Search

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) and IDO2 originated from gene duplication before vertebrate divergence. While IDO1 has a well-defined role in immune regulation, the biological role of IDO2 remains unclear. Discovered in 2007, IDO2 is located near the IDO1 gene. Because of their high sequence similarity, IDO2 was initially thought to be a tryptophan (Trp)-degrading enzyme like IDO1. Differently from what expected, IDO2 displays extremely low catalytic activity toward Trp. Nevertheless, many studies, often contradictory, have tried to demonstrate that IDO2 modulates immune responses by catabolizing Trp into kynurenine, an unconvincing hypothesis linked to an incomplete understanding of IDO2's activity. In this study, we review IDO2's functional role beyond Trp metabolism. IDO2's evolutionary persistence across species, despite being almost inactive as an enzyme, suggests it has some relevant biological importance. IDO2 expression in human normal cells is poor, but significant in various cancers, with two prevalent SNPs. Overall, the comparison of IDO2 to IDO1 as a Trp-degrading enzyme may have led to misunderstandings about IDO2's true physiological and pathological roles. New insights suggest that IDO2 might function more as a signaling molecule, particularly in cancer contexts, and further studies could reveal its potential as a target for cancer therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2 (IDO2) is a paralog of Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), a tryptophan-degrading enzyme producing immunomodulatory molecules. However, the two proteins are unlikely to carry out the same functions. IDO2 shows little or no tryptophan catabolic activity and exerts contrasting immunomodulatory roles in a context-dependent manner in cancer and autoimmune diseases. The recently described potential non-enzymatic activity of IDO2 has suggested its possible involvement in alternative pathways, resulting in either pro- or anti-inflammatory effects in different models. In a previous study on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues, we found that IDO2 expression revealed at the plasma membrane level of tumor cells was significantly associated with poor prognosis. In this study, the A549 human cell line, basally expressing IDO2, was used as an in vitro model of human lung adenocarcinoma to gain more insights into a possible alternative function of IDO2 different from the catalytic one. In these cells, immunocytochemistry and isopycnic sucrose gradient analyses confirmed the IDO2 protein localization in the cell membrane compartment, and the immunoprecipitation of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins revealed that kinase activities can target IDO2. The different localization from the cytosolic one and the phosphorylation state are the first indications for the signaling function of IDO2, suggesting that the IDO2 non-enzymatic role in cancer cells is worthy of deeper understanding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is a tryptophan metabolizing enzyme chronically activated in many cancer patients and its expression and activity correlate with a poor prognosis. In fact, it acts as an immune regulator and contributes to tumor-induced immunosuppression by determining tryptophan deprivation and producing immunosuppressive metabolites named kynurenines. These findings made IDO1 an attractive target for cancer immunotherapy and small-molecule inhibitors, such as epacadostat, have been developed to block its enzymatic activity. Although epacadostat was effective in preclinical models and in early phase trials, it gave negative results in a metastatic melanoma randomized phase III study to test the benefit of adding epacadostat to the reference pembrolizumab therapy. However, the reason for the epacadostat failure in this clinical trial has never been understood. Our data suggest that a possible explanation of epacadostat ineffectiveness may rely on the ability of this drug to enhance the other IDO1 immunoregulatory mechanism, involving intracellular signaling function. These findings open up a new perspective for IDO1 inhibitors developed as new anticancer drugs, which should be carefully evaluated for their ability to block not only the catalytic but also the signaling activity of IDO1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Indoleamine 2,3‐dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) catalyzes the initial rate‐limiting step in the degradation of the essential amino acid tryptophan along the kynurenine pathway. When discovered more than 50 years ago, IDO1 was thought to be an effector molecule capable of mediating a survival strategy based on the deprivation of bacteria and tumor cells of the essential amino acid tryptophan. Since 1998, when tryptophan catabolism was discovered to be crucially involved in the maintenance of maternal T‐cell tolerance, IDO1 has become the focus of several laboratories around the world. Indeed, IDO1 is now considered as an authentic immune regulator not only in pregnancy, but also in autoimmune diseases, chronic inflammation, and tumor immunity. However, in the last years, a bulk of new information—including structural, biological, and functional evidence—on IDO1 has come to light. For instance, we now know that IDO1 has a peculiar conformational plasticity and, in addition to a complex and highly regulated catalytic activity, is capable of performing a nonenzymic function that reprograms the expression profile of immune cells toward a highly immunoregulatory phenotype. With this state‐of‐the‐art review, we aimed at gathering the most recent information obtained for this eclectic protein as well as at highlighting the major unresolved questions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the last two decades, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) has attracted wide interest as a key player in immune regulation, fostering the design and development of small molecule inhibitors to restore immune response in tumor immunity. In this framework, biochemical, structural, and pharmacological studies have unveiled peculiar structural plasticity of IDO1, with different conformations and functional states that are coupled to fine regulation of its catalytic activity and non-enzymic functions. The large plasticity of IDO1 may affect its ligand recognition process, generating bias in structure-based drug design campaigns. In this work, we report a screening campaign of a fragment library of compounds, grounding on the use of three distinct conformations of IDO1 that recapitulate its structural plasticity to some extent. Results are instrumental to discuss tips and pitfalls that, due to the large plasticity of the enzyme, may influence the identification of novel and differentiated chemical scaffolds of IDO1 ligands in structure-based screening campaigns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the clinical approach of untreatable tumors and brought a breath of fresh air in cancer immunotherapy. However, the therapeutic effects of these drugs only cover a minority of patients and alternative immunotherapeutic targets are required. Metabolism of l-tryptophan (Trp) via the kynurenine pathway represents an important immune checkpoint mechanism that controls adaptive immunity and dampens exaggerated inflammation. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), the enzyme catalyzing the first, rate–limiting step of the pathway, is expressed in several human tumors and IDO1 catalytic inhibitors have reached phase III clinical trials, unfortunately with disappointing results. Although much less studied, the IDO1 paralog IDO2 may represent a valid alternative as drug target in cancer immunotherapy. Accumulating evidence indicates that IDO2 is much less effective than IDO1 in metabolizing Trp and its functions are rather the consequence of interaction with other, still undefined proteins that may vary in distinct inflammatory and neoplastic contexts. As a matter of fact, the expression of IDO2 gene variants is protective in PDAC but increases the risk of developing tumor in NSCLC patients. Therefore, the definition of the IDO2 interactome and function in distinct neoplasia may open innovative avenues of therapeutic interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]