Search

• An analysis of the industrial accident prevention effect of the hazardous machine safety certification system was performed. • The necessity of the safety certification system was confirmed using three statistical methods. • Surveys, industrial accident data analysis, field surveys, and expert interviews were conducted. • It was confirmed that the safety certification system has a positive effect on industrial accident prevention. • The safety certification system must ensure efficiency by considering the safety policy and industrial environment of each country. The "4th industrial revolution" is accelerating changes in technology, industry, and machinery, and the "Internet of everything" (IoE) requires comprehensive integration of people and machines. Despite the development of these technologies, fatal accidents continue to occur due to malfunctions of dangerous machinery, so the importance of the safety certification system is increasing, but there are few objective analysis data. In this study, the necessity of a safety certification system was confirmed by analyzing the effect of the safety certification system on the prevention effect of industrial accidents in three methods. Based on these analysis results, the industrial accident prevention effect of the current safety certification system and necessary supplementary tasks were derived. Safety certification systems for more than 30 machines and equipment are in operation in South Korea. In this research, the press, crane, catapult, and lift machines most commonly used in industrial fields were analyzed. This study was conducted in five steps: a safety certification system operation status investigation, a survey and interviews, an analysis of dangerous machinery and equipment accidents, focus group interviews, and study of the direction of safety certification systems in consideration of recent IoE developments. As a result of the analysis, various opinions were presented on the safety certification system by subject, and it was found that it was necessary to prepare supplementary measures for the advancement of the safety certification system advancement, expand its field applicability, and improve the efficiency of safety certification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SACM (Structured Assurance Case Metamodel) is a standard for assurance case specification and exchange. It consists of an argumentation metamodel and an evidence metamodel for justifying that a system satisfies certain requirements. For assurance of safety-critical systems, SACM can be used to manage safety evidence and to specify safety cases. The standard is a promising initiative towards harmonizing and improving system assurance practices, but its suitability for safety evidence management needs to be further studied. To this end, this paper studies how SACM 1.1 supports this activity according to requirements from industry and from prior work. We have analysed the notion of evidence in SACM, its evidence lifecycle, the classes and associations of the evidence metamodel, and the link of this metamodel with the argumentation one. As a result, we have identified several improvement opportunities and extension possibilities in SACM. The notions of evidence and evidence assertion should be clarified, the overlaps between metamodel elements should be reduced, and a wider support to the lifecycle of the artefacts used as safety evidence could be provided. Addressing these aspects will allow SACM to better fit safety evidence management needs and practices, especially beyond the scope of a safety case. The results and the conclusions drawn are especially valuable for practitioners interested in SACM adoption and vendors interested in developing tool support for SACM-based safety evidence management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: To ensure the safety of avionic systems, civil avionic software and hardware regulated by certification authorities must be certified based on applicable standards (e.g., DO-178B and DO-254). The overall safety integrity of an avionic system, comprising software and hardware, should be considered at the system level. Thus, software and hardware components should be planned, developed and certified in a unified, harmonized manner to ensure the integral safety of the entire avionic system. One of the reasons for the high development costs of avionic systems complying with standards may be a lack of sufficient understanding of how to employ these standards efficiently. Therefore, it is important to understand the similarities and differences between DO-178B and DO-254 to effectively manage the processes required by these standards, to minimize cost, and to ultimately ensure the safety of the entire avionic system. Thus, the goal of this paper is to compare various aspects of DO-178B and DO-254 comprehensively. The paper may serve as a useful supplementary material for the practitioner to understand the rationales behind and the differences between two main standards used in avionic industries. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The article explores the rationale, methods and findings of a standard setting session conducted to create minimum passing scores for a testing process proposed to be used as a component of the Gearing Up for Safety certification process in U.S. Gearing Up is an agricultural production safety training curriculum for youth created to meet the requirements of the Agricultural Hazardous Occupations Order (AgHOs). The test is proposed to be taken by youth workers seeking jobs to perform functions specified under the AgHOs, which primary objective is to provide necessary training to agricultural production workers. AgHOs training program is designed to ensure that the workers will meet the minimum safety and training requirements as indicated in the Code of the Federal Regulations.