Search

Antimicrobial resistance is a major health concern. A primary cause is the inappropriate use of antimicrobials, particularly by patients with upper respiratory tract infection. However, baseline information for antibiotic use for common cold before being applied the National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance in Japan is lacking. Here, we analyzed the inappropriate use of antibiotics in the working-age workers. We used large claims data from an annual health check-up for at least 5 consecutive years. Among 201,223 participants, we included 18,659 working-age workers who were diagnosed with common cold at a clinic/hospital. We calculated the proportion of patients with common cold who were prescribed antibiotics and analyzed predictive factors associated with antibiotics prescription. Antibiotics were prescribed to 49.2% (n = 9180) of patients diagnosed with common cold. In the logistic regression analysis, the group taking antibiotics was predominantly younger, male, without chronic diseases, and diagnosed at a small hospital/clinic (where the number of beds was 0-19). Cephems accounted for the highest proportion of prescribed antibiotics, with 40-45% of patients being prescribed antibiotics. Our data may be applied to prioritize resources such as medical staff-intervention or education of working-age people without chronic diseases who visit clinics for common cold to avoid the potential inappropriate use of antibiotics and prevent antimicrobial resistance acceleration., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

The dosage and frequency of lamotrigine administration for each patient must be prescribed carefully according to the disease, age, concomitant medications, and administration period. According to Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) reports, either the number of patients with adverse events caused by the inappropriate use of lamotrigine or the ratio of the patients who have benefited from the Relief System for Adverse Drug Reactions did not change even after the revision of the package insert in 2015. The procedure for auditing lamotrigine prescriptions was standardized to improve patient safety in our hospitals. The efficacy of standardization was evaluated by investigating the patients' records and prescriptions. A total of 77 patients treated with lamotrigine were examined to evaluate the appropriateness of the dosage and frequency of administration as well as the number of prescription enquiries made by pharmacists retrospectively. In addition, the presence of adverse events such as skin rash was examined using medical records. The number of inappropriate cases found and the prescription questions asked by pharmacists during the 24-month period before and after standardization were compared. The rate of inappropriate prescriptions after standardization was significantly lower than that before (12.1 vs. 29%; p<0.05). The rate of prescription questions raised after standardization was significantly higher than that before (37.0 vs. 1.7%; p<0.05). Moreover, there was no adverse event after standardization. Our standardization practice was effective to easily identify inappropriate prescriptions and provide physicians with the appropriate dosage or frequency of administration for the patients.