Search

Relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor prognosis. CD19 is a B-cell marker, is aberrantly expressed in AML, mostly with t(8; 21)(q22; q22.1). Here we report the results of a phase 2 study giving point of care produced CD19 CAR T- cells for r/r AML with aberrant expression of CD19 (NCT04257175). Lymphodepletion included fludarabine and cyclophosphamide The response was evaluated by bone marrow (BM) aspiration on day 28. Six patients (5 adults and 1 child) were included. Median number of previous chemotherapy lines was 4 (range, 3-8) and four patients received CAR T-cells 8-18 months post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) of any grade occurred in all patients, and 1 patient had grade 3 CRS. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 2 patients at low grades. Tocilizumab was administered to 2 patients and corticosteroids to 3 patients. Four patients achieved a complete remission (CR), while 2/6 progressed (PD). Three patients (2 with CR and 1 with PD) underwent allo-HSCT (it was the second transplant in 2) 2-5 months post CAR T-cells infusion. The median duration of response in patients achieving CR was 8.5 (range; 3-14) months. However, all patients eventually died within 5 (1-18) months. In conclusion, CD19 CAR T- cell treatment for AML is feasible and safe. However, the response is short and should be followed by allo-HSCT. Hopefully, future long term results will be improved by combining the CAR T- cell therapy with the emerging novel effective anti-leukemic compounds., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no relevant conflict of interest and no competing financial interests., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Purpose: Greater disease burden is a well-established predictor of poorer outcomes following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy. Although bridging therapy (BT) is widely used between leukapheresis and CAR T infusion, limited data have evaluated the impact of BT on CAR T outcomes. In this study, we hypothesized that the quantitative dynamics of radiomic cytoreduction during bridging are prognostic., Experimental Design: Patients with large B-cell lymphoma treated with CD19-CAR T from 2016 to 2022 were included in the study. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) was determined for all patients on pre-leukapheresis PET and on post-BT/pre-infusion PET in those who received BT. Patients were stratified into "High" and "Low" disease burden using an MTV cutpoint of 65.4cc established by maximally selected log-rank statistic for progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Of 191 patients treated with CAR T, 144 (75%) received BT. In the BT cohort, 56% had a reduction in MTV post-BT. On multivariate analysis, the MTV trajectory across the bridging period remained significantly associated with PFS (P < 0.001); however, notably, patients with improved MTV (High->Low) had equivalent PFS compared with those with initially and persistently low MTV (Low->Low; HR for High->Low MTV: 2.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-9.18). There was a reduction in any grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome in the High->Low MTV cohort as compared with the High->High MTV cohort (13% vs. 41%; P = 0.05)., Conclusions: This is the first study to use radiomics to quantify disease burden pre- and post-BT in a large real-world large B-cell lymphoma cohort. We demonstrate that effective BT can enable initially high-disease burden patients to achieve post-CAR T outcomes comparable with low-disease burden patients., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

The activity of anti-CD19 chimerci antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with Richter's transformation (RT) to aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is largely unknown. In a multicenter retrospective study, we report the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with RT (N=30) compared to patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma (N=283) and patients with transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) (N=141) between April 2016 and January 2023. Two-thirds of patients received prior therapy for CLL before RT and 89% of them received B-cell receptor and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors. Toxicities of CAR T-cell therapy in RT were similar to other lymphomas, with no fatalities related to cytokine release syndrome or immune effector-cell associated neurotoxicity synderome. The 100-day overall response rate and complete response rates in patients with RT were 57% and 47%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 19 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months in patients with RT compared to 18 months in de novo LBCL and not reached in patients with transformed iNHL. The OS at 12 months was 45% in patients with RT compared with 62% and 75% in patients with de novo LBCL and transformed iNHL, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, worse OS was associated with RT histology, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and more prior lines of therapy. CAR T-cell therapy can salvage a proportion of patients with CLL and RT exposed to prior targeted agents; however, efficacy in RT is inferior compared to de novo LBCL and transformed iNHL.

Abstract: T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma (THRLBCL) is a rare histologic variant of LBCL. Limited data regarding CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) THRLBCL suggest poor efficacy. We investigated CART outcomes for R/R THRLBCL through the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry. A total of 58 adult patients with R/R THRLBCL who received commercial CD19-CART therapy between 2018 and 2022 were identified. Most patients (67%) had early relapse of disease (45% primary refractory) with a median of 3 (range, 1-7) prior therapies and were treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (69%). At median follow-up of 23 months after CART therapy, 2-year overall and progression-free survival were 42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27-57) and 29% (95% CI, 17-43), respectively. In univariable analysis, poor performance status before CART therapy was associated with higher mortality (hazard ratio, 2.35; 95%CI, 1.02-5.5). The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse/progression and nonrelapse mortality were 69% and 2%, respectively. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurologic syndrome occurred in 7% and 15% of patients, respectively. In this largest analysis of CD19-CART therapy for R/R THRLBCL, ∼30% of patients were alive and progression free 2 years after CART therapy. Despite a high incidence of progression (69% at 2 years), these results suggest a subset of patients with R/R THRLBCL may have durable responses with CARTs., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Purpose: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a potent immunotherapy for hematologic malignancies, but patients can develop long-term adverse events, including second primary malignancies (SPM) that impact morbidity and mortality. To delineate the frequency and subtypes of SPMs following CAR-T in lymphoma and myeloma, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis., Experimental Design: A literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Following the extraction of SPM cases and assignment of malignant origin, we analyzed SPM point estimates using random effects models., Results: We identified 326 SPMs across 5,517 patients from 18 clinical trials and 7 real-world studies. With a median follow-up of 21.7 months, the overall SPM point estimate was 6.0% (95% confidence interval, 4.8%-7.4%). SPM estimates were associated with treatment setting (clinical trials > real-world studies), duration of follow-up, and number of prior treatment lines, which were each confirmed as independent study-level risk factors of SPM in a meta-regression model. A subgroup meta-analysis of the four trials that randomized CAR-T versus standard-of-care revealed a similar risk of SPM with either treatment strategy (P = 0.92). In a distribution analysis of SPM subtypes, hematologic malignancies were the most common entity (37%), followed by solid tumors (27%) and non-melanoma skin cancers (16%). T-cell malignancies represented a small minority of events (1.5%). We noted disease- and product-specific variations in SPM distribution., Conclusions: These data raise awareness of SPM as a clinically relevant long-term adverse event in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy. However, our findings do not indicate that SPM frequency is higher with CAR-T versus previous standard-of-care strategies., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Abstract: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CART) for central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is a promising strategy, yet responses are frequently not durable. Bridging radiotherapy (BRT) is used for extracranial lymphoma in which it can improve CART outcomes through cytoreduction of high-risk lesions. We hypothesized that BRT would achieve similar, significant cytoreduction before CART for CNSL (CNS-BRT). We identified patients with CNSL with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma who received CNS-BRT before commercial CART. Cytoreduction from CNS-BRT was calculated as change in lesion size before CART. Twelve patients received CNS-BRT, and the median follow-up among survivors is 11.8 months (interquartile range, 8.5-21.9). Ten patients had CNSL (9 secondary, 1 primary) and 2 patients had epidural disease (evaluable for toxicity). All 10 patients with CNSL had progressive disease at the time of CNS-BRT. Of 12 patients, 1 experienced grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome, and 3 of 12 patients experienced grade ≥3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. CNS-BRT achieved a 74.0% (95% confidence interval, 62.0-86.0) mean reduction in lesion size from baseline (P = .014) at a median of 12 days from BRT completion and before CART infusion. Best CNS response included 8 complete responses, 1 partial response, and 1 progressive disease. Three patients experienced CNS relapse outside the BRT field. Preliminary data suggest CNS-BRT achieves rapid cytoreduction and is associated with a favorable CNS response and safety profile. These data support further study of BRT as a bridging modality for CNSL CART., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are an established treatment for B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHL). With the remarkable success in improving survival, understanding the late effects of CAR T cell therapy is becoming more relevant. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of subsequent malignancies in adult patients with B-NHL. We retrospectively studied 355 patients from 2 different medical centers treated with four different CAR T cell products from 2016 to 2022. The overall cumulative incidence for subsequent malignancies at 36 months was 14% (95% CI: 9.2%, 19%). Subsequent malignancies were grouped into 3 primary categories: solid tumor, hematologic malignancy, and dermatologic malignancy with cumulative incidences at 36 months of 6.1% (95% CI: 3.1%-10%), 4.5% (95% CI: 2.1%-8.1%) and 4.2% (95% CI: 2.1%-7.5%) respectively. Notably, no cases of T cell malignancies were observed. In univariable analysis, increasing age was associated with higher risk for subsequent malignancy. While the overall benefits of CAR T products continue to outweigh their potential risks, more studies and longer follow ups are needed to further demonstrate the risks, patterns, and molecular pathways that lead to the development of subsequent malignancies., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, including axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), has demonstrated significant efficacy in treating refractory or relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Though adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are well characterized, the dermatologic adverse event (DAE) profile is less thoroughly described. This study aims to provide the first comprehensive analysis of DAEs associated with axi-cel and tisa-cel using real-world data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. FAERS database reports citing axi-cel or tisa-cel in patients aged 16 years or older were included, excluding duplicate reports and off-label indications. Disproportionality analysis by reporting odds ratio (ROR) was utilized to detect increased reporting of drug-adverse event combinations. Of the 11,256,845 reports in the FAERS database, 5559 identified CAR-T therapy as the primary suspected drug. After exclusions, 3,666 reports were analyzed (2,168 for axi-cel and 1,498 for tisa-cel). Among these, 2.7% of axi-cel and 5.1% of tisa-cel cases reported DAEs. There was a statistically significant increased reporting of 2 DAE groups associated with CAR-T therapy: severe cutaneous eruptions (ROR 5.18, 95% CI 1.29, 20.76) and vascular cutaneous (ROR 2.91, 95% CI 1.51, 5.60). The median time to DAE onset was 3 days after CAR T-cell infusion. Death was a reported outcome in 11.9% and 13.0% of axi-cel and tisa-cel DAE cases, respectively, and in 50% and 25% of severe cutaneous eruptions and vascular cutaneous cases, respectively. This study reveals a significantly increased reporting rate of severe cutaneous eruptions and vascular cutaneous DAEs associated with CAR-T therapy, with both event groups associated with high mortality. These results emphasize the importance of monitoring dermatologic toxicities in clinical practice to ensure timely identification and management of potentially severe adverse events., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Although chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy represents a transformative immunotherapy, it is also associated with distinct toxicities that contribute to morbidity and mortality. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL (Cochrane) for reports of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after CAR T cell therapy in lymphoma and multiple myeloma up to March 2024. After extraction of causes and numbers of death, we analyzed NRM point estimates using random-effect models. We identified 7,604 patients across 18 clinical trials and 28 real-world studies. NRM point estimates varied across disease entities and were highest in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma (10.6%), followed by multiple myeloma (8.0%), large B cell lymphoma (6.1%) and indolent lymphoma (5.7%). Entity-specific meta-regression models for large B cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma revealed that axicabtagene ciloleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel were independently associated with increased NRM point estimates, respectively. Of 574 reported nonrelapse deaths, over half were attributed to infections (50.9%), followed by other malignancies (7.8%) and cardiovascular/respiratory events (7.3%). Conversely, the CAR T cell-specific side effects, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome/neurotoxicity, cytokine release syndrome and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, represented only a minority of nonrelapse deaths (cumulatively 11.5%). Our findings underline the critical importance of infectious complications after CAR T cell therapy and support the comprehensive reporting of NRM, including specific causes and long-term outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Recent reports have raised concerns about the association of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) with non-negligible cardiotoxicity, particularly atrial arrhythmias. First, we conducted a pharmacovigilance study to assess the reporting of atrial arrhythmias following CD19-directed CAR-T. Subsequently, to determine the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of atrial arrhythmias post-CAR-T, we compiled a retrospective single-centre cohort of non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Only commercial CAR-T products were considered. Atrial arrhythmias were nearly fourfold more likely to be reported after CAR-T therapy compared to all other cancer patients in the FAERS (adjusted ROR = 3.76 [95% CI 2.67-5.29]). Of the 236 patients in our institutional cohort, 23 (10%) developed atrial arrhythmias post-CAR-T, including 12 de novo arrhythmias, with most (83%) requiring medical intervention. Atrial arrhythmias frequently co-occurred with cytokine release syndrome and were associated with higher post-CAR-T infusion peak levels of IL-10, TNF-alpha and LDH, and lower trough levels of fibrinogen. In a multivariable analysis, risk factors for atrial arrhythmia were history of atrial arrhythmia (OR = 6.80 [2.39-19.6]) and using CAR-T product with a CD28-costimulatory domain (OR = 5.17 [1.72-18.6]). Atrial arrhythmias following CD19-CAR-T therapy are prevalent and associated with elevated inflammatory biomarkers, a history of atrial arrhythmia and the use of a CAR-T product with a CD28 costimulatory domain., (© 2024 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Hematologic toxicity frequently complicates chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. In an effort to standardize reporting, the European Hematology Association (EHA) and European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) devised the immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT) grading system, distinguishing between early (day 0-30) and late (after day +30) events based on neutropenia depth and duration. However, manual implementation of ICAHT grading criteria is time-consuming and susceptible to subjectivity and error. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel computational approach, utilizing the R programming language, to automate early and late ICAHT grading. Given the complexities of early ICAHT grading, we benchmarked our approach both manually and computationally in two independent cohorts totaling 1251 patients. Our computational approach offers significant implications by streamlining grading processes, reducing manual time and effort, and promoting standardization across varied clinical settings. We provide this tool to the scientific community alongside a comprehensive implementation guide, fostering its widespread adoption and enhancing reporting consistency for ICAHT., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Fludarabine is one of the most common agents given for lymphodepletion before CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells, but its optimal therapeutic intensity is unknown. Using data from a multicenter consortium, we estimated fludarabine exposure (area under the curve [AUC]) using a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model in 199 adult patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas who received commercial axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel). We evaluated the association of estimated fludarabine AUC with key outcomes, aiming to find an AUC that optimized efficacy and tolerability. We identified low (<18 mg × hour/L [mgh/L]), optimal (18-20 mgh/L), and high (>20 mgh/L) AUC groups for analyses; the 6-month cumulative incidences of relapse/progression of disease (relapse/POD) by AUC groups were 54% (45%-62%), 28% (15%-44%), and 30% (14%-47%), respectively; and the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 39% (31%-48%), 66% (52%-84%), and 46% (30%-70%) and the overall survival (OS) rates were 58% (50%-67%), 77% (64%-92%), and 66% (50%-87%), respectively. In multivariable analyses compared with low AUC, an optimal AUC was associated with the highest PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 0.3-0.91; P = .02) and lowest risk of relapse/POD (HR, 0.46; 0.25-0.84; P = .01) without an increased risk of any-grade cytokine release syndrome (HR, 1.1; 0.7-1.6; P = .8) or and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) (HR, 1.36; 0.83-2.3; P = .2). A high AUC was associated with the greatest risk of any-grade ICANS (HR, 1.9; 1.1-3.2; P = .02). Although the main cause of death in all groups was relapse/POD, nonrelapse-related deaths, including 3 deaths from ICANS, were more frequent in the high AUC group. These findings suggest that PK-directed fludarabine dosing to achieve an optimal AUC may result in improved outcomes for patients receiving axi-cel., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) is an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Outcomes of patients with out-of-commercial specification (OOS) CAR T products are not well characterized. We therefore assessed 37 adult patients who underwent leukapheresis for tisa-cel therapy in a single center. In nine (24%) patients, manufactured tisa-cel was considered OOS. Three of them (33%) received tisa-cel after institutional review board approval; 2/9 (22%) did not receive tisa-cel due to disease progression; and 4/9 (44%) received academic point-of-care (POC) CAR T-cell as salvage therapy, at a median of 35 days following OOS notification. Three of those four patients achieved a complete response. In univariate analysis, risk factors for OOS were ≥ 4 prior therapies or previous bendamustine exposure. In conclusion, we report high OOS incidence of 24% in real-life setting. Forty-four percent of those patients received POC CAR T-cell as salvage therapy.

Purpose: Tumor-intrinsic features may render large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) insensitive to CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T). We hypothesized that TP53 genomic alterations are detrimental to response outcomes in LBCL treated with CD19-CAR-T., Materials and Methods: Patients with LBCL treated with CD19-CAR-T were included. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed on pre-CAR-T tumor samples in a subset of patients. Response and survival rates by histologic, cytogenetic, and molecular features were assessed. Within a cohort of newly diagnosed LBCL with genomic and transcriptomic profiling, we studied interactions between cellular pathways and TP53 status., Results: We included 153 adults with relapsed or refractory LBCL treated with CD19-CAR-T (axicabtagene ciloleucel [50%], tisagenlecleucel [32%], and lisocabtagene maraleucel [18%]). Outcomes echoed pivotal trials: complete response (CR) rate 54%, median overall survival (OS) 21.1 months (95% CI, 14.8 to not reached), and progression-free survival 6 months (3.4 to 9.7). Histologic and cytogenetic LBCL features were not predictive of CR. In a subset of 82 patients with next-generation sequencing profiling, CR and OS rates were comparable with the unsequenced cohort. TP53 alterations (mutations and/or copy number alterations) were common (37%) and associated with inferior CR and OS rates in univariable and multivariable regression models; the 1-year OS in TP53 -altered LBCL was 44% (95% CI, 29 to 67) versus 76% (65 to 89) in wild-type ( P = .012). Transcriptomic profiling from a separate cohort of patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma (n = 562) demonstrated that TP53 alterations are associated with dysregulation of pathways related to CAR-T-cell cytotoxicity, including interferon and death receptor signaling pathway and reduced CD8 T-cell tumor infiltration., Conclusion: TP53 is a potent tumor-intrinsic biomarker that can inform risk stratification and clinical trial design in patients with LBCL treated with CD19-CAR-T. The role of TP53 should be further validated in independent cohorts., Competing Interests: Roni ShouvalConsulting or Advisory Role: Medexus, MyBiotics Michal J. BesserEmployment: Envizion Medical (I)Leadership: Envizion Medical (I)Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Envizion Medical (I)Consulting or Advisory Role: Biological Industries (a Sartorius Company), Gilboa TherapeuticsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patents at Envizion Medical (I), Royalties at Biological Industries (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Lonza Connie Lee BatleviStock and Other Ownership Interests: Moderna Therapeutics, Novavax, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Regeneron, ViatrisHonoraria: DAVA OncologyConsulting or Advisory Role: LifeSci Capital, GLG, Juno Therapeutics, Celgene, Seattle Genetics, Kite, a Gilead company, TG Therapeutics, Karyopharm TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Janssen Biotech (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Epizyme (Inst), Xynomic Pharma (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Roche (Inst), Autolus (Inst)Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/2778694 Parastoo B. DahiConsulting or Advisory Role: Kite, a Gilead company Sean M. DevlinThis author is a member of the Journal of Clinical Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript. Sergio A. GiraltHonoraria: Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi,Consulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Takeda, Sanofi, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Janssen, Actinuum, Bristol Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, PfizerResearch Funding: Celgene (Inst), Miltenyi Biotec, Johnson & Johnson, Amgen, Actinuum, SanofiTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene, Sanofi, Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals Richard J. LinEmployment: Pfizer (I)Consulting or Advisory Role: Kite/Gilead Gal MarkelEmployment: 4C Biomed, Ella TherapeuticsLeadership: 4C Biomed, Ella TherapeuticsStock and Other Ownership Interests: Purple Biotech, Biond Biologics, Nucleai, Staburo GmbH, Ella Therapeutics, 4C BiomedHonoraria: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Medison, RocheConsulting or Advisory Role: MSD, NovartisSpeakers' Bureau: MSD, BMSResearch Funding: Novartis (Inst), Immunicom (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent on anti-CEACAM1 blocking antibodiesTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: BMS, Novartis, MSD Gilles SallesHonoraria: Roche/Genentech, Janssen, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, AbbVie, MorphoSysConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Celgene, Novartis, MorphoSys, Epizyme, Alimera Sciences, Genmab, Debiopharm Group, Velosbio, BMS, BeiGene, Incyte, Miltenyi Biotec, Ipsen Craig S. SauterConsulting or Advisory Role: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Juno Therapeutics, Sanofi, Gilead Sciences, Novartis¸ Precision BioSciences, Gamida Cell, Karyopharm Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, GenmabResearch Funding: Juno Therapeutics (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Precision BioSciences (Inst), BMS (Inst), Actinium Pharmaceuticals (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Juno Therapeutics, Sanofi, Gilead Sciences, Novartis Michael ScordoHonoraria: i3 CMEConsulting or Advisory Role: McKinsey & Company, Angiocrine Bioscience, OmerosResearch Funding: Angiocrine Bioscience, Omeros (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Kite/Gilead Gunjan L. ShahResearch Funding: Amgen (Inst), Janssen (Inst) Marcel van den BrinkHonoraria: Seres Therapeutics, Merck, Magenta Therapeutics, WindMIL, Rheos Medicines, Frazier Healthcare Partners, Nektar, Notch Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Priothera, Ceramedix, LyGenesis, Pluto Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Da Volterra, Novartis (I), Synthekine (I), BeiGene (I)Consulting or Advisory Role: Seres TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Seres TherapeuticsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Dr van den Brink receives royalties from Wolters Kluwer, and he has intellectual property Licensing with Seres Therapeutics and Juno TherapeuticsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Rheos MedicinesOther Relationship: DKMSUncompensated Relationships: Seres therapeutics, Notch Therapeutics, Pluto Therapeutics Miguel-Angel PeralesStock and Other Ownership Interests: NexImmuneHonoraria: MorphoSysConsulting or Advisory Role: Incyte, Merck, Servier/Pfizer, NexImmune, Novartis, MolMed, Medigene, Takeda, Nektar, AbbVie, Cidara Therapeutics, Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Bristol Myers Squibb, Omeros, Vor BiopharmaResearch Funding: Incyte (Inst), Miltenyi Biotec (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Kite, a Gilead company (Inst), Nektar (Inst) Maria Lia PalombaStock and Other Ownership Interests: Seres Therapeutics (I)Honoraria: Flagship Biosciences (I), Evelo Therapeutics (I), Jazz Pharmaceuticals (I), Therakos (I), Amgen (I), Merck (I), Seres Therapeutics (I)Consulting or Advisory Role: Flagship Biosciences (I), Novartis (I), Evelo Therapeutics (I), Jazz Pharmaceuticals (I), Therakos (I), Amgen (I), Merck (I), Seres Therapeutics (I), Kite, a Gilead company, Novartis, BeiGene, SynthekineResearch Funding: Seres Therapeutics (I)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Intellectual Property Rights (I), Juno intellectual property rights (Inst)No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Background: Pivotal trials of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) have identified common toxicities but may have been underpowered to detect cardiovascular and pulmonary adverse events (CPAEs)., Objectives: This study sought to investigate CPAEs associated with commercial CD19-directed CAR-T therapy., Methods: In this retrospective, pharmacovigilance study, the authors used the Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system to identify CPAEs associated with axicabtagene-ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel. The authors evaluated disproportionate reporting by the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the lower bound of the information component 95% credibility interval (IC 025 >0 is deemed significant). Significant associations were further adjusted to age and sex (adj.ROR)., Results: The authors identified CAR-T reports of 2,657 patients, including 546 CPAEs (20.5%). CPAEs overlapped with cytokine release syndrome in 68.3% (373 of 546) of the reports. Compared with the full database, CAR-T was associated with overreporting of tachyarrhythmias (n = 74 [2.8%], adj.ROR = 2.78 [95% CI: 2.21-3.51]), cardiomyopathy (n = 69 [2.6%], adj.ROR = 3.51 [2.42-5.09]), pleural disorders (n = 46 [1.7%], adj.ROR = 3.91 [2.92-5.23]), and pericardial diseases (n = 11 [0.4%], adj.ROR = 2.26 [1.25-4.09], all IC 025 >0). Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) were associated only with axicabtagene-ciloleucel therapy (n = 28 [1.6%], adj.ROR = 1.80 [1.24-2.62], IC 025 >0). Atrial fibrillation (n = 55) was the leading tachyarrhythmia, followed by ventricular arrhythmias (n = 14). Tachyarrhythmias and VTEs were reported more often following axicabtagene-ciloleucel than tisagenlecleucel in an age- and sex-adjusted model (adj.ROR = 1.82 [1.04-3.18] and adj.ROR = 2.86 [1.18-6.93], respectively). Finally, the fatality rate of CPAEs was 30.9%., Conclusions: In this largest post-marketing study to date, the authors identified an association between CAR-T and various CPAEs, including tachyarrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, pericardial and pleural disorders, and VTEs. These findings should be considered in the multidisciplinary assessment for and monitoring of CAR-T therapy recipients., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This research was funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748. This study was supported in part by NIH/NCI grant RO1-CA 233610 (Dr Herrmann). Dr Perales has received personal fees from Abbvie, Bellicum, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Cidara Theraputics, Incyte, Kite/Gilead, Medigene, Miltenyi, MolMed, Nektar Therapeutics, NexImmune, Novartis, Omeros, Merck, Servier, and Tekeda; has served on data safety and monitoring boards for Cidara Therapeutics, Medigene, and Servier; and has received clinical trial support from Incyte, Kite/Gilead, and Miltenyi. Data presented in this study do not represent the opinion of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of the Study: The prognosis of patients with relapsed/refractory precursor B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is dismal. Antibody-based therapies, such as blinatumomab or inotuzumab ozogamycin (IO) have led to improved outcomes. The impact of prior immunotherapy on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-Cell therapeutic efficacy and toxicity is unknown., Methods: We describe a case series of ALL patients with prior exposure to blinatumomab or IO, who were treated with anti-CD19 CAR T cells with CD28 co-stimulatory domain (NCT02772198). We then review the literature on CAR-T post antibody-based therapy with either antibodies., Results: Five adult patients with B-ALL were included. Three had active disease, and two were in morphological complete remission (CR) with minimal residual disease (MRD+). Therapy before CAR-T included blinatumomab (3/5 [60 %]) and IO (3/5 [60 %]), with one patient receiving both. One patient experienced severe cytokine release syndrome and central nervous system toxicity and subsequently died. At 28 days following treatment, two patients achieved CR with MRD negativity, and two had an MRD + CR. Two patients received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. At a median of 10 months (range, 5-26, three out of the four patients are still in CR, and one relapsed. The literature review identified a deficiency on data on the influence of blinatumumab and IO on outcomes post CAR-T therapy., Conclusions: CD19 CAR T-cell therapy after treatment with blinatumomab and/or IO in patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL is feasible and results in promising response rates in this case series. Future trails should specifically address outcomes in this population., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)