Search

Background: Heart transplantation is the ultimate treatment for end-stage heart failure. Cardiac sarcoidosis has rarely been reported in heart transplantation worldwide. Their long-term prognosis after heart transplantation is unknown. Herein we have presented clinical and pathological observations among heart transplantation patients with isolated cardiac sarcoidosis., Methods: From 1987 to 2011, we performed 411 heart transplantations including five patients retrospectively reviewed due to the presence of sarcoidosis and giant-cell cardiomyopathy in the recipient heart., Results: Among the heart transplantations from 2003 to 2011, the four male and one female patients were ages 31 to 40 years. None of them had extra-cardiac sarcoidosis. All five subjects presented with dilated cardiomyopathy with patent coronary arteries. The commonest clinical presentations were atrioventricular block, ventricular arrhythmia, electrocardiographic findings of ST elevations, and poor left ventricular ejection fractions (17%-23%). All patients survived without allograft heart failure to date with the longest survivor at 8 years postoperatively. No recurrence of sarcoidosis has been observed clinically or among the post-heart transplantation endomyocardial biopsies., Conclusion: Heart transplantation is a useful treatment for isolated cardiac sarcoidosis patients suffering end-stage heart failure. Often the diagnosis is difficult to establish before heart transplantation despite endomyocardial biopsy. No recurrence of sarcoidosis was observed among the allografted hearts., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The most serious complication after heart transplantation is allograft dysfunction. Patients presenting with compromised hemodynamics show a high incidence of mortality. The most common reason for allograft dysfunction is rejection. We have employed steroid pulse therapy combined with plasmapheresis for hemodynamically compromised patients after heart transplantation., Methods and Results: Steroid pulse therapy and plasmapheresis were performed on 35 patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation for graft dysfunction. Thus treatment rescued ventricular function and improved the ejection fraction in 77% of patients, among who ever 71.4% showed improved New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class., Conclusions: Steroid pulse therapy combined with plasmapheresis improved the cardiac contractility and NYHA functional class of most heart transplant recipients with graft dysfunction., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains one of the leading causes of late graft failure and death. Cyclosporine microemulsion Neoral (CsA) had been used in heart transplantation (HTx) recipients. Meanwhile, Everolimus (EVL; Certican, Norvatis Pharmaceuticals; Basel, Switzerland) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been combined with CsA for maintenance treatment. We compared atherosclerosis in HTx patients showing CAV by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in two groups: the CE who received CsA, EVL, and steroid versus the CM group, who received CsA, MMF, and steroid., Materials and Methods: We explored IVUS parameters such as plaque thickness (PT), lumen circumference (LC), media adventitial circumference, lumen diameter (LD), and media adventitial diameter to characterize the atherosclerosis among CE versus CM groups., Results: In this study, both the CE and CM groups showed increased plaque thickening in the first year posttransplantation (P < .05). However, MMF significantly reduced LC and LD (P < .05) Upon multivariate linear regression analysis, the CE group seemed to show less effect on the maximal difference in PT between 2 and 12 months after adjusting for age at transplantation and gender (P < .05). There was no acute clinical adverse event of CAV reported in either both group during the follow-up. The atherosclerosis of CAV revealed by LC, LDmax, and LDmin was significantly less among patients treated with CE than CM., Conclusion: These results suggested that everolimus-treated patients showed benefits compared with MMF-treated subjects as extrapolated from these IVUS data., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Tacrolimus (Tac) in combination with mycophenolate mofetil is widely used after heart transplantation (HT). Everolimus (EVR), a new potent proliferation signal inhibitor can be used with a carcineurin inhibitor to reduce the occurrence of rejection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tac combined with EVR in de novo HT., Materials and Methods: From January 2009 to April 2011, 33/62 patients who underwent HT were prescribed Tac and EVR as de novo immunosuppression. The main exclusion criteria were poor kidney function (serum creatinine > 2.8 mg/dL), panel-reactive antibodies > 25%, donors > 60 years old, or cold ischemia time > 6 hours. All patients received Tac (C0 blood level 5-10 ng/mL during the first 6 months, then 3-5 ng/mL), EVR (C0 target 3-8 ng/mL), and corticosteroids. After transplantation, routine examinations included echocardiogram and protocol endomyocardial biopsy., Results: There was no operative mortality. The 1- and 3-year actuarial survivals were 95.74% ± 3.49%. One patient who had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting previously and received intra-aortic balloon pumping and extracorporeal membrane oxygenator-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation before HT died of Aspergillus septicemia 58 days after HT. No biopsy-proven acute rejection > grade 2R or acute rejection associated with hemodynamic compromise was observed. Hyperlipemia was noted in 16 cases (48.5%), hypertension in 11 (33.3% 5%), and diabetes mellitus in 12 (36.4%). No other severe adverse events were noted., Conclusions: Concentration-controlled EVR (C0 target 3-8 ng/mL) in combination with Tac achieved good efficacy and safety. The 1- and 3-year actuarial survivals were 95.74% ± 3.49%., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation (SHKT) has become an accepted therapeutic option for patients with end-stage heart failure associated with end-stage renal disease. The immunosuppressive therapy is usually based upon a heart transplantation protocol using a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). Sirolimus (SRL) is a potent nonnephrotoxic immunosuppressant with antiproliferative activity in nonimmune cells. Its use has recently been reported to show less nephrotoxicity among both heart and kidney transplants. However, the data for the SHKT are limited. We retrospectively examined the causes of 5 patients who received combined SRL-CNI immunosuppressive therapy with reduced CNI doses from 2003 to 2009. There was no mortality during follow-up. Two of the 3 patients who received a conversion regimen recovered renal function. One who suffered severe proteinuria after transplantation proceeded to hemodialysis at 3 years after conversion. Both of the patients who received the combined regimen de novo remained stable regarding their renal function. Cardiac function was stable in these patients; there was neither allograft rejection nor allograft coronary vasculopathy. We observed that patients without dyslipidemia or hyperuricemia before SHKT were less likely to develop these disorders under the combined regimen. Early medical intervention after close follow-up of lipid and uric acid values by dose adjustments resulted in a stable status of our patients., (Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In this study, we examined whether cyclosporine was effective when combined with everolimus in clinical heart transplantation (HT)., Patients and Methods: From August 2004 to July 2007, 108 adult patients underwent primary HT. The main exclusion criteria were: donors > 60 years; cold ischemia times > 6 hours; recipients of multiorgan transplantation or a previous transplantation; and panel-reactive antibodies > or = 25%. The cyclosporine plus everolimus regimen (group CE, n = 32) was suggested first; upon refusal or if the recipient or donor was positive for hepatitis B surface antigen or PCR + hepatitis C infection, then patient was randomly assigned to success cyclosporine plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; group CM, n = 24) or tacrolimus plus MMF (group TM, n = 25). All patients underwent similar operative procedures and postoperative care with protocol endomyocardial biopsies., Results: No 30-day mortality was noted in any group. The efficacy failure rates were 3%, 25%, and 16% in groups CE, CM, and TM, respectively (P = .04 between groups CE and CM). The 1-year survivals were 96.7% +/- 18.1%, 89.7% +/- 29.8%, and 81.0% +/- 35.5% for groups CE, CM, and TM, respectively (P = .04 between groups CE and TM). The 3-year survival rates were 91.9% +/- 28.3%, 79.8% +/- 46.0%, and 81.0% +/- 35.5% in groups CE, CM, and TM, respectively., Conclusions: The 3 immunosuppressive regimens offered good efficacy after HT. The cyclosporine plus everolimus regimen showed a significantly better result with less efficacy failure (compared with cyclosporine plus MMF: 3% vs 25%) and better 1-year survival compared with tacrolimus plus MMF: 96.7% vs 81.0%.

After clinical heart transplantation (HT), it is crucial to use appropriate immunosuppressive agents to prevent rejection. The use of basiliximab or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (RATG) for induction therapy has significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes after kidney transplantation. In this study we sought to examine the effects of basiliximab after HT. From June 2006 to July 2007, we performed 43 HT including patients 18-65 years old undergoing primary HT who were included in this study of basiliximab induction (20 mg intravenous [iv] on days 0 and 4). Cyclosporine and everolimus were given with basiliximab induction. All others received RATG induction (1.5-2.5 mg/kg iv infusion on days 0, 1, and 2) followed by cyclosporine or tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil. All patients underwent the same operative procedure, steroid-tapering protocol, and postoperative care with protocol endomyocardial biopsy. Basiliximab was well-tolerated and easy to use. There was only 1 operative mortality; the patient died of sepsis due to Enterobacter cloacae. All others survived the operation and are alive and in good health with a 2-year survival rate of 92.86%. No severe adverse events were noted during the first postoperative month. No acute rejection > or = grade 2R or rejection associated with hemodynamic compromise was noted during the whole course. Basiliximab as induction immunosuppressant was simple, safe, and effective after HT.

This study described an analysis of severe sepsis among heart transplantation recipients who were treated by sparing all immunosuppressants. Sepsis leading to multiple organ failure (MOF) in heart transplantation has a high mortality. This retrospective study of 190 patients who underwent heart transplantation from 1993 to 2004 included 12 who had severe sepsis with MOF who were treated by sparing all immunosuppressants. Half of them survived after sparing all immunosuppressants with intensive endomyocardial biopsy. Only one case needed pulse therapy for an acute rejection episode. The most common bacterial infectious episodes were caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n = 3). All sepsis episodes occurred in the first month after heart transplantation except in one case, which occurred 6 years after heart transplantation. There was a 50% survival rate of heart transplantation recipients who experienced MOF due to severe sepsis and were treated by sparing all immunosuppressants under a program of intensive endomyocardial biopsy.

Lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD) is a well recognized complication of solid organ transplantation. It is associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and is often a fatal complication of immunosuppression. We report a 2.5-year-old boy who developed LPD presenting as small bowel lymphoma after liver transplantation. The patient had intermittent fever after transplantation and reactivation of latent EBV infection was documented by pre- and posttransplant serologic tests. About 5 months after his liver transplantation, the patient had sudden onset of abdominal pain and emergency laparotomy was performed for peritonitis. He proved to have multiple small bowel perforations caused by B cell lymphoma and died of multiple organ failure 9 days after operation, despite aggressive treatment and stopping immunosuppressive agents. We conclude that prevention of overimmunosuppression in pediatric recipients after liver transplantation and early detection and treatment of LPD are important to decrease this often-fatal complication.

Background Malignancy is the leading cause of death in Taiwan. The risk of malignancy is higher in heart transplant recipients than in the general population. We reviewed the malignancy incidence among the patients who underwent heart transplantation (HT) at the National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) during the past 28 years. We found that the incidence of malignancy is low in Taiwan and that the pattern of malignancy is different from that in the Western population. Methods From July 1987 to March 2015, 518 patients underwent HT at NTUH. Forty-four patients who died within 1 month after transplantation were excluded from this study. Thus, a total of 476 patients were enrolled in this study. There were 393 male and 83 female patients, with a mean age of 45 years at transplantation. The major indications for HT were dilated cardiomyopathy (52%) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (33%). After HT, all patients received triple immunosuppressive therapy, including a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), cell-cycle inhibitor (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, or everolimus), and steroid. After 1995, induction with rabbit anti–human thymocyte globulin was routinely performed. Survival was estimated by means of the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Twenty-seven patients without pre-transplantation malignancy developed malignancies after HT. The median survival time (MST) of these 27 HT patients was 76.8 months. After malignancy was diagnosed, the overall MST was 20.7 months. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 44% and 27%, respectively. Twenty-one patients (77.8%) died, 10 of them because of cancer. The most common malignancy was non-Hodgkin lymphoma ( n = 6), followed by skin cancer (including 2 keratoacanthomas, 2 squamous cell carcinomas, and 1 basal cell carcinoma; n = 5) and lung squamous cell carcinoma ( n = 3). The univariate analysis identified cancer stage ( P = .044) and comorbidity ( P = .002) as factors associated with poor malignancy survival. In the multivariate analysis, comorbidity was an independent prognostic factor for greater risk of death because of post-transplantation malignancy ( P = .002). Conclusions In Taiwan, the risk of malignancy after HT is low (5.7%), as is the incidence of skin cancer. The most common malignancy was non-Hodgkin lymphoma, followed by skin cancer and lung cancer. Comorbidity was an independent factor for overall survival in cancer patients who previously underwent HT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background With advances in immunosuppressive therapy, heart transplantation is currently recommended as the only established surgical treatment for refractory heart failure. However, chronic immunosuppression increases the risk for malignancy. Everolimus (EVR) is a potent mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor that is used after transplantation and to treat advanced malignancies, as we have done in Taiwan after heart transplantation since 2004. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and EVR are frequently used as cell-cycle inhibitors to optimize post-transplantation outcomes. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of 454 patients who received either MMF (n = 232) or EVR (n = 222) after heart transplantation at the National Taiwan University Hospital from March 1, 1990, to March 1, 2015. Patient characteristics and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared between groups. Results During a median follow-up of 69.2 months, malignancy was diagnosed in 27 patients receiving MMF (n = 23) or EVR (n = 4). There was a significant difference in malignancy risk between groups (9.91% vs 1.80%, P = .001). The most common malignancies were non-Hodgkin lymphoma, skin cancers, and lung squamous cell carcinoma. The 2-year overall survival after malignancy was 50% in the EVR group and 47% in the MMF group ( P = .745). Conclusions EVR treatment after heart transplant is associated with a lower risk of malignancy than is MMF treatment. The 2-year survival rate after malignancy was similar between EVR and MMF groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Transplantation and immunosuppressive drugs are major limitations to the success of pregnancy. In 1988, the first pregnancy after a heart transplant was reported, which has given female recipients the hope to give birth. During pregnancy, physiologic changes with increased blood volume and hemodilution may influence blood drug level. Case Report We reported our experience in monitoring on immunosuppressive drugs for 2 cases. Both of them underwent heart transplantation in 2006 and were 34 and 37 years old at time of pregnancy. For both cases, we frequently monitored the blood level and increased the dosage of immunosuppressive drugs accordingly. Both cases had uneventful pregnancy and delivery to healthy babies at the National Taiwan University Hospital in Taiwan. Their postpartum courses were uneventful as well. Conclusions We advocate adjusting the immunosuppressive dosage according to the blood level before pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: The objective of this study was to report our experience of treating acute humoral rejection with plasmapheresis in heart transplant (HT) recipients. Patients and Methods: From May 1996 to December 2005, 238 HTs were performed using therapy with cyclosporine or tacrolimus, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone as well as induction treatment with rabbit anti-human thymocyte globulin. Endomyocardial biopsy for rejection surveillance was performed weekly for the first month, monthly for 3 months, yearly after the first year, and whenever rejection was suspected. Immunofluorescence studies with IgG, IgM, C3, C4, C1q, and HLA-DR were performed routinely on the first month biopsy. After a 2-year trial, immunofluorescence studies were not performed routinely, because no significant findings were observed; thus they were performed only when clinical deterioration, unstable hemodynamic status, or suspicion of rejection occurred on routine echocardiographic examinations. Plasmapheresis with fresh frozen plasma exchanging twice the blood volume of the patients was performed for 5 days. Rescue immunosuppression with methylprednisolone (1 g/d) was delivered for 3 days and the immunosuppressants changed, but no intravenous immunoglobulin was prescribed. Results: Twelve patients suffered biopsy-proven acute humoral rejection at 3 days to 32 months after HT (mean, 9.4 months). Immunofluorescence studies showed positive HLA-DR in 7 patients; IgG in 4 patients; IgM in 1 patient; C3 in 4 patients; C4 in 1 patient; and C1q in 1 patient. One patient who was 3 months after HT showed only C1q positive but was treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-aortic balloon pumping support and died 1-month after plasmapheresis. Another patient who deteriorated on the 3rd postoperative day and died 3 days after plasmapheresis was considered to have vascular rejection by interstitial edema, vacuolated endothelial cells and no pathognomonic clinical features, although there was no positive immunofluorescence result. All other subjects were discharged from the hospital, although 3 required mechanical support during plasmapheresis. Hypotension with hypocalcemia was frequently noted during plasmapheresis. The 1-year survival rate was 75% ± 11%, and 5-year survival rate, 51% ± 15%. Conclusion: Plasmapheresis with concurrent rescue immunosuppression was an effective treatment for acute humoral rejection in HT even with unstable hemodynamics. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The cyclosporine (CsA) blood concentration at 2 hours postdose (C2) has been shown to be better than trough level (C0) to predict acute cellular rejection (ACR) in solid organ transplantations. We tried to assess the superiority of C2 monitoring to C0 in heart transplantation (HTx). Prospective data were collected from the HTx recipients from November 1991 to April 2003. The 100 patients surviving longer than 3 months after HTx, provided 237 sample sets, with ACR graded by endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and concurrent C0 and C2 levels. ACR was defined as International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grade lb or higher. Nonparametric methods, logistic regression model, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used. There was no significant demographic heterogeneity between ACR and non-ACR groups. C2 was significantly lower in ACR than non-ACR groups (P = .0192) whereas C0 showed no significant difference. In the logistic regression model, C2 was a significant predictor against ACR (P = .026, odds ratio = 0.76 per 100 ng/mL), but C0 was not. ROC analysis showed that C2 of 600 ng/mL might provide the optimal cut-off point, with a sensitivity of 51.23% and a specificity of 71.43%, but C0 did not show this association. In conclusion, C2 monitoring is superior to C0 for predicting ACR in HTx. ACR should be suspected when the C2 value is below 600 ng/mL. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Acute renal failure (ARF) is a frequent medical complication after liver transplantation (LT). We analyzed cadaveric related liver transplant recipients who had developed ARF early in the postoperative course. Between January 1982 and August 2003, a total of 67 patients underwent cadaveric related LT. Their mean age was 28.64 years at LT. The 67 recipients had the following indications: biliary atresia (n = 17), Wilson''s disease (n = 15), hepatitis B–related liver cirrhosis (n = 14), hepatitis C–related liver cirrhosis (n = 4), primary biliary cirrhosis (n = 4), hepatitis B–related liver cirrhosis with hepatoma (n = 3), hepatitis C–related liver cirrhosis with hepatoma (n = 2), Budd-Chiari syndrome (n = 2), neonatal hepatitis (n = 1), choledochus cyst (n = 1), autoimmune cirrhosis (n = 1), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 1), and hemangioendothelioma (n = 1). Forty-nine patients received cyclosporine (CsA), azathioprine, and steroids and 18, a combination with tacrolimus (FK506). Eight (11.94%) patients developed ARF at a mean time of 17.25 days after LT. The mean peak serum creatinine was 2.24 mg%. Four of these patients had a diagnosis of hepatitis B–related liver cirrhosis; two, hepatitis C–related liver cirrhosis; one, primary biliary cirrhosis; and one, hepatitis B–related liver cirrhosis with hepatoma. The ARF etiology was multifactorial for the majority of patients. Eight ARF patients had a history of liver cirrhosis, which may be a risk factor for intraoperative ARF. ARF treatment included fluid replacement, decreased or altered immunosuppressive agents, avoiding exposure to nephrotoxic drugs, and adjusting antibiotic dosages. The majority of patients returned to normal renal function at 1 to 3 weeks after the diagnosis of ARF. No patient required dialysis and/or experienced a mortality. We conclude that the incidence of ARF is relatively low and with good outcomes. ARF etiology was multifactorial for the majority of patients, but eight patients had a history of liver cirrhosis, which may be a risk factor for intraoperative ARF. We suggest that in the early postoperative period of LT cases diagnosis and treatment of ARF are important. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]