Search

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a significant morbidity and mortality in patients with cirrhosis. There is a significantly higher morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19 in patients with decompensated cirrhosis as compared to compensated cirrhosis, and in patients with cirrhosis as compared to noncirrhotic chronic liver disease. The fear of COVID-19 before or after liver transplantation has lead to a significant reduction in liver transplantation numbers, and patients with decompensated cirrhosis remain at risk of wait list mortality. The studies in liver transplantation recipients show that risk of mortality due to COVID-19 is generally driven by higher age and comorbidities. The current review discusses available literature regarding outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with cirrhosis and outcomes in liver transplant recipients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mucormycosis is a rare but emerging fungal infection complicating solid organ transplantation. It is associated with a high mortality rate. We describe an unusual case of hepatic mucormycosis in a living donor liver transplant recipient presenting as delayed graft dysfunction, which was successfully treated with combination of liposomal amphotericin B and oral posaconazole therapy, without surgical resection. The patient had clinical improvement with normalization of liver function tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While antibody mediated hyper-acute vasculitic rejection is rare in liver transplant recipients, acute and chronic rejection have clinical significance. The liver allograft behaves differently to other solid organ transplants as acute rejection generally does not impair graft survival and chronic rejection (CR) is uncommon. The incidence of acute and chronic rejection has declined in current era due to improved immunosuppressive regimens. Acute rejection generally improves with steroid boluses and steroid resistant rejection is uncommon. CR may improve with escalation of immunosuppression or may result in irreversible loss of graft function leading to retransplantation or death. The current review discusses diagnosis and management of acute and chronic liver allograft rejection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With advancements in immunosuppressive strategies and availability of better immunosuppressive agents, survival rate following liver transplantation has improved significantly in the recent times. Besides improvements in surgical techniques, the most important factor that has contributed to this better outcome is the progress made in the field of immunosuppression. Over the last several years, the trend has changed to tailored immunosuppression with the aim of achieving optimal graft function while avoiding its undesirable side effects. Induction agents are no longer used routinely and the aim is to provide minimal immunosuppression in the maintenance phase. The present review discusses the various types of immunosuppressive agents, their mechanism of action, clinical utility, advantages and disadvantages, and their side effects in short and long-term. It also discusses about tailoring immunosuppression in presence of various situations such as renal dysfunction, metabolic syndrome, hepatitis C recurrence, cytomegalovirus infections and so on. The issue of chronic kidney disease and the available renal sparing immunosuppressive strategies has been particularly stressed upon. Finally, it discusses about the practical aspects of various immunosuppression regimens including drug monitoring. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Liver transplantation (LT) recipients such as all organ transplant recipients, have a risk of developing de novo malignancies owing to prolonged immunosuppression. However, there is limited data on this after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), wherein immunosuppression levels are less than in deceased donor transplantation. We aim to describe experience of de novo malignancies from a predominantly LDLT center. A total of 2100 adults (age >18 years) who underwent LT between January 2006 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively collected database. The data were analyzed up to June 2019. Data are shown as number, percentage, mean ± standard deviation, and median (interquartile range). Of 2100 patients who underwent LDLT, 21 (1%) patients developed de novo malignancy after transplantation. The de novo malignancy cohort comprised 20 males and 1 female, aged 50 ± 8.8 years. The distribution of de novo malignancies was as follows: 7 oropharyngeal (carcinoma of buccal and oral mucosa), 4 lung, 2 squamous cell carcinoma of skin, 2 lymphoma, 1 each of brain, colonic, gastric; ovary, pancreatic, and prostate. These malignancies were diagnosed at a median follow-up of 42 months (32–73) after LT. Over a median follow-up of 38 months (10–56) after the diagnosis of de novo malignancy, 6 patients (28.5%) died. Patients with de novo malignancy had a higher follow-up after LDLT, 94.3 ± 32.9 versus 62.5 ± 41.8 months, P = 0.000. Patients with alcohol as etiology for LT had higher trend of de novo malignancies (33.3% versus 26.4%), P = 0.46. The incidence of de novo malignancy was 1% at a median follow-up of 42 (32–73) months. De novo malignancies following LDLT, although uncommon, are associated with significant mortality. A careful screening protocol should be followed after transplantation for early detection of de novo malignancies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights from the article: B Background and Aims: b Liver recipients like all organ transplant recipients, have a risk of developing denovo malignancies due to prolonged immunosuppression. B Results: b Of 1639 patients who underwent LDLT, 20 (1.22%) developed de novo malignancy after transplantation, among which 19 were males and 1 female. Of 20 de novo malignancies, 6 had oropharyngeal malignancy (carcinoma of oral and buccal mucosa), 4 lung cancer, 2 squamous cell carcinoma of skin, 2 lymphoma and 1 each had hepatoblastoma, bone tumor, carcinoma stomach; carcinoma ovary, pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer.