria (CU) refractory to H1-antihistamines (H1-AH) in clinical practice. Methods: We performed an observational, prospective (24 months), international, multicenter study. The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and H1-AH–refractory CU (>2 months). At each visit, patients completed questionnaires to assess disease burden (Urticaria Control Test [UCT]), disease activity (7 day-Urticaria Activity Score [UAS7]), and QOL (Dermatology Life Quality index [DLQI], Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire [CU-Q2oL], and Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire [AE-QoL]). We present data for Spain. Results: The study population comprised 270 evaluable patients (73.3% female, mean [SD] age, 48.9 [14.7] years). At baseline, 89.3% were prescribed a CU treatment. After 1 year, first- and second-line treatments became less frequent and third-line treatments became more frequent. At baseline, 47.0% of patients experienced angioedema; at 1 year, this percentage had fallen to 11.8%. The mean (SD) AE-QoL score decreased from 45.2 (28.7) to 24.0 (25.8). The mean (SD) UCT score decreased from 7.0 (4.5) to 12.1 (4.1). According to UAS7, 38.2% of patients reported absence of wheals and itch in the previous 7 days at 1 year compared with 8.3% at baseline. The mean (SD) DLQI score decreased from 8.0 (7.4) to 2.8 (4.6). At the 1-year visit, the percentage of patients reporting a high or very high impact on QOL fell from 29.9% to 9.6%. Conclusions: H1-AH–refractory CU in Spain is characterized by absence of symptoms and a considerable impact on QOL. Continuous follow-up of CU patients and third-line therapies reduce disease burden and improve patients’ QOL.

Urticaria diagnosis may be challenging in children since it can be triggered or related to numerous conditions. In this paper, we reviewed the main aspects regarding the diagnosis of urticaria in the pediatric population. Acute urticaria is often due to viral infections. However, other culprits, including foods, insect stings, drugs, contrast media, vaccination, latex, and medical diseases, may account for acute patterns. Laboratory tests and confirmatory allergy tests should be individualized and guided by history. Chronic urticaria (CU) is defined when hives and/or angioedema last for more than 6 weeks. The most common type of chronic urticaria in children is chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Chronic inducible urticaria (CindU) is less common but is important to diagnose in order to manage appropriately and reduce the risk of severe reactions. Inducible forms in children are often diagnosed with specific provocation tests similar to the tests used in adults. Given that chronic urticaria could rarely be a presentation of vasculitis, systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis, or auto-inflammatory syndromes, it is important to rule out these conditions. It is crucial to differentiate cases of chronic urticaria from mastocytosis and Bradykinin-mediated angioedema, given that treatment may differ. The management of chronic urticaria in children has improved over the last decade because of the development of both clear management guidelines and new effective drugs. It is crucial to increase awareness for appropriate diagnosis and new available treatment to improve the management of chronic urticaria in children.

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate factors affecting drug survival and treatment response in patients with chronic urticaria treated with omalizumab in clinical practice. Methods: This study included 386 patients with chronic urticaria. Demographic characteristics, clinical features, laboratory parameters, and omalizumab treatment data were analyzed retrospectively. The 7-day urticaria activity score (UAS7) and urticaria control test (UCT) were used to assess disease severity and treatment responses. Results: Well-controlled disease (UAS7 ≤6) was achieved in 59.3% of patients at a median of 2 months. Complete response was significantly higher in patients treated with omalizumab for ≥12 months (p < 0.001). Family history of asthma (p = 0.01) was less frequent, and disease duration (p = 0.041) was shorter in patients with well-controlled disease. Total treatment duration was longer in patients with relapse (p < 0.001) and serum Helicobacter pylori IgA positivity (p = 0.029). Discussion/Conclusion: Treatment response is better in patients treated with omalizumab for ≥12 months. However, prolonged treatment does not prevent relapse. Our findings suggest that continuous or intermittent therapy is an appropriate alternative treatment option in patients with severe chronic urticaria; however, continuous therapy can be preferred to maintain the patient’s quality of life.

Introduction: Chronic urticaria (CU) is a condition usually lasting longer than 6 weeks, with wheals and angioedema, sometimes both. Omalizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal IgG antibody developed against IgE. In some patients with CU, treatment response to omalizumab is good, but in some patients, it is poor. We aimed to compare the clinical features and laboratory parameters of the patients who responded and did not respond to omalizumab treatment among patients diagnosed with CU. Methods: Patients treated with omalizumab for the diagnosis of CU were evaluated retrospectively. Treatment response to omaliz­umab was evaluated by urticaria control test (UCT) (responder to omalizumab: UCT score ≥12 at 6 months and an increase of ≥3 compared to baseline). The clinical features and laboratory parameters of the patients who responded and did not respond to treatment were compared. Results: The mean age of the 220 patients, 66 (30%) men and 154 (70%) women, who received 300 mg of sc omalizumab every 4 weeks for CU was 38.89 ± 12.76 years. One hundred eighty-nine (85.9%) patients had good response to omalizumab treatment at the end of 6 months. Atopy (n = 73 [38.6%], p = 0.026), eosinophil count (median = 190 [0–800] [cells/µL], p < 0.001), basophil count (median = 40 [0–100] [cells/µL], p = 0.021), and total IgE (median = 240.5 [45–2,644] [kU/L], p < 0.001) level were significantly higher in the omalizumab responder patients (UCT score ≥12 at 6 months and an increase of ≥3 compared to baseline). Psychiatric disorders (n = 13 [41.9%], p = 0.008) and anti-TG (n = 11 [35.5%] [>2 IU/mL positive], p = 0.024) were significantly higher in the oma­lizumab nonresponder patients (UCT score ≤11 at 6 months). A weak but significant clinical correlation was found between blood eosinophil count (r = 0.168, p = 0.013), blood lymphocyte count (r = −0.149, p = 0.027), total IgE level (r = 0.207, p = 0.002), and increase in UCT score. As a result of the ROC curve analysis, the blood eosinophil count (AUC: 0.763, p < 0.001), total IgE level (AUC: 0.866, p < 0.001), and blood basophil count (AUC: 0.662, p = 0.004) had diagnostic value in predicting the response to omalizumab treatment in patients with CU. Conclusion: The patients with CU who were atopic with high eosinophils, high basophils, and high total IgE levels had good response to omalizumab treatment, but the patients with concomitant psychiatric disease and positive thyroid autoantibodies had poor response to omalizu­mab treatment. These findings obtained in our study should be tested in randomized controlled studies.

Urticaria is a disease with a complex pathomechanism. Confirmation of the cause in chronic urticaria seems to be a great challenge for specialists.To assess the frequency of different types of urticaria and their coexistence in 1 patient, diseases associated with chronic urticaria and the frequency of accompanying oedema.The study was divided into two parts. Retrospective analysis included 441 chronic urticaria patients at the age of 15 or older hospitalized in 10 years. Information from history of the disease has been placed in a specially designed form. For the prospective analysis 78 patients have been chosen out of 441 subjects previously qualified for retrospective analysis.The most common type of urticaria was autoimmune (27.9% R; 30.8% P), spontaneous (19.3% R; 39.7% P) and aspirin-induced urticaria (17.5% R; 25.6% P). The most common coexisting types of urticaria were autoimmune with aspirin-induced (7.5% R; 10.3% P) and autoimmune with dermographic urticaria (3.2% R; 5.1% P). In more than half of the patients (66.7%) one type occurs only. Angioedema coexisted in over half of the patients (58% R; 69.2% P) Among the coexisting comorbidities in people with accompanying angioedema, statistically significant differences appeared in patients with thyroid diseases (19.9% with oedema and 4.9% without oedema). Among drug users, there was a greater difference between the percentage of patients with or without angioedema than among non-drug users.It was found that among the inducing factors - pressure and stress and among drugs taken for diseases other than urticaria - NSAIDs had an influence on the persistence of symptoms in P patients.

Background Natto (fermented soybeans)-induced hypersensitivity is characterized by delayed symptom onset that hampers diagnosis. We aimed to clarify the clinical utility of the basophil activation test (BAT) in the diagnosis of natto-induced hypersensitivity. Methods Five patients with a history of anaphylaxis and chronic urticaria suspected of natto-induced hypersensitivity and seven with chronic spontaneous urticaria clinically unrelated to natto were enrolled in the patient and control groups, respectively. The BAT was performed with two incubation times, 15 min and 1 h, in combination with various concentrations of natto-mucilage extract. Results In controls, CD203c levels in basophils remained low in the 15-min incubation but were significantly increased in the 1-h incubation. In the patient group, in the 15-min condition, basophil CD203c was significantly upregulated by natto mucilage but not by soybean vs controls (P = 0.001). Low concentrations of natto mucilage were sufficient to upregulate basophil CD203c in the anaphylaxis cases, but high concentrations were required to induce the same effect in the urticaria cases. Finally, the dose-dependent pattern of the BAT results differed significantly between the anaphylaxis and urticaria cases (P = 0.006). Thus, a strong background reaction was observed in the BAT with 1 h incubation; 15 min of incubation was sufficient to identify patients with natto-induced hypersensitivity and may distinguish the clinical phenotype of natto-induced hypersensitivity, i.e., anaphylaxis or urticaria. Conclusions The BAT with a 15-min incubation period is useful in diagnosing natto-induced hypersensitivity.

Background Autoantibodies (AAbs) against immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies (Abs) and their high-affinity receptor alpha subunits (FceRIα) are key factors in the elicitation of type IIb autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria (type IIb aiCSU). In this study, we aimed to develop a new method to detect functional anti-FceRIα and anti-IgE AAbs, which can crosslink the plural FceRІα molecules and IgE Abs on the surface of mast cells and basophils, in sera from aiCSU patients using the amplified luminescence proximity homogeneous assay (Alpha). Methods Sera were obtained from 14 aiCSU patients, as diagnosed by recurrent chronic spontaneous urticaria episodes and positive results for the autologous serum skin test and/or histamine release test (HRT). The AAbs to FceRIα and IgE Abs were determined in sera from aiCSU patients using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Alpha by cross-linking (AlphaCL) of IgE Abs and/or FceRІα. Results Serum anti-FceRIα and anti-IgE AAb levels were not significantly different between aiCSU patients and healthy subjects in ELISA. Anti-FceRIα AAbs were detected in 10 of 14 aiCSU patients who displayed positive (5/5) and negative (5/9) results in the HRT for anti-FceRIα AAbs by AlphaCL, whereas no signals were observed in healthy subjects. Additionally, anti-IgE AAbs were detected in two of four aiCSU patients who displayed positive results in the HRT for anti-IgE AAbs. Conclusions A new assay method using AlphaCL can detect anti-FceRIα and anti-IgE AAbs with FceRIα- and IgE-crosslinking abilities in sera from aiCSU patients. This simple and practical assay method may be available as a diagnostic tool for urticaria patients.

Despite advances in the treatment of chronic urticaria, in a significant percentage of the patients symptoms are not fully controlled with conventional approaches. New strategies under development include blocking intracellular mediators of mast cell and basophil activation. We aim to investigate the effects of the Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor remibrutinib on human blood basophils and CD34+-derived mast cells activation induced by serum obtained from chronic urticaria patients. Twenty-two patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (mean age 52 years, 27% women) and 22 patients with chronic inducible urticaria (46 years, 27% women) were included in the study together with a sex-matched control group. Patients were classified as responders or non-responders to anti-IgE therapy on the basis of their clinical data, FcεR1a expression on blood basophils and total IgE levels. Changes on CD63 expression—as an activation marker-, were used to evaluate in vitro the response of basophils and mast cells to serum exposure and the inhibitory effects of remibrutinib. Remibrutinib inhibits degranulation induced by IgE cross-linking in mast cells and basophils and also the activation triggered by factors present in the sera of spontaneous and inducible chronic urticaria patients. Patient's serum induces a greater degranulation of effector cells than controls. Activation of mast cells and basophils by patient sera and remibrutinib effects were not related to omalizumab responsiveness. Remibrutinib inhibits activation of human basophils and mast cells induced in vitro by exposure to the serum of chronic urticaria patients independently of their response to omalizumab.

Objetivos: Determinar la prevalencia de urticaria crónica en pacientes diagnosticados con alguna patología alérgica, y conocer el sexo y grupo etario más afectado. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo de corte trasversal, observacional y retrospectivo. Se revisaron expedientes clínicos de pacientes diagnosticados con urticaria crónica en la Unidad de Medicina Integral de Tehuacán, Puebla. Seleccionados por criterios de edad, sexo y patología alérgica diagnosticada. Resultados: En el periodo comprendido del primero de enero de 2015 al 31 de diciembre de 2020, se diagnosticaron 373 pacientes con urticaria crónica, con una prevalencia de 10.5 %. Una edad media de la población de 26.05 años. El sexo femenino fue el más prevalente con 59.5 % del total de la población estudiada. Conclusiones: Los resultados reflejan una prevalencia de 10.5 %, con mayor frecuencia en el sexo femenino a una razón de 1.4:1 con respecto al sexo masculino. La prevalencia de urticaria crónica ha aumentado significativamente en los últimos años y en especial en pacientes jóvenes (lactantes, preescolares y escolares).

Background We previously reported upregulation of expression of Mas–related G protein–coupled receptor X2 (MRGPRX2) on mast cells (MCs) in the skin of patients with severe chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Serum levels of substance P (SP) were reportedly significantly elevated, in correlation with the severity of CSU. Hemokinin-1 (HK-1) reportedly induced histamine release from LAD2 cells via MRGPRX2. We aimed to investigate HK-1's role in CSU. Methods The concentrations of HK-1 and SP were measured using ELISAs. Skin– and synovium–derived cultured MCs were generated by culturing dispersed skin and synovial cells, respectively, with stem cell factor. MRGPRX2 expression in the MCs was reduced using a lentiviral shRNA silencing technique. Results Anti–SP Ab used in the SP ELISA showed 100% cross–reactivity to HK-1, but anti–HK-1 Ab showed 0% cross–reactivity to SP. The serum level of HK-1 was significantly lower in patients with CSU (n = 151) than in non–atopic healthy control (NC) subjects (n = 114). The EC50 of histamine release from MCs induced by HK-1 (5056 nM) was 12–fold higher than by SP (426 nM). Brief pretreatment of MCs with HK-1 at concentrations of 3.0–10 μM significantly reduced histamine release by 0.1 μM SP. However, brief incubation of MCs with HK-1 did not elicit rapid MRGPRX2 internalization. Conclusions In NC subjects, high HK-1 concentrations may desensitize MGRPRX2–mediated MC activation, thereby preventing MC degranulation by SP.

Histamine-mediated angioedema is the most frequent form of angioedema. It is classified as idiopathic histaminergic acquired angioedema (IH-AAE)1 when allergies and other causes have been excluded and a positive treatment response to antihistamines, corticosteroids, or omalizumab has been reported. Idiopathic histaminergic acquired angioedema may occur in isolation, when it is termed chronic histaminergic angioedema (CHA), or it may be associated with wheals in chronic spontaneous urticaria angioedema (CSU-AE). The term CHA is equivalent to IH-AAE and mast cell-mediated angioedema. However, this term reflects the chronic and recurrent course of the disease. Therefore, we propose that the term CHA be internationally discussed in the following guidelines. Chronic spontaneous urticaria is classically characterized by the presence of recurrent episodes of wheals (hives) with or without angioedema for at least 6 weeks.2 Chronic histaminergic angioedema is typically considered a subtype of CSU without wheals. However, a recent study3 found several features that differentiate CHA from CSU, which suggests that CHA is a separate entity. Quality of life (QoL) studies specifically for CHA patients have not been performed, and their QoL has been assessed only in the context of CSU-AE.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is characterized by the recurrent occurrence of short-lived wheals with or without angioedema for more than 6 weeks. Although its pathogenesis is not completely defined, several mechanisms seem involved, including autoimmunity and autoallergy with complement and coagulation activation. Various biologics are currently available or under investigation to counteract different CSU pathomechanisms.The recent literature dealing with biologics in the treatment of CSU was screened and analyzed; the different treatments were divided into anti-IgE and other than anti-IgE biologics. The latter were subdivided according to their target mechanisms.Biologic drugs exert their effects in a very precise and specific manner. A majority of patients (arguably those with type I disease) respond to anti-IgE treatment. Others, possibly with type IIa disease, show a slow response to anti-IgE drugs. Things are much more complicated in anti-IgE-refractory patients. Some respond well to nonspecific immune suppressors, such as corticosteroids and cyclosporin suggesting that an immune-mediated pathogenic mechanism, not involving the high-affinity IgE receptor, is probably active. Several ongoing studies are evaluating biologics and small molecules counteracting other pathomechanisms, including anti-receptor biologics, Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, mast cell targets, and specific cytokines.

BackgroundA lot of studies have revealed that chronic urticaria (CU) is closely linked with COVID-19. However, there is a lack of further study at the gene level. This research is aimed to investigate the molecular mechanism of COVID-19-related CU via bioinformatic ways.MethodsThe RNA expression profile datasets of CU (GSE72540) and COVID-19 (GSE164805) were used for the training data and GSE57178 for the verification data. After recognizing the shared differently expressed genes (DEGs) of COVID-19 and CU, genes enrichment, WGCNA, PPI network, and immune infiltration analyses were performed. In addition, machine learning LASSO regression was employed to identify key genes from hub genes. Finally, the networks, gene-TF-miRNA-lncRNA, and drug-gene, of key genes were constructed, and RNA expression analysis was utilized for verification.ResultsWe recognized 322 shared DEGs, and the functional analyses displayed that they mainly participated in immunomodulation of COVID-19-related CU. 9 hub genes (CD86, FCGR3A, AIF1, CD163, CCL4, TNF, CYBB, MMP9, and CCL3) were explored through the WGCNA and PPI network. Moreover, FCGR3A, TNF, and CCL3 were further identified as key genes via LASSO regression analysis, and the ROC curves confirmed the dependability of their diagnostic value. Furthermore, our results showed that the key genes were significantly associated with the primary infiltration cells of CU and COVID-19, such as mast cells and macrophages M0. In addition, the key gene-TF-miRNA-lncRNA network was constructed, which contained 46 regulation axes. And most lncRNAs of the network were proved to be a significant expression in CU. Finally, the key gene-drug interaction network, including 84 possible therapeutical medicines, was developed, and their protein-protein docking might make this prediction more feasible.ConclusionsTo sum up, FCGR3A, TNF, and CCL3 might be potential biomarkers for COVID-19-related CU, and the common pathways and related molecules we explored in this study might provide new ideas for further mechanistic research.

Objective: To estimate the frequency of chronic urticaria in patients who attended an allergy service in a tertiary care hospital; in addition, the main clinical characteristics are described. Methods: In a period of 7 months, a total of 96 patients who were over 18 years of age were analyzed; they had been diagnosed with chronic spontaneous urticaria and chronic inducible urticaria. Results: The frequency of chronic urticaria was of 1.31 % (n=98); 53 % were associated with some allergic pathology, and 54 % showed an alteration in the paraclinical tests. Chronic spontaneous urticaria was found in 80 % of the patients; and in 62 % of them, the urticaria was associated with angioedema. Chronic urticaria was controlled in 19 % of the studied population with the use of a single antihistamine. Conclusions: The frequency of chronic urticaria in our study was lower than the frequency reported nationwide.

Objectives The satisfaction level of adult patients receiving drugs for atopic dermatitis and chronic urticaria is unclear. The objective of this multicenter study was to assess the satisfaction level of adult patients receiving treatment for allergic skin diseases, primarily atopic dermatitis and chronic urticaria. Methods We developed a self‐administered questionnaire with multiple‐choice questions on patient characteristics, quality of life (QOL), and Abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM‐9). We surveyed 302 patients receiving dermatological treatment. Results The global satisfaction of patients (TSQM‐9) was lower for atopic dermatitis treatment compared with that for chronic urticaria. For atopic dermatitis, dupilumab had higher scores for effectiveness and global satisfaction, whereas topical tacrolimus and moisturizers had higher scores for convenience. For chronic urticaria, omalizumab had higher scores for effectiveness and global satisfaction, while antihistamines had a higher score for convenience. The Dermatology Life Quality Index was significantly associated with treatment effectiveness and global satisfaction, and patient satisfaction improved with the corresponding improvement in the QOL. For atopic dermatitis, satisfaction with dupilumab was higher than that with conventional standard therapy, after the confounding factors were eliminated. However, the same trend was not observed for chronic spontaneous urticaria. Conclusions The satisfaction of the effectiveness for the biologic agents was higher, compared to that with conventional standard therapy. Treatment with biologics is worth exploring for patients who are not satisfied with their existing treatments.

Background The pathophysiology of the underlying paroxysmal permeability disturbances in angioedema (AE) is not well understood. Methods To identify clinical and laboratory parameters specific for a certain AE subtype, 40 AE patients were prospectively enrolled: 15 hereditary (HAE), 13 ACE-inhibitor induced (ACE-AE), and 12 mast cell-mediated without wheals in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU-AE). Ten healthy subjects served as controls. Serum levels of markers indicating activation of the ficolin-lectin pathway, of endothelial cells, or those indicating impairment of vascular integrity or inflammation were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results New routine clinical diagnostic criteria could not be identified, not even for distinguishing bradykinin-mediated (BK-) AE (ie, HAE and ACE-AE) from mast cell-/histamine-mediated CSU-AE. However, FAP-α and tPA were significantly increased in all AE compared to controls. In HAE, FAP- α, tPA, uPAR, pentraxin-3, Tie-2, sE-selectin, and VE-cadherin were significantly increased compared to controls. In HAE compared to CSU-AE and ACE-AE, sE-Selectin, Tie-2, and VE-Cadherin were significantly increased, whereas for Ang-2 the difference was significant compared to CSU-AE only. Tie-2 correlated strongly negatively with C4, C1-INH activity, and C1-INH function. Conclusions This study is the first to compare HAE, ACE-AE, and CSU-AE. Although significance is limited by small sample size, Tie-2 was identified as a new promising biomarker candidate for HAE. FAP- α and tPA might serve as a marker for AE in general, whereas sE-selectin and Ang-2 were increased in BK-AE only. Our results add information to the role of endothelial dysfunction and serine proteases in different AE subtypes.

Background and objectives According to current guidelines, oral antihistamines are the first line treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Up-dosing antihistamines up to fourfold the licensed dose is recommended if control is not achieved. Such indications are based mainly on expert´s opinions. Objectives: To critically review and analyze clinical evidence regarding to efficacy and safety of higher-than-licensed dosage of second-generation oral antihistamines in CSU treatment. Material and methods A systematic literature review following a sensitive search strategy was performed. All articles published in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library between 1961 and October 2018 were examined. Publications with CSU patients treated with prescribed second-generation antihistamines in monotherapy comparing with either placebo, licensed dosage and/or higher dosage were included. Articles were evaluated by peer revisors. Quality was evaluated using Jadad and Oxford scores. Results We identified 337 articles, 14 were included in the final evaluation; 6 focus on fexofenadine, 2 on cetirizine, levocetirizine, rupatadine and desloratadine, and 1 for ebastine and bilastine. Only 5 studies were placebo-controlled. The number of included patients ranged from 20 to 439. Observation lapse was ≤ 16 weeks. High fexofenadine doses produced dose-dependent significant response and controlled urticaria in a majority of patients. Cetirizine, levocetirizine, rupatadine and bilastine showed an increased effectiveness when up-dosing. Most frequent adverse events were headache and drowsiness. Conclusion The low quality and heterogeneity of the articles reviewed made impossible to reach any robust conclusions and unveil the need to develop large-scale randomized clinical trials.

Background: The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related mental health status on chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) has not been addressed before. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the depression, anxiety and stress levels, and the fear of COVID-19 in patients with mild-to-moderate CSU and to determine their impact on urticaria activity during the pandemic. Methods: A total of 509 patients with mild-to-moderate CSU were prospectively evaluated with validated scales, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) and the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) during the lockdown period (LP) and the return to normal period (RTNP). CSU activity was determined with the urticaria activity score summed over 7 days (UAS7) and medication scores (MS). UAS7 and MS before the pandemic were retrospectively collected from medical records. Results: The median UAS7 and MS were both significantly higher in the LP than in the median of related scores during the prepandemic period (p < 0.0001) and the RTNP (p < 0.0001). The mean FCV-19S and DASS-21 scores were both significantly higher in the LP than in the RTNP (p < 0.0001). The FCV-19S and the DASS-21 anxiety and stress subscales were significantly higher in women. The UAS7s were positively correlated with the FCV-19S and depression, anxiety, and stress subscale scores. Conclusion: Fear of COVID-19, anxiety, depression, and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially when strict isolation measures are taken, have a significant impact on mental health and urticaria activity in patients with mild-to-moderate CSU, even though they are not infected. Psychological support for patients with CSU seems to be important to control disease activity during the pandemic.

A decrease in the number of basophils in the peripheral blood, or basopenia, has been noted, reflecting the activity of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Infiltration of basophils into the skin has also been reported, but the mechanism of basopenia in CSU has not been clarified. The phenomenon of basopenia during the active phase of urticaria was confirmed, and basophil numbers increased following symptom improvement in 15 out of 17 patients treated with omalizumab and in 13 of 15 patients treated with antihistamines. Our examination by immunostaining also revealed basophil infiltration of the CSU lesions, as in previous reports, but since most of our patients were already taking oral steroids, it was not considered appropriate to examine the relationship between basophil numbers in tissue and peripheral blood. Then, we used mouse model of contact hypersensitivity with a single application of oxazolone, which is known to stimulate basophil infiltration, and investigated basophil counts in the skin, peripheral blood, and bone marrow. In this model, a decrease in peripheral blood basophil numbers was observed one day after challenge, but not after 2 days, reflecting supplementation from the bone marrow. Indeed, when cultured basophils expressing GFP were transplanted into the peripheral blood, GFP-positive basophil numbers in the peripheral blood remained low even after 2 days of challenge. Despite differences among species and models, these results suggest that one reason for the decrease of basophils in the peripheral blood in CSU may involve migration of circulating basophils into the skin.

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a common skin disease that affects about 1% of the world's population of all ages and seriously affects patients' quality of life. Therefore, further safe and effective treatments are urgently needed. Therefore, artemisinic acid was investigated in the present study due to its pharmacologic effect on inhibiting mast cell degranulation and chronic urticaria in a mouse model.4Artemisinic acid decreased the symptoms of substance P-induced chronic urticaria in the mouse model and alleviated secretagogue-induced local cutaneous and systemic anaphylaxis through the Lyn-PLC-p38-NF-κB signaling pathway. Artemisinic acid inhibited mast cell degranulation and pro-inflammatory cytokine production in vitro. Mechanism analysis demonstrated that it could arrest mast cell activation through the Lyn-PLC-p38/ERK1/2/AKT-NF-κB signaling pathway. Based on the results of in vitro kinase assay of Lyn and PLC, artemisinic acid was a potential small molecule inhibitor of Lyn. Artemisinic acid displayed good structural affinity (KArtemisinic acid can attenuate substance P/MRGPRX2-mediated chronic urticaria and mast cell activation. Artemisinic acid is an antagonist of Lyn kinase and can be developed as a drug candidate to treat allergic diseases.

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease mainly mediated by mast cells. Lipids exert essential functions in biological processes; however, the role of lipids in CU remains unclear. Nontargeted lipidomics was performed to investigate the differential lipid profiles between CU patients and healthy control (HC) subjects. Functional validation studies were performed in vitro and in vivo including β-hexosaminidase release examination from mast cells and passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) mouse model. We detected dramatically altered glycerophospholipids in CU patients compared with HCs. Phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and phosphatidylglycerol (PG) were increased, while phosphatidylcholine (PC) was reduced in CU patients. The reduction in PC was related to a high weekly urticaria activity score (UAS7), while PS was positively associated with the dermatology life quality index (DLQI). We also identified the differential lipid profiles between chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), symptomatic dermographism (SD), and CSU coexist with SD. CU patients were classified into two subtypes (subtype 1 and subtype 2) based on consensus clustering of lipid profiling. Compared with patients in subtype 2, patients in subtype 1 had elevated levels of PC (18:0e/18:2) and PE (38:2), and lower urticaria control test (UCT) scores indicated worse clinical efficiency of secondary generation H1 antihistamines treatment. Importantly, we found that supplementation with PC could attenuate IgE-induced immune responses in mast cells. In general, We described the landscape of plasma lipid alterations in CU patients and provided novel insights into the role of PC in mast cells.

BackgroundThe pathogenesis of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) has not been clarified entirely. Type IIb autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSUaiTIIb) is a distinct subtype of CSU that is often difficult to treat and is connected to low levels of total IgE. Previous findings indicate that an enhanced signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) may be responsible for reduced IgE serum levels.ObjectiveOur aim was to investigate a possible underlying gain-of-function mutation or activating polymorphism in STAT3 that could be responsible for the low levels of IgE in patients with CSUaiTIIb.MethodsWe included 10 patients with CSUaiTIIb and low levels of IgE and sequenced selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in STAT3 associated with common autoimmune diseases. Exon sequencing was performed for the most relevant exons of STAT3. To test for a gain-of-function of STAT3, we performed a phospho-specific flow cytometry analysis of STAT3 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells before and after stimulation with interleukin-6.ResultsNo differences were found in the prevalence of the tested SNPs between our patients and a control population. Moreover, we could not find any mutations or variants on the tested exons of STAT3. The function of STAT3 was also not altered in our patients.ConclusionIn total, we could not find any evidence for our hypothesis that low IgE in patients with CSUaiTIIb is linked to mutations in STAT3 or altered activity of STAT3. Thus, it remains to be discovered what causes the low serum levels of IgE in patients with CSUaiTIIb.

IntroductionChronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) is a subgroup of chronic urticaria induced by a specific stimulus. We evaluated basophil characteristics in patients with CIndU and compared with those in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and healthy controls (HCs).MethodsBlood was collected from patients, and a basophil activation test (BAT) was performed. Basophil responsiveness and surface marker expression in patients with CIndU were compared with those in patients with CSU and HCs. For some patients with CIndU, blood was collected before and after wheals were induced. In these cases, we compared the responsiveness of basophils before and after the appearance of wheals.ResultHCs (n=23) and patients with CIndU (n=24) or CSU (n=38) were enrolled in the study. The degree of basophil activation at steady state in patients with CIndU was higher than in HCs. Basophil responsiveness via high-affinity IgE receptor (FcϵRI) stimulation with anti-IgE or anti-FcϵRI antibody in patients with CIndU was equivalent to that in HCs, and higher than that in patients with CSU. No abnormalities in IgE and FcϵRI expressions on the surface of basophils in patients with CIndU were observed. When we induced wheals in some patients with CIndU and performed a BAT before and after the appearance of wheals, no significant changes were found.ConclusionPeripheral blood basophils in CIndU were slightly activated at steady state, but no abnormalities in basophil responsiveness. In future, a higher number of cases should be enrolled to confirm the role of basophils and refine therapeutic targets for CIndU.

Urticaria is characterized by the occurrence of wheals and flares in response to vasoactive mediators, such as histamine. Various studies have suggested the involvement of basophils in the pathogenesis of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). However, histamine release from peripheral basophils in response to stimuli acting on the high affinity IgE receptor (FcϵRI) is impaired in many patients with CSU (non/low responders). We previously demonstrated that tissue factor (TF)s expressed on vascular endothelial cells in response to a combination of various stimuli, such as that of histamine and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), activates the extrinsic coagulation pathway and produces anaphylatoxin, complement 5a (C5a), which then activates basophils and mast cells via the C5a receptor (C5aR). We have revealed that histamine release was induced in response to C5a and formyl-l-methionyl-l-leucyl-l-phenylalanine (fMLP), regardless of the response to anti-IgE antibody, the reduced numbers of basophils and severity of urticaria. Moreover, we found that spontaneous release of histamine ex vivo from basophils of patients with CSU is higher than that from healthy individuals. These results suggest that basophils and the complement system, which could be activated by coagulation factors, may play a critical role in the pathogenesis of CSU, especially in cases refractory to treatment involving the IgE/FcϵRI pathway.

Background: Chronic urticaria (CU), characterized by daily wheals and/or angioedema lasting more than 6 weeks, is a common skin disease. CU is classified as spontaneous or inducible. Because of Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, face-to-face visits were reduced, and many centers started remote consultations to minimize hospital admissions and risk for viral diffusion. Telemedicine became a valuable tool for evaluating and monitoring patients with chronic diseases, such as CU. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of telemedicine as a means for the follow-up of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) during the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, we collected data related to CSU evolution and treatment by remote consultation. Moreover, we specifically investigated the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination on CSU in relapsing or worsening of such a disease. Methods: The electronic charts were reviewed for patients diagnosed with CSU, who were referred to the allergy unit of Meyer Children’s Hospital, Florence. For each patient, a review of demographic characteristics, diagnostic workup, efficacy, and tolerability of the treatment was performed. Patients with a physical agent triggering CU were excluded from the study. Disease activity was monitored using the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7). In addition, when the COVID-19 pandemic started, follow-up continued through telemedicine after an initial face-to-face visit when possible. Approximately 1 year after the diagnosis of CSU, patients were recontacted to investigate whether they had experienced a relapse or worsening of urticaria during a possible COVID-19 or immediately after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Results: From January 2020 to March 2021, 84 cases of CSU were identified, with 71 (84.5%) of these being evaluated via televisit (remote consultation). During the remote follow-up period, 38/71 (53.5%) patients who were evaluated via televisit recovered completely from CSU, while 24 (33.8%) made therapy adjustments, and 9 (12.7%) had to discontinue follow-up through remote visits and return to face-to-face visits. In February 2022, we recontacted the 71 patients with CSU, and 50 (70.4%) of them answered by phone call interview. Four (19.2%) of the 26 patients who had COVID-19 showed CSU relapse, while 1 (3.8%) had a CSU worsening. Instead, 1 (3.8%) patient of the 26 who were vaccinated had a relapse of CSU, and 1 (3.8%) had a worsening of CSU, both after the first dose. Conclusion: Our data showed that telemedicine can be an effective tool for the follow-up of patients with CSU. Moreover, COVID-19, as well as COVID-19 vaccination, may trigger CSU relapse or worsening, but both are unspecific triggers, and urticaria shows a very short duration in most cases.

Background: Ligelizumab, a next-generation, humanized anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibody is in development as a treatment for patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria, whose symptoms are inadequately controlled with standard-of-care therapy. Objective: To evaluate the long-term safety and re-treatment efficacy of ligelizumab 240 mg in patients who completed the core study and extension study. Methods: This open-label, single-arm, long-term Phase 2b extension study was designed to assess patients who were previously administered various doses of ligelizumab, omalizumab or placebo in the Phase 2b, dose-finding core study and who presented with active disease after Week 32. In the extension study, patients received ligelizumab 240 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks, for 52 weeks and were monitored post-treatment for 48 weeks. Results: Overall, ligelizumab was well-tolerated with no newly identified safety signals. A total of 95.4% (226/237) screened patients received ligelizumab 240 mg in the extension study; 84.1% (190/226) of patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. Most reported events were mild (41.6%) or moderate (35.8%) and mostly unrelated to the study treatment. At Week 12, 46.5% of patients had a complete response increasing to 53.1% after 52 weeks. Following 52 weeks of extension study treatment, 75.8% (95% confidence interval, 69.9, 81.3) of patients had cumulative complete responses. The median time to relapse in complete responders was 38 weeks. Conclusion: The long-term safety profile of ligelizumab 240 mg in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria was consistent with the core study and re-treatment efficacy was shown. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02477332 and NCT02649218.

Background In chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), the guidelines recommend very limited diagnostic procedures during the routine workup, although additional investigations might be indicated in some patients with CSU. For physicians treating patients with CSU, it is often difficult to decide which diagnostic tests are useful. Objective To provide recommendations on what diagnostic tests should be performed on which patients with CSU. Methods We performed an extensive literature search on the respective topics and identified relevant questions that should prompt diagnostic procedures based on the published evidence and expert consensus among all authors. Results We provide questions, diagnostic testing, where appropriate, and recommendation that should be included when assessing the history of a patient with CSU, to explore and rule out differential diagnoses, to assess patients for underlying causes and modifying conditions, to explore patients for comorbid diseases and consequences of having CSU, and to assess patients for CSU components that can help to predict their disease course and response to treatment. Conclusions Here, we provide physicians treating patients with CSU with information about which clues should lead to which tests and why.

Chronic urticaria and angioedema are diseases often managed by Allergy and Immunology specialists. Recent international guidelines have outlined a stepwise approach to management of patients using dose escalation of second-generation antihistamines followed by use of omalizumab and finally cyclosporine in more refractory cases. In select patients (those with refractory chronic urticaria), nonbiologic alternative medications with anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressant activity may be considered. Angioedema without wheals may have several different pathophysiologic mechanisms. Optimal management of mast cell-mediated angioedema is less clear but is often managed similar to chronic spontaneous urticaria. Drug-induced angioedema due to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is a common cause of angioedema in the emergency department. Although bradykinin is thought to be a primary mediator for this type of angioedema, studies of targeted therapies have been generally disappointing. In contrast, several targeted therapies have been proven successful using acute and preventive approaches for management of hereditary angioedema. Further developments, including novel biologics, novel oral therapies, and gene therapy approaches, may hopefully continue to broaden therapeutic options to ensure optimal individual management of patients with hereditary angioedema.

Urticaria and angioedema are experienced by up to 1 in 5 people, usually the result of common allergen or medication triggers and infections. Similarly, the majority of recurrent angioedema has an exogenous trigger, for example, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, or is hereditary (type 1 and 2 hereditary angioedema); chronic spontaneous urticaria are most often autoimmune or autoallergic in routine clinical practice. There are, however, several skin and systemic conditions that can imitate the clinical appearance of either angioedema or urticaria, whereas there are several uncommon conditions that have chronic urticaria and/or recurrent angioedema as part of their disease manifestations. Correct diagnosis is paramount to ensuring subsequent tailored therapy for many of these conditions, and in many instances, diagnostic delay can be several years with morbid consequence. In this grand rounds article, we present 2 illustrative clinical cases as the backdrop to discussing a practical diagnostic approach for clinicians to recognize copycat phenotypes and "red flags" that should prompt further investigation of several uncommon mimics. We highlight key diagnostic features, epidemiology, and management for mimics where treatment is distinct from the common phenotypes of recurrent angioedema and chronic urticarias.

Patients with urticaria and angioedema often have triggers that cause an outbreak or a swelling episode or worsen their chronic condition. Exploring these factors with each patient may result in better understanding and control of their disease. Patients should be advised to avoid known triggers, if feasible, or prepare to prevent or control an exacerbation with appropriate pretreatment if avoidance is not possible. In this review, we describe and discuss a variety of factors for which there is evidence that they cause or exacerbate chronic spontaneous urticaria and angioedema. These potentially exacerbating factors include drugs, food additives, and naturally occurring pseudoallergens, mental stress, and trauma.

Angioedema and urticaria affect people of all ages. Accurate diagnosis and optimum management is essential for healthy aging. Older people continue to experience mast cell-mediated urticaria and angioedema, with a higher prevalence of autoimmune and a lower prevalence of autoallergic disease. Bradykinin-mediated angioedemas are more common in the elderly because of their association with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) treatment. Acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency, another bradykinin-mediated angioedema, occurs predominantly in older people, whereas hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency continues to cause symptoms, even in old age. Drug-induced angioedemas disproportionately affect older people, the most frequent users of ACEIs, aspirin, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Accurate diagnosis and targeted treatment prevent unnecessary morbidity and mortality. Second-generation antihistamines with omalizumab if required are effective and well tolerated in older people with mast cell-mediated urticaria. For bradykinin-mediated angioedemas, these drugs are ineffective. C1-inhibitor replacement or blockade of kallikrein or the bradykinin B2 receptor of the contact pathway is required to treat hereditary angioedema and may be considered in other bradykinin-mediated angioedemas, if supportive treatment is insufficient. For aspirin-related angioedema and urticaria, alternative medications or, exceptionally, desensitization may be required.

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a chronic inflammatory mast cell-driven disorder. Endothelial cells (ECs) contribute importantly to key features of CU. Several markers of EC (dys)function in CU have been reported, but have not yet been systematically reviewed. In this study, we systematically reviewed and categorized all published markers of EC functions in CU through a comprehensive search in Pubmed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SCOPUS using the following Mesh terms: CU AND pathogenesis AND (vasculopathy OR microangiopathy OR ECs OR marker). In total, 79 articles were selected and the identified biomarkers were categorized according to EC (dys)function in CU. The most frequent and consistently reported upregulated biomarkers in CU skin were adhesion molecules, TF, and P-selectin. The most frequently reported upregulated and reliable biomarkers in sera of CU patients were F1+2 for coagulation cascade involvement, D-dimers for fibrinolysis, and MMP-9 for vascular permeability. Emerging biomarkers described in the selected articles were endostatin, heat shock proteins, cleaved high molecular weight kininogen, and adipokines. This systematic review contributes to the pool of growing evidence for vascular involvement in CU where EC dysfunction is present in different aspects of cell survival, maintenance of vascular structure, and coagulation/fibrinolysis balance., SCOPUS: re.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Purpose of review Studies show that inhibitors of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTKis), currently FDA-approved for the treatment of B cell malignancies, can prevent IgE-mediated reactions through broad inhibition of the FcεRI signaling pathway in human mast cells and basophils. This review will summarize recent data supporting the use of these drugs as novel therapies in various allergic disorders. Recent findings Recent studies have shown that BTKis can prevent IgE-mediated degranulation and cytokine production in primary human mast cells and basophils. Two oral doses of the second-generation BTKi acalabrutinib can completely prevent moderate passive systemic anaphylaxis in humanized mice and even protect against death during severe anaphylaxis. Furthermore, two doses of ibrutinib can reduce or eliminate skin prick test responses to foods and aeroallergens in allergic subjects. BTKis in development also show efficacy in clinical trials for chronic urticaria. Unlike other therapies targeting IgE, such as omalizumab, BTKis appear to have rapid onset and transient effects, making them ideal candidates for intermittent use to prevent acute reactions such as IgE-mediated anaphylaxis. Summary These studies suggest that BTKis may be capable of preventing IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, paving the way for future trials in food allergy and urticaria.

Chronic urticaria (CU) is an urgent medical and social problem. The instruments of everyday clinical practice are international and domestic guidelines which briefly reflect modern ideas about various aspects of CU. Recently, a new opportunity has emerged to expand theoretical and practical experience in the management of patients with CU, to carry out educational activities to disseminate modern knowledge about urticaria, to conduct research in the field of studying the pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention of exacerbations of the disease. This opportunity is realized through the centers of excellence for working with such patients (GA2LEN UCARE centers). One of the five Russian centers, have prepared and conducted an online training program Chronic urticaria: scientific and medical achievements and practical aspects of patient management at the Federal State Budgetary Institution State Research Center Institute of Immunology FMBA of Russia. The event was held by the employees of the Federal State Budgetary Institution State Research Center Institute of Immunology of the FMBA of Russia on November, 2020.

Introduction and objectives: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is thought to be an auto-immune disease in a subpopulation of patients. Protein tyrosine phosphatase-22 (PTPN22) polymorphisms are considered to be one of the strongest contributing factors to autoimmune diseases. In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential association of several PTPN22 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with CSU in an Iranian population.Material and methods: A total of 93 CSU patients and 100 healthy individuals were included in this study. Five SNPs within the PTPN22 gene were analyzed using TaqMan genotyping assays. The frequency of alleles, genotypes, and haplotypes of PTPN22 SNPs (rs12760457, rs2476601, rs1310182, rs1217414, and rs33996649) was investigated.Results: A significantly higher prevalence of the rs1310182 T allele was observed among patients compared with controls [OR = 1.75 (95% CI: 1.17–2.63); P = 0.007]. In addition, the rs1310182 CC genotype and TT genotype were 0.47 and 2.06 times more common in patients, respectively (P = 0.03). Moreover, haplotype analysis demonstrated that CGCGC, CGTGC, and TGCGC (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with CSU. No significant differences were observed between the patients and controls in the other analyzed PTPN22 SNPs.Conclusions: Polymorphisms of the PTPN22 gene are associated with an increased susceptibility to CSU in the studied Iranian population.

Introduction: the COVID-19 pandemic dramatically disrupts health care around the globe. The impact of the pandemic on chronic urticaria (CU) and its management are largely unknown. Aim: to understand how CU patients are affected by the COVID-19 pandemic; how specialists alter CU patient management; and the course of CU in patients with COVID-19. Materials and methods: our cross-sectional, international, questionnaire-based, multicenter UCARE COVID-CU study assessed the impact of the pandemic on patient consultations, remote treatment, changes in medications, and clinical consequences. Results: the COVID-19 pandemic severely impairs CU patient care, with less than 50% of the weekly numbers of patients treated as compared to before the pandemic. Reduced patient referrals and clinic hours were the major reasons. Almost half of responding UCARE physicians were involved in COVID-19 patient care, which negatively impacted on the care of urticaria patients. The rate of face-to-face consultations decreased by 62%, from 90% to less than half, whereas the rate of remote consultations increased by more than 600%, from one in 10 to more than two thirds. Cyclosporine and systemic corticosteroids, but not antihistamines or omalizumab, are used less during the pandemic. CU does not affect the course of COVID-19, but COVID-19 results in CU exacerbation in one of three patients, with higher rates in patients with severe COVID-19. Conclusions: the COVID-19 pandemic brings major changes and challenges for CU patients and their physicians. The long-term consequences of these changes, especially the increased use of remote consultations, require careful evaluation., Novartis; Sanofi; Menarini Universidad Espiritu Santo; Takeda; Allakos; AstraZeneca; CSL Behring; Genentech; Pharming; GSK; Shire/Takada; BioCryst; ResTORbio; Pearl Therapeutics, CVS Health; Law offices of Levin; Riback; Adelman; Flangel; Vedder Price; Fresenius; Taiho; Kyowa Kirin; Tanabe; Korin; Uriach Pharma; Instituto Carlos III FEDER; Menarini; Amgen; Thermo Fisher; Avene; ALK‐Abello; Bencard/Allergy Therapeutics; Celgene; Allergopharma; Faes Farma; AbbVie; Janssen; Leo Pharma; Lilly; Roche; Genesis; Menlo Therapeutics; UCB; Pfizer; Almirall; Galderma; Allergika; Beiersdorf; Biocryst; Biogen Idec; BMS; Boehringer‐Ingelheim; Eli‐Lilly; Galderma; Hexal; Klosterfrau; LEO‐Pharma; LETI‐Pharma; L´Oreal; Medice; Octapharma; Pflüger; Pharming; Regeneron; Shire; ALK‐Abello; Fraunhofer‐IZI Leipzig; Hautnetz Leipzig/Westsachsen; MSD; HAL‐Allergy; Bencard; Nestle; Nutricia; Bayer Health Care; FAES; Henkel; Allakos; Argenx; Genentech Menarini; Moxie; Aralez; Celldex

Background: Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) is a disease presenting typical wheals characterized by itching, angioedema or both. Although CU is, by appearance, a relatively “simple” disease, yet it has a devastating effect on those suffering due to its immense social implications. Aims: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of omalizumab in the treatment of CSU. In particular, gender, co-administration of drugs and comorbidities were taken into account. Materials and Method: 108 patients (25 Males/83 Females) admitted to our department were diagnosed with CSU and were treated for 30 months. CSU was estimated on a score basis, which was used in order to define disease severity. The mean total CSU score and the mean CSU score of the first trimester, as well as the first semester, were calculated. Patients were treated with omalizumab, and in several cases, with co-administration of dapsone, cyclosporine and anti-histamines. Results: Females manifested significantly higher scores as compared to males. Further on, patients who relapsed manifested significantly higher scores during the whole time course, as well as at the end of the first semester. Conclusions: Females are more prone to CSU. Although CSU scores in patients with remission, relapse and poor response manifested no significant difference at diagnosis, relapsed patients manifested higher CSU scores in the first semester. Therefore, the first semester of treatment is probably critical for the final patient outcome. Further studies are necessary in order to understand the mechanisms of CSU for better treatment and prognosis.

Chronic urticaria (CU) is associated with debilitating symptoms such as pruritic wheals and/or angioedema, which can significantly affect patients’ sleep, productivity and quality of life. Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is defined in cases in which no triggering factor is identified. Various guidelines directing the optimal management of CU in the adult population were published and updated over the recent years with the most accepted and widely used being the EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO 2017 guidelines. Meanwhile, guidelines specific to the pediatric population are scarce, mainly due to the fact that high quality evidence is lacking for many treatment options in this age group. The objective of this article is to review and synthesize the existing literature regarding the management of pediatric CSU. Our review highlights evidence supporting the EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO 2017 treatment guidelines with non-sedating second-generation antihistamines (sgAHs) as the mainstay of treatment for pediatric CSU, considering their demonstrated efficacy and reassuring safety profile. Additionally, the use of omalizumab in adolescents is well supported by the current literature. There is limited data available regarding the updosing of sgAHs, omalizumab in children with CSU under 12 years of age and the treatment with cyclosporine and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) in pediatric patients of all ages. However, the results from currently available case series and case reports are promising for omalizumab and cyclosporine use in children with CSU, although large and well-designed randomized control trials (RCTs) assessing these treatment options are needed in order to formulate strong recommendations for their use. First-generation antihistamines (fgAHs) remain commonly used in pediatric CSU treatment despite a lack of studies assessing their efficacy and safety in the pediatric population and their widely known inferior safety profile compared to sgAHs.

Background Chronic urticaria (CU) is a common disease which represents a considerable burden for many patients. The current urticaria guideline describes the evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of CU. In addition, however, questions often arise in everyday practice that are not addressed by the guideline. Methods In May 2020, a digital meeting with German urticaria experts was held, in which practical aspects of CU treatment were discussed and supporting aids for everyday clinical treatment formulated. The resulting advice in this document focus on practical questions and the available literature and experiences of the participants. Results The diagnosis of CU can be made in a short time by means of a thorough anamnesis, a physical examination, and a basic laboratory chemical diagnosis. For this purpose, practical recommendations for everyday practice are given in this paper. An extended diagnosis is only indicated in a few cases and should always be carried out in parallel with an effective therapy. In general, CU should always be treated in the same way, regardless of whether wheals, angioedema or both occur. Symptomatic therapy should be carried out according to the treatment steps recommended by the guidelines. This publication provides practical advice on issues in everyday practice, such as the procedure in the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the cardiac risk under higher dosed H1 antihistamines, the self-administration of omalizumab as well as vaccination under omalizumab therapy. In addition to treatment recommendations, topics such as documentation in the practice and family planning with urticaria will be discussed. Discussion These supporting treatment recommendations serve as an addendum to the current CU guideline and provide support in dealing with CU patients in everyday practice. The aim is to ensure that patients suffering from CU achieve complete freedom of symptoms with the help of an optimal therapy.

Introduction: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a frequent disorder in which activation of effector cells and histamine release can be induced via several distinct pathogenetic mechanisms. Much work has been carried out to identify biomarkers useful for classifying CSU patients, and to predict their response to currently available treatments.Areas covered: The recent literature dealing with CSU biomarkers was screened in PubMed and Google Scholar using 'chronic spontaneous urticaria', 'biomarker', 'diagnosis', 'therapy' and 'treatment response' as key words. The characteristics found in relevant papers were divided into clinical and serological biomarkers of (a) clinical severity/disease activity, and (b) response to treatments.Expert opinion: A diagnostic biomarker for CSU is still missing. Most biomarkers described so far do not seem to possess sufficient specificity for this disease. Basopenia and the activation of the coagulation cascade might be biomarkers of disease activity and severity, but information available so far is insufficient to consider their routine use. Markers suggesting IgG-mediated autoimmunity (autologous serum skin test, basophil activation/histamine release assays, low total IgE) seem to identify patients less prone to respond to omalizumab but responsive to cyclosporine. In contrast, 'autoallergy' (i.e. the presence of IgE to autoallergens), which is often associated with elevated IgE levels seems to identify patients who will respond to omalizumab.