Search

Unlabelled: The treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors depends on the aggressiveness of the disease. We wanted to know whether (18)F-FDG PET and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) can predict early disease progression and patient survival., Methods: We undertook a prospective study of patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumor diagnosed between September 2003 and January 2006. After obtaining signed informed consent from the patients, we performed CT, SRS, and (18)F-FDG PET and reviewed histologic data. CT was repeated every 3 mo to assess the risk of early progressive disease (first 6 mo), progression-free survival, and overall survival., Results: Thirty-eight patients (mean age, 60 +/- 15 y) were included. Histologically, 4 patients had a high-grade and 34 a low-grade tumor. The results of (18)F-FDG PET and SRS were positive in 15 and 27 patients. The 2-y overall survival and progression-free survival were 73% and 45%; 16 patients had early progressive disease. Most (18)F-FDG PET-positive patients had early progressive disease (14/15, vs. 2/23 (18)F-FDG PET-negative patients), and most SRS-negative patients had early progressive disease (9/11, vs. 7/27 SRS-positive patients); (18)F-FDG PET gave excellent negative and positive predictive values of 91% and 93%; (18)F-FDG PET results correlated with progression-free survival (P < 0.001) and overall survival (P < 0.001) even when only low-grade tumors were considered. SRS was associated with progression-free survival (P < 0.001) and overall survival (P < 0.03). At multivariate analysis, only (18)F-FDG PET was predictive of progression-free survival., Conclusion: (18)F-FDG PET exhibits excellent predictive values for early tumor progression. (18)F-FDG PET and SRS results correlate with progression-free survival and overall survival even for histologically low-grade tumors. These explorations could be included in the initial work-up for metastatic neuroendocrine tumor.

Purpose: Well-differentiated metastatic endocrine carcinomas are difficult to manage because of variable disease outcome. New prognostic factors are required. These tumors overexpress somatostatin receptors (sst), implying the use of somatostatin analogs for tumor localization by somatostatin receptor scintigraphy using indium-111-pentetreotide ((111)In-pentetreotide) and for medical treatment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the correlation between (111)In-pentetreotide scintigraphy, sst receptor expression, and prognosis., Patients and Methods: Between 1994 and 2002, 48 consecutive patients with well-differentiated endocrine carcinomas and a negative (111)In-pentetreotide scintigraphy were retrospectively paired according to sex, age, and tumor localization with 50 patients with well-differentiated endocrine carcinomas and a positive tracer uptake at (111)In-pentetreotide scintigraphy. Overall survival and expression of sst1 to sst5 receptors by immunohistochemistry were assessed., Results: The lack of tracer uptake at the (111)In-pentetreotide scintigraphy seemed to be a poor prognostic factor (P = .007) for overall survival by Kaplan-Meier test and in multivariate analysis; age and absence of clinical secretory syndrome also seemed to be poor prognostic factors. The tracer uptake (positive (111)In-pentetreotide scintigraphy) correlated with the tumor expression of somatostatin receptor sst2 (P < .001) but not with that of sst1, sst3, sst4, or sst5. In a bivariate analysis, lack of sst2 expression also significantly correlated with poor prognosis., Conclusion: We demonstrate the prognostic value of (111)In-pentetreotide scintigraphy in well-differentiated malignant endocrine tumors. In these tumors, sst2 somatostatin receptor expression correlates with both tracer uptake and a better prognosis.

Unlabelled: The biodistribution of 111In-pentetreotide was assessed in patients with gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors or lymphoma and in control patients and analyzed as a function of scanning time, presence or absence of tumor uptake, tumor type and previous octreotide treatment., Methods: Patients underwent imaging 4 and 24 hr after injection of approximately 200 MBq 111In-pentetreotide. The frequency of organ visualization was assessed on planar views. Total organ and tumor uptake (% injected dose [ID]) was determined using the geometric mean method and regional tissue uptake (% ID/100 ml) by semiquantitative SPECT., Results: Liver, spleen, kidneys and urinary bladder were visualized in all patients. Thyroid, bowel and pituitary were more often visualized at 24 hr than at 4 hr. Activity in the gallbladder, breast, ureters and ascites was only occasionally observed. Total liver, spleen and thyroid uptake was stable over time, whereas kidney activity decreased slightly. At 24 hr, regional uptake was threefold lower in the liver than in the spleen or kidneys and was similar in the three groups. In patients with long-term octreotide therapy, a positive correlation was found between the duration of octreotide therapy and liver or spleen uptake. Total and regional tumor uptake showed high intraindividual and interindividual variations. Total tumor activity was stable over 24 hr in patients with GEP and decreased in those with lymphoma. The mean regional tumor uptake was 10-fold lower in patients with lymphoma than in those with GEP. Cold octreotide injected 24 hr after tracer administration did not result in any displacement of organ and tumor activity., Conclusion: Organ uptake seems not to be influenced by the presence of 111In-pentetreotide-positive lesions or by tumor type. Tumor uptake is highly variable among patients and clearly lower in patients with lymphoma than in those with GEP. The widespread of uptake values in tumors indicates that radiotherapy using radiolabeled somatostatin analogs may not be applicable to all patients with 111In-pentetreotide-positive tumors.

Requisites for preoperative and intraoperative tumor localization with [111In]diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-D-[Phe1]-octreotide scanning were explored in 23 patients with endocrine tumors (15 carcinoids, 4 insulinomas, and single cases of gastrinoma, medullary thyroid carcinoma, aldosteronoma, and paraganglioma). The patients were subjected to Octreoscan single photon emission computed tomographic examination prior to surgery and well counter investigation of nuclide uptake in tumors and normal tissues sampled at surgery. Somatostatin receptor-positive tumors demonstrated efficient nuclide accumulation with mean tumor:blood radioactivity ratios of 180-370 (for carcinoids and insulinoma), compared with tissue:blood ratios of 302 for spleen, 42 for liver, and < 10-15 in other normal tissues (pancreas, small intestine, and mesenteric fat). Inefficient preoperative visualization of lesions was related to inconspicuous size, as for primary intestinal carcinoids, tiny liver metastases, and a single small insulinoma. High background activity, pronounced tumor fibrosis, and meager accumulation of tracer also interfered with visualization. Tumor deposits in organs with low background activity (such as carcinoid mesenteric metastases and endocrine pancreatic tumors) were generally most readily detected. Intraoperative investigations with hand-held gamma detector probes were disturbed by obvious high background activity. These investigations revealed two preoperatively unrecognized primary intestinal carcinoids, which, however, were both palpable during surgery. These studies, therefore, had little impact on the surgical strategy.

A large number of endocrine tumors express somatostatin receptors, and the use of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs has been recently introduced for their localization. Using in vivo scintigraphy with 111In-pentetreotide, primary tumor localizations were demonstrated in 3/3 carcinoids (2 intestinal carcinoids and 1 lung ACTH-secreting carcinoid; in 2 patients liver metastases larger than 1 cm were visualized), in 1/1 GH-secreting pituitary macroadenoma, and in 1/1 thyroid localization of MTC. Bone and/or lymph node metastases were imaged in 2/4 patients previously treated for MTC, with persistently high CT and CEA levels; in the other 2 patients the other scintigraphic techniques were also negative. Octreotide scintigraphy was negative in 2/2 insulinomas and in 2/2 ACT-producing pituitary adenomas. In 2 patients with carcinoid syndrome and 1 patient with Cushing syndrome due to ectopic ACTH, octreotide therapy induced a significant decrease in tumoral markers. Our preliminary data are in agreement with the results of larger series reported in literature: octreotide scintigraphy is a useful noninvasive tool to detect endocrine tumors expressing somatostatin receptors, particularly for carcinoids. It is of great use in the differential diagnosis of Cushing syndrome due to ectopic ACTH. Moreover, 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy may be useful in selecting patients who may benefit from octreotide therapy to control hormonal hypersecretion effects.

The results of octreotide scintigraphy, performed in two patients with malignant endocrine pancreatic tumors, were compared with the effect of somatostatin-14 and its analogue octreotide on hormonal levels and clinical outcome. Radiolabeled octreotide failed to demonstrate any tumor localisation in a patient with a malignant insulinoma. Nevertheless, IV injection of somatostatin and octreotide resulted in a significant decrease in peripheral insulin levels. Moreover in this patient, chronic treatment with a high dose of octreotide subcutaneously was able to transiently lower the incidence of hypoglycemic events. In a second patient with metastatic PP-oma, 111In-octreotide disclosed a pancreatic tumor in the tail of the pancreas and metastatic supraclavicular lymph nodes. In this patient IV administration of somatostatin and octreotide inhibited the hormonal secretion of the tumor but subcutaneous injection of octreotide induced hardly any decrease in plasma PP levels and failed to affect tumor growth. These observations find a possible reason for this in the heterogeneous affinity of the somatostatin receptors in endocrine pancreatic tumors. They indicate that octreotide scintigraphy alone should not be used to select patients with neuroendocrine tumors who can benefit from chronic treatment with the somatostatin analogue.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the value of somatostatin-receptor scintigraphy (SRS) in the preoperative localization of gastrointestinal endocrine tumors. The authors report their preliminary experiences with this new technique as compared to conventional imaging studies like computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US)., Summary Background Data: Most endocrine tumors possess high-affinity somatostatin-receptors. Using the stable, 111Indium labelled somatostatin analogue pentatreotid, which binds to these receptors, it is possible to detect somatostatin-receptor-positive tumors scintigraphically., Methods: In nine patients with various gastrointestinal endocrine tumors, SRS, CT, and US were performed before surgical exploration. The preoperative imaging studies and intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) were then compared to findings on surgical exploration., Results: Twelve primary tumors were found in 8 patients at surgical exploration. These primary tumors were correctly identified with SRS in five patients, with US in four patients, and with CT in three patients. In one patient with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, scintigraphy suggested a tumor in the area of the hepatoduodenal ligament, while CT and US had negative results. The underlying gastrinoma could not be identified despite extensive surgical exploration. Scintigraphy, CT, and US showed comparable results in the detection of metastases in four patients., Conclusions: The data from this small series suggest that SRS is helpful in the preoperative localization of gastrointestinal endocrine tumors.