Search

The purpose of the study is to examine the impact of globalization and institutional quality on income inequality as well as examining the influence of institutional quality on the relationship between globalization and income inequality. The study employed instrumental variable quantile regression which accounts for simultaneity/reverse causality. This method enabled us to determine how the existing level of income inequality affects the impact of globalization and institutions on income inequality. Findings revealed that the impact of globalization on income inequality depends on the measure of globalization utilized, while the impact of institutional quality on income inequality depends on the initial level of income inequality. More precisely, we found that trade globalization significantly reduces income inequality in the presence of improved institutional quality in countries where the initial levels of income inequality are low, while it increases income inequality in the presence of improved institutions in countries where the initial levels of income inequality are high. Furthermore, in the presence of improved institutional quality, foreign direct investment and official development assistance (financial globalization) significantly increase income inequality in countries where the initial levels of income inequality are high and low, respectively. Policy recommendations based on these findings are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Poverty and income inequality are the twin greatest menaces in sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA) with significant prevalence. This study decomposed their significance and probabilities in determining the quality of life (QOL) of individuals and households in SSA while controlling for household demographics. The household‐level poverty (HLP) index and the indexes for QOL indicators were constructed from the national demographic and health surveys (DHS) for SSA countries. Data on consumption poverty thresholds and income inequality are from the global consumption and income project (GCIP) over 1985–2015. Findings reveal that, while the HLP index elicits more rural poverty across regions, consumption poverty thresholds are more urbanized and persistent across regions, except for Central Africa. The results for income inequality were found to be Gini −0.4396 and Atkinson index −0.4437, and more urbanized across regions. Furthermore, we found that SSA has made giant strides towards achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs) 6 and 3 but no information on the quality of healthcare. However, abysmal likelihoods exist for SDGs 4, 7 and 8 in SSA. Similarly, abysmal probabilities were also found for households' access to adequate housing, a good environment and insurance coverage. Indeed, SDG‐4 is more significant for achieving SDG‐8. HLP stand as a significant bottleneck to achieving SDG‐7 and adequate housing, while income inequality mars SDG‐3 targets and sustainable environmental conditions in SSA. Policy options are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]